Connect with us

Wisconsin

Washington State gets rare nonconference visit from Power Five opponent hosting No. 19 Wisconsin

Published

on

Washington State gets rare nonconference visit from Power Five opponent hosting No. 19 Wisconsin


Opportunities to host big-name teams in nonconference games don’t come around often for Washington State. In fact, it’s been a quarter-century since it last happened.

Tucked away among the wheat fields and rolling hills of eastern Washington, Washington State has rarely been a destination for college football programs looking for top-tier nonconference opportunities.

But No. 19 Wisconsin was willing to take on the challenge of playing on a late summer afternoon on the Palouse on Saturday. In doing so, the Badgers will be the first nonconference Power Five opponent to visit Washington State in 25 years.

“The biggest part is there will be different distractions as we go throughout the week. And our No. 1 job as a coaching staff and players in particular is to narrow that focus,” Washington State coach Jake Dickert said. “Everyone wants to be their best every Saturday and that doesn’t change just because a top-20 team is here in Pullman. We have the same standards of expectations of how we do everything.”

Advertisement

As much as Dickert might want to put blinders on his team, this week is a big deal for the Cougars. Illinois in the 1998 season opener was the last Power Five team to come to Pullman for a nonconference game. Mix in the latest round of college realignment that has left Washington State searching for a new home and the Cougars upsetting Wisconsin last year in Madison, and the potential is there for an amped environment.

“There’s – I don’t want to say a personal vendetta – but there’s definitely a lot of passion going into this game,” Wisconsin linebacker Maema Njongmeta said. “We’re excited to face them. We feel when you play a good opponent, it brings out the best in you.”

While Washington State’s 17-14 win at Wisconsin last year may remain fresh in the minds of the Badgers, it’s what both teams did in Week 1 that’s more relevant this time.

The Cougars (1-0) rolled in their opener, knocking off Colorado State 50-24 on the road behind a terrific performance from quarterback Cameron Ward. Ward threw for 451 yards and three touchdowns, and rushed for another 40 yards and one TD.

Wisconsin (1-0) is supposed to look more like Washington State this season, bringing the “Air Raid” offense to Madison. But in the opening win against Buffalo, it looked more like Wisconsin of the past as running backs Chez Mellusi (157 yards) and Braelon Allen (141) had big games on the ground in the 38-17 victory.

Advertisement

“This is not that Wisconsin team that I know growing up,” said Dickert, a Wisconsin native. “The biggest thing is a new staff, they brought new schemes and systems that they’re still getting comfortable with. But the identity of Wisconsin football is they’re big, fast, tough, play aggressive, play with tons of effort.”

ON THE ROAD … AGAIN

Wisconsin hasn’t ventured away from home for very many nonconference games in the past decade. The trip to Pullman will be just the third true nonconference road game for Wisconsin in the past 10 years.

The Badgers won at South Florida to open the 2019 season and at BYU in 2017. Their last nonconference road loss came in 2013 when the Badgers lost 32-30 at Arizona State.

“Whatever you have going into the game, the team that you have is all you need,” Wisconsin QB Tanner Mordecai said. “The whole stadium is obviously rooting against you, but all you need is all the guys in the locker room, all the guys you traveled there with is all you need to win the game.”

RUN AROUND

While Washington State put up plenty of points in the opener, it would like to get more from its run game, particularly Wisconsin transfer Nakia Watson. The Cougars had just 90 yards rushing against Colorado State and Watson was held to 15 yards on seven carries.

Advertisement

Watson scored both touchdowns for Washington State in last year’s upset of the Badgers.

HONORING LEACH

Washington State will honor former coach Mike Leach as part of Saturday’s home opener. Leach passed away in December but was at the helm of a major turnaround for the Cougars program in the previous decade. Leach took over at Washington State in 2012 and was 55-47 with six bowl game appearances before leaving to take over at Mississippi State after the 2019 season.

