Connect with us

News

After a study found toxic metals in tampons, lawmakers are pressing the FDA to act

Published

on

After a study found toxic metals in tampons, lawmakers are pressing the FDA to act

Four female House Democrats sent a letter to the FDA commissioner on Thursday urging the agency to address concerns about the safety and regulation of tampons.

Loic Venance/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Loic Venance/AFP via Getty Images

Lawmakers are calling on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to do more to address concerns about the ingredients in tampons after a study released earlier this summer found toxic metals in products from over a dozen popular brands.

Members of the Democratic Women’s Caucus called on the FDA to “review and improve the current safety standards for tampons” in a letter sent to Commissioner Dr. Robert Califf on Thursday.

“We urge the FDA to take swift action to ensure that women are safe from harmful and toxic substances in tampons,” they wrote. “We look forward to reviewing your plan to address these concerns and working with you on this issue.”

Advertisement

They did not specify a timeline or next steps.

The letter, a copy of which was shared with NPR, was signed by Reps. Summer Lee of Pennsylvania, Grace Meng of New York and policy task force co-chairs Kathy Manning of North Carolina and Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts. The Democratic Women’s Caucus includes all Democratic women in the U.S. House of Representatives.

An FDA spokesperson told NPR that the agency “has received the letter and will respond directly to the Caucus.”

Safety concerns about tampons, and calls for stronger regulation, are not new. More than a dozen studies in recent years have evaluated the presence of various chemicals in widely used menstrual products, including a 2019 study that found higher concentrations of blood mercury in tampon users (which is cited in Thursday’s letter).

But they intensified in July after a first-of-its-kind study published in Environment International detected amounts of 16 heavy metals — including lead — in various tampons made by 14 common brands, which were not named.

Advertisement

Heavy metals have been linked to all sorts of negative health effects, from damaging the cardiovascular, nervous and endocrine systems to increasing cancer risks to harming maternal health and fetal development.

The study authors caution that more research is needed to determine to what extent the metals might “leach out of tampons” and into peoples’ bodies, and what health impacts they might have if so.

But they say more transparency is needed, too — especially considering millions of Americans spend so many hours with tampons inside their bodies. The study found that people who menstruate may use more than 7,400 tampons over their reproductive years.

“I think it’s important that we ask for clear labeling on our products so that people can make informed decisions for themselves based on their own values and health priorities,” lead author Jenni Shearston, a postdoctoral scholar at the UC Berkeley School of Public Health, told NPR in July.

“And I think it’s also important that we try to get better testing, especially of heavy metals like arsenic or lead in tampons so we can make sure everyone’s safe.”

Advertisement

When asked about the metals study in July, the FDA mentioned the “limitations” of the research — since it didn’t evaluate to what extent metals might be absorbed by the body — but said it would look into it.

The spokesperson told NPR on Thursday that the FDA has since commissioned an independent literature review and initiated an internal bench laboratory study to evaluate metals in tampons.

“These initiatives will enable FDA to complete a risk assessment of metals contained in tampons, based on a worst-case scenario of metal exposure,” they wrote, adding that the findings will be released publicly once they have been peer-reviewed. “The FDA will also continue monitoring these devices going forward as part of its total product lifecycle approach to medical devices.”

The FDA doesn’t currently require tampons to be tested for chemicals

Various brands of tampons on store shelves.

The FDA says all tampons legally sold in the U.S. go through a review process before they can hit store shelves, but critics say that doesn’t go far enough.

Brandon Bell/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Brandon Bell/Getty Images

The FDA regulates and classifies tampons as medical devices, so manufacturers are not required to disclose their ingredients on the label the way that other consumer products do, as the letter points out.

Advertisement

The FDA’s tampon guidance from 2005 doesn’t mandate that products be tested for chemical contaminants. And it recommends — but doesn’t require — that tampons “be free of” the highly toxic compound dioxin as well as “any pesticide and herbicide residues.”

Chemicals could get into tampons in a number of ways, from raw materials like cotton being contaminated by pollutants in the soil and water to manufacturers intentionally adding them as odor control or antimicrobial agents.

Tampons must meet FDA requirements for safety and effectiveness before they can be legally sold in the U.S.

The spokesperson said that process involves toxicity testing, which consists of identifying potentially harmful substances — “such as some metals” — and assessing the risk of those substances coming out of the product and being absorbed by the body during single as well as repeated use.

“As part of the FDA’s review, manufacturers submit data including the results of testing to evaluate the safety of the materials used to make tampons and applicators (if present); tampon absorbency, strength, and integrity; and whether tampons enhance the growth of certain harmful bacteria or change normal bacteria levels in the vagina,” the agency explained in an online fact sheet.

Advertisement

The Center for Baby and Adult Hygiene Products (BAHP), a North American trade association, defended the safety of its members’ menstrual products in a 2022 statement in which it said all absorbent hygiene products “undergo a thorough safety assessment beyond what is required by the applicable regulatory framework.”

It said any chemicals in menstrual products are “not intentionally added by the manufacturers,” saying such “impurities” may be present in the environment or “even made by the human body.”

“Our members routinely test their products with external labs for the presence of background substances and these reports affirm our products are safe and that women can use them with confidence,” it said.

Thursday’s letter isn’t the first from members of Congress who want answers and action.

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wa., the chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, sent a letter to Califf of the FDA in late July, several weeks after the publication of the metals study.

Advertisement

“In light of this alarming reporting, I urge the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to carefully examine these new findings and evaluate any necessary actions to ensure the safety of tampons and menstrual products,” Murray wrote.

Murray asked the FDA to respond in writing to six specific questions about what it currently does and plans to do to ensure the safety of period products, and to brief her staff on the “regulation and safety processes for tampons and menstrual products,” by specific dates in August.

NPR has reached out to Murray’s office about the status of those requests. The FDA says it “will respond directly to Senator Murray regarding questions in the letter.”

Some states are passing their own laws in the absence of federal requirements

The New York State Capitol building in Albany.

New York was the first state to require manufacturers to disclose ingredients on the packing of period products, with a law that took effect in 2021. California and Nevada have since followed suit.

Bennett Raglin/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Bennett Raglin/Getty Images

Congress has tried unsuccessfully in the past to strengthen regulations on tampons and other menstrual products.

Advertisement

In 2022, Reps. Debbie Lesko, R.-Ariz., and Meng — one of the letter’s signatories — introduced the “Menstrual Products Right to Know Act,” which would have required the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to “treat menstrual products as misbranded if their labeling does not list each component of the product.”

The legislation was referred to a subcommittee and did not progress further.

In a report that same year, the House Appropriations Committee expressed concern about the “potential danger of fragrance ingredients used in menstrual products that are medical devices.

“These products are used frequently by consumers without knowledge of the presence of these ingredients, or understanding of their potential harms,” lawmakers wrote, noting that the FDA does not currently maintain a list of such ingredients.

The committee’s report directed the agency to evaluate the fragrance ingredients in its existing records and “if necessary” compile a list. It also directs the FDA to determine at what concentrations it would recommend that manufacturers disclose the presence of such ingredients in their product labels.

Advertisement

The FDA spokesperson said the agency will continue working to update its existing guidance to include recommendations outlined in the report, and “looks forward to engaging with patients, health care providers, and others during a public comment period when those guidance updates are proposed.”

In the meantime, some states are taking matters into their own hands.

In 2019, New York became the first to pass a law requiring manufacturers to contain a “plain and conspicuous” list of ingredients on the packaging for menstrual products. It took effect in 2021.

The nonprofit group Women’s Voices for the Earth (WVE) conducted a field study on ingredient disclosures from late 2021 to early 2022 and found that the ingredients newly announced on period product labels included chemicals that can irritate skin, trigger allergic reactions, cause cancer and release microplastic particles into the environment.

“Numerous additives to period products are now being disclosed for the first time, indicating that chemical exposure from period products is much more complicated than previously assumed,” they wrote in a May 2022 report.

Advertisement

The group also noted that while compliance with New York law was imperfect — for example, some products described ingredients as “fragrance” or “adhesive” without including the actual chemical names — ingredient information appeared to be becoming more standard on menstrual product labels nationwide.

“We commonly found products in other states with ingredient disclosures on the package similar or identical to what is required in New York, affording period product users across the country the right to know what is in their products,” WVE added.

California followed suit in 2020, passing a law that requires period product manufacturers to disclose “intentionally added ingredients” both on labels and online starting in 2023. And last year, Nevada became the third state to require ingredient disclosure, with a law slated to take effect at the start of 2025.

In June, Vermont became the first state to ban so-called PFAS, or “forever chemicals,” from menstrual products; that law is poised to take effect in 2026.

Half a dozen other states have also enacted phaseouts of PFAS in menstrual products so far, according to the national environmental health alliance Safer States. They include Maine, Colorado, Connecticut and Minnesota.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Ukraine’s Kursk offensive has triggered doubts among Russian elite, spy chiefs say

Published

on

Ukraine’s Kursk offensive has triggered doubts among Russian elite, spy chiefs say

Watch the FT Weekend festival session here.

Ukraine’s Kursk offensive has dented Vladimir Putin’s war narrative and triggered “questions” among the Russian elite about the point of the war, two of the world’s leading spy chiefs have said.

CIA director Bill Burns said Kursk was “a significant tactical achievement” that had boosted Ukrainian morale and exposed Russia’s weaknesses. It has “raised questions . . . across the Russian elite about where is this all headed”, he said.

He was speaking at the Financial Times’ Weekend festival in London on Saturday alongside MI6 chief Richard Moore.

Moore said the Kursk offensive was “a typically audacious and bold move by the Ukrainians . . . to try and change the game” — although he cautioned it was “too early” to say how long Kyiv’s forces would be able to control the Russian territory they had seized.

Advertisement
MI6 chief Richard Moore, left, and CIA director Bill Burns speaking at the FT weekend festival on Saturday © Em Fitzgerald/FT

It is the first time the two heads have appeared together at a public event in the history of their agencies’ 77-year intelligence sharing partnership. It also represents the latest move by the US and British spy agencies to come out of the shadows to warn the countries they serve about the mounting dangers that the world faces.

The spy chiefs spoke about what they called an unprecedented range of threats to the international world order, from Putin’s war in Ukraine and Russia’s campaign of sabotage operations across Europe to the rise of China and rapid technological change.

One area of particular focus is the conflict in the Middle East.

Asked whether there was going to be a deal to release Israeli hostages held in Gaza, Burns, who has been deeply involved the negotiations, said: “This goes to a question of whether or not leaders on both sides are prepared to recognise that enough is enough, and that the time has come for them to make some hard choices and some difficult compromises.”

Burns said that, while he could not say the talks were going to be a success, “I also cannot tell you how close we are right now”. A potential deal between Israel and Hamas was “90 per cent” there and “the last 10 per cent” was always the hardest part.

Advertisement

A more detailed proposal would come in “the next several days . . . [and] my hope is that they [the Israeli and Hamas leaders] will recognise what is at stake here”.

Burns also stressed that a two-state solution was central to securing a lasting peace, as it was “crucial to offer some sense of hope for the day after, not just for Gaza, but for all Palestinians and Israelis”.

“It is a very elusive goal . . . but the only thing I would say is: show me what’s a better alternative,” he said.

Burns, 68, is a career diplomat now working as a spy, and Moore, 61, is a career intelligence officer who has previously worked as a diplomat. Both are Oxford university graduates who have led parallel professional lives working on Russian, Middle Eastern and Asian affairs.

On Russia, both men said there was no sign that Putin’s grip on power had lessened. But it would be wrong to “confuse a tight grip on power with a stable grip”, Moore said, especially as the Kursk incursion had “brought the war home to ordinary Russians”.

Advertisement

Both also said it would be wrong to take Putin’s threats of nuclear escalation lightly but that the west should not be unnecessarily intimidated. “Putin is a bully and is going to continue sabre-rattling from time to time,” Burns said.

Asked whether Iran had shipped short-range ballistic missiles to Russia, Burns said that doing so would “mark a dramatic escalation”.

Moore said that if Russia did use Iranian missiles in Ukraine, alongside the drones that Tehran had already supplied, it would be “very obvious”.

CIA director Bill Burns and MI6 chief Richard Moore
It was the first time the heads of MI6 and the CIA have appeared together at a public event in the history of their agencies’ 77-year intelligence sharing partnership © Em Fitzgerald/FT

Recent Russian sabotage operations across Europe were “reckless”, Moore said, describing Russian intelligence as “having gone a bit feral”. But “in the UK that is not new”, he added, referring to the attempted assassination of Russian double agent Sergei Skripal in Salisbury in 2018.

Asked if Russian intelligence might be conducting similar sabotage operations against the US by abetting illegal migration across the Mexico border, Burns said: “It’s something we are very sharply focused on. Part of that is a function of so many Russian agents [being] kicked out of Europe. So they are looking for somewhere to go instead.”

Despite the threat posed by Russia and the risk of conflagration in the Middle East, both Burns and Moore stressed that their biggest challenge was China’s rise.

Advertisement

Burns said the funds that the CIA devoted to China had tripled over the past three years to 20 per cent of the agency’s budget, and that he had travelled twice to China over the past year for talks to “avoid unnecessary misunderstandings”.

Moore described regular contact with his Chinese counterparts as “essential”.

Burns and Moore said one aim of their joint appearance was to underscore the strength of the UK-US relationship at a time of unprecedented global risks.

“The international world order . . . is under threat in a way we haven’t seen since the cold war,” both spy chiefs wrote in an article published on Saturday in the FT. Combating that risk “is at the very foundation of our special relationship . . . [which] can be relied upon into the next century,” they said.

The closest comparable occasion to their rare joint performance on Saturday was a news conference given by Ken McCallum, the head of British domestic intelligence MI5, and his US counterpart, Christopher Wray, the head of the FBI, in London in July 2022. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Dick Cheney's Reason for Endorsing Harris Over Trump

Published

on

Dick Cheney's Reason for Endorsing Harris Over Trump

Former Vice President and influential Republican Dick Cheney released a statement announcing his endorsement of Democratic nominee Vice President Kamala Harris for President. Speaking out against the Republican nominee, former President Donald Trump, Cheney said that he can “never be trusted with power again.”

“In our nation’s 248 year history, there has never been an individual who is a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump,” Cheney, 83, said in the statement shared on Sept. 6. “He tried to steal the last election using lies and violence to keep himself in power after the voters had rejected him,” he continued, referencing the events of Jan. 6, 2021.

Cheney, who served as Vice President under President George W. Bush between 2001 and 2009 went on to say that American citizens have a “duty” to prioritize the nation over partisan politics.

The statement came Friday, hours after one of Cheney’s daughters, former Wyoming Republican Representative Liz Cheney revealed on a panel at the Texas Tribune’s annual festival that her father will be voting for Harris. 

“If you think about the moment we’re in, and you think about how serious this moment is, my dad believes—and he said publicly—there has never been an individual in our country who is as grave a threat to our democracy as Donald Trump is,” she had said on the panel moderated by journalist Mark Leibovich.

Advertisement

Cheney’s endorsement marks the most high profile Republican politician to announce that they will vote for Harris over Republican nominee Trump, further spotlighting other former establishment Republicans who have yet to come out to endorse Trump during this run for the presidency—many of whom have been critical of Trump in the past—including his own former Vice President Mike Pence, former President George W. Bush, and former Republican nominee for President Mitt Romney.

The Harris campaign responded in a statement on Friday, supporting the endorsement.

“The Vice President is proud to have the support of Vice-President Cheney, and deeply respects his courage to put country over party,” said campaign chair Jen O’Malley Dillon, per the Washington Post.

Trump reacted to Cheney’s statement via a post shared on his own social media platform, Truth Social. He called the former Vice President an “irrelevant RINO”— which stands for Republican in Name Only and is a term used by some to describe Republicans who are viewed as being disloyal to the party.

“He’s the King of Endless, Nonsensical Wars, wasting Lives and Trillions of Dollars, just like Comrade Kamala Harris. I am the Peace President, and only I will stop World War III!,” Trump wrote.

Advertisement

Earlier in the week, Liz Cheney herself publicly supported Harris, announcing her endorsement for the Democratic nominee. “As a conservative and someone who believes in and cares deeply about the Constitution, I have thought deeply about this. And because of the danger that Donald Trump poses—not only am I not voting for Donald Trump, but I will be voting for Kamala Harris,” she said on Sept. 4 at a Sanford School of Public Policy event at Duke University in North Carolina.

The former Wyoming representative was ostracized by Trump-backed Republicans after she sat as one of 10 House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump over allegations that he incited the assault on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Continue Reading

News

Apple’s new iPhone will use Arm’s next-generation chip technology for AI

Published

on

Apple’s new iPhone will use Arm’s next-generation chip technology for AI

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Apple’s iPhone 16 will launch on Monday with a next-generation chip based on Arm’s newest design architecture, marking the latest step in the Cupertino tech giant’s push to bring generative artificial intelligence features to its smartphones. 

Apple will reveal the A18 chip at its event on Monday, with the company embracing SoftBank-owned Arm’s newest V9 chip design in its smartphones, sources familiar with the matter told the Financial Times.

Apple’s adoption of V9 for the iPhone — which makes up close to half of its total revenues — represents a boost for Arm, which has a multiyear licensing agreement with Apple. Arm chief executive Rene Haas has previously said V9 brings in twice the royalties of the previous generation V8.

Advertisement

Arm’s chip architecture refers to a set of instructions that provide the building blocks for the chip, with the UK-based, US-listed company securing revenue through both licensing and royalties. Arm launched V9 in 2021.

Apple is already using Arm’s V9 architecture for its newest line of M4 MacBook chips, which it announced in May. It said the M4 brought a “giant leap” in performance for the next generation of its PCs, expected to be announced in the coming months.

Apple and Arm declined to comment. Apple is in the process of recasting itself as an AI-focused company, announcing a number of features in June that it collectively calls “Apple Intelligence”. 

These include a smarter Siri, custom emoji generation and photo editing capabilities using its own in-house AI models, as well as a partnership giving users free access to OpenAI’s ChatGPT and a new “Private Cloud Compute” infrastructure aimed at securing user data if it leaves their phone to tap Apple’s models.

But the increased computer demands that come from running AI models on a pocket-sized device make advances in chip technology essential. Apple Intelligence can only work on the company’s most advanced iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max devices that have its A17 Pro chip, which uses Arm’s previous generation of architecture, the V8.

Advertisement

After a blockbuster IPO in September last year, Arm shares are up about 70 per cent since the start of 2024 as the company benefits from diversifying into PC, automotive and industrial chips and rides a wave of investment in AI chips. 

Investors will be watching the iPhone 16 launch closely for any further detail that Apple might give on when the features will land in front of consumers. The company has signalled that it will use a staggered approach, introducing some features first and adding other languages and regions later. 

A developer beta test of iOS 18.1, the update to iOS18 that will bring Apple Intelligence to the iPhone, is ongoing.

Continue Reading

Trending