Connect with us

News

Analysis: Why isn’t the UN doing more to stop what’s happening in Ukraine?

Published

on

Analysis: Why isn’t the UN doing more to stop what’s happening in Ukraine?

He begged them to do one thing to cease the battle in his nation, criticizing the Safety Council’s inaction instantly. And he known as out the elephant within the room: Russia, one of many 5 everlasting members of the Council, whose standing provides it the power to veto any motion it disagrees with.

“We’re coping with a state that turns the correct of veto within the UN Safety Council right into a proper to die,” Zelensky mentioned.

It was a blunt message urging the Council to reform, and if that will not work, he mentioned, “the subsequent choice could be to dissolve your self altogether. And I do know you’ll be able to admit that if there’s nothing you are able to do moreover dialog.”

Many individuals who’ve watched the UN for years agree that the UN Safety Council seems to be impotent on this second, with the world watching. The Safety Council was designed in a unique period, after World Warfare II, with a membership and veto system which have finally restricted its effectiveness in coping with this international battle. Different components of the UN have responded extra successfully to the humanitarian and refugee crises the battle has created.

Former US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton, who served beneath Republican Presidents together with George W. Bush and Donald Trump, agreed with Zelensky’s evaluation. “I assumed he was completely proper,” Bolton advised CNN’s chief political analyst Gloria Borger. “And I assumed yet another convert to understanding what’s fallacious with the United Nations. Its political establishments are basically damaged.”

Bolton has by no means been an enormous fan of the UN. He is well-known for saying, again in 1994, that if the UN Secretariat constructing in New York “misplaced 10 tales, it would not make a little bit of distinction.”

There have been many moments of impasse earlier than within the Safety Council when the massive powers disagree. However this second has drawn outsized consideration globally.

Advertisement

“That is the one largest disaster to hit the UN because the finish of the Chilly Warfare,” mentioned Richard Gowan, the UN Director for the Worldwide Disaster Group. “It’s doable that this does mark the start of a form of basic rupture amongst the good powers that can make UN diplomacy see vastly more durable going ahead.”

The system was designed this manner: to forestall international battle but in addition to reward the principle winners of World Warfare II, in response to Gowan.

Key veto energy

When the United Nations constitution was signed in 1945, it established the Safety Council with 5 everlasting members and 6 nonpermanent members. The everlasting members — the US, the UK, France, the Soviet Union, and the Republic of China — had been every given the facility to veto any resolutions they opposed.

“It was Franklin Roosevelt who needed to arrange a company that might police the world after the defeat of Nazi Germany,” Gowan mentioned. “However the one method he may get Russia and different powers to comply with that deal, was if they’d the power to dam any actions towards themselves.”

The late Soviet Union chief Joseph Stalin himself insisted on that energy as a method for his state to guard itself.

Advertisement

Right now, the Safety Council has 15 members, however the 5 everlasting members have remained the identical, with Russia holding the previous Soviet Union’s seat and China taking the seat of the Republic of China. And the veto hasn’t modified both.

“What we’re seeing is, when there is a basic disagreement among the many everlasting members, nothing occurs,” Bolton mentioned.

Zelensky's compelling question: What is the UN for?

The UN constitution additionally makes it inconceivable to do one other factor Zelensky prompt: kick Russia off the Safety Council, as a result of the nation can veto that too.

Over time, international locations and diplomats have prompt to reform the council by including extra everlasting members to make it higher mirror the up to date geopolitical actuality, and even attempt to remove the veto energy. However no nation needs to dilute its energy.

“I am being sincere with you, I do not assume anybody’s going to wish to quit their veto,” former US Ambassador to the UN Invoice Richardson, who served beneath former Democratic President Invoice Clinton, advised Borger.

Richardson factors out that the US has used the veto to guard its personal pursuits — and should must once more.

Advertisement

“It helped us within the Iraq Warfare. It helped us in Bosnia. It helps us in conflicts in Africa,” he mentioned. “So no nation that may be a everlasting member needs to surrender their veto. And I’d be towards the US giving up their veto proper now, simply in order that we take motion on one other situation.”

In idea, the Safety Council “may impose much more sweeping international financial sanctions on Moscow than we now have already seen. It may technically authorize army motion to push again Russian forces in Ukraine,” in response to Gowan.

However with Russia and sure China set to veto any motion taken towards the battle, the Safety Council is deadlocked.

A large international group

The UN is greater than simply the Safety Council, and different areas of the physique — which has six predominant organs — have been extra lively since Russia invaded Ukraine.

Advertisement
“The UN is for airing publicly the tragedies of the world. Just like the refugee disaster in Ukraine, just like the doable battle crimes, like so many different human prices which are happening,” Richardson mentioned. “On the similar time, the UN is offering meals. The UN is offering refugee help.”
The UN Normal Meeting has condemned Russia twice over the battle in Ukraine; these resolutions are nonbinding however carry symbolic weight. Russia was additionally suspended from the Human Rights Council, which requires a two-thirds vote.

However Bolton mentioned the maths behind that vote exhibits Russia has vital help all over the world; the voting consequence was 93 in favor, 24 towards and 58 abstentions. A remaining 18 member states weren’t included in that consequence.

“So this is the actual headline … A majority of the members of the United Nations, didn’t vote to expel Russia,” he advised Borger.

Russian President Vladimir Putin possible anticipated these sorts of condemnations, however what he actually cares about is the standing and energy that being on the Safety Council provides Russia.

“After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Moscow clung on to its seat within the Safety Council basically as proof that it was nonetheless an enormous energy,” Gowan of the Worldwide Disaster Group mentioned. “Now, in the actual world … Russia shouldn’t be that vital. It is China and the US which are the dominant gamers, however within the Safety Council, the Russians stand as equal to the US. And so they’re very, very happy with having that standing.”

And Richardson is aware of firsthand from his time on the UN within the Nineties, Russia is aware of play the system.

Advertisement

“Once I turned UN ambassador for the US, Lavrov, International Minister had been there 10 years already. So he was very skillful,” Richardson mentioned. “He knew maneuver within the Safety Council. He was very formidable. And so we now have Russia proper now, very educated about UN operations in order that’s a bonus that they’ve.”

And so the Safety Council may solely watch as Russia invaded Ukraine. And in a weird split-screen second, Russia held the rotating presidency of the Safety Council and even chaired the assembly because the invasion started and diplomacy failed.

Bolton does not see any method to change the system.

“Except unicorns break away and sweetness and lightweight prevails, the place there are disagreements among the many (everlasting) 5, there might be no motion,” he mentioned.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Trump’s crypto embrace overshadows new EU digital assets rules

Published

on

Trump’s crypto embrace overshadows new EU digital assets rules

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Donald Trump’s embrace of cryptocurrencies risks undermining Europe’s incoming rules on digital assets as companies overlook the continent in favour of a friendlier US market, industry executives have warned.

Companies such as Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, have indicated they will look to refocus their attention on the US after Trump promised to make the country “the crypto capital of the planet”.

Top executives and analysts say a crypto-friendly White House will exert a strong pull that compares favourably to the European Union’s new landmark rules, which come into force from December 30.

Advertisement

The bloc’s rules, known as the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA), will set guardrails for the public following the collapse of companies like exchange FTX and lenders including Genesis and Celsius. The standards have in the past been praised by the industry as a potential benchmark for global crypto asset regulation.

“In the previous US administration . . . MiCA certainly seemed like it was a good way of trying to think about the crypto industry without completely killing off innovation,” said Eswar Prasad, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. 

But in the wake of Trump’s win, “we’re going to see a migration of crypto-related activities away from Europe in any form because things are going to be much easier in the US,” he added. “[MiCA] is going to be seen as very stringent.”

Trump’s victory has helped propel bitcoin to a record high of $108,000 this year, more than double its price a year ago. Retail and institutional investors have warmed to Trump’s pledge that he will end the US’s tough regulatory crackdown of recent years.

He has also nominated Paul Atkins, a crypto advocate, to head the Securities and Exchange Commission, and appointed David Sacks, a venture capitalist, to advise the president on crypto and AI policy. “We’re going to do something great with crypto,” he said last week.

Advertisement

The EU’s MiCA rules will regulate the issuance of crypto coins including stablecoins, as well as digital asset services like custody and trading by demanding that companies providing those services are authorised in the EU.

Yulia Makarova, special counsel at law firm Cooley, said complying with MiCA “increases the costs for start-up firms” in particular. “Ongoing compliance costs can be such that the business gets to the brink of viability,” she added, warning that crypto start-ups may choose to launch in the US rather than the EU.

Some companies, such as US cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase and Circle, operator of the stablecoin USDC, have secured their EU licences. However others, such as Tether, the world’s largest stablecoin, will not be compliant with the new rules and are being delisted by local regulated exchanges.

“The new administration might take a bit of shine and a bit of edge off MiCA,” said Denzel Walters, head of Luxembourg at market maker B2C2. “But I still think MiCA here presents a really great opportunity for the digital assets market,” he added.

Executives are betting that Trump, as well as a new cohort of pro-crypto politicians in Washington, will also make headway with new legislation for crypto assets, which will in turn pave the way for traditional financial institutions to plough money into crypto.

Advertisement

Already, crypto companies that dropped US services for fear of being hit by regulators, or were banned, are planning to return. “We are closer than ever to restoring US dollar services and our plan is to achieve this important milestone in early 2025,” said Norman Reed, interim chief executive of crypto exchange Binance US. “It is not a matter of if, but when,” he added.

Continue Reading

News

Bird flu has killed 20 big cats including cougars at a U.S. wildlife sanctuary

Published

on

Bird flu has killed 20 big cats including cougars at a U.S. wildlife sanctuary

A cougar is seen in a forest in autumn. The Wild Felid Advocacy Center of Washington says bird flu has killed 20 of its big cats, including cougars, in the past month.

iStock/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

iStock/Getty Images

An animal sanctuary in Shelton, Wash., is under quarantine after a bird flu outbreak killed 20 big cats at the facility over the past month.

The Wild Felid Advocacy Center of Washington called the deaths “heartbreaking,” confirming the virus has claimed more than half its animals, including four cougars and a half-Bengal tiger, since late November.

“Our sanctuary is under quarantine to protect our remaining animals and prevent further spread,” the center said in a statement, adding it will remain closed to the public until further notice.

Advertisement

The sanctuary said the outbreak may have been caused by respiratory secretions passed from infected birds to the cats or by contaminated meat fed to the cats. It said bird flu poses a serious risk to felines, often progressing from mild symptoms to fatal pneumonia within 24 hours.

The first cat, a cougar, died on Nov. 23 after showing signs of the illness. The virus then quickly sickened many other animals across the sanctuary. While some of the cats shared a wall between their habitats, they did not have direct contact.

The sanctuary’s 17 surviving animals — cougars, bobcats, servals, and tigers — remain under close observation.

In response, the sanctuary removed 8,000 pounds of food from storage and began deep cleaning, but the nonprofit says the measures have strained its finances. “The mounting medical costs, even at discounted rates, are significant,” it said, appealing for donations to cover expenses.

The outbreak comes amid rising concerns over bird flu in the U.S.

Advertisement

Earlier this month, California Gov. Gavin Newsom declared a state of emergency due to its spread among dairy cattle, and outbreaks have been reported in wild and domestic bird populations across multiple states.

A brand of cat food also said it was recalling a line of its products after authorities linked the death of a cat to a batch of feed contaminated with bird flu.

The brand, Northwest Naturals, said it was advising people to throw out two-pound bags of its Feline Turkey Recipe that have a best-by date between May 21, 2026, and June 23, 2026, after the bags tested positive for virulent bird flu.

Experts warn that highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is becoming more prevalent, driven by migratory bird patterns.

While the virus primarily affects birds, it has shown the capacity to infect mammals, including domestic pets and wildlife, under certain conditions.

Advertisement

Earlier this month, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirmed the first severe human case of bird flu in the U.S. — a Louisiana resident who was hospitalized after being exposed to backyard flocks.

Continue Reading

News

India’s former prime minister Manmohan Singh dies

Published

on

India’s former prime minister Manmohan Singh dies

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

India’s former prime minister Manmohan Singh, who liberalised the economy and then led the country through a period of strong economic growth, has died.

Singh, 92, was being treated for age-related medical conditions, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences in New Delhi said, as it announced his death on Thursday.

The Oxford university-educated economist set India on a path to becoming a fast-growing economy as finance minister from 1991 to 1996, when he opened up the country to more foreign trade and private investment.

Advertisement

Considered a political lightweight by some in India at that time, Singh was a surprise choice by the Congress party to be prime minister after it won parliamentary elections in 2004.

Alongside a growth rate of almost 7 per cent, Singh’s decade as premier was marred by allegations of widespread corruption against his party’s leaders, although his personal integrity was rarely questioned.

Singh was accused of inaction and opposition parties claimed he was subservient to Congress’s chief at that time, Sonia Gandhi.

Shortly before Congress lost elections to Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata party in 2014, Singh said in a speech to parliament that “history would be kinder to me than the contemporary media, or for that matter opposition parties”.

Prime Minister Modi on Thursday described Singh as one of India’s most distinguished leaders, saying he left a “strong imprint on our economic policy over the years” and had “made extensive efforts to improve people’s lives” as premier.

Advertisement

Rahul Gandhi, a senior member of the Congress party, paid tribute to Singh, saying he had lost a “mentor and guide” whose “humility and deep understanding of economics inspired the nation”.

A member of parliament for more than three decades, Singh retired from active politics earlier this year.

The mild-mannered Singh, who belonged to India’s minority Sikh community, was born to a humble family in 1932 in a village in India’s Punjab prior to the country’s independence, which is now part of Pakistan.

Singh rose to become one of India’s most successful economists, serving the government in various capacities, including as head of the country’s central bank in the 1980s.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending