Connect with us

South Dakota

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem slams Ben & Jerry’s over July 4th tweet

Published

on

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem slams Ben & Jerry’s over July 4th tweet


South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem laid into uber-woke ice cream brand Ben & Jerry’s over the company’s infamous July 4th tweet in which it called for Mount Rushmore to be returned to Native Americans. 

Noem, a Republican, called the Ben & Jerry’s bosses of being a ‘bunch of liberal Vermont businessmen’ who ‘haven’t studied our history’ and think that they ‘know everything about this country,’ during an interview with Fox News on Thursday.

The governor went on to call Mount Rushmore ‘the greatest symbol of our freedom.’

Since sending out the message on Tuesday, Unilever, which has owned Ben & Jerry’s since 2000, has lost $2.6 billion in market capital. Those shares were down .5 percent on Wednesday and down 1 percent at the start of trading on Thursday. 

Advertisement

At the time of writing, the company’s market capital is down to $131 billion from $133.5 billion.

Since sending out the message on Tuesday, Unilever, which has owned Ben & Jerry's since 2000, has lost a staggering $2.6 billion in market capital

Since sending out the message on Tuesday, Unilever, which has owned Ben & Jerry’s since 2000, has lost a staggering $2.6 billion in market capital

‘We can learn from the men on that mountain. We can do better, but boy did they lead us through some challenging times,’ Noem added in her Fox interview in an apparent reference to the face that adorn the monument, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln.  

‘We should be proud of America and knock off what Ben & Jerry’s is doing. They don’t have any idea what they’re doing,’ the governor added. 

Advertisement

Noem had been touted by some as a potential 2024 nominee for the Republican party having recently seen her state pass multiple populist right-wing bills including a ban on gender-affirming care for minors and sales tax cut. 

Recently, the Mount Rushmore State governor said in a radio interview that she is focused on her job and that with Trump in the race, ‘right now I don’t see a path for victory with anybody else.’

The embattled brand, which was founded by longtime Bernie Sanders allies Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenwood, tweeted the message to its 494,000 followers.

The 2000 acquisition agreement between Unilever and Ben & Jerry’s gave the ice cream maker autonomy to continue its progressive social mission independently of business decisions made by its parent. 

‘This 4th of July, it’s high time we recognize that the US exists on stolen Indigenous land and commit to returning it,’ the company’s official account wrote before suggesting Mount Rushmore should be handed back to its original owners.’

Advertisement

The ice cream brand, which has long courted progressive audiences, called  for the United States to return 'stolen indigenous land'

The ice cream brand, which has long courted progressive audiences, called  for the United States to return ‘stolen indigenous land’

Ben & Jerry's lead by CEO Dave Stever (pictured) sparked outrage on Tuesday with a tweet to its 494,000 followers

Ben & Jerry’s lead by CEO Dave Stever (pictured) sparked outrage on Tuesday with a tweet to its 494,000 followers

Ben Cohen (left) and Jerry Greenfield (right) - the original founders of Ben & Jerry's. Cohen was recently discovered to be the single largest funder of left-wing foreign policy group Eisenhower Media Network

Ben Cohen (left) and Jerry Greenfield (right) – the original founders of Ben & Jerry’s. Cohen was recently discovered to be the single largest funder of left-wing foreign policy group Eisenhower Media Network

Ben & Jerry's also cites treaties that allowed the tribes to keep Mount Rushmore and a Supreme Court decision that ruled the land had, in fact, been stolen from the Lakota tribe after they staged a sit-in in 1970

Ben & Jerry’s also cites treaties that allowed the tribes to keep Mount Rushmore and a Supreme Court decision that ruled the land had, in fact, been stolen from the Lakota tribe after they staged a sit-in in 1970

The company said the Lakota Sioux tribe referred to Mount Rushmore as Tunkasila Sakpe and that the tribe considers the land sacred

As a result, the ice cream makers are reaping a whirlwind of anger on social media.  

A Twitter user wrote: ‘Ok you start. Relinquish your headquarters.’ Another wrote: ‘This should be easy then. Shut down and donate all of your land, facilities, and assets to indigenous people.’

Others called the Vermont-based ice cream giant ‘hypocrites’ while another said: ‘I’m curious, how many millions have you made by being virtue signaling grifters?’

Earlier this month, Unilever was named as an ‘international sponsor of war’ by Ukraine as the company continues to operate in Russia and is therefore subject to a new law requiring taxpaying businesses to contribute directly to the war effort.

In 2022, Unilever paid $331 million in taxes in Russia, reports The Guardian.

Advertisement

In 2021, Ben & Jerry’s also unsuccessfully attempted to stop Unilever from selling its ice cream in parts of Israel.

The company initially announced it would no longed sell its ice cream in ‘occupied Palestinian territory,’ areas of land that are considered part of the modern state of Israel and have been for decades.

However, the founders and their company were ultimately stopped from carrying out their goal by Israeli license-holder Avi Zinger, who has continued to produce the ice cream in his factory in the suburbs of Tel Aviv and distribute it to the Israeli settlements.

At the time, the company was slammed by some for its anti-Zionist position, which its critics said reflected anti-Semitic values.

Unilever was later found to be selling the ice cream in the area through a third party distributor.

Advertisement



Source link

South Dakota

Support South Dakota libraries | Letter to the Editor

Published

on

Support South Dakota libraries | Letter to the Editor


play

Have you ever visited your local library? Has your child or grandchild, student or family member? Maybe you don’t check out books, but do you attend programs at your library or participate in a summer reading program or read a book through the Libby app? 

I hope for everyone reading this the answer is a resounding yes, and I also hope that means that you will reach out to your elected officials urging them to fight Gov. Noem’s proposed $1 million cut to the South Dakota State Library. 

The proposed cut would be devastating for local libraries like our vibrant Doland Community Library, the Watertown Regional Library and all of the patrons who rely on the programs and services offered through them. 

Consider this: In 2024, more than 6,200 people visited the Doland Community Library. In a community of fewer than 200 people. That’s incredible.

Now imagine if the proposed cut to the State Library funding happens – what programs and services will be lost? Well, take a look at what’s at stake:

Advertisement

The State Library helps with the costs associated with this service to allow patrons who are registered users to check out e-books on their devices. 

The Doland Community Library has a certified librarian thanks to the State Library, which opens our library up to additional services and grants.  

Our State Library provides crucial guidance and education to our librarian and library board members in the operating of our library as an accredited library.

The Doland Community Library offers a top-notch Summer Reading Program that brings hundreds of adults and children to our community on several days of the six-week event. The training, manuals and funding for the program comes from the State Library.

Advertisement

Interlibrary Loan Support: Thanks to this program from the State Library, patrons can access books from across the state.

SD Reads: This program promotes reading across the state and you yourself were a recent participant who read to our students.

Legal guidance: The State Library holds each library accountable and helps ensure applicable laws are being followed. 

The State Library pays for several free databases available such as Ancestry.com, SAT study guides and practice tests.

The State Library provides additional tools to promote literacy such as Birth to Five, 1,000 Books Before Kindergarten, Canva, and the Stephanie Miller Summer Reading Program Grant. 

Advertisement

It goes without saying that the State Library is an incredible resource for our local libraries. Any cut would be felt not just at the state level through reduced staff and diminished services, but also by me, my family and every other patron in our rural area. 

If you’re alarmed by this potentially devastating proposed cut, please consider contacting your elected officials. You can find your legislators at https://sdlegislature.gov/legislators/find. The more we can let our elected officials know how valuable our State Library is, the more inclined they will be to preserve the funding for our State Library, which serves so many of us at the local level.

Danielle (Troske) Teigen, Doland Community Library Board Member, Turton



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

South Dakota Childcare Task Force report says funding is needed

Published

on

South Dakota Childcare Task Force report says funding is needed


SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (Dakota News Now) – A new report from the South Dakota Childcare Task Force, along with additional research from the Hunt Institute, revealed the difficulties of finding and paying for childcare in South Dakota.

Over seventy percent of young children in South Dakota have all parents working. With weekly costs for a toddler being as much as $260 per week, affording childcare expenses can be difficult.

Adding to the burden is finding daycare for your children.

Senator Tim Reed believes a higher wage for childcare workers will allow centers to open existing rooms they already have.

Advertisement

“We need to be able to increase what we’re paying at the childcare assistance level and I think it’s going to have to increase in other levels too, but we need to start there,” Sen. Reed said.

There are communities that have demonstrated how working together can solve the problem. The focus of the future: Braided funding.

“Tri share is three entities that are helping to cover child care for the family. The parent has a part of it. The employer has part of it and then some other funding source has part of it and in most states that other funding is coming from the state. What’s really unique about the program in Rapid City is that it’s coming from philanthropic funds,” said South Dakota Association for the Education of Young Children executive director Janessa Bixel.

The Black Hills Area Community Foundation is funding a portion of a childcare program in Rapid City.

In Madison, TIF funding is helping the launch of a new childcare center. Could more state funding happen in South Dakota?

Advertisement

“And the budget cuts, obviously that makes some of the items that we want to do tougher to get done because they all do cost money. And so, I mean, we’re going to have to work on that, you know, and promote how important this is. We just. To talk through all of the possibilities of where we can fund this,” Sen. Reed said.

Reed said the lack of affordable childcare is costing South Dakota $329 million each year.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

South Dakota attorney general unveils package of new laws for 2025 legislative session

Published

on

South Dakota attorney general unveils package of new laws for 2025 legislative session


play

South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley hopes to prevent and catch future criminal conduct by state employees with new reporting requirements, protections for whistleblowers and a bigger role for the state auditor, according to a package of legislation he released Tuesday.

Advertisement

Jackley unveiled seven bills for lawmakers to consider during the annual legislative session that kicks off next Tuesday at the Capitol in Pierre.

Jackley’s bills focus on government accountability, human trafficking, prison contraband and probation.

Government accountability

Jackley’s government accountability measures come in response to several prosecutions he began last year against former state employees.

Those cases include allegations of former Department of Revenue employees creating fake vehicle titles to secure loans and avoid excise taxes, a former Department of Social Services employee allegedly embezzling $1.8 million, and a former Department of Public Safety employee allegedly filing fake food-service health inspection records for inspections that were never conducted.

Advertisement

“Protecting taxpayer dollars and restoring the public’s trust in government should be given high priority,” Jackley said Tuesday in a press release.

One of his proposed measures would require state employees in supervisory roles to report suspected unlawful conduct to the attorney general and state auditor. Failure to report suspected violations would be classified as a felony.

Additionally, the attorney general would be required to submit an annual report to lawmakers on the state budget committee outlining the number and outcomes of misconduct reports received.

Another bill seeks to shield state employees from retaliation for reporting misconduct or participating in audits and investigations. The bill would:

Advertisement
  • Prohibit state supervisors from discharging, discriminating against or taking any other retaliatory action against whistleblowers.
  • Establish a process allowing state employees to file complaints with the attorney general within two years after experiencing retaliation.
  • Authorize courts to reinstate employees and award back pay if they suffered illegal retaliation.

A third measure would authorize the state auditor to access all financial records of every state agency to conduct audits, investigate improper conduct and ensure internal controls are in place and maintained.

The fourth bill proposes state agencies conduct mandatory annual risk reviews, with results submitted to the Board of Internal Control. The reviews would assess agencies’ risk management practices and identify vulnerabilities.

Human trafficking

Another proposal would revise human trafficking laws and prohibit the obstruction of their enforcement.

“Human trafficking remains a national concern that we are not immune from, and this legislation strengthens victim protections and enhances our ability to hold offenders accountable,” Jackley said.

The bill would update the definitions of human trafficking in the first degree and second degree and would:

Advertisement
  • Establish mandatory minimum prison sentences of 15 years for a first offense and 20 years for a second or subsequent offense of human trafficking in the first degree.
  • Establish mandatory minimum prison sentences of five years for a first offense and 10 years for a second or subsequent offense of human trafficking in the second degree.
  • Create the new felony crime of obstructing the enforcement of human trafficking laws.

Prison contraband

Jackley’s legislative package also includes measures dealing with contraband in state correctional facilities. Officials with the state Department of Corrections reported finding contraband during a lockdown last year at the penitentiary in Sioux Falls.

Existing laws prohibit inmates from possessing drugs, unapproved prescription drugs, alcohol and weapons. Among other provisions, the proposed legislation would add unapproved cell phones and electronic communication devices to the list of banned items, clarify that employees and other people are prohibited from giving a similar list of items to inmates, and adjust the severity of various penalties for the different types of contraband.

Presumptive probation

Another proposal addresses South Dakota’s presumptive probation system, which mandates that some non-violent offenders receive probation instead of prison time. Jackley’s bill would make re-offenders who were already on probation or parole supervision ineligible for presumptive probation. 

The bill also adds those convicted of threatening public officials or fleeing law enforcement to the list of ineligible offenders, as well as sex offenders who violate safety zones.

“Sentencing courts need more flexibility to impose appropriate sentences for certain violent offenders, and those choosing to reoffend while on probation or parole,” Jackley said.

Advertisement

South Dakota Searchlight is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending