Gov. Larry Rhoden issued his second veto while making law a slew of legislation focused on South Dakota’s elections and its citizen-led petition process.

Rhoden on Tuesday signed 20 “election bills” largely aimed at tightening the state’s residency and voting requirements.

The most notorious includes House Bill 1208. According to the bill’s language, people who claim residency at a mail forwarding address or post office “without providing a description of the location of the individual’s habitation” are not considered residents of the state and can only vote in the federal election, if eligible. The bill works in tandem with the standing requirement that prospective voters must live in South Dakota for 30 consecutive days to be considered a resident and able to vote in state elections.

Opponents of the legislation have said the bill unfairly restricts the voting rights of full-time travelers from South Dakota and the state’s homeless population.

“South Dakota continues to be an example of free and fair elections. Our election system has integrity, and these bills improve our already strong system,” Rhoden stated in a Tuesday press release. “America is founded on the principle of freedom, and I am proud that we live in a nation and a state where we can choose our leaders.”

Other bills signed by Rhoden include laws prohibiting and penalizing the use of deepfakes in an election, requiring South Dakota driver’s licenses to indicate citizenship status, and banning people who aren’t registered as in-state voters from circulating petitions on ballot measures.

House Bill 1169, brought by State Rep. Rebecca Reimer, R-Rapid City, was the only one of the batch to receive the governor’s veto brand. The bill would have required groups circulating petitions for South Dakota Constitutional Amendments to obtain no less than 5% of signatures for all 35 legislative districts in the state, based on that district’s total votes in the last gubernatorial election, in order to placed on an election ballot.

The statute as it stands only requires circulators to receive a number of signatures equal to 5% of votes cast in the last gubernatorial election for the whole state.

Rhoden stated in a Tuesday press release that HB 1169 has a “worthy goal” in raising the bar for petitioning for constitutional amendments in the state but could prove a legal problem. He explained in a letter to the State House that if a court determines the proposed law infringes on the ability to engage in free speech, it would undergo “strict scrutiny,” or the highest standard of judicial review.

“I am concerned that this bill will not withstand scrutiny in the courts. This bill attempts to change the South Dakota Constitution in statute, and I believe that approach to be misguided,” Rhoden stated.

The governor’s veto was announced after Voter Defense Association of South Dakota, a group focused on the state’s ballot process, held a Friday press conference in which they and supporters threatened to put the bill through the referendum process.

Matthew Schweich, president of VDA, told the Argus Leader the bill would have hamstrung future citizen ballot initiatives in South Dakota by implementing “the most extreme geographic distribution requirement in the U.S.”

Former State Sen. Reynold Nesiba, a Sioux Falls Democrat, planned to sponsor the referendum petition to reject the legislation.

“It will effectively end the constitutional amendment process initiated by citizens in South Dakota,” Nesiba said. “We have to remember our state motto is, ‘Under God the People Rule.’”

Schweich also challenged the bill from a practicality standpoint by sharing concerns that petition gatherers would need to carry multiple versions of their petitions and clipboards for voters that may not live where they’re encountered. He also said the bill would make South Dakota’s petition process more vulnerable to outside influence, as smaller groups would be unable to financially support a statewide campaign that some out-of-state groups could still afford.

Rhoden echoed this in his letter to the State House.

“The additional burden of collecting signatures from each of the 35 senatorial districts, each on a separate petition sheet, risks creating a system where only those with substantial financial resources can effectively undertake a statewide petition drive. This undermines the bill’s intent by putting South Dakotans at a disadvantage to dark money out-of-state groups,” Rhoden wrote.

Other bills signed by Rhoden on Tuesday include:

• SB 68: Requires an individual be a citizen of the United States before being eligible to vote and to provides a penalty therefor.
• SB 73: Requires that an individual registering as a voter when applying for a driver’s license be a resident of the state for the purposes of voting.
• SB 89: Repeals the requirement that judicial officers be listed on a separate nonpolitical ballot.
• SB 91: Revises the requirements for a petition to initiate a measure or constitutional amendment or to refer a law.
• SB 92: Requires that the director of the Legislative Research Council and the secretary of state review an initiated measure and determine if the measure embraces more than one subject.
• SB 173: Revises the process by which a recount may be requested.
• SB 185: Amends provisions pertaining to the process by which the qualifications of a registered voter are verified.
• HB 1062: Amends provisions pertaining to the maintenance and publication of the statewide voter registration file.
• HB 1066: Revises residency requirements for the purposes of voter registration.
• HB 1126: Modifies provisions pertaining to the compensation of a recount board.
• HB 1127: Requires that notice of a county’s canvass, post-election audit, and testing of automatic tabulating equipment be posted to the secretary of state’s website.
• HB 1130: Provides permissible dates for municipal and school district elections.
• HB 1164: Revises the process for nominating candidates for lieutenant governor.
• HB 1184: Amends the deadline for filing a petition to initiate a measure or constitutional amendment.
• HB 1256: Requires the inclusion of certain information on a candidate’s nominating petition or on a ballot question petition.
• HB 1264: Requires the disclosure of an outstanding loan balance on a campaign finance disclosure report.

State House and Senate lawmakers will convene in Pierre on Monday. Both chambers will need a two-thirds majority of legislators to override Rhoden’s veto.

A new national nonprofit wants to redefine the environmental movement.

‘Nature is Nonpartisan’ launched its efforts in Belle Fourche, South Dakota, the geographical center of America. 

According to a press release by the group, ‘Nature is Nonpartisan’ wants to become the nation’s most influential environmental organization by creating a large-scale, cross-partisan movement dedicated to practical, long-lasting solutions. It’s kicking off its first effort called ‘Make America Beautiful Again.’

SDPB’s Lee Strubinger spoke to the group’s founder, Benji Backer, on Thursday. The interview has been shortened for clarity. Backer said the group wants broad investments in conservation.

—————————-

How will that work in this like particular political moment?

I think the polarizing moment that you’re alluding to is exactly why we exist and exactly the problem, right? Americans want efficiency and effectiveness from all energy sources. They’re not against solar and wind, they’re not against hydropower, they’re not against nuclear, they’re not against natural gas. They don’t want to have, you know, winners and losers chosen. The response to this administration is because of the pro solar wind only idea that has been pushed for a while and that wasn’t right either. So I think the answer truly lies between those two, similar on the timber issue.

But the problem is there hasn’t been the balance in the discourse. It’s either cut everything down or don’t touch it. It’s just solar and wind or just oil and gas and neither of those are productive conversations.

How do you plan to manage this coalition and what does that coalition look like?

We’re going to build coalitions around whatever push we’re doing at that time. So right now we’re pushing, you know, this administration to buy into a package that we’re calling make America beautiful again. And so we’re leveraging left and right leaning voices to push the administration to do that. That will be different than what we do in two or three years.

What we’re being really intentional about is that for every liberal person or every liberal group or every liberal board member we have on board, we also have a conservative and that’s the whole point. It’s for us to bring uncomfortable conversations there. I’ve hired an evenly split political team, our board is that way, it’ll never change. That’s how our coalitions will work and we’re going to make sure that we’re resembling the bulk of America and everything that we do.

Sounds like a tightrope.

Somebody’s got to do it and we’re going to be the ones to do it is because there’s proof in the past that this was possible.

Look at cultural transformation on issues like criminal justice reform or gay marriage or some of these other topics. Those are way harder topics to build consensus around. A love of nature, there’s a reason why almost 80% of Americans self-identify as environmentalist in 1990. We can get to that again and we have to rebuild that or the group to do it.