___

AP college football: https://apnews.com/hub/college-football and https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-football-poll





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wisconsin

WR Trech Kekahuna Talks Leaving UW, Felt Underappreciated By The Staff

Published

on

WR Trech Kekahuna Talks Leaving UW, Felt Underappreciated By The Staff


MADISON, Wis. – Trech Kekahuna’s ears perked up when the University of Wisconsin sold him on the Air Raid. Once excited about developing into the Badgers’ top receiver in a pro-style offense, the former four-star prospect dreamt about the possibilities he could achieve in UW’s aerial attack with his ability as a pass catcher and natural speed to generate yards after the catch. That didn’t turn out to be the case.

“I just didn’t like how things were going,” Kekahuna told BadgerBlitz.com. “I wanted to try something new.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Here is the 2025 recruiting class that has signed with Wisconsin football

Published

on

Here is the 2025 recruiting class that has signed with Wisconsin football


play

MADISON – Wednesday, Dec. 4, is the first day of the early signing period for college football. Here are 24 players who signed with Wisconsin on Wednesday morning. The early signing period ends Friday, Dec. 6.

Hometown: Charlotte, North Carolina.

Advertisement

Height: 6-1. Weight: 180.

Carter Smith, quarterback

Hometown: Fort Myers, Florida.

Height: 6-3. Weight: 185.

Jaylen Williams, defensive lineman

Hometown: Palatine, Illinois.

Height: 6-6. Weight: 250

Advertisement

Emmett Bork, tight end

Hometown: Oconomowoc, Wisconsin.

Height: 6-6. Weight: 245.

Drayden Pavey, defensive tackle

Hometown: Cincinnati, Ohio

Height: 6-3. Weight: 294.

Advertisement

Xavier Ukponu, defensive tackle

Hometown: Denton, Texas.

Height: 6-3. Weight: 300.

Hardy Watts, offensive lineman

Hometown: Brookline, Massachusetts.

Height: 6-5. Weight: 305.

Nicolas Clayton, defensive end  

Hometown: Gainesville, Florida.

Advertisement

Height: 6-5. Weight: 215.

Eugene Hilton Jr., receiver

Hometown: Zionsville, Indiana.

Height: 6-1. Weight: 175.

Mason Posa, inside linebacker

Hometown: Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Height: 6-3. Weight: 210.

Advertisement

Torin Pettaway, defensive lineman

Hometown: Middleton, Wisconsin.

Height: 6-5. Weight: 285.

Nizyi Davis, tight end

Hometown: Indianapolis.

Height: 6-6. Weight: 210.

Jahmare Washington, defensive back

Hometown: Chicago.

Advertisement

Height: 6-2. Weight: 170.

Nolan Davenport, offensive lineman

Hometown: Massillon, Ohio.

Height: 6-6. Weight: 280.

Logan Powell, offensive lineman

Hometown: Phoenix.     

Height: 6-5. Weight: 290.

Advertisement

Luke Emmerich, safety

Hometown: Monticello, Minnesota.

Height: 6-1. Weight: 195.

Cam Clark, offensive lineman

Hometown: Dexter, Michigan.

Height: 6-7. Weight: 290.

Grant Dean, safety

Hometown: Neenah, Wisconsin.     

Advertisement

Height: 6-1. Weight: 190.

Sam Lateju, outside linebacker

Hometown: Lagos, Nigeria.

Height: 6-5. Weight: 230.

Jaimier Scott, defensive back

Hometown: Cincinnati.

Height: 6-1. Weight: 179.

Advertisement

Cooper Catalano, inside linebacker

Hometown: Germantown, Wisconsin.

Height: 6-2. Weight: 215.

Michael Roeske, offensive lineman

Hometown: Wautoma, Wisconsin.

Height: 6-8. Weight: 295.

Remington Moss, defensive back

Hometown: Fredericksburg, Virginia.

Advertisement

Height: 6-3. Weight: 192.

Landyn Locke, quarterback

Hometown: Rockwall, Texas.

Height: 6-4. Weight: 185.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Takeaways from No.11 Wisconsin's 67-64 Loss to Michigan

Published

on

Takeaways from No.11 Wisconsin's 67-64 Loss to Michigan


Takeaways from No.11 Wisconsin’s 67-64 Loss to Michigan

MADISON, Wis. – Michigan 7-footers Vlad Goldin and Danny Wolf were working on creating a nickname for their tandem, a partnership that could potentially cause matchup nightmares throughout the Big Ten schedule.

Here’s one they can workshop – Badger Bashers.

Goldin and Wolf controlled the low post, picked apart Wisconsin’s defensive mistakes, and made Wisconsin center Steven Crowl a non-factor in a 67-64 victory at the Kohl Center.

Advertisement

It was a disappointing setback for the Badgers (8-1, 0-1 Big Ten), which shut down Michigan guards but struggled to hit open shots consistently against the Wolverines’ top-10-rated defense. It doesn’t get any easier for the Badgers considering No.5 Marquette has a defense that is rated five spots better than the Wolverines.

“I think we’re going to respond great,” guard John Blackwell said. “We have a great group of vets who have been through this. You’re not going to win every game. We’re going to be just fine. We’re going to build off this loss, take it on the chin, and keep moving forward.”

Here are my takeaways from the Kohl Center.

Advertisement

Goldin and Wolf were superior to Crowl and Winter

In a battle of teams with 7-foot frontcourts, it was no contest.

Wolf is described as a 7-foot point guard because of how he handles basketball. Goldin is all muscle in the low post. Together, they pummeled Wisconsin relentlessly in the second half once Crowl got into foul trouble and created a mismatch problem.

Wolf was active early with nine points, six rebounds, and five blocks. Goldin struggled around the rim in going 2-for-7. Both players exploited UW’s interior with Wolf going 4-for-6 with five assists and Goldin going 7-for-9, mostly on dunks at the rim. The duo scored 28 of Michigan’s 41 second-half points and 44 of its 67, as Crowl and Winter got lost guarding the pick-and-roll or not creating enough resistance on the player rolling toward the basket.

That was evident late as Goldin got behind Wisconsin’s defense for easy baskets at the rim to allow Michigan to answer UW’s offense and take control over the final three minutes.

“We weren’t physical enough,” forward Nolan Winter said. “We weren’t intent on the ball screen with what we were doing. It’s on both of us as bigs. We know it. We know we’ve got to be better, and Steven knows he’s got to be out of foul trouble. We need him out there and the presence he brings us. It’s poor communication.

Advertisement

“They’re two great 7-footers coming off ball screens. They know what they’re doing, but we got to handle that a lot better.”

Crowl and Winter were hoping Tuesday would be their big coming-out party. The end of the first half showed some promise. With John Tonje on the bench because of foul trouble for the final 6:02, Crowl and Winter helped the Badgers go on a 13-6 run entering the half largely by creating and finding space.

Blackwell drew a double team on the low block and split with a bounce pass to Crowl for an easy finish off the glass. Kamari McGee successfully probed the double team as well, drawing Goldin away from the basket to stop dribble penetration before bouncing a pass to Winter. With guard Tre Donaldson late on the switch, Winter had an easy dunk at the rim. With Blackwell leading the break on the next possession, the sophomore attacked the right block, drew the double team, and passed to Winter for another slam.

That allowed Wisconsin to take a six-point lead in the locker room, even though the Badgers shot 32.3 percent in the first half. A lot of those actions were cut off in the second half, as the Badgers went 4-for-14 around the rim and UW’s duo was only 1-for-4 from the floor.

The defensive miscues don’t all fall on the forwards. Wisconsin guards struggled at times guarding rollers and winning individual matchups. The Badgers held Michigan to 6-for-25 from three-point range, but the 18-9 run to start the second half was created by Michigan attacking the paint and converting, wiping out UW’s six-point halftime lead.

Advertisement

“They’re both vets and have been around this for a while,” said Winter, as Michigan shot 61.5 percent in the second half. “Their games really complement each other well. The ball screens created some issues for our defense. They executed really well and they’re both really talented, find one another and finish.”

Blackwell’s Leadership Emerging 

Tonje led Wisconsin in scoring for the seventh time with 18 points (12 in the second half), but the senior didn’t play in control as he’s done in many games throughout the season. Blackwell was a different story with 16 points and nine rebounds, including his work creating off the offensive glass

Blackwell had four offensive rebounds through the first seven games of the season and equaled that total against Michigan, including two on a stretch that showed he’s on his way to becoming the future of Wisconsin’s program.

On consecutive second-half possessions, Blackwell boxed out guard Roddy Gayle Jr. on three-point attempts, secured the loose ball, and finished at the rim. When he hit a step-back jumper on the next trip, Blackwell’s 6-0 run gave UW a 47-44 lead.

UW finished with 16 offensive rebounds that led to 12 second-chance points, a big boost for a team that entered the night 291st nationally in offensive rebounding (9.0 per game).

Advertisement

“His ability to gobble up offensive rebounders and finish in there,” head coach Greg Gard said. “He played a lot of minutes. We needed him on the floor. He did a lot of good things in the second half.”

Blackwell didn’t play perfectly, which his season-high five turnovers would indicate. UW was well under the 17.3 turnovers Michigan forced a game, but the 10 UW turnovers led to 13 Michigan points.

Klesmit in A Deep Freeze

Gard vividly remembered how Max Klesmit drove into the lane and made a play in the paint with a turnaround jumper, putting the Badgers up 64-61 with 2:37 remaining. He likely remembers it because it was the last point UW scored or because it was Klesmit’s only second-half field goal.

Klesmit went 3-for-14 from the floor and 1-for-9 from three, numbers that aren’t pretty but better than his second-half stat line of 1-for-9 and 0-for-6.

The senior missed shots on three consecutive possessions that would have tied the game or put Wisconsin ahead. He badly missed one and barely drew iron on another.

Advertisement

“I think they are good shots, honestly,” Blackwell said. “Max, Kamari, JT, keep shooting the ball. They are great looks. They are going to fall sooner. I was fine with our looks. We just got to get back in the gym and get more reps.”

Wisconsin shot a season-worst 18.8 percent (6-for-27) on threes, a lack of perimeter success that prevented the Badgers from spreading the floor. Not spreading Michigan out prevented the Badgers from attacking gaps and getting to the free throw line, where they went 14-for-19 (the third-fewest makes of the season).

Gard thought Wisconsin forced at least one possession down the stretch, but that Klesmit had open looks. Klesmit’s three-point miss with 22 seconds left was originally supposed to be a possession where the Badgers went for two, but Blackwell drew two defenders and kicked the ball out to the senior.

“Max has made those shots before,” Gard said. “He’s in a slump right now. We got to help him get out of it.”

Gard also bemoaned Winter’s missed free throw with UW down three in three seconds left. With the plan to make the first and miss the second, Gard said UW practiced the exact scenario on Monday and executed the drill.

Advertisement

But the bigger worry is Klesmit, who is shooting career-worst overall (32.6 percent) and from three-point range (25.4). Over the last four games, Klesmit is 9-for-39 from the floor (23.1 percent) and 5-for-28 from the perimeter (17.9).

“You got to keep shooting,” Gard said. “Work on it. You can’t be hesitant, can’t be gun shy. You got to keep working stuff in practice, getting extra shots, just got to work your way out of it.”

By The Numbers

21.2 – Michigan’s first-half shooting percentage. The Wolverines finished at 39.0 percent after going 16-for-26 in the second half.

7:42 – Number of minutes the Wolverines went without a field goal to end the first half

3:02 – Longest field goal drought for Michigan in the second half

Advertisement

19 – Fast break points for Michigan, which outscored the Badgers by 15 in transition

5 – Shot attempts by Crowl, only three of which came from two-point range.

3 – Michigan’s winning streak in the series, tied for the longest against the Badgers since 2000.

_________________________________________________

*Chat about this article in The Badgers’ Den

Advertisement

*Check out our videos, interviews, and Q&As on our YouTube channel

*Subscribe and listen to the BadgerBlitz.com podcast (as seen on Apple, Google, Spotify and wherever you listen to podcasts)

*Follow us on Twitter: @McNamaraRivals, @TheBadgerNation, @RaulV45, @seamus_rohrer, @DonnieSlusher_

*Like us on Facebook





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending