Connect with us

News

Americans wounded in rocket attack on Iraq base

Published

on

Americans wounded in rocket attack on Iraq base

Seven US personnel were wounded in a rocket attack by Iran-backed militias on a base in Iraq, underscoring the threat to American forces amid intensified diplomatic efforts to ease tensions between Iran and Israel.

US defence secretary Lloyd Austin said the attack on Ain al-Assad, the main base hosting American forces in Iraq, “marked a dangerous escalation and demonstrated Iran’s destabilising role in the region”, according to a Pentagon readout of a call with his Israeli counterpart.

The assault on Monday was the first time in months that American troops in Iraq have been wounded, and followed a US strike against Iran-backed Iraqi militias last week.

Two rockets hit the airbase at about 9pm local time on Monday, wounding five US soldiers and two American contractors, a US defence official said. Two were evacuated from Iraq for further treatment and all are in a stable condition, the official said.

The Ain al-Assad attack took place as Washington and its Arab allies sought to reduce soaring regional tensions following the back-to-back assassinations of senior leaders of the Lebanese militant movement Hizbollah and Hamas last week.

Advertisement

Both Iran and Hizbollah have vowed to retaliate against Israel after Fuad Shukr, a Hizbollah commander, was killed by an Israeli strike on Beirut, and Ismail Haniyeh, Hamas’s political leader, was assassinated in Tehran.

US secretary of state Antony Blinken said Washington was “engaged in intense diplomacy pretty much around the clock with a very simple message: all parties must refrain from escalation, all parties must take steps to ease tensions”.

An Iranian official told the Financial Times that the US had sent messages to Tehran through Jordan, Oman and Qatar urging the republic not to escalate the situation, saying that would not be in its interests. But Iran’s response has been that “we have made our decision”, the official said. 

US defence secretary Lloyd Austin said the attack ‘marked a dangerous escalation and demonstrated Iran’s destabilising role in the region’ © Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Hizbollah’s leader on Tuesday said the group would respond to the killing of its most senior military commander, regardless of international diplomacy and “no matter the consequences”.

“Our response will come. Alone, or with the Axis [of Resistance],” Hassan Nasrallah said, referring to the network of Iran-backed groups in the region, in a speech marking a week since Israel’s assassination of Shuk.

Advertisement

“These are all possibilities,” he said, adding that the uncertainty over the retaliation was psychological warfare and was part of Israel’s punishment.

Blinken said to “break this cycle”, there needed to be a ceasefire to end the 10-month war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, urging the sides to accept a deal.

The US, along with Qatar and Egypt, have for months been seeking to broker a deal to secure the release of hostages in Gaza and halt the war in the besieged strip, which is considered vital to ending the regional hostilities that erupted after Hamas’s October 7 attack.

But they have struggled to get the parties to agree a deal, and mediators have warned that the killing of Haniyeh, Hamas’s main negotiator, has further set back the talks.

The fear is that a robust retaliation to the assassinations by Iran and Hizbollah will trigger an Israeli counter-response and push the region closer to a full-blown war.

Advertisement

Hizbollah and Israel continued to trade fire on Tuesday, with Lebanese authorities saying at least six people were killed in Israeli strikes, one of which targeted the town of Mayfadoun, some 30km inside Lebanon. At least four of those people were Hizbollah fighters. 

Israeli health authorities said seven people were wounded, including one critically, after a Hizbollah barrage, although the Israel Defense Forces later clarified that one of its own air defence interceptor missiles “missed the target and hit the ground, injuring several civilians”. The IDF said the incident was under review. 

There are also concerns that Iran could mobilise the militant groups in the so-called Axis of Resistance, which includes Houthi rebels in Yemen and militias in Iraq and Syria, as well as Hizbollah and Hamas.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

The US has moved additional military assets, including warships and fighter jets, to the region to help defend Israel and in a show of deterrence. But there is a risk that its forces are sucked into combat.

There are about 2,500 American troops in Iraq and about 900 in Syria, where they have been part of an international coalition fighting Isis, the jihadi group.

Advertisement

Iran-backed militias have launched multiple rocket and drone strikes against US forces since the October 7 attack and Israel’s retaliatory offensive in Gaza triggered a wave of regional hostilities.

Those attacks had diminished in intensity after the US launched air strikes against Iran-affiliated targets in Syria following an attack on a US base on the border between Jordan and Syria that killed three American soldiers in January.

Ain al-Assad base has been targeted at least twice in the past month.

The Houthis have also launched attacks against US navy vessels that have been patrolling the Red Sea in an effort to prevent the Yemeni rebels’ assaults on merchant shipping in the key maritime trade route.

Iranian leaders stepped up their threats against Israel on Monday as the region braced for the Islamic republic’s response, with President Masoud Pezeshkian warning that Tehran would “definitely” respond to Haniyeh’s killing.

Advertisement

He said Iran was not seeking to “expand the scope of war” in the region but Israel “will definitely receive a response for its crimes and insolence”.

Israel has neither denied nor confirmed responsibility for Haniyeh’s killing.

Additional reporting by Raya Jalabi in Beirut and Neri Zilber in Tel Aviv

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

South Korea’s President Yoon Suk Yeol arrested after stand-off with police

Published

on

South Korea’s President Yoon Suk Yeol arrested after stand-off with police

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

South Korea’s suspended President Yoon Suk Yeol was arrested on Wednesday morning following a predawn raid by police and investigators on his fortified hilltop compound.

Yoon’s detention followed a six-hour stand-off between law enforcement officials and members of the president’s security detail. It is the first time in South Korea’s history that a sitting president has been arrested.

The development marks the latest twist in a political crisis that was triggered by his failed attempt to impose martial law last month, and which has shaken confidence in the democratic integrity of Asia’s fourth-largest economy.

Advertisement

Yoon was suspended from his duties after he was impeached by parliament in December following his attempt to impose martial law. The country is currently being led by finance minister Choi Sang-mok as acting president.

The operation on Wednesday, which began shortly after 4am, was the second attempt this month by the CIO to detain Yoon for questioning on insurrection and abuse of office charges.

An initial effort earlier this month was foiled by Yoon’s protection officers following a tense hours-long stand-off at the presidential residence. Yoon had previously refused to comply with investigators and had challenged their authority to bring him in for questioning.

“The rule of law has completely collapsed in this country,” Yoon said in a video statement recorded before his transfer to the headquarters of the country’s Corruption Investigation Office for questioning. “I’ve decided to appear for CIO questioning in order to prevent any bloodshed.”

According to South Korea’s state-owned news agency Yonhap, police and officials from the CIO arrived at the compound early on Wednesday and presented a warrant for Yoon’s arrest but were again initially prevented from entering by the Presidential Security Service.

Advertisement

Yonhap also reported that about 30 lawmakers from Yoon’s conservative People Power party were at the compound and attempting to prevent officials from entering it.

But with hundreds of police gathered outside, some of them equipped with ladders and wire cutters to overcome barricades erected by Yoon’s protection officers, CIO officials were eventually allowed to enter the residence.

Yoon’s lawyers initially attempted to broker a deal whereby he would surrender voluntarily for questioning. But this was not accepted by CIO officials, and he was eventually arrested just after 10.30am and transferred to the investigative agency’s headquarters.

“Yoon’s arrest is the first step towards restoring our constitutional order,” said Park Chan-dae, floor leader of the leftwing opposition Democratic Party of Korea. “It underlines that justice is still alive.”

While Yoon’s powers have been transferred to Choi as acting president, he remains South Korea’s head of state while the country’s Constitutional Court deliberates on whether to approve his impeachment or reinstate him in office.

Advertisement

The court held its first formal hearing into Yoon’s impeachment on Tuesday, but the session was adjourned after four minutes because the suspended president declined to attend, citing concerns for his personal safety.

The efforts by the CIO and police to detain Yoon for questioning relates to a separate, criminal process connected to his failed imposition of martial law. Yoon’s lawyers insist the CIO has no standing to pursue criminal insurrection charges against him.

Continue Reading

News

SEC sues Elon Musk, says he didn't disclose Twitter ownership on time before purchase

Published

on

SEC sues Elon Musk, says he didn't disclose Twitter ownership on time before purchase

Elon Musk speaks as part of a campaign town hall in support of Donald Trump in Folsom, Pa., on Oct. 17, 2024.

Matt Rourke/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Matt Rourke/AP

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has sued billionaire Elon Musk, saying he failed to disclose his ownership of Twitter stock in a timely manner in early 2022, before buying the social media site.

As a result, the SEC alleges, Musk was able to underpay “by at least $150 million” for shares he bought after he should have disclosed his ownership of more than 5% of Twitter’s shares. Musk bought Twitter in October 2022 and later renamed it X.

Musk started amassing Twitter shares in early 2022, and by March of that year, he owned more than 5%. At this point, the complaint says, he was required by law to disclose his ownership, but he failed to do so until April 4, 11 days after the report was due.

Advertisement

Representatives for X and Musk did not immediately return a message for comment.

After Musk signed a deal to acquire Twitter in April 2022, he tried to back out of it, leading the company to sue him to force him to go through with the acquisition.

The has SEC said that starting in April 2022, it authorized an investigation into whether any securities laws were broken in connection with Musk’s purchases of Twitter stock and his statements and SEC filings related to the company.

Before it filed the lawsuit, the SEC went to court in an attempt to compel Musk to testify as part of an investigation into his purchase of Twitter.

The SEC’s current chair, Gary Gensler, plans to step down from his post on Jan. 20 and it is not clear if the new administration will continue the lawsuit.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Palisades and Eaton Fires May Not Be Fully Extinguished for Weeks

Published

on

Palisades and Eaton Fires May Not Be Fully Extinguished for Weeks

It may take weeks or longer for firefighters to fully extinguish the two most destructive fires that have ravaged parts of the Los Angeles area, fire officials warned.

The sheer sizes of those blazes, the Palisades and Eaton fires, have presented a significant challenge. They have charred almost 40,000 acres combined and are still only partly contained.

Difficult weather conditions have also hindered efforts. David Acuna, a battalion chief with Cal Fire, said the persistence of strong winds, and the fact that fires were burning through homes, which can generate intense heat, made containment impossible when the blazes first ignited.

Crews have been trying to establish a boundary around the fires, using trenches, natural barriers and other methods to prevent further spread. But Capt. Erik Scott, a spokesman for the Los Angeles Fire Department, said, “It’s going to be a slow, arduous process.”

The emergence of smaller fires over the last week has further complicated efforts. Of particular concern was the Auto fire in Ventura County, northwest of Los Angeles, which grew to more than 50 acres before being contained. Officials worried about it breaking free again in windy conditions.

Advertisement

These fires have required an immediate response from both air and ground crews to prevent them from growing, Mr. Acuna said, which diverts resources from the larger blazes.

Stopping the fires’ forward progress is only the first step. Firefighters must also extinguish all remaining flames inside the contained area.

Mr. Scott said this second part of the process would also take time. Among other steps, he said, firefighters need to use hand tools to scrape away brush near the burn perimeter and turn over smoldering piles to ensure nothing is hot enough to reignite.

These timelines are not unusual for large fires. In 2018, the Woolsey fire burned through nearly 100,000 acres in Los Angeles and Ventura counties, destroying over 1,600 structures. The fire ignited in early November and was not contained for two weeks. And it took until early January for the fire to be fully extinguished.

The Santa Ana winds that have repeatedly raised the fire danger over the last week have so far proven lighter than anticipated on Tuesday, but forecasters warn that wind speeds could increase on Wednesday. The region remains critically dry, with little rain expected in the near future. The combination of those elements is threatening to ignite more fires across Southern California, and could further hinder firefighters’ efforts.

Advertisement

Erin McCann contributed reporting.

Continue Reading

Trending