Connect with us

News

Blinken: Images of dead Ukrainians ‘a punch to the gut’

Published

on

Blinken: Images of dead Ukrainians ‘a punch to the gut’

“You’ll be able to’t assist however see these photographs as a punch to the intestine,” Blinken informed CNN’s Dana Bash on “State of the Union” on Sunday. “For the reason that aggression, we have come out and mentioned that we consider that Russian forces have dedicated conflict crimes, and we have been working to doc that, to supply the data we have now to the related directions and organizations that can put all of this collectively. And there must be accountability for it.”
Final month, the State Division formally accused Russian forces of conflict crimes in Ukraine. Requested Sunday whether or not Russian troops had been committing genocide, Blinken mentioned, “We’ll look laborious and doc the whole lot that we see, put all of it collectively, make it possible for the related establishments and organizations which are taking a look at this, together with the State Division, have the whole lot they should assess precisely what came about in Ukraine, who’s accountable and what it quantities to.”

“I feel crucial factor is we won’t change into numb to this, we won’t normalize this,” Blinken added. “That is the fact that is occurring on daily basis so long as Russia’s brutality towards Ukraine continues. That is why it wants to return to an finish.”

NATO Secretary Basic Jens Stoltenberg was additionally requested later Sunday by Bash if the Russian actions in Ukraine constituted genocide, however he opted as an alternative to name it “a brutality towards civilians we have not seen in Europe for many years.”

“It’s a brutality towards civilians we have not seen in Europe for many years. And it is horrific and it is completely unacceptable that civilians are focused and killed. And it simply underlines the significance that this conflict should finish,” Stoltenberg mentioned on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

Additionally Sunday, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton known as for additional motion towards Russia and its president, Vladimir Putin, telling NBC’s “Meet The Press” that “Now’s the time to double down on the strain.”

Advertisement

“I feel we’re actually taking a look at this with our eyes large open and seeing very clearly the risk he poses, not simply to Ukraine, as we are able to watch each night time on our information, however actually to Europe, to democracy and the worldwide stability we thought we had been constructing within the final 20 years,” Clinton mentioned.

Blinken on Sunday declined to substantiate reporting from CNN and others that the US was serving to facilitate the switch of Soviet-era tanks to Ukraine, which was one of many weapons programs Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been looking for.

However Blinken mentioned the US and NATO international locations had been serving to to get Ukraine the weapons it wanted, including there would quickly be 10 anti-tank weapons programs within the county for each one Russian tank that is in Ukrainian territory.

“Throughout the board, what we’re making an attempt to do is be certain the Ukrainians have the programs they want that they will use and so they can use instantly,” Blinken mentioned.

Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, informed Fox on Sunday that he helps sending the Ukrainians “something that they will use and as quick as we are able to get it there.”

“We will not dither and fear about among the niceties right here when the Ukrainians are preventing for his or her very lives, and in the event that they really feel like they should take out a gas depot throughout Russian border, go for it,” he added, referring to an alleged strike on a Russian gas depot late final week.

Advertisement
Russia has accused Ukrainian helicopters of placing the gas depot in Belgorod. CNN couldn’t confirm the Russian claims, and the Ukrainian Ministry of Protection has neither confirmed nor denied the assault.
Requested concerning the prospect of Ukraine sustaining neutrality between the West and Russia as a part of a negotiated finish to the conflict, Blinken mentioned the Biden administration would help what the Ukrainians need to preserve their sovereignty.

“In the case of the longer term, we and allies and companions are going to need to be certain to do the whole lot we are able to to make sure that this will’t occur once more and that Ukraine has the means to defend itself, to discourage additional Russian aggression,” he mentioned. “So we are going to take a look at something we are able to do (to) again up that type of final result.”

This report has been up to date with extra response and particulars.

CNN’s Chandelis Duster, Allie Malloy and Ali Most important contributed to this report.

News

Space engine start-up in talks for new capital after funding crunch

Published

on

Space engine start-up in talks for new capital after funding crunch

A British technology start-up which had promised to build the world’s first space plane is in last-ditch talks to secure new financing after two of its backers wrote down the value of their investment.

Reaction Engines, which was founded in 1989, is in detailed talks with the UAE-backed Strategic Development Fund (SDF), one of its existing shareholders, about a new injection of capital, according to two people familiar with the situation. The SDF led a £40mn funding round in January last year. 

The British start-up is also backed by several aerospace giants, including BAE Systems and Rolls-Royce, as well as financial investors Artemis and Schroders.

Reaction has previously raised more than £150mn and grew its commercial revenues by more than 400 per cent last year. The company, however, warned earlier this year that it would need to raise additional financing. It has this weekend lined up PwC, the accountancy firm, to act as administrator if the funding talks collapse.

Sky News first reported that PwC had been put on standby. The accountancy firm, which has not yet been formally appointed, declined to comment on Saturday. Reaction also declined to comment. 

Advertisement

Other existing investors are monitoring the situation, said one of the people close to the talks. 

Artemis and Schroders both announced last week that they had significantly written down the value of their stakes in Reaction. Artemis cut the value of its 2.3 per cent holding by 75 per cent. Artemis Alpha Trust, the fund that manages the London-based fund manager’s stake, now values it at £1.2mn, compared with £6.4mn in April. 

Reaction has in recent years focused on developing a hybrid jet and rocket engine, known as Sabre. The innovative engine was originally planned to power Skylon, a space aircraft also designed by Reaction.

Key to Sabre’s development is Reaction’s groundbreaking pre-cooling technology which prevents engines from overheating and could lead to hypersonic space planes. The company is part of a UK-led military project aiming to make hypersonic flight a reality. At hypersonic speeds, the temperature generated inside a conventional gas turbine would start to melt components unless they were cooled in some way.

More recently the company has focused its attention on developing nearer-term aerospace and commercial applications for its pre-cooling technology. It signed an agreement with US industrial group Honeywell to collaborate on the development of thermal management technologies to help reduce aircraft emissions. 

Advertisement

Reaction is chaired by Philip Dunne, a former UK defence minister. It has been led by Mark Thomas, who was previously at Rolls-Royce. 

Continue Reading

News

Former US President Trump hints at support for Florida ballot measure legalising recreational marijuana – Times of India

Published

on

Former US President Trump hints at support for Florida ballot measure legalising recreational marijuana – Times of India
Former President Trump has suggested he might support a Florida ballot measure to legalise recreational marijuana for adults, known as Amendment 3, reported the Hill.
Trump, a Florida resident, emphasised the importance of this measure being appropriately managed by the state Legislature to avoid public consumption issues.
Emphasis on responsible legislation
“In Florida, like so many other States that have already given their approval, personal amounts of marijuana will be legalised for adults with Amendment 3,” Trump said in a post on his Truth Social site.“Whether people like it or not, this will happen through the approval of the Voters, so it should be done correctly.”

Trump avoided stating his voting intention or openly backing marijuana legalisation but stressed that responsible legislation is necessary to avoid public nuisances. He pointed to the need for laws that prevent marijuana use in public areas to keep public spaces free from the smell of marijuana, similar to the issues observed in other cities.
“The state Legislature needs to responsibly create laws that prohibit marijuana consumption in public spaces so we do not smell marijuana everywhere we go, like we do in many of the Democrat-run Cities,” said Trump.
Concerns over inconsistent marijuana laws
He also highlighted the inconsistency of criminalising marijuana possession in Florida when it is legal in many other states. Trump emphasised that law enforcement resources and lives should not be wasted on arresting adults for possessing small amounts of marijuana.
“We do not need to ruin lives & waste Taxpayer Dollars arresting adults with personal amounts of it on them, and no one should grieve a loved one because they died from fentanyl-laced marijuana,” he added.
Impact on voter mobilisation and Republican division
Trump’s comments follow recent efforts by Democrats to attract younger voters in Florida, focusing on issues like abortion and marijuana legalisation. These issues have mobilised younger voters in other regions, as seen in Ohio, and Democrats hope for a similar impact in Florida.
Democrats are targeting the fall ballot measures, aiming to increase voter turnout and gain the support of younger voters, a group with which Trump has faced challenges.
Earlier in the year, the Department of Justice made a significant move toward reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug. If this reclassification is approved, marijuana will be downgraded to a Schedule III drug.
Despite the trend toward normalisation and Trump’s comments, some Republicans remain opposed to legalising recreational marijuana. Sen Rick Scott has publicly stated his intention to vote against the measure. He cited personal family experience with addiction as a key reason for his opposition.
“My brother, who died at 67 in April, began smoking marijuana as a teenager and led a life of addiction,” Scott said.

Continue Reading

News

Big Oil calls on Kamala Harris to come clean on her energy and climate plans

Published

on

Big Oil calls on Kamala Harris to come clean on her energy and climate plans

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

The US oil industry and Republicans are demanding Kamala Harris clarify her energy and climate policy, as the Democratic candidate tries to please her progressive base without alienating voters in shale areas like Pennsylvania, a crucial swing state.

On Thursday, the vice-president said she no longer supported a ban on fracking, the technology that unleashed the shale revolution. But Harris’s reversal has not quelled attacks from Donald Trump or US executives that she would damage the country’s oil and gas sector.

The heads of the US’s two biggest oil lobby groups said the Democratic candidate must also say whether she would keep or end a pause on federal approvals for new liquefied natural gas plants, and whether she supported curbs on drilling imposed by the Biden administration.

Advertisement

“Based on what we know of her past positions, the bills that she has sponsored, and her past statements she’s taken a pretty aggressively anti-energy and anti-oil and gas industry stand,” said Anne Bradbury, head of the American Exploration and Production Council.

“These are significant and major policy questions that impact every American family and business, and which voters deserve to understand better when making their choice in November,” she said.

Mike Sommers, chief executive of the American Petroleum Institute, Big Oil’s most powerful lobby group, said Harris should say whether she would stick with Biden administration policies that had unleashed “a regulatory onslaught the likes of which this industry has never seen”.

Trump, the Republican candidate, has accused Harris of plotting a “war on American energy” and has repeatedly blamed her and President Joe Biden for high fuel costs in recent years.

On Thursday, he vowed to scrap Biden administration policies that “distort energy markets”. The former president has called climate change a hoax and his advisers have said he would gut Biden’s signature climate legislation, the Inflation Reduction Act.

Advertisement

The debate over Harris’s energy policy comes as she and Trump court blue-collar workers in Pennsylvania, a huge shale gas producer that employs 72,000 workers — a potentially decisive voting group in a state Biden won narrowly in 2020.

Harris said in 2019 that she supported a fracking ban but told CNN on Thursday she had ditched that position and the US could have “a thriving clean energy economy without banning fracking”.

US oil and gas production has reached a record high under Biden, even as clean energy capacity has expanded rapidly.

But gas executives in particular have been alarmed at a federal pause on building new LNG export plants, which supply customers from Europe to Asia, saying the policy will stymie further US shale output.

Toby Rice, chief executive of Pennsylvania-based EQT, the US’s largest natural gas producer, said Harris should lift the restrictions, which he argued would compromise energy security.

Advertisement

“Ignoring her anti-fracking statement four years ago for a second, can we talk about the recent LNG Pause that was put in place this year?”, he said. “This is a policy that has received massive criticism from all sides — our allies, industry and environmental champions . . . a step backwards for climate and American energy security.”

While Biden put climate at the centre of his and Harris’s 2020 White House campaign, Harris has been largely silent, and made only a passing reference to climate change in her speech at the Democratic convention.

“It looks like the Harris campaign has concluded that it’s safer to avoid antagonising producers or climate activists by skirting these issues entirely,” said Kevin Book, managing director of ClearView Energy Partners.

Climate-focused voters are less vexed than energy executives by the lack of explicit policy from Harris.

“Let’s be clear: the most important climate policy right now is defeating Donald Trump in November,” said Cassidy DiPaola of Fossil Free Media, a non-profit organisation. “All the wonky policy details in the world won’t matter if climate deniers control the White House.”

Advertisement

Last week the political arms of the League of Conservation Voters, Climate Power and the Environmental Defense Fund unveiled a $55mn advertising campaign backing Harris in swing states, focused on economic rather than climate issues.

In contrast, Trump has courted oil bosses who are backing his pledge to slash regulation and scrap clean energy subsidies. His campaign received nearly $14mn from the industry in June, according to OpenSecrets, almost double his oil haul in May.

Additional reporting by Sam Learner

Climate Capital

Where climate change meets business, markets and politics. Explore the FT’s coverage here.

Are you curious about the FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Find out more about our science-based targets here

Advertisement

   

Continue Reading

Trending