Wisconsin

How Wisconsin women’s basketball erased a 17-point deficit to beat Penn State

Published

2 years ago

February 11, 2024

How Wisconsin women’s basketball erased a 17-point deficit to beat Penn State

MADISON – Wisconsin women’s basketball coach Marisa Moseley issued a challenge to her team after its blowout loss to Northwestern last week and after a slow start Sunday the Badgers answered the call.

UW trailed by 17 in the second quarter and by 14 at the half before a super-charged second half that led to a 69-64 victory over Penn State front of 4,519 at the Kohl Center. It was the Badgers’ biggest comeback victory of the season and a much-needed outcome for a team that lost by 24 points to Northwestern last Sunday.

“What we talked about after our last loss was that we have a decision to make…,” Moseley said. “It’s really cool to see them really decide to go this direction and really take charge, You’re in charge of your own destiny in the way that you play. It was really cool to see them take another step towards that this afternoon.”

The Badgers (11-11, 4-8 Big Ten) locked down defensively, received another big-time performance from sophomore Serah Williams and turned off the faucet of turnovers that played such a large role in the team’s slow start.

The result was Wisconsin’s most impressive win of the season. Penn State (16-8, 7-6) entered play tied for fourth in the Big Ten with four of its wins over teams that beat the Badgers this season.

BOX SCORE: Wisconsin 69, Penn State 64

Williams, the team’s 6-foot-4 sophomore forward, extended her streak of double-doubles to nine straight. Her 31 points and 15 rebounds each tied her career highs. She also blocked three shots and had four steals.

No other Badger scored in double figures, but there were some quality stat lines.

Sophomore guard Ronnie Porter: eight points, five assists, five steals; senior guard Natalie Leuzinger: seven points, three assists, zero turnovers; senior Halle Douglass: eight points on 3-for-3 shooting and six rebounds; and sophomore Sania Copeland: six points, five assists, four steals.

Defensively the Badgers held Penn State to 16.7% (2-for-12) shooting in the third quarter and 29.7% for the second half. After a scoring 40 points in the first half, the Nittany Lions took almost 15 minutes to score 10 during the second half.

Penn State’s inability to score also provided it fewer chances to set up its press, which played a big role in the Nittany Lions’ 21 fast break points. And even when the press was on UW handled it much better during the final 20 minutes.

Graduate student Ashley Owusu, a 6-0 guard, had 24 points for Penn State, 16 in the first half. Junior guard Leilani Kapinus, a graduate of Madison Memorial High School, finished with 11 points and nine rebounds.

The effort of those players and their teammates wasn’t a match for UW resolve on this day.

“The past few games we’ve been down a lot, but we learned from those games and then kind of forget about them,” Leuzinger said. “This was a whole new game, especially in the second half.”

Here is a look at how the Badgers scored the comeback.

Fast start to second half allows UW to cut into deficit quickly

Wisconsin trailed, 40-26, at the half but scored 13 points during the first 4 minutes of the second half to get the deficit down to three points. For the sake of comparison, the Badgers managed 12 points in the first quarter and 14 in the second.

The Badgers had come all the way back by the 4:46 mark of the quarter when they grabbed their first lead of the night, 43-42, on a layup by Williams that came off a Porter steal.

The beginning of the first half was a 180-degree turn from the start of the game when Penn State hit its first seven shots and led by 11 points after 3 ½ minutes.

“Just being able to come out like that it just shows that we’re capable of doing that in any situation like that during the game,” Leuzinger said. “It just not only brings a lot of momentum for this game but for the next couple of games we have.”

Serah Williams’ dominance showed in the second half

Williams’ stat line from the second half was impressiver: 23 points on 8-for-9 shooting with nine rebounds, two blocks and two steals. She also didn’t turn the ball over in the second half after having four in the first half, an improvement she credited to better communication in the second half.

Her production was consistent throughout the second half. She had 11 points and hit five of six shots in the third quarter. In the fourth, she had 12 points and went 3 for 3 from the floor and 6 for 6 from the free throw line.

Her ninth double-double moved her out of a tie for the all-time mark by Milwaukee native Theresa Huff, who set the mark during the 1982-83 season.

“I was just trying to play my game and be consistent with how I play all season,” Williams said. “I know if I just bring that intensity I can help my team the best way I can. … I didn’t really catch the ball in the paint today. It was just running and trusting my teammates to get me the ball where I could (make a move).”

Wisconsin did the job defensively down the stretch

Wisconsin went from trailing by 17 to leading by eight, 55-47, with 8 minutes left. Penn State, however, was due for a run and it came through with 10-2 spurt to tie the game with 3:20 to play. The game was also tied at 60 with 2:54 to go.

The Badgers closed the game with stops on five of their final seven defensive possessions. Four of those stops came when it was a one-possession game.

UW also went 7 for 7 from the line with freshman D’Yanis Jimenez giving her team its final margin of victory with two free throws with 3 seconds left.

“I wrote on the board before the game the word relentless and in my pre-game speech I told our team in order to win this game we have to be relentless,” Moseley said. “Relentless in the way we pursue the ball. Relentless in how we play defense, taking care of the ball. Every loose ball, every hustle play had to be ours … I couldn’t be more proud of the complete team effort. It really did take the entire group.”

Source link

Click to comment

Wisconsin

How many homes could be built in Northeast Wisconsin in 2026?

Published

9 hours ago

May 10, 2026

Press Room

How many homes could be built in Northeast Wisconsin in 2026?

(Stacker) – Homebuilding plays a critical role in maintaining a steady housing supply and keeping prices at sustainable levels. As the U.S. population grows, more housing is needed to meet demand. Since the Great Recession, construction has lagged well behind what is needed, which is one of the main reasons home prices are so high today.

Supply has slowly increased over the past few years but is still below what is needed for the market to balance out. Until that gap closes, prices are likely to remain elevated, and many buyers will likely struggle to afford a home.

So, how many homes are getting built in Northeast Wisconsin in 2026? Is construction increasing or decreasing?

Redfin Real Estate analyzed the rate of housing permits issued in the cities of Appleton, Fond du Lac, Green Bay, Oshkosh and Sheboygan over the past 13 months to find out.

Appleton

Appleton housing permits January 2025-January 2026(WBAY)

2026

January – Building permits: 29 (1.2 per 10,000 population)

2025

January – Building permits: 57 (2.3 per 10,000 population)
February – Building permits: 52 (2.1 per 10k)
March – Building permits: 46 (1.9 per 10k)
April – Building permits: 74 (3.0 per 10k)
May – Building permits: 74 (3.0 per 10k)
June – Building permits: 60 (2.5 per 10k)
July – Building permits: 183 (7.5 per 10k)
August – Building permits: 53 (2.2 per 10k)
September – Building permits: 128 (5.3 per 10k)
October – Building permits: 139 (5.7 per 10k)
November – Building permits: 86 (3.5 per 10k)
December – Building permits: 246 (10.1 per 10k)

Fond du Lac

2026

January – Building permits: 10 (1.0 per 10,000 population)

2025

January – Building permits: 12 (1.2 per 10,000 population)
February – Building permits: 12 (1.2 per 10k)
March – Building permits: 11 (1.1 per 10k)
April – Building permits: 20 (1.9 per 10k)
May – Building permits: 21 (2.0 per 10k)
June – Building permits: 15 (1.4 per 10k)
July – Building permits: 17 (1.6 per 10k)
August – Building permits: 16 (1.5 per 10k)
September – Building permits: 21 (2.0 per 10k)
October – Building permits: 19 (1.8 per 10k)
November – Building permits: 11 (1.1 per 10k)
December – Building permits: 20 (1.9 per 10k)

Green Bay

2026

January – Building permits: 304 (9.3 per 10,000 population)

2025

January – Building permits: 84 (2.6 per 10,000 population)
February – Building permits: 67 (2.0 per 10k)
March – Building permits: 97 (3.0 per 10k)
April – Building permits: 166 (5.1 per 10k)
May – Building permits: 141 (4.3 per 10k)
June – Building permits: 93 (2.8 per 10k)
July – Building permits: 185 (5.6 per 10k)
August – Building permits: 120 (3.7 per 10k)
September – Building permits: 88 (2.7 per 10k)
October – Building permits: 155 (4.7 per 10k)
November – Building permits: 156 (4.8 per 10k)
December – Building permits: 62 (1.9 per 10k)

Oshkosh

2026

January – Building permits: 16 (0.9 per 10,000 population)

2025

January – Building permits: 15 (0.9 per 10,000 population)
February – Building permits: 23 (1.3 per 10k)
March – Building permits: 22 (1.3 per 10k)
April – Building permits: 46 (2.7 per 10k)
May – Building permits: 61 (3.6 per 10k)
June – Building permits: 54 (3.1 per 10k)
July – Building permits: 77 (4.5 per 10k)
August – Building permits: 26 (1.5 per 10k)
September – Building permits: 87 (5.1 per 10k)
October – Building permits: 125 (7.3 per 10k)
November – Building permits: 16 (0.9 per 10k)
December – Building permits: 79 (4.6 per 10k)

Sheboygan

2026

January – Building permits: 3 (0.3 per 10,000 population)

2025

January – Building permits: 13 (1.1 per 10,000 population)
February – Building permits: 31 (2.6 per 10k)
March – Building permits: 27 (2.3 per 10k)
April – Building permits: 9 (0.8 per 10k)
May – Building permits: 19 (1.6 per 10k)
June – Building permits: 22 (1.9 per 10k)
July – Building permits: 11 (0.9 per 10k)
August – Building permits: 11 (0.9 per 10k)
September – Building permits: 15 (1.3 per 10k)
October – Building permits: 174 (14.7 per 10k)
November – Building permits: 13 (1.1 per 10k)
December – Building permits: 38 (3.2 per 10k)

Nationally

2026

January – Building permits: 1,386,000 (44.2 per 10,000 population)

2025

January – Building permits: 1,460,000 (46.6 per 10,000 population)
February – Building permits: 1,454,000 (44.2 per 10k)
March – Building permits: 1,481,000 (47.2 per 10k)
April – Building permits: 1,422,000 (45.4 per 10k)
May – Building permits: 1,394,000 (44.5 per 10k)
June – Building permits: 1,393,000 (44.4 per 10k)
July – Building permits: 1,362,000 (43.5 per 10k)
August – Building permits: 1,330,000 (42.4 per 10k)
September – Building permits: 1,425,000 (45.1 per 10k)
October – Building permits: 1,411,000 (45.0 per 10k)
November – Building permits: 1,388,000 (44.3 per 10k)
December – Building permits: 1,455,000 (46.4 per 10k)

National permit data is a seasonally adjusted annual rate; metro-level permit data is the non-seasonally adjusted total number of permits issued per month.

Source link

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for May 9, 2026

Published

21 hours ago

May 10, 2026

Press Room

Wisconsin Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for May 9, 2026

The Wisconsin Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at May 9, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Powerball numbers from May 9 drawing

15-41-46-47-56, Powerball: 22, Power Play: 2

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 3 numbers from May 9 drawing

Midday: 2-4-4

Evening: 8-4-5

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from May 9 drawing

Midday: 7-3-4-7

Evening: 3-3-5-1

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning All or Nothing numbers from May 9 drawing

Midday: 03-04-05-06-07-09-12-13-14-16-19

Evening: 03-08-09-12-13-14-15-17-20-21-22

Check All or Nothing payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Badger 5 numbers from May 9 drawing

05-14-18-25-27

Check Badger 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning SuperCash numbers from May 9 drawing

02-09-16-28-32-35, Doubler: Y

Check SuperCash payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Megabucks numbers from May 9 drawing

02-20-36-39-40-41

Check Megabucks payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

Prizes up to $599: Can be claimed at any Wisconsin Lottery retailer.
Prizes from $600 to $199,999: Can be claimed in person at a Lottery Office. By mail, send the signed ticket and a completed claim form available on the Wisconsin Lottery claim page to: Prizes, PO Box 777 Madison, WI 53774.
Prizes of $200,000 or more: Must be claimed in person at the Madison Lottery office. Call the Lottery office prior to your visit: 608-261-4916.

Can Wisconsin lottery winners remain anonymous?

No, according to the Wisconsin Lottery. Due to the state’s open records laws, the lottery must, upon request, release the name and city of the winner. Other information about the winner is released only with the winner’s consent.

When are the Wisconsin Lottery drawings held?

Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
Mega Millions: 10:00 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
Super Cash: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
Pick 3 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
Pick 3 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
Pick 4 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
Pick 4 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
All or Nothing (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
All or Nothing (Evening): 9 p.m. CT daily.
Megabucks: 9:00 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
Badger 5: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.

That lucky feeling: Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.

Feeling lucky? WI man wins $768 million Powerball jackpot **

WI Lottery history: Top 10 Powerball and Mega Million jackpots

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Wisconsin editor. You can send feedback using this form.

Source link

Wisconsin

Wisconsin multi-county police chase, 2 people from Illinois arrested

Published

1 day ago

May 9, 2026

Press Room

Wisconsin multi-county police chase, 2 people from Illinois arrested

article

Fond du Lac County Sheriff’s Office

FOND DU LAC COUNTY, Wis. – Two people from Illinois were arrested following a police chase that started in Fond du Lac County and ended in Winnebago County on Friday, May 8.

Initial traffic stop

What we know:

According to the Fond du Lac County Sheriff’s Office, just after 1 p.m. the sheriff’s office got an alert for a stolen vehicle out of Illinois heading northbound on I-41 from County Road Y.

It was learned that the vehicle was involved in two different police chases in the past week in Illinois, but had eluded officers each time.

FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android

A short time later, a deputy spotted the vehicle on I-41 near Winnebago Street. The deputy continued to follow the suspect vehicle northbound, waiting for more deputies to get into position to attempt a high-risk traffic stop. Once those deputies were in position, a high-risk traffic stop was conducted. The vehicle initially pulled over and stopped, but right after deputies got out of their squad cars and started telling the people to get out of the vehicle, it instead fled northbound on I-41.

Chase into Winnebago County

What we know:

The chase went into Winnebago County, with the vehicle failing to pullover and instead speeding up. As the chase continued, the vehicle continued driving recklessly, passing by other vehicles on the interstate, including passing on the shoulder and weaving between vehicles, all at a high rate of speed.

The vehicle exited I-41 and ran three red lights. The chase continued southbound on State Highway 26, with the vehicle continuing to pass vehicles at a high rate of speed on the two-lane highway.

The vehicle then went off the road and drove through the yard of a home before circling around in the yard, traveling through the ditch, and reentering the highway going northbound. It then went into a field near County Road Z and Clay Road.

As a sergeant with the sheriff’s office was moving in to perform a Pursuit Intervention Technique (PIT Maneuver), the suspect vehicle went into reverse and rammed the front of the squad. The vehicle then attempted to leave the field by traveling through a ditch and back up onto the road, where another sheriff’s squad ended the chase by intentionally striking the vehicle and pushing it off the road and back into the ditch.

The vehicle rolled over in the ditch, came to rest upright, but was then disabled and could not move. Two people got out of the vehicle and were taken into custody. The vehicle started on fire and a fire department had to respond to extinguish the fire. Both people from the vehicle were evaluated by medical personnel on scene.

SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News

Facing charges

What we know:

The driver of the vehicle was identified as a 23-year-old man from Des Plaines, Illinois. He was taken to the Fond du Lac County Jail on the following charges:

Fleeing/Eluding an Officer
1st-Degree Reckless Endangering Safety (2 Counts)
Resisting/Obstructing Officer
Delivering Illegal Articles by Inmate (Ecstasy Pills).

The driver’s criminal history in Illinois was flagged as armed and dangerous with previous weapons offenses, dangerous drug offenses, and criminal damage to property.

The passenger of the vehicle was identified as a 23-year-old woman from Franklin Park, Illinois. She was taken to the Fond du Lac County Jail on the following charges: