South Dakota
Recreational marijuana is on the South Dakota ballot this November. What to know:
Next month, South Dakota voters will once again determine the state’s fate of recreational marijuana with Initiated Measure 29.
If passed, the measure would allow those aged 21 and older to “possess, grow, ingest and distribute marijuana or marijuana paraphernalia,” according to Attorney General Marty Jackley’s explanation.
Proponents say IM-29 is a “common-sense policy” that would boost the state’s revenue with licensed businesses as opposed to black market sales and allow law enforcement to eliminate prosecuting non-violent marijuana offenses to focus on “real crime.”
Voters originally opted for and passed the legalization of marijuana in 2020. However, the measure was challenged by Gov. Kristi Noem and two law enforcement officers. Ultimately, it was extinguished in 2021 by the South Dakota Supreme Court, citing the ballot measure at the time violated the state Constitution’s requirement that amendments do not encompass more than one subject, according to previous Argus Leader reporting.
Opponents argue that voting Yes on IM-29 could lead to increased public health risks, especially among teens, as well as impaired driving. The measure would also allegedly “open the door for increased crime, suicide rates… and mental health problems.”
What would IM-29 do for South Dakota?
If passed, the debated initiated measure would add four new sections to Title 34 of the state’s codified laws, which covers public health and safety.
IM-29 would legalize recreational marijuana for adults aged 21 and older in South Dakota, allowing for possession of up to 2 ounces. Residents would also be able to grow up to six marijuana plants with no more than 12 per household.
It would still remain illegal to drive under the influence, and the measure would restrict where it is contained or consumed, including schools, certain properties depending on the property owner, places of employment according to the employer, and any other locations where tobacco is prohibited.
A fiscal note on the measure says it would “not decriminalize the sale of cannabis but would decriminalize the sale of cannabis accessories.” In other words, marijuana-derived substances would be allowed but marijuana would remain illegal under federal law.
IM-29 also discloses that South Dakota counties may see incarceration expenses reduced by $581,556 per year.
No changes would be made to the medical marijuana program.
What proponents are saying:
IM-29 sponsor, and Executive Director for South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Law, Matthew Schweich says voting yes on IM-29 would protect personal freedom and restore the will of the people of South Dakota, referring to the outcome of the 2020 election on the matter.
“Whether we pass measure 29 or not, cannabis already exists in South Dakota. The question is, are we going to be pragmatic and take a common sense approach or are we going to stick with an obsolete failed policy prohibition that has done nothing for us for a century?” he stated during a Sept. 19 South Dakota Public Broadcasting debate against former state lawmaker and Protecting South Dakota Kids Executive Director Rhonda Milstead.
During that debate, Schweich also said he supports “strong labeling and packaging” as well as THC caps on marijuana products.
Proponents for IM-29 said if passed, the measure would help create new South Dakota jobs, reduce spending on incarceration and generate millions in new tax revenue.
This time, they say, the measure is shorter and simpler compared to previous attempts to legalize recreational marijuana in the state.
What opponents are saying:
During the SDPB debate last month, Milstead said she thinks no amount of THC will be safe for people.
“So why invite trouble into our state in the form of a drug that is not safe, not responsible and will never be regulated?” she said during the debate.
According to the 2024 Ballot Question Pamphlet, opponents of IM-29 also say the measure will harm South Dakota children, families and communities, going as far as to say that a research report on child abuse said marijuana is often actively used the most by perpetrators of child abuse and neglect.
“I have been diagnosed for years with something called Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome,” Kylee Hanson said. “That’s where the puking, it just comes in cycles for days on end. It’s like you develop some kind of allergy, I guess they would say, for a daily smoker of marijuana, a…
— Paul TenHaken (@paultenhaken) September 30, 2024
Mayor Paul TenHaken has also shown opposition to marijuana use and possession for both medical and recreational use. In 2021, TenHaken proposed a cap on the number of medical marijuana dispensaries in Sioux Falls.
On Sept. 30, TenHaken posted on X, formerly known as Twitter, that he is encouraging others to vote No on IM-29, saying he “believes adding another legally addictive vice would not have positive community benefits at this time.”
This article originally appeared on Sioux Falls Argus Leader: IM-29, legalizing recreational marijuana, on the ballot in South Dakota
South Dakota
DOC lacks population-specific programs, otherwise has ‘right things’ in place
South Dakota’s Department of Corrections has the “right” programming, but not the means to implement all its goals. It’s also lacking in programming for certain populations, like Native Americans. That’s the latest from a task force aimed at rehabilitation reform and lowering recidivism met again.
South Dakota’s recidivism rate is the highest it’s been since the Department of Corrections started tracking it. Recidivism in the state is defined as the rate offenders who leave the prison system return on either a new crime or parole violation.
Half the prisoners who left the system in 2021 returned within three years. The 50% rate for the 2021 cohort is a 7% spike immediately following the pandemic, something Secretary
Nick Lamb said should naturally go down as the cohort gets farther from the pandemic. Lamb set a goal for DOC reduce that number by at least 5%. Due to the three-year lag on recidivism rate, many programs implemented won’t show success or failure statistically until years later.
Though, Lamb told appropriators during the 2026 Legislative Session that not all states reflect parole violations or repeat offenses in their recidivism rate. This could make South Dakota’s look disproportionately higher when comparing directly.
One of the ways lawmakers are trying to fix the high rate is through new prisons with features to better serve rehabilitative efforts. The women’s prison in Rapid City has more space for programming. Lawmakers approved funding and the construction a new men’s prison in Sioux Falls this past September in a special session. It replaces one built in 1881.
The Correctional Rehabilitation Task Force was formed by Gov. Larry Rhoden to look at South Dakota’s Department of Corrections and try to improve that figure. One of the ways to do that is through programming and treatment.
Many of South Dakota’s prison population has a substance use disorder. The DOC’s 2025 statistical report showed in FY25, 91% of males and 97% of females assessed at intake in the prison system were identified as having a substance use disorder.
One thing the task force looking at the issue heard at its latest meeting is programming is actually on the right track. The task force hired the Council of State Governments, or CSG, Justice Center as a third-party consultant to dive into DOC programming and ways to improve the system. They provided the task force with preliminary results.
David D’Amora is a Senior Policy Advisor with CSG. He said DOC is on the right track after seeing all of the programs the department has.
“And looking through that document, my issue is not you should throw this out. My issue is, ‘How do you build up the capacity to do this?’ You’ve got the right things,” D’Amora told the task force during its April 22 meeting. “Now, you’ve got to figure out how to implement it the right way, which is going to take some time and some resources.”
But he did point to some issues, noting programming specifically for Native Americans is lacking.
“That is in fact going to be one of the things in our recommendations as far as improving programming,” D’Amora said.
The 2025 DOC report showed Native Americans are overrepresented in South Dakota’s prison system in general: 35% of men 61% of women in state prisons are Native, despite accounting for just 10% of the state’s general population.
There are other gaps such as women-specific programming and in education programming outside of individuals seeking a GED. Specific program for other populations, such as low literacy learners, people with long sentences and individuals with serious mental illness, is lacking as well.
Sara Friedman is a Program Director for CSG, and she said a lot of programming is “duplicative.”
“You do have some programs that kind of address the exact same need for the exact same type of person, when you could be having more of a here’s an intro-class and here’s an advanced class,” Friedman said. “You could have more tiered and sequencing within the program catalog.”
Getting into programming has been an issue for inmates as well. The CSG report showed that 25% more inmates received programming in 2025 than in 2023, but waitlists are an issue. Access to programs in the state’s three largest prison facilities, the Jameson Annex, Mike Durfee State Prison in Springfield and the South Dakota Penitentiary, is also an issue.
CSG uplifted many things the DOC is currently doing, especially DOC staff, noting that DOC employees are “deeply committed and skilled.” The presentation noted that staff are stretched thin, though, and the structure in place “undermines impact and limits staff critical support.”
CSG plans to provide cohesive changes and legislation that could help the state’s prison system. That’s expected in further detail at future meetings. However, they offered some changes they may recommend.
Those include additional trainings and quality assurance for DOC staff, improving data quality issues to actually track program success. changing the structure for earned discharge credits and others.
CSG also mentioned it may be beneficial to create a single rehabilitation and reentry division in DOC. It would oversee all programming, education, case management