Connect with us

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Assembly bill would cap home bakers' revenue at $20K

Published

on

Wisconsin Assembly bill would cap home bakers' revenue at K


Since 2017, Wisconsin’s home bakers have been able to sell a variety of homemade goods directly to consumers. But a new bill making its way through the state Legislature could limit the size of those cottage industries.

Assembly Bill 897 would cap sales revenue for home bakers at $20,000. Right now, people selling home-baked goods — or cottage food products — without a license have no limit to how much they can sell.

The bill would bring home bakers in line with home canners, who have had to operate under a $5,000 revenue cap since 2009 — though this bill would also extend the $20,000 revenue cap to home canners.

Stay informed on the latest news

Sign up for WPR’s email newsletter.

Advertisement

Jobea Murray is the board president of the Wisconsin Cottage Food Association. She said the proposed legislation would make it impossible for home bakers to earn a living.

“It would really limit our abilities as home bakers to run profitable businesses out of our homes, and utilizing our available resources of our home kitchens,” she recently told WPR’s “The Morning Show. “

Murray also owns and operates a home bakery called Jobea Bakes. As a mom of three young children, she said the flexibility of working from home has made her business possible.

Advertisement

“For my life, it’s such a great balance between being able to have a business and be a successful business owner and deciding what success means to me,” she said. “I don’t want the government to say that I can’t have my business out of my house once I hit a certain revenue.”

But supporters of the bill say the lack of regulation gives home-based sellers an unfair advantage over brick-and-mortar stores. 

State Rep. Rob Summerfield, R-Bloomer, is among the lawmakers to introduce the bill. In a statement, he said the $20,000 revenue cap was chosen as “the starting point dollar amount.”

“Since introducing this legislation and starting the committee process, I am looking into this dollar amount further and I am open to changes on the necessity of a cap and other provisions in the bill,” he said.

The bill would also add sesame to the list of ingredients that must be included on food labels. It would also require people selling “nonpotentially hazardous food” — or prepared foods that aren’t baked or heated — to register their business with the state Department of Trade and Consumer Protection if they make more than $2,000 per year.

Advertisement

A similar bill in the Senate would set the cap at $25,000.

The proposed bills are just the next step in an ongoing fight over the sale of home-baked goods.

In 2017, a ban on selling homemade baked goods without a license was deemed unconstitutional. At the time, Judge Duane Jorgenson found the ban primarily served business interests. 

Erica Smith, an attorney who represented the farmers in that lawsuit, previously told WPR that “(Jorgenson) found that it had zero connection to protecting the public health, and it only served to protect established commercial bakers from competition.”

Another ongoing lawsuit, filed in 2021, hopes to overturn a ban on selling shelf-stable items that aren’t baked.

Advertisement

“If we can win the appeal and we kind of get the second lawsuit settled, then it’ll be things like roasted coffee beans, dried pastas, Rice Krispies Treats, chocolate dipped pretzels, hot cocoa bombs … marshmallows would be a big one as well —items that you think of as being shelf-stable and non-hazardous and a very low risk to consumers but just don’t go in an oven,” Murray told “The Morning Show.”

As of January, the Wisconsin Cottage Food Association was still waiting for oral arguments to be scheduled after a series of appeals and stays.

Similar bills looking to regulate the sale of home-baked goods failed to pass in 2013, 2015 and 2017. 

The current Assembly bill received a public hearing in January but has yet to receive a vote.



Source link

Advertisement

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Lawmakers Propose Ranked Choice Voting for All Elections

Published

on

Wisconsin Lawmakers Propose Ranked Choice Voting for All Elections


BELOIT, Wis. — State Senator Mark Spreitzer (D-Beloit) and Representative Clinton Anderson (D-Beloit) introduced LRB-5709 on March 5, legislation that would implement ranked choice voting for state, federal, and local elections in Wisconsin.

The Wisconsin legislation would also eliminate the need for February primaries in nonpartisan elections.

Today, voters in Wisconsin almost never elect independent candidates, because the state’s elections are decided by first-past-the-post plurality voting (FPPV). In this system, a voter’s expression of preference is restricted to a single candidate. Each voter has just one choice, and if there are more than two candidates in the race, winning by plurality rather than majority is quite possible. 

Consequently, no matter how attractive an independent candidate may seem in the spring, summer, and early fall of an election year, he or she will be tarnished as a “spoiler” on Election Day and will almost certainly lose. 

Advertisement

This unfortunate situation reduces the supply of independent candidates willing to compete and perpetually forces Americans into one of two warring factions.

In contrast, ranked-choice voting (RCV) allows voters to express their true preference for each candidate by ranking them in order of preference. 

If no candidate wins an outright majority, the candidate with the lowest number of first-place votes is eliminated, and the second-preference votes of his or her supporters are redistributed to the remaining candidates. 

This “instant runoff” process continues until a majority winner is determined. Not only does RCV give voters “more voice” in elections, but it also has the potential to stop our political system from tearing us apart into two camps.

Senator Spreitzer called the bill an improvement over a system that forces strategic voting. 

Advertisement

“Under ranked choice voting, voters can vote for the candidate they like the most instead of having to strategically vote against the candidate they like the least,” he said.

“It is a system that encourages positive campaigns, ensures that winners have the support of a majority of voters, and allows more candidates to run without being seen as a waste of a vote or a spoiler.”

Representative Anderson pointed to existing models as evidence that the system works. 

“Ranked choice voting is not a new idea. It’s already working in states like Maine and Alaska, and in cities like New York City,” he said.

“Our current system rewards candidates for tearing each other down instead of building broad support. Ranked choice voting changes that. It encourages campaigns focused on issues and coalition-building, ensures nominees win with a true majority, and creates space for more voices beyond the two-party system.”

For the best analysis of the pernicious effects of a lack of competition in our political system, please read The Politics Industry by Wisconsinite Katherine M. Gehl and her co-author, Harvard Business School professor Michael E. Porter.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report: Austin Brown, S, Wisconsin

Published

on

2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report: Austin Brown, S, Wisconsin


It is never too early to evaluate defensive back depth for the 2026 NFL Draft. Todd Bowles’ defense relies heavily on versatile safeties who can rotate between deep coverage, the slot, and the box while maintaining physicality against the run. Identifying defensive backs who bring positional flexibility and strong tackling ability remains an important part of building depth in Tampa Bay’s secondary.

We are working through each position group this cycle. With that in mind, here is our report on Wisconsin safety Austin Brown.

Information

  • School: Wisconsin
  • Conference: Big Ten
  • Position: Safety
  • Height Weight: 6-1, 215 pounds
  • Class: Senior
  • Hometown: Johnston City, Illinois

Background

Brown developed into a reliable defensive presence during his time at Wisconsin, progressing from a special teams contributor early in his career to a full-time starter in the secondary. After appearing in all 13 games during his freshman season primarily on special teams, Brown steadily expanded his role within the Badgers’ defense over the next three seasons.

By 2024, Brown had earned eight starts and finished the season with 51 tackles, three pass breakups, one sack, and a forced fumble. One of his standout performances came against USC, where he recorded nine tackles and delivered a strip-sack while adding two tackles for loss. His ability to contribute in multiple ways helped establish him as a dependable defensive back in Wisconsin’s secondary.

Brown took on an even larger role in 2025, starting all 12 games and finishing the year with 52 tackles, one tackle for loss, and three passes defended. His most productive outing came against Alabama, where he recorded 11 tackles and a tackle for loss. Throughout the season, he showed versatility by aligning at safety, slot defender, and occasionally outside corner, depending on the defensive package.

Advertisement

Academically, Brown also earned Academic All-Big Ten honors multiple times during his career.

Notable Stats

  • 672 total snaps
  • 43 tackles
  • 14 assisted tackles
  • 3 passes defended
  • 1 pressure
  • 1 hurry

Brown’s 2024 season stands out as his most efficient evaluation year, highlighted by a 73.7 overall defensive grade and an 85.8 tackling grade according to PFF.

Pro Day Testing

Brown also helped himself significantly during Wisconsin’s pro day testing session. His 20 repetitions on the bench press would have ranked as the top mark among safeties at the 2026 NFL Combine, surpassing the leading total of 18 reps recorded by a safety in Indianapolis.

He followed that with a 43-inch vertical jump, which would have also placed him at the top of the safety group at the combine. Arizona safety Genesis Smith recorded a 42.5-inch vertical during combine testing.

Those testing numbers highlight Brown’s explosiveness and upper-body strength. While his production reflects a steady defensive contributor, the athletic testing shows physical tools that could help him get drafted and carve out a role at the next level.

Skills

  • High-effort defensive back
  • Versatile alignment experience across the secondary
  • Strong tackling production for the position
  • Physical build at 6-1, 215 pounds
  • Reliable short-area pursuit
  • Experience playing safety, slot, and outside coverage roles
  • Disciplined run support

Brown’s versatility stands out when evaluating his role in Wisconsin’s defense. He logged snaps at multiple positions in the secondary, including free safety, slot defender, and outside coverage assignments, depending on the defensive package.

His physical build allows him to contribute effectively against the run. Brown consistently works downhill to finish tackles and limit yards after contact. His tackling efficiency improved significantly between 2023 and 2024, which showed up in his strong tackling grade during the 2024 season.

Advertisement

In coverage, Brown shows awareness of zone concepts and the ability to stay involved around the football. While he does not profile as a pure center-field range safety, his instincts and effort allow him to remain active within structured defensive schemes.

Player Summary

Austin Brown projects as a Day 3 draft selection who offers value as a versatile defensive back capable of contributing in multiple alignments. His combination of size, tackling reliability, and positional flexibility gives him a pathway to carve out a role as a rotational safety and special teams contributor early in his career.

In Tampa Bay, Brown would profile as a developmental depth option in Todd Bowles’ secondary. His experience playing multiple positions in the defensive backfield fits well with the variety of roles required in Bowles’ defense, giving him the potential to grow into a dependable rotational defender while contributing on special teams.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

[Photo Story] Penn State Men’s Hockey Disappoints Against Wisconsin

Published

on

[Photo Story] Penn State Men’s Hockey Disappoints Against Wisconsin


With the last regular-season series, No. 6 Penn State men’s hockey dropped both games to No. 11 Wisconsin over the weekend. The Nittany Lions were outplayed both nights, wrapping up their season to finish with a record of 20-12-2.

Of course, our photographers were at Pegula Ice Arena to capture all the action. Let’s take a look.

Wisconsin was dominant in both games against Penn State, winning 7-3 and 5-2, respectively. The Badgers outshot the Nittany Lions 41-31 on Thursday and 37-25 on Friday. Charlie Cerrato made a notable appearance. He played his first game back on Friday after being injured January 9 against Minnesota.

In Thursday’s game, the Nittany Lions fought for the first two periods, but the Badgers’ goal opened the third period and killed all of the momentum. In Friday’s game, the Nittany Lions fell behind from the very start and never built momentum to overcome the deficit.

Advertisement

Penn State now goes on to the Big Ten Tournament, where it will go up against Minnesota at home. Puck is set for 7 p.m. on Wednesday, March 11.

Please choose an option below.

Sign up for our e-mail newsletter:

OR

Ella is a second-year Telecommunications major from Miami, Florida. She enjoys taking photos, listening to all genres of music, coffee, and has become a self proclaimed grandma. If needed, you can contact her through email at [email protected] or on Twitter @ellawehm

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending