Connect with us

News

Biden has a big oil problem. Here’s what you need to know about the recent OPEC+ decision. | CNN Politics

Published

on

Biden has a big oil problem. Here’s what you need to know about the recent OPEC+ decision. | CNN Politics

A model of this story appeared in CNN’s What Issues publication. To get it in your inbox, join free right here.


Washington
CNN
 — 

With simply weeks to go till the November midterms, 4 letters are haunting President Joe Biden and the Democrats: OPEC.

Final week, the Group of Petroleum Exporting Nations (OPEC) and its allies, led by Saudi Arabia and Russia, mentioned that it’ll slash oil manufacturing by 2 million barrels per day, the most important reduce because the begin of the pandemic, in a transfer that threatens to push gasoline costs larger simply weeks earlier than US midterm elections.

The group introduced the manufacturing reduce following its first assembly in individual since March 2020. The discount is equal to about 2% of world oil demand.

Advertisement

The Biden administration criticized the choice in a press release, calling it “shortsighted” and saying that it’s dangerous to some international locations already fighting elevated vitality costs essentially the most.

The manufacturing cuts will begin in November. OPEC+, which mixes OPEC international locations and allies similar to Russia, will meet once more in December.

For one perspective on the OPEC+ choice and to higher perceive the way it impacts everybody, we turned to Hossein Askari, who teaches worldwide enterprise at The George Washington College.

Our dialog, performed over the telephone and calmly edited for move and brevity, is beneath.

WHAT MATTERS: Are you able to stroll us by means of this latest OPEC choice? What’s taking place precisely?

Advertisement

ASKARI: So when the battle in Ukraine began, sorry to inform your viewers, however the US was not very nicely ready in what it was going to do. It sanctioned Russia for this and for that. And so the worth of oil began going up. And on the similar time, the US really put sanctions on Russian oil, not on gasoline, on oil. And so there was much less Russian oil within the Western markets.

Russia really began promoting its oil an increasing number of to China and to India and slicing its costs to these international locations. So they might purchase Russian oil, however there was a scarcity of oil.

Another excuse why the scarcity had developed was America principally sanctions like a mad cowboy, if I’ll say that. It has sanctioned Venezuela for a few years.

However Saudi Arabia, with the brand new efficient ruler who’s generally known as MBS, he has cozied as much as Putin. And so when President Biden went and noticed him a couple of months again and type of requested him to extend oil manufacturing – I’m sorry to say this, I’ve to throw on this little bit of politics – I feel America actually shamed itself by doing that.

In fact, MBS didn’t reply positively. However now he, the truth is, has gone excessive. He has agreed inside OPEC – and naturally he’s the primary spokesman in OPEC with Russia – that they are going to in the reduction of.

Advertisement

WHAT MATTERS: What does the OPEC choice imply for the common American?

ASKARI: From the place we are actually, crude oil costs by the tip of the 12 months, my guess, most, they’ll go up by $5 a barrel. Now, lots of people assume they’re gonna go up greater than that. I don’t imagine that, as a result of I feel the world economic system goes to develop much less and I feel that we’re going to see some Venezuelan oil come in the marketplace, and I feel we might even see some offers made so some extra Iranian oil might come in the marketplace.

For gasoline, I feel Individuals can see perhaps costs going up from the place they’re at the moment, if nothing else occurs, by about one other 30 to 50 cents a gallon.

Nevertheless, there’s additionally one other drawback for Individuals that’s house heating oil, and that may additionally go up. So for the common American, they’re going to pay, it doesn’t matter what, one thing extra per gallon of gasoline on the pump. And I feel there’s going to be extra of an impression, really, on the gasoline oil that they warmth their homes with. So it’s gonna placed on the squeeze on the common American. There’s no two methods about it.

WHAT MATTERS: What ought to the US do now?

Advertisement

ASKARI: I feel the US ought to be a lot, a lot more durable with Saudi Arabia as a result of we’ve got bent over backward to accommodate them in each means. And we’ve got regarded the opposite means with what they’ve finished. And now it’s the time to be powerful. They’ve been powerful with us. I feel the President of the US ought to be powerful with Saudi Arabia.

WHAT MATTERS: What else can the US do by way of serving to with oil costs within the quick time period?

ASKARI: I feel undoubtedly this administration has very unhealthy rapport with US oil corporations and vitality corporations. I feel that there ought to be extra behind-the scenes cooperation with the oil corporations and the administration as a result of you actually need them now to cooperate.

I do know lots of people don’t imagine in fracking, however perhaps it’s time to do some extra fracking. Possibly it’s time to extend output. They will improve output elsewhere too. I feel that will be extraordinarily, extraordinarily useful.

And I feel the US oil corporations – and I’m not a backer of oil corporations, please don’t misunderstand – however I feel they really feel that the administration principally simply needs to drive them out enterprise.

Advertisement

WHAT MATTERS: The rest you’d like so as to add?

ASKARI: Some folks assume that OPEC selections are purely financial. Some folks assume purely political. It has at all times been each, particularly for Saudi Arabia.

It’s actually Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates driving OPEC’s choice. I feel Individuals ought to perceive it’s not the opposite members, it’s not Nigeria or Iran. I really feel Individuals ought to perceive who’re our associates and who are usually not our associates.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Ministers split over aid for Titanic shipbuilder Harland & Wolff

Published

on

Ministers split over aid for Titanic shipbuilder Harland & Wolff

The UK government is split over a financial support package for Harland & Wolff in a row that casts uncertainty over the future of the Belfast shipbuilder behind the Titanic.

The Treasury has reservations about approving a taxpayer-backed £200mn guaranteed loan facility, while three rival ministries — Defence, Trade and Business, and the Northern Ireland Office — are all keen to press ahead, according to Whitehall officials.

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt, who must greenlight the package, has not made up his mind and is still receiving advice, with some involved in the talks claiming he is dragging his feet on the decision, three people with knowledge of the talks said. Insiders said a decision is expected in the coming days. H&W wants to borrow up to £200mn from a group of banks at a lower interest rate with the government acting as a guarantor for those loans.

Without the guarantee, the lossmaking business will need to find other sources of financing to help meet its working capital requirements and fulfil key contracts that include building three ships in a £1.6bn Royal Navy contract.

The company’s auditors last year warned the business faced “material uncertainty” unless it could source fresh financing and win additional new work.

Advertisement

The group is also engaged in pay negotiations with staff and “needs the money” to meet payroll, one person with knowledge of the business said.

Report of the government split comes only days after defence secretary Grant Shapps claimed the UK was entering a “golden age” of shipbuilding, after he approved new warships as part of the UK’s increased military spending.

Two of the officials said that the government was inclined to help the Aim-listed company, which has operations in Scotland and England as well as the iconic shipyard where the Titanic was built and whose yellow cranes dominate the Belfast skyline.

One insisted that the Treasury was concerned about the specific financing mechanism proposed, but was not opposed to the principle of extending support to the 163-year-old company. Officials are weighing alternative support options in the event the chancellor blocks the guarantee scheme.

However, MPs have questioned whether it is right to use taxpayers’ money to support the struggling business at all.

Advertisement

Kevan Jones, Labour MP for North Durham, on Wednesday called on the National Audit Office to investigate the matter.

“There are serious questions to answer around the use of taxpayer money in guaranteeing a multimillion pound loan to Harland & Wolff, given its current financial position,” Jones told the Financial Times.

Jones, who has previously raised concerns in parliament about the intention to offer an unprecedented 100 per cent guaranteed loan, wrote to Gareth Davies, head of the NAO, earlier this week asking the agency to look into what guarantees were in place to protect taxypayers. 

Jones said there were also questions to be asked about the “due diligence that was done on the ability of H&W to deliver on the £1.6bn contract prior to it being awarded”.

“The National Audit Office should seek answers to these questions on taxpayers’ behalf,” said Jones.

Advertisement

In a statement on Wednesday, H&W said its management was “comfortable with progress on what is a complex and large transaction for all parties involved”.

H&W shares fell more than 28 per cent on Tuesday before recovering half their losses to close at £10.10, valuing the business at less than £18mn.

The company’s latest annual accounts, to the end of 2022, showed revenues of £27mn but losses of £70mn. H&W also had net debt of £82.5mn, in part thanks to high interest payments on a $100mn loan to New York-based Riverstone Credit Partners.

In December, H&W said it had “sufficient funds” to meet its working capital requirements “until the new loan facility is completed”.

Francis Tusa, analyst and editor of the Defence Analysis newsletter, said “awarding a £1.6bn contract to a company with a market value substantially below this level is not best practice”. H&W has not built a complex warship for more than two decades.

Advertisement

Ministers had agreed in December to advance the loan guarantee to the next stage, so that H&W could work on financing with its bank syndicate.

The officials said the MoD, DBT and NIO want a financial package agreed swiftly to offer certainty around the future of the shipbuilding business.

The package is critical if H&W is to deliver on a £1.6bn contract to build three support ships for the Royal Navy, which it won in 2022 as part of a Spanish-led consortium. Unions have previously raised concerns that the work could migrate to Spain.

The NIO supports extending finance to Harland & Wolff, mindful of its status as an iconic Belfast-founded business that has particular significance to the unionist community, according to one of the Whitehall insiders. The government pledged in January to support the region’s shipbuilding and defence industries.

Despite the row, first reported by The Times, unions remain confident. Alan Perry, senior organiser for the GMB union in Belfast, said he was “definitely not” hearing the company was in any danger or anything “at the moment that would concern us”.

Advertisement

A government spokesperson said: “We continue to engage with Harland and Wolff with the export development guarantee. Due to commercial sensitivities, it would not be appropriate to comment further until the outcome of the process is confirmed.”

Continue Reading

News

Morrisey dominated Eastern Panhandle, outdistanced opponents in 35 of 55 counties on way to victory – WV MetroNews

Published

on

Morrisey dominated Eastern Panhandle, outdistanced opponents in 35 of 55 counties on way to victory – WV MetroNews

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — State Attorney General Patrick Morrisey dominated the Eastern Panhandle counties in Tuesday’s Primary Election in which he won the GOP nomination for governor.

Greg Hunter

Morrisey outdistanced former state lawmaker Moore Capito by more than 10,000 votes in that area of the state.

MetroNews Decision 2024 vote analyst Greg Hunter said Capito needed to be stronger in Kanawha and surrounding counties to make up the difference but he wasn’t.

“Moore Capito did well in Kanawha County but really that whole sort of Kanawha Valley region, seven counties, he wasn’t as dominate as he needed to be,” Hunter said Wednesday.

The Capito campaign also needed to win what Hunter calls the neutral areas like Wood and Monongalia counties but the counties were even or Morrisey was the winner. Morrisey won 35 of 55 counties in the GOP race.

Advertisement

“You get one dominate region and a few hundred vote wins in several other counties and you end up with a 10,000 vote lead like Morrisey had,” Hunter said.

Morrisey received approximately 75,000 which represented about 34% of the GOP votes cast.

Morrisey on Talkline

Patrick Morrisey

Morrisey made an appearance Wednesday on MetroNews Talkline. He said a dozen years in office as state Attorney General was a solid springboard to victory.

“Over the last 12 years, we’ve been able to get a lot of terrific things done to help our state and help pave the way for West Virginia to be the shining state in the mountains,” Morrisey said. “I think the conservative values and the experience made a really big difference.”

Morrisey said his victory sends a message.

Advertisement

“I think the people of West Virginia spoke loud and clear that they are looking for changes. That they are looking for people who have a vision for putting West Virginia first, protecting our jobs and protecting us from all of the threats out there,” Morrisey said.

Advice for Williams

Danny Jones

Former Charleston Mayor Danny Jones has some advice for his friend, Huntington Mayor Steve Williams and his upcoming race against Morrisey.

Jones said on “Talkline” Wednesday that if Williams is serious about the race he should step down from being mayor and be a full-time candidate.

“When you get up in the morning you think about being governor and you do it until you go to bed at night,” Jones said. “Steve hasn’t been out on the trail in a long time and he’s never been nothing but a nice guy.”

Jones said Williams is going to have to take the gloves off against Morrisey.

Advertisement

“He’s a good-looking tall man and he’s got to get out where people can see him,” Jones said.

Morrisey said he knows Williams and expects a campaign on the issues.

“I have respect for the Democrat nominee, we’ve worked together and he’s praised a lot of work we’ve done on the epidemic,” Morrisey said. “I think this will be spirited and focused on the issues.”

Continue Reading

News

US inflation falls to 3.4% in April

Published

on

US inflation falls to 3.4% in April

Stay informed with free updates

US inflation fell to 3.4 per cent in April, in line with economists’ expectations, prompting investors to increase their bets on Federal Reserve interest rate cuts this year.

The consumer price data released by the US labour department on Wednesday compared with a 3.5 per cent annual rise in consumer prices in March.

Before the report, traders had bet on between one and two rate cuts this year, starting in November. But in its immediate aftermath, they priced in two full cuts by December, according to Bloomberg data.

Advertisement

US bond yields dipped and stock futures also rose after the data release. 

The two-year Treasury yield, which moves with interest rate expectations, dropped to 4.71 per cent, its lowest level since early April.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

The figures come a day after Fed chair Jay Powell warned the central bank may have to maintain high interest rates for longer as it struggles to tame persistent inflation.

With less than six months to go before the US election, high inflation has hit President Joe Biden’s poll ratings on the economy.

Advertisement

According to Wednesday’s figures, core consumer prices — which strip out volatile food and energy costs — rose by 3.6 per cent last month compared with last year. On a monthly basis, the core consumer price index rose by 0.3 per cent in April, compared with 0.4 per cent in March.

This is a developing story.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending