Connect with us

News

Biden promises Ukraine ‘advanced air defense systems’ after Russian missile strikes | CNN Politics

Published

on

Biden promises Ukraine ‘advanced air defense systems’ after Russian missile strikes | CNN Politics

Watch Jake Tapper’s unique interview with President Joe Biden on CNN Tonight with Jake Tapper at 9 p.m. ET Tuesday.



CNN
 — 

President Joe Biden spoke with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday after a deluge of Russian missiles focused cities throughout Ukraine, condemning the strikes and pledging continued US safety help “together with superior air protection techniques.”

Throughout the name, a White Home assertion stated, Biden “expressed his condemnation of Russia’s missile strikes throughout Ukraine, together with in Kyiv, and conveyed his condolences to the family members of these killed and injured in these mindless assaults. President Biden pledged to proceed offering Ukraine with the assist wanted to defend itself, together with superior air protection techniques.”

Advertisement

The White Home didn’t specify which air protection techniques Biden mentioned with Zelensky, however the US beforehand dedicated to offering Ukraine with Nationwide Superior Floor-to-Air Missile Techniques. NASAMS can be able to participating Russian cruise missiles.

Biden, the assertion stated, “additionally underscored his ongoing engagement with allies and companions to proceed imposing prices on Russia, holding Russia accountable for its struggle crimes and atrocities, and offering Ukraine with safety, financial, and humanitarian help.”

Requested whether or not the assaults of the previous 24 hours would change the calculus on what the US would take into account providing Ukraine, a senior administration official stated they’d no bulletins to make on that entrance, however that the US will proceed to assist present Ukraine with short- and long-range air protection techniques, because it has previously.

And a second senior administration official supplied the next abstract of air protection assist supplied to Ukraine from the US: “We’ve got transferred greater than 1,400 Stinger anti-air techniques to Ukraine, in addition to air surveillance and multi-mission radars. We enabled our Allies to switch air protection techniques of their very own to Ukraine – together with Slovakia’s switch of a essential S-300 system in April. And in August, President Biden introduced a brand new help bundle for Ukraine that included orders for 8 new NASAMS—Nationwide Superior Floor to Air Missile Techniques. We are going to proceed to offer Ukraine with what it must defend itself.”

Secretary of State Antony Blinken additionally spoke with Ukrainian International Minister Dmytro Kuleba on Monday to reiterate US assist following the lethal strikes. Biden is anticipated on Tuesday to affix an emergency video convention with G7 leaders throughout which Zelensky is anticipated to handle the group.

Advertisement

Russia launched a complete of 84 cruise missiles in opposition to targets throughout Ukraine on Monday, the Basic Workers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine stated in a Fb submit.

Russian President Vladimir Putin stated the strikes had been a response to what he described as acts of “terrorism” by Kyiv. Particularly, he referred to Saturday’s explosion on the Kerch Bridge linking Russia and Crimea – which he blamed on Ukraine’s “particular providers” – and a listing of different alleged “crimes.”

Kuleba stated that such claims had been “nonsense,” writing in a tweet, “Putin is determined due to battlefield defeats and makes use of missile terror to attempt to change the tempo of struggle in his favor.” And Ukraine’s protection intelligence company claimed in a press release on Monday that Moscow had been planning a “large” missile assault on Ukraine since early final week.

Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy head of Russia’s Safety Council, additionally lately stated he thinks Moscow ought to purpose for the “full dismantling” of Zelensky’s “regime.”

In a submit on Telegram, Medvedev – who served as President of Russia between 2008 and 2012 – stated: “The Ukrainian state in its present configuration … will pose a relentless, direct and clear menace to Russia. Subsequently, along with defending our individuals and defending the borders of the nation, the objective of our future actions, in my view, needs to be the entire dismantling of the political regime of Ukraine.”

Advertisement

John Kirby, a spokesperson for the Nationwide Safety Council, stated Monday that there’ll doubtless be extra assist packages for Ukraine introduced “within the very close to future.”

“It’s clear that he’s feeling the stress each at residence and abroad, and the way he reacts to that solely he can say,” Kirby advised CNN’s Kate Bolduan on “Erin Burnett OutFront.”

Kirby added: “He understands nicely that he’s not doing nicely on the battlefield.”

Requested if he thinks such strikes make it extra doubtless Putin would resort to nuclear weapons, Kirby stated that the US has seen nothing new.

“We proceed to watch his nuclear capabilities, Kate, finest we will. And what I can inform you at this time is that we simply don’t see any indications that Mr. Putin has decided to make use of weapons of mass destruction and even nuclear weapons. And we’ve seen nothing, Kate, that might give us trigger to alter our personal deterrent posture,” Kirby stated.

Advertisement

The point out of air protection system comes amid a sequence of escalations within the struggle.

Putin final month delivered a speech saying the partial mobilization of some 300,000 reservists following profitable Ukrainian counterattacks, elevating the specter of nuclear weapons if he deemed the “territorial integrity” of Russia to be jeopardized. And the Russian president lately introduced the annexation of 4 Ukrainian areas in defiance of worldwide regulation.

Final week, Biden delivered a stark warning concerning the risks of Putin’s nuclear threats, invoking the prospect of “Armageddon.” However a number of US officers have stated the remark was not based mostly on any new intelligence about Putin’s intentions or modifications in Russia’s nuclear posture.

This story has been up to date with extra data Monday.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Apollo to finance UK Hinkley Point nuclear plant with £4.5bn loan

Published

on

Apollo to finance UK Hinkley Point nuclear plant with £4.5bn loan

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

US private equity giant Apollo will provide £4.5bn in debt financing to support the UK’s Hinkley Point nuclear project, in a deal that will help ease financial pressures on the flagship development.

The investment grade financing will be provided as unsecured debt at an interest rate just below 7 per cent, people familiar with the matter said.

The funding could be used for other UK projects by French state-owned electricity group EDF, but Hinkley Point is expected to be the primary target for the debt package.

Advertisement

The financing meets a key funding gap for the nuclear project, which has suffered from consistent cost overruns. It was expected to cost £18bn and to be completed in 2025 but the estimated cost has swelled to almost £46bn and its start date pushed back to 2029.

This is a developing story

Continue Reading

News

Trump Can Retain Control Of National Guard In LA, Appeals Court Rules

Published

on

Trump Can Retain Control Of National Guard In LA, Appeals Court Rules

Topline

A federal appeals court on Thursday night ruled that the California National Guard troops—deployed in Los Angeles last week amid protests against the federal government’s crackdown on immigrants—can remain under President Donald Trump’s control while the state’s legal challenge against the deployment moves forward.

Key Facts

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that on matters such as federalizing the California National Guard, any decision must be “highly deferential” towards the president, and the court concluded that “it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority.”

Advertisement

However, the ruling disagreed with the White House’s primary argument that such a matter “is completely insulated from judicial review.”

The appellate court ruling blocks an already paused ruling issued by U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer that ordered the president to “return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith.”

The ruling only focused on the issue of presidential authority and did not address the claim made in Trump’s order that the protests amounted to a “form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.”

Advertisement

How Have California Officials Reacted To The Ruling?

California Attorney General Rob Bonta issued a statement saying, “While it is disappointing that our temporary restraining order has been stayed pending the federal government’s appeal, this case is far from over…our state and local law enforcement officers responded effectively to isolated episodes of violence at otherwise peaceful protests and the President deliberately sought to create the very chaos and crises he claimed to be addressing.” Gov. Gavin Newsom wrote on X: “The court rightly rejected Trump’s claim that he can do whatever he wants with the National Guard and not have to explain himself to a court. The President is not a king and is not above the law. We will press forward with our challenge to President Trump’s authoritarian use of U.S. military soldiers against citizens.”

How Did Trump React To The Ruling?

In a post on his Truth Social platform, the president hailed the ruling as a “BIG WIN,” and attacked the California Governor, saying: “The Judges obviously realized that Gavin Newscum is incompetent and ill prepared.” Trump then signaled he could deploy forces to tackle protests in other states, saying: “this is much bigger than Gavin, because all over the United States, if our Cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should State and Local Police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done.”

Crucial Quote

The appeals court ruling noted that precedent from earlier rulings cited by the Trump administration, “does not compel us to accept the federal government’s position that the President could federalize the National Guard based on no evidence whatsoever, and that courts would be unable to review a decision that was obviously absurd or made in bad faith.”

Further Reading

Trump Keeps Control Of National Guard In Los Angeles After Appeals Court Pauses Ruling (Forbes)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: How the L.A. Port got hit by Trump’s Tariffs

Published

on

Video: How the L.A. Port got hit by Trump’s Tariffs

New York Times reporter Ana Swanson reports from the Los Angeles Port, the largest port in the Western Hemisphere as well as the place that first saw the signs of Trump’s tariff war. The Port of Los Angeles is significant because of our trade relationship with China in particular, which is why The Trump administration’s 145% tariffs on the country resulted in lower volume at the port. Ana Swanson explains what the port illustrates about U.S. trade and how what’s felt at the Port of Los Angeles will soon be felt by U.S. consumers.

Continue Reading

Trending