Connect with us

News

China’s Xi opens Party Congress with speech tackling Taiwan, Hong Kong and zero-Covid | CNN

Published

on

China’s Xi opens Party Congress with speech tackling Taiwan, Hong Kong and zero-Covid | CNN


Hong Kong
CNN
 — 

Chinese language chief Xi Jinping on Sunday vowed to steer China by way of grave challenges towards nationwide rejuvenation, advancing a nationalistic imaginative and prescient that has put it on a collision path with the West.

Talking on the opening of the twentieth Celebration Congress, the place he’s poised to safe a norm-breaking third time period in energy, Xi struck a assured tone, highlighting China’s rising power and rising affect below his first decade in energy.

However he additionally repeatedly underscored the dangers and challenges the nation faces.

Describing the previous 5 years as “extremely uncommon and extraordinary,” Xi mentioned the ruling Communist Celebration has led China by way of “a grim and sophisticated worldwide scenario” and “enormous dangers and challenges that got here one after one other.”

Advertisement

The very first challenges Xi listed have been the Covid-19 pandemic, Hong Kong and Taiwan — all of which he claimed China had come away from victorious.

The Chinese language authorities, Xi mentioned, had “protected individuals’s lives and well being” from Covid, turned Hong Kong from “chaos to governance,” and carried out “main struggles” towards “independence forces” within the island of Taiwan, a self-governing democracy Beijing claims as its personal territory regardless of having by no means managed it.

Wen-Ti Sung, a political scientist with the Australia Nationwide College’s Taiwan Research Program, mentioned Xi’s resolution to flag the Taiwan challenge early on in his speech was a departure from earlier speeches and conveys a “newfound urgency on making progress on the Taiwan challenge.”

Xi gained the loudest and longest applause from the almost 2,300 handpicked delegates contained in the Nice Corridor of the Individuals when he spoke about Taiwan once more later within the speech.

He mentioned China would “attempt for peaceable reunification” — however then gave a grim warning, saying “we’ll by no means promise to surrender using power and we reserve the choice of taking all measures essential.”

Advertisement

“The wheels of historical past are rolling on in the direction of China’s reunification and the rejuvenation of the Chinese language nation. Full reunification of our nation should be realized,” Xi mentioned to thundering applause.

Xi additionally underscored the “fast adjustments within the worldwide scenario” — a thinly veiled reference to the fraying ties between China and the West, which have been additional strained by Beijing’s tacit help for Moscow following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

He mentioned China has “taken a clear-cut stance towards hegemonism and energy politics” and “by no means wavered” in opposition to unilateralism and “bullying” — in an obvious jab at what Beijing views as a US-led world order that must be dismantled.

Laying out broad instructions for the following 5 years, Xi mentioned China would concentrate on “top quality training” and innovation to “renew progress” within the nation’s crisis-hit economic system. China will “pace up efforts to realize better self-reliance in science and expertise,” he mentioned, in feedback that come simply months after his damaging crackdown on the nation’s personal sector and main tech corporations.

Xi additionally vowed to hurry up efforts to construct the Individuals’s Liberation Military (PLA) right into a “world-class army,” pledging to enhance the PLA’s capacity to safeguard nationwide sovereignty and construct strategic deterrence. He additionally urged the PLA to strengthen its coaching and enhance its “capacity to win.”

Advertisement

Xi’s speech was peppered with the Chinese language time period for “safety” — which was talked about about 50 occasions. He referred to as nationwide safety the “basis of the rejuvenation of the Chinese language nation,” and urged enhancing safety in army, economic system and “all elements,” each at residence and overseas.

One other level of focus was Marxism and beliefs. “I don’t assume there will likely be any rest of the ideological ambiance within the coming 5 years,” mentioned Victor Shih, an knowledgeable on elite Chinese language politics on the College of California.

Dali Yang, a political scientist on the College of Chicago, mentioned the instructions specified by Xi’s opening speech have been a continuation of his earlier insurance policies. By emphasizing the challenges and struggles, he mentioned, it justifies “the necessity for a robust celebration and its nice chief.”

The week-long congress kicked off on Sunday morning amid heightened safety, escalated zero-Covid restrictions and a frenzy of propaganda and censorship.

The Communist Celebration’s most consequential assembly in many years, the congress is ready to cement Xi’s standing because the China’s strongest chief since late Chairman Mao Zedong, who dominated till his dying aged 82. It’ll even have a profound influence on the world, as Xi doubles down on an assertive international coverage to spice up China’s worldwide clout and rewrite the US-led world order.

Advertisement

The conferences will likely be largely held behind shut doorways all through the week. When delegates reemerge on the finish of the congress subsequent Saturday, they are going to conduct a ceremonial vote to rubber stamp Xi’s work report and approve adjustments made to the celebration structure — which could bestow Xi with new titles to additional strengthen his energy.

The delegates may also choose the celebration’s new Central Committee, which can maintain its first assembly the following day to nominate the celebration’s prime management — the Politburo and its Standing Committee, following selections already hashed out behind the scenes by celebration leaders earlier than the congress.

The congress will likely be a significant second of political triumph for Xi, but it surely additionally comes throughout a interval of potential disaster. Xi’s insistence on an uncompromising zero-Covid coverage has fueled mounting public frustration and crippled financial progress. In the meantime, diplomatically, his “no-limits” friendship with Russian President Vladimir Putin has additional strained Beijing’s ties with the West following Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine.

Advertisement

This is why Xi’s refined gestures throughout speech worries individuals

Within the lead-up to the congress, officers throughout China drastically ramped up restrictions to forestall even minor Covid outbreaks, imposing sweeping lockdowns and more and more frequent mass Covid assessments over a handful of instances. But infections brought on by the extremely transmissible Omicron variant have continued to flare. On Saturday, China reported almost 1,200 infections, together with 14 in Beijing.

Public anger towards zero-Covid got here to the fore Thursday in an exceptionally uncommon protest towards Xi in Beijing. On-line photographs confirmed two banners have been unfurled on a busy overpass denouncing Xi and his insurance policies, earlier than being taken down by police.

“Say no to Covid check, sure to meals. No to lockdown, sure to freedom. No to lies, sure to dignity. No to cultural revolution, sure to reform. No to nice chief, sure to vote. Don’t be a slave, be a citizen,” one banner reads.

Advertisement

“Go on strike, take away dictator and nationwide traitor Xi Jinping,” learn the opposite.

The Chinese language public have paid little consideration to the celebration’s congresses prior to now – they haven’t any say within the nation’s management reshuffle, or the making of main insurance policies. However this 12 months, many have pinned their hopes on the congress to be a turning level for China to loosen up its Covid coverage.

A sequence of current articles within the celebration’s mouthpiece, nevertheless, recommend that might be wishful pondering. The Individuals’s Each day hailed zero-Covid because the “most suitable option” for the nation, insisting it’s “sustainable and should be adopted.”

On Sunday, Xi defended his extremely contentious and economically damaging zero-Covid coverage.

“In responding to the sudden outbreak of Covid-19, we prioritized the individuals and their lives above all else, and tenaciously pursued dynamic zero-Covid coverage in launching all-out individuals’s battle towards the virus,” he mentioned.

Advertisement

Alfred Wu, an affiliate professor on the Lee Kuan Yew Faculty of Public Coverage on the Nationwide College of Singapore, mentioned Xi’s phrases signaled it’s “inconceivable for China to alter the zero-Covid technique within the close to future.”

News

Small but mighty Nimble becomes first mixed-breed dog to win Westminster agility title

Published

on

Small but mighty Nimble becomes first mixed-breed dog to win Westminster agility title

Cynthia Hornor poses with Nimble, the first mixed-breed dog ever to win the Westminster Kennel Club dog show’s agility competition, in New York on Monday.

Jennifer Peltz/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Jennifer Peltz/AP


Cynthia Hornor poses with Nimble, the first mixed-breed dog ever to win the Westminster Kennel Club dog show’s agility competition, in New York on Monday.

Jennifer Peltz/AP

She was nimble, she was oh-so-very quick – with the perfect moniker to match.

A 6-year-old canine from of Ellicott City, Md., named Nimble beat out 350 competitors to become the first mixed-breed dog to win the Westminster Kennel Club’s Masters Agility Championship in New York.

Advertisement

“I was surprised,” Nimble’s handler Cynthia Hornor told NPR. “But she proved that she’s the little engine that could.”

Nimble, who finished the race in a blistering 28.76 seconds, is a first in more ways than one: She also became the first dog from the 12-inch height division to take home the top prize since the agility competition — itself the first WKC event to allow mixed breeds to compete — was introduced in 2014.

Dogs compete in the 8-inch, 12-inch, 16-inch, and 20-inch categories. The top 10 dogs from each height category go on to compete in the championships.

While she made two firsts, Nimble also had at least two big aces in her paws.

Advertisement

Despite coming in an underdog — as part of the non-purebred category the WKC refers to as “All American Dogs” — Nimble is a combination of two pedigrees made up of winners: a border collie-papillon mix. Border collies have won eight of the last 11 agility titles, while the top three finishers in this year’s competition were all papillons.

Nimble’s second secret weapon: her owner and handler Hornor, who won the Masters Agility title in 2023 with her other dog Truant, a 20-inch border collie.

“This is going to be a fun run,” a Fox Sports announcer predicted on Saturday as Nimble eagerly waited for the clock to start her final run.

When it did, the pointy-eared black and white pup rocketed her way through a series of hoops, seesaws, ladders and more with hardly any cueing needed from Horner.

“I said it was going to be fun, but I didn’t know it was going to be an e-ticket!” the announcer said halfway through Nimble’s race, with eager crowds cheering in the background.

Advertisement

Hornor says she hopes Nimble’s big win will be enough to put to bed any false ideas that mixed breeds can’t be as fast as purebred dogs.

“Agility is the equalizer,” Hornor said. “Mixed-breed dogs can be just as fast as purebred dogs.”

Nimble’s reward for proving it?

“She got steak, and she got to play,” said Hornor. “She just really loves playing, so her reward is being able to go run and play.”

And if there’s one lesson Hornor wants other dog owners to take away from Nimble’s big win, it’s that agility is a great way for owners to bond with their dogs.

Advertisement

“It’s the thing I enjoy the most about this sport,” said Hornor, who has been an agility trainer for more than 20 years. “When I see my students, I love seeing their bond grow with their dogs because of agility.”

Continue Reading

News

China poses ‘genuine and increasing cyber risk’ to UK, warns GCHQ head

Published

on

China poses ‘genuine and increasing cyber risk’ to UK, warns GCHQ head

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

China poses a “genuine and increasing cyber risk to the UK”, the head of Britain’s signals intelligence agency has said.

The remarks by Anne Keast-Butler, director of GCHQ, follow a slew of alleged China-related espionage activity in the UK, including a suspected cyber attack that targeted the records of thousands of British military personnel.

Keast-Butler told a security conference in Birmingham on Tuesday that while the cyber threats from Russia and Iran were “globally pervasive” and “aggressive” respectively, China was her agency’s top priority.

Advertisement

“China poses a genuine and increasing cyber risk to the UK,” she said, calling the country “the epoch-defining challenge” in a direct echo of the British government last year.

“In cyber space, we believe that the PRC’s [People’s Republic of China’s] irresponsible actions weaken the security of the internet for all,” said Keast-Butler.

“China has built an advanced set of cyber capabilities and is taking advantage of a growing commercial ecosystem of hacking outfits and data brokers at its disposal,” she added.

Her warnings came a week after a reported cyber attack on private IT contractor SSCL, which has multiple government contracts, accessed the records of up to 272,000 people on the UK Ministry of Defence’s payroll.

Defence secretary Grant Shapps told parliament last week that the attack had been carried out by a “malign actor”. He did not confirm who was behind it, but a person with direct knowledge of the incident said Beijing was thought to be the culprit.

Advertisement

SSCL, which is owned by Paris-based Sopra Steria, a digital services company, holds the payroll details of most of the British armed forces and 550,000 public servants in total through its other state contracts, including with the Home Office, Ministry of Justice and Metropolitan Police.

The hack is one of a series of recent incidents that has sparked growing concern across Europe and in the US about Chinese cyber and espionage activity.

On Monday, UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said Britain faced threats from “an axis of authoritarian states like Russia, Iran, North Korea, and China” as three men appeared in a London court on charges of assisting intelligence services in Hong Kong.

On Tuesday, the UK government summoned China’s ambassador to Britain, Zheng Zeguang, over the case.

John Lee, Hong Kong’s chief executive, on Tuesday said his administration had demanded the British government provide an explanation about the prosecution of one of the three men, Bill Yuen, who was the office manager of the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office in London.  

Advertisement

Beijing officials have also repeatedly denied the British accusations, calling them “groundless and slanderous” in what has become a tit-for-tat series of allegations and denials.

Meanwhile, Felicity Oswald, who heads the National Cyber Security Centre, a branch of GCHQ, warned CyberUK conference attendees about the Chinese Communist party’s cyber capability, which she described as “vast in scale and sophistication”.

She said western security agencies had repeatedly raised the alarm about Volt Typhoon, a Chinese hacking network, which FBI director Christopher Wrap said this year had targeted the US electricity grid and water supply.

Oswald added that a Chinese law, introduced in recent years, that required Chinese citizens to report any cyber security vulnerabilities they identified to the government “should worry all of us”.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Despite state bans, abortions nationwide are up, driven by telehealth

Published

on

Despite state bans, abortions nationwide are up, driven by telehealth

Abortion rights activists at the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. on March 26, the day the case about the abortion drug mifepristone was heard. The number of abortions in the U.S. increased, a study says, surprising researchers.

Drew Angerer/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Drew Angerer/AFP via Getty Images


Abortion rights activists at the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. on March 26, the day the case about the abortion drug mifepristone was heard. The number of abortions in the U.S. increased, a study says, surprising researchers.

Drew Angerer/AFP via Getty Images

In the 18 months following the Supreme Court’s decision that ended federal protection for abortion, the number of abortions in the U.S. has continued to grow, according to The Society of Family Planning’s WeCount project.

“We are seeing a slow and small steady increase in the number of abortions per month and this was completely surprising to us,” says Ushma Upadhyay, a professor and public health scientist at the University of California, San Francisco who co-leads the research. According to the report, in 2023 there were, on average, 86,000 abortions per month compared to 2022, where there were about 82,000 abortions per month. “Not huge,” says Upadhyay, “but we were expecting a decline.”

Advertisement

The slight increase comes despite the fact that 14 states had total abortion bans in place during the time of the research. According to the report, there were about 145,000 fewer abortions in person in those states since the Dobbs decision, which triggered many of the restrictive state laws.

“We know that there are people living in states with bans who are not getting their needed abortions,” says Upadhyay. “The concern we have is that that might be overlooked by these increases.”

Florida, California and Illinois saw the largest surges in abortions, which is especially interesting given Florida’s recent 6-week ban that started on May 1.

Abortion rights opponents demonstrate in New York City, on March 23. Some states’ abortion bans are known as “heartbeat bills,” because they make abortion illegal after cardiac activity starts, usually around six weeks of pregnancy.

Kena Betancur/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Kena Betancur/AFP via Getty Images


Abortion rights opponents demonstrate in New York City, on March 23. Some states’ abortion bans are known as “heartbeat bills,” because they make abortion illegal after cardiac activity starts, usually around six weeks of pregnancy.

Kena Betancur/AFP via Getty Images

Advertisement

The latest report also captures for the first time the impact of providers offering telehealth abortions from states with protections for doctors and clinics known as shield laws – statutes that say they can’t be prosecuted or held liable for providing abortion care to people from other states.

Between July and December 2023, more than 40,000 people in states with abortion bans and telehealth restrictions received medication abortion through providers in states protected by shield laws. Abortion pills can be prescribed via telehealth appointments and sent through the mail; the pills can safely end pregnancies in the first trimester.

The report includes abortions happening within the U.S. health care system, and does not include self-managed abortions, when people take pills at home without the oversight of a clinician. For that reason, researchers believe these numbers are still an undercount of abortions happening in the U.S.

Accounting for the increases

A major factor in the uptick in abortions nationwide is the rise of telehealth, made possible in part by regulations first loosened during the coronavirus pandemic.

According to the report, telehealth abortions now make up 19% of all abortions in the U.S. In comparison, the first WeCount report which spanned April 2022 through August 2022 showed telehealth abortions accounted for just 4% of all abortions. Research has shown that telehealth abortions are as safe and effective as in-clinic care.

Advertisement

“It’s affordable, it’s convenient, and it feels more private,” says Jillian Barovick, a midwife in Brooklyn and one of the co-founders of Juniper Midwifery, which offers medication abortion via telehealth to patients in six states where abortion is legal. The organization saw its first patient in August 2022 and now treats about 300 patients a month.

“Having an in-clinic abortion, even a medication abortion, you could potentially be in the clinic for hours, whereas with us you get to sort of bypass all of that,” she says. Instead, patients can connect with a clinician using text messages or a secure messaging platform. In addition to charging $100 dollars for the consultation and medication – which is well below the average cost of an abortion – Barovick points to the cost savings of not having to take off work or arrange child care to spend multiple hours in a clinic.

She says her patients receive their medication within 1 to 4 business days, “often faster than you can get an appointment in a clinic.”

A study published in JAMA Internal Medicine on Monday followed about 500 women who had medication abortions with the pills distributed via mail order pharmacy after an in-person visit with a doctor. More than 90% of the patients were satisfied with the experience; there were three serious adverse events that required hospitalization.

In addition to expansions in telehealth, there have been new clinics in states like Kansas, Illinois and New Mexico, and there’s been an increase in funding for abortion care – fueled by private donors and abortion funds.

Advertisement

The impact of shield laws

During the period from October to December 2023, nearly 8,000 people per month in states with bans or severe restrictions accessed medication abortions from clinicians providing telehealth in the 5 states that had shield laws at the time. That’s nearly half of all monthly telehealth abortions.

“It’s telemedicine overall that is meeting the need of people who either want to or need to remain in their banned or restricted state for their care,” says Angel Foster, who founded The MAP, a group practice operating a telehealth model under Massachusetts’ shield laws. “If you want to have your abortion care in your state and you live in Texas or Mississippi or Missouri, right now, the shield law provision is by far the most dominant way that you’d be able to get that care.”

Foster’s group offers medication abortions for about 500 patients a month. About 90% of their patients are in banned or restrictive states; about a third are from Texas, their most common state of origin, followed by Florida.

“Patients are scared that we are a scam,” she says, “they can’t believe that we’re legit.”

Since the WeCount data was collected, additional states including Maine and California have passed shield laws protecting providers who offer care nationwide. The new shield laws circumvent traditional telemedicine laws, which often require out-of-state health providers to be licensed in the states where patients are located. States with abortion bans or restrictions and/or telehealth bans hold the provider at fault, not the patient.

Advertisement

Existing lawsuits brought by abortion opponents, including the case awaiting a Supreme Court decision, have the potential to disrupt this telehealth surge by restricting the use of the drug mifepristone nationwide. If the Supreme Court upholds an appeals court ruling, providers would be essentially barred from mailing the drug and an in-person doctor visit would be required.

There is also an effort underway in Louisiana to classify abortion pills as a controlled substance.

Continue Reading

Trending