Connect with us

Wisconsin

Does Wisconsin have laws regulating data centers? What to know about the latest projects, environmental concerns

Published

on

Does Wisconsin have laws regulating data centers? What to know about the latest projects, environmental concerns


play

  • The rise of the digital economy and AI has increased the need for data centers, with 46 currently in Wisconsin and more planned.
  • Data centers have drawn criticism for their significant water and energy consumption, with some using as much water as a small city.
  • Many data center operators lack transparency, often signing non-disclosure agreements with local governments about their water usage.
  • A proposed bill in Wisconsin aims to increase transparency by requiring data centers to report their water and energy use.

While a growing digital economy and use of artificial intelligence has increased the need for physical facilities to store, manage and process data, there is currently little to no regulation in place to mitigate environmental impacts and increase transparency for data processing centers in Wisconsin.

Data centers have drawn criticism from some community members over environmental concerns about sustainability because the facilities require an enormous amount of water and energy to operate. Fewer than one-third track water usage, and, often, data centers sign nondisclosure agreements with local governments on water use.

Advertisement

Midwest states like Wisconsin, Illinois and Michigan have become a popular choice for housing data centers due to their close proximity to the Great Lakes, which are seen as an endless freshwater supply.

According to datacentermap.com, Wisconsin is currently home to 46 data processing centers, or data centers, with plans for more. The facilities are concentrated in southeastern Wisconsin, particularly in the Milwaukee area, which, for now, is home to 20 data centers.

Here’s your guide to data centers in Wisconsin.

Does Wisconsin have laws regulating data centers?

Currently, the only mention of data centers in state statute is for tax incentives, however, a newly proposed bill would create rules to fill a “legislative void” by increasing transparency surrounding massive data processing and storage facilities.

In a Nov. 6 memo, bill co-sponsor Sen. Jodi Habush Sinykin, D-Whitefish Bay, said the legislation aims to hold data centers and the companies behind them accountable by requiring more transparency around water usage and energy consumption. Additionally, the bill would require increased renewable energy sources across the state, prioritize good-paying, local jobs and insulate ratepayers from the costs of these projects.

Advertisement

While a lot of decisions surrounding data centers originate at the local level of government, Habush Sinykin said in a Nov. 6 press release the state Legislature also “has a responsibility to regulate this emerging industry.”

“The new legislation being proposed today is about making sure that we have clear, statewide guardrails in place that provide people in communities across Wisconsin with the information and transparency they need to engage in the local decision-making process in an informed, effective manner from the start,” Habush Sinykin said.

Advertisement

What impact do data centers have on the environment?

An August report from the Alliance for the Great Lakes found some data center sites can use between 1 and 5 million gallons of water per day. The average American household uses a few hundred gallons a day, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Many Great Lakes states lead the nation in the number of data centers due to the freshwater resources available to them, which are needed to cool hyperscale data centers, some of which can use as much water as a small city.

The report contends that data center owners are not transparent about their water footprint, and there is no requirement for them share that information publicly. Fewer than one-third track water usage, and, often, data centers sign nondisclosure agreements with local governments on water use.

On Sept. 15, Midwest Environmental Advocates filed a legal action, on behalf of the Milwaukee Riverkeeper, against the City of Racine to disclose projected water use at Microsoft’s Mount Pleasant data center.

The move is one of the first of many that will likely become the next phase of controversy over Great Lakes water rights as more tech companies look to the region for its seemingly endless supply of water.

Advertisement

Unsustainable water use can cause cities to sink because the ground becomes more compact. The Alliance for the Great Lakes report notes Chicago, Columbus, Indianapolis and Detroit sink more each year. Over time, this threatens drinking water supplies and infrastructure.

How much energy do data centers in Wisconsin use?

Demand for energy is increasing in Wisconsin, in part, due to the data centers popping up in the state.

Data centers in southeast Wisconsin account for more than half the 3.3 gigawatts of increased energy demand WEC Energy Group, We Energies’ parent company, expects to experience by 2030, said President and CEO Scott Lauber during an Oct. 30 earnings call.

These include the first phase of Microsoft’s $7.3 billion Mount Pleasant data center project and a $15 billion data center campus in Port Washington, which will power OpenAI and Oracle’s artificial intelligence programs.

Advertisement

While data centers account for a large part of the increased demand for energy in Wisconsin, We Energies spokesperson Brendan Conway said demand for energy in Wisconsin is also expected to grow outside of data center projects, which has prompted the company to file a flurry of applications to spend more than $5.5 billion on new energy projects.

The utility filed plans for nine major energy projects with the state Public Service Commission on Oct. 17. If approved, the plants would add nearly three gigawatts of energy to the grid, or enough to power more than two million homes.

Since a majority of the expected energy demand is coming from data centers, under We Energies’ proposal, data center customers would be required to cover 75% of the cost to build and maintain the plant, which would be passed along through energy bills. Other We Energies customers would cover the remaining 25%, as well as the annual cost of natural gas.

Additionally, as part of its rate plan proposal, We Energies would require data center companies to enter a 10-year service agreement that then automatically renews for one-year terms. If a company ends its agreement early, it would have to pay the remaining cost of the infrastructure powering its data centers.

Advertisement

Where are Wisconsin’s major data center projects?

Here’s where some of Wisconsin’s major data center projects are happening, as of Nov. 13.

Mount Pleasant Microsoft data center campus

Microsoft is finishing construction on its first Racine County data center, which is to be completed in early 2026. The company says it plans to hire more than 400 employees to work at the first data center and once the second data center opens, the total number of employees will be nearly 800 for both facilities.

Construction for the second data center is scheduled to be finished by the end of 2028. Thousands of construction jobs are planned for the completion of the data center, the company said.

Microsoft just expanded its Racine County data center land holdings with two more purchases totaling around $38 million, according to land deeds posted online by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue on Nov. 10. Microsoft said it now owns 2,005 acres in Mount Pleasant.

Advertisement

Beaver Dam Meta data center

Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, plans to spend more than $1 billion to build a data center in Beaver Dam. The data center campus will span over 700,000 square feet, according to a Nov. 12 Wisconsin Economic Development Corp announcement.

The planned data center would bring roughly 100 jobs to the area and support 1,000 construction trade jobs in the process, the company said. The data center is planning to go online in 2027.

Advertisement

QTS development in Dane County

Data center operator QTS is in the process of submitting a zoning application to the DeForest Village Board for its proposed multibillion dollar development in Dane County.

The Virginia-based company wants to develop up to five buildings over time, though those plans could change depending on the village board approval process. The company has purchase agreements for the project site, which are contingent on its rezoning.

If approved, QTS also plans on starting a $50 million fund to support local institutions, which includes scholarships and workforce partnerships with Madison Area Technical College and research partnerships with the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

How many data centers are there in Wisconsin?

As of November 2025, Wisconsin is home to 46 data centers, and that number is only growing. Is there a data center in your community? Check out the list below:

Advertisement

Milwaukee area (20 data centers)

  • Data Holdings Milwaukee: 3135 W. Highland Ave., Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • TierPoint Milwaukee: 3701 W. Burnham St., Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • 1547 Critical Systems Realty: 324 E. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • TSR Solutions: 324 E. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • New Era Technology-Milwaukee: 10400 W. Innovation Drive, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Aventus Lakes: 7901 W. Clinton Ave., Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cogent Data Center-Milwaukee 1: 324 E. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cogent Data Center-Milwaukee 2: 2915 S 5th Court, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Netwurx Milwaukee: 324 E. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Vaultas Milwaukee: 3135 W. Highland Blvd., Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • ISCorp North MQN: 10325 N. Port Washington Road, Mequon, Wisconsin
  • ISCorp South MQN: 10235 N. Port Washington Road, Mequon, Wisconsin
  • CyberLynk Network Inc.: 10125 S. 52nd St., Franklin, Wisconsin
  • Expedient Franklin: 4777 Ironwood Drive, Franklin, Wisconsin
  • Windstream Brookfield: 13935 Bishops Drive, Brookfield, Wisconsin
  • Lumen Milwaukee: 3235 Intertech Drive, Brookfield, Wisconsin
  • Veolina Data Center: 8450 W. Forest Home Ave., Greenfield, Wisconsin
  • Cloverleaf Ozaukee County: Lake Drive/Dixie Drive, Port Washington, Wisconsin
  • Airiam Hartland: 1040 Cottonwood Ave., Hartland, Wisconsin
  • Mircosoft: Caldonia, Wisconsin*

*Microsoft abandoned its plans to have 244 acres of farm land rezoned for a data center after pushback from residents and local officials. However, it is possible Microsoft will still build a Caledonia data center at a new location in the village or somewhere else in the county.

Madison area (11 data centers)

  • US Signal Madison WI01: 222 W. Washington Ave., Madison, Wisconsin
  • US Signal Madison WI02: 5515 Nobel Drive, Madison, Wisconsin
  • EdgeConneX Madison: 4916 E. Broadway, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Dane County Data Exchange 1: 4916 E. Broadway, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Dane County Data Exchange 2: 3351 Dairy Drive, Madison, Wisconsin
  • 5NINES Data Center: 222 W. Washington Ave., Madison, Wisconsin
  • SupraNet Madison: 8000 Excelsior Drive, Madison, Wisconsin
  • HC Colo #1: 612 W. Main St., Madison, Wisconsin
  • Lumen Madison: 612 W. Main St., Madison, Wisconsin
  • Meta: N8853 County Road A, Beaver Dam, Wisconsin
  • QTS Wisconsin: Dane County, Wisconsin

Kenosha-Racine area (5 data centers)

  • OFFSITE: 3618 7th Ave., Kenosha, Wisconsin
  • ExcalTech Kenosha: 3618 8th Ave., Kenosha, Wisconsin
  • Microsoft: 12123-12827 Louis Sorenson Road, Sturtevant, Wisconsin
  • Microsoft: 12734 Louis Sorenson Road, Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin
  • Microsoft: County Rd KR and 90th St, Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin

Fox River Valley (5 data centers)

  • Ark Data Centers Green Bay: Fire Lane 11, Harrison, Wisconsin
  • WIN-Green Bay Data Center: 417 Pine St., Green Bay, Wisconsin
  • Netsonic Wisconsin Data Center: 1263 Main St., Green Bay, Wisconsin
  • HBS Little Chute: 1700 Stephen St., Little Chute, Wisconsin
  • New Era Technology-Appleton: 2201 E. Enterprise Ave., Appleton, Wisconsin

Central Wisconsin (3 data centers)

  • Wildcard One Data Center: Indianhead Drive, Mosinee, Wisconsin
  • Aventus 715: 901 Commerce Drive, Marshfield, Wisconsin
  • CyberOne Data: 141 Market Ave., Port Edwards, Wisconsin

Chippewa Valley (2 data centers)

  • WIN-Eau Claire Data Center: 800 Wisconsin St., Eau Claire, Wisconsin
  • Balloonist LLC (unknown company): County Road B, Menomonie, Wisconsin

Francesca Pica, Caitlin Looby, Ricardo Torres and Claudia Levens of the Journal Sentinel contributed to this report.

Anna Kleiber can be reached at akleiber@gannett.com.



Source link

Wisconsin

Wisconsin man accused of killing parents to fund Trump assassination plot set to enter plea deal

Published

on

Wisconsin man accused of killing parents to fund Trump assassination plot set to enter plea deal


MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin man accused of killing his parents and stealing their money to fund a plan to assassinate President Donald Trump is set to enter a plea deal resolving the case Thursday.

Nikita Casap, 18, is expected to agree to the deal during a morning hearing in Waukesha County Circuit Court in suburban Milwaukee. He goes into the hearing facing multiple charges, including two homicide counts, two counts of hiding a corpse and theft, with a trial scheduled to begin March 2.

Online court records did not list the terms of the plea agreement. Harm Venhuizen, a spokesperson for the state public defender’s office, which is representing Casap, said state Supreme Court ethics rules prevent the office from commenting on cases. The Waukesha County District Attorney’s Office did not respond to questions about the deal.

According to a criminal complaint, investigators believe Casap shot his mother, Tatiana Casap, and his stepfather, Donald Mayer, at their home in the village of Waukesha on or around Feb. 11.

Advertisement

He lived with the decomposing bodies for weeks before fleeing across the country in his stepfather’s SUV with $14,000 in cash, jewelry, passports, his stepfather’s gun and the family dog, according to the complaint. He was eventually arrested during a traffic stop in Kansas on Feb. 28.

Federal authorities have accused Casap of planning his parents’ murders, buying a drone and explosives and sharing his plans with others, including a Russian speaker. They said in a federal search warrant that he wrote a manifest calling for Trump’s assassination and was in touch with others about his plan to kill Trump and overthrow the U.S. government.

Stay up to date with the news and the best of AP by following our WhatsApp channel.

Follow on

Advertisement

“The killing of his parents appeared to be an effort to obtain the financial means and autonomy necessary to carrying out his plan,” that warrant said.

Detectives found several messages on Casap’s cellphone from January 2025 in which Casap asks how long he will have to hide before he is moved to Ukraine. An unknown individual responded in Russian, the complaint said, but the document doesn’t say what that person told Casap. In another message Casap asks: “So while in Ukraine, I’ll be able to live a normal life? Even if it’s found out I did it?”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin bill stirs issue of parental voice, trans youth autonomy

Published

on

Wisconsin bill stirs issue of parental voice, trans youth autonomy


A Republican-authored bill would require Wisconsin school boards to adopt a policy that would inform a parent or guardian if a student requests to be called by names and pronouns not aligned with their gender assigned at birth.

The bill would require legal documentation, parental approval and a principal to approve changes to a student’s name and pronouns. The bill makes exceptions for nicknames or students going by their middle names.

Although the bill has no chance of being signed into law by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, it reflects the continuing political energy of two issues: parental authority in schools, and the treatment of trans youths.

Notably, hundreds of trans-related bills were introduced at multiple levels of government across the country in the last year.

Advertisement

The lawmakers who introduced the bill, Rep. Barbara Dittrich (R-Oconomowoc) and state Sen. Andre Jacque (R-Franken), said it is about parental rights and transparency. At a Capitol public hearing Jan. 6, Jacque cited a ruling from October 2023 in which a Waukesha judge sided with parents who sued the Kettle Moraine School District after staff at the middle school used a child’s chosen name and pronouns. The parents did not support their child’s transition.

But the Senate Committee on Education hearing grew heated as LGBTQ+ youth, parents of transgender children, Democratic lawmakers and other advocates called the bill unnecessary and potentially violence-inducing. They said it makes life worse for a vulnerable population that makes up less than 1% of Wisconsin pupils.

Jacque argued that without the bill, educators can make decisions about children’s health and well-being in secrecy.

Advertisement

“Hiding from us important things that are going on in their lives is not only disrespectful to parents, it is harmful to our children and deliberately sabotaging the ability for vital communication to take place,” Jacque said.

Sen. Sarah Keyeski (D-Lodi) questioned why the Legislature should be involved when school boards already have the ability to approve such policies.

“I think it’s interesting how much you lean on local control for certain things, but then all of a sudden, you want government control,” she said.

Abigail Swetz, executive director of Fair Wisconsin, said such a bill would prevent educators from “engaging in the best practice” for using names and pronouns. Swetz, a former middle school teacher who advised a Gender and Sexuality Alliance club, said she’s seen firsthand the positive impact of affirming trans and nonbinary students.

Advertisement

“The mental health struggles that trans youth face are not a self-fulfilling prophecy. They’re entirely pressured outcomes, and bills like SB120 add to that pressure,” Swetz said.

Jenna Gormal, the public policy director at End Abuse Wisconsin, said forcing students to come out to parents before they’re ready reinforces power and control while stripping students of their autonomy.

Alison Selje, who uses they/them pronouns, spoke of the seismic shift in their well-being and academic performance when someone used their correct pronouns. Selje was a student at Madison West High School at the time. The Madison Metropolitan School District has a policy – which has survived a court challenge – protecting the use of names and pronouns of trans students.

“I remember the first time I heard someone use the right pronoun for me. This was during the pandemic so I was still wearing a mask, but underneath it, I was smiling ear to ear,” Selje said. “The use of my pronouns was a confidence boost, but it was also a lifesaver.”

Advertisement

Support for the bill came from two women representing Moms for Liberty. Laura Ackman and Amber Infusimo shared stories of parents finding out about their children’s new gender identity through school playbills and yearbooks.

“This bill rightly affirms schools shouldn’t be making significant decisions without parental knowledge or involvement,” Ackman said. “It does not prevent kindness, respect or compassion.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

3 takeaways as Wisconsin Badgers ‘showed some fight’ in win over UCLA

Published

on

3 takeaways as Wisconsin Badgers ‘showed some fight’ in win over UCLA


play

  • The Wisconsin Badgers defeated UCLA 80-72, with a balanced scoring attack. Nick Boyd led the team with 20 points.
  • Wisconsin showed improvement with its 3-point shooting and halfcourt defense against the Bruins.
  • The game concluded with a flagrant foul on Wisconsin’s Nolan Winter and offsetting technical fouls.

MADISON – Wisconsin men’s basketball got the palette-cleanser it needed.

After losing to its last three high-major opponents by double-digit margins, the Badgers enjoyed a double-digit lead for almost the entire game en route to an 80-72 win over UCLA on Jan. 6 at the Kohl Center.

Advertisement

“The thing I like about tonight is we showed some fight and some togetherness and some heart,” Wisconsin coach Greg Gard said after the game. “And it wasn’t perfect, but when you have heart and you have fight, you always have a chance. … We were physically and emotionally engaged and after it.”

BOX SCORE: Wisconsin 80, UCLA 72

Wisconsin boasted a balanced scoring attack. Nick Boyd had a team-high 20 points, followed closely by Nolan Winter with 18 and John Blackwell with 17. Andrew Rohde also had 12 points on 4-of-6 shooting.

UCLA, meanwhile, relied on 18 points from Eric Dailey Jr. and 16 points from Tyler Bilodeau while the Bruins were playing without standout guard Skyy Clark.

Here are three takeaways from the win:

Advertisement

Badgers benefit from far superior 3-point shooting

One of the many what-ifs from Wisconsin’s 16-point loss to then-No. 6 Purdue was its 3-point shooting. UW went a mere 4 of 25 against the Boilermakers, marking its second consecutive game with sub-20% perimeter shooting.

The Badgers’ Jan. 6 win over UCLA was a much different story, as they made more 3-pointers in the first nine minutes against the Bruins than they did in all 40 minutes against Purdue.

UW finished the game with 33% shooting, going 10 of 30. But the perimeter shooting was more of a difference-maker than one might surmise from glancing through the final box score.

Advertisement

The early 3-pointers helped the Badgers claim 16-4, 28-9 and 38-19 leads throughout the first half – a sizeable enough cushion to withstand UCLA’s 14-4 run in the second half without the outcome ever seeming in serious jeopardy.

“When you see your teammates shoot with confidence and you see see them go in a few times, then it’s contagious,” Blackwell said. “It rubs off on others to make other shots and just be aggressive.”

Gard similarly said the improved 3-point shooting “creates energy.”

“As much as you try to say, ‘Don’t get emotionally attached to your shot going in or not,’ I thought we got good looks,” Gard said. “We knocked them down. We took the right ones. And that energizes both ends of the floor.”

Meanwhile, UCLA – ranking 16th in the NCAA in 3-point shooting at 38.6% ahead of the Jan. 6 game – had uncharacteristically lackluster shooting from deep, missing its first 14 3-point attempts and ultimately going 1 of 17. The Bruins’ lack of Clark – a 49.3% 3-point shooter – surely played a factor in that.

Advertisement

Wisconsin shows improvements, imperfections in halfcourt defense

As much as Wisconsin’s improved 3-point shooting captured the spotlight, the Badgers’ improved halfcourt defense also was instrumental in the Badgers enjoying a double-digit lead for much of the game.

“We were connected,” Gard said. “We were energetic. We were physical. We were covering for each other. We had each other’s back.”

UCLA averaged .969 points per possession in the first half, and the Bruins did not score outside of fastbreak opportunities until the 13:23 mark in the half.

UCLA was better in the second half, but even then, its 1.029 points per possession over the course of the entire game was the fewest allowed by UW to a high-major since holding Marquette to exactly one point per possession on Dec. 6.

Advertisement

“Our communication was really high-level,” Winter said. “These last two days of practice probably have been some of our best practices all year from a communication standpoint and a defensive standpoint.”

That’s not to say Wisconsin’s defense was perfect against the Bruins, however. UCLA made six straight shots at one point in the second half, and Gard picked out a few other issues with UW’s halfcourt defense.

“We had a couple ball-screen mistakes – one we hedged way too far, one we didn’t hedge at all,” Gard said. “Other than that, I thought we were pretty solid, and a lot of good things to build upon. We’ll have to continue to get better on that end of the floor.”

What happened with Nolan Winter’s flagrant foul, Nick Boyd’s technical foul

The Wisconsin-UCLA game ended with some drama as the officiating crew handed out a Flagrant 1 and offsetting technical fouls.

Winter received the flagrant foul after a somewhat of a hard foul on Eric Dailey Jr. as the UCLA forward attempted a layup.

Advertisement

“Yeah, it was a hard foul,” Winter said of his flagrant. “I didn’t really mean to get a flagrant, obviously, but I didn’t want to give him any free points, especially at the end of the game. … We played to the whistle.”

Gard pointed out that UCLA was “pressing us until the very end,” too.

After Winter’s foul, Dailey appeared to give Winter a light shove. Boyd and others ran to Winter’s defense, and Boyd made contact with Dailey. Boyd and Dailey received offsetting deadball technical fouls after replay review.

Boyd saw Dailey “push my guy,” he said after the game.

“Over these last couple weeks, man, we’ve just been getting pushed around too much,” Boyd said. “So I just had to have his back. That’s the mentality we’re carrying with us the rest of the year. We get pushed. We’re stepping right back up.”

Advertisement

UCLA coach Mick Cronin, unlike many of his peers this season, did not hold a postgame press conference at the Kohl Center. So Gard was the only coach in a position to share his thoughts on what transpired.

Gard’s thoughts were shaped by other officiating decisions that he did not want to specifically identify.

“I’m not going to get into refereeing, and those guys got a really hard job,” Gard said. “But there was some actions on the other end that if they get them under control, then that never happens because the play would have been whistled dead. … I’ll deal with that with the league in terms of we should have never gotten to that based on some other stuff.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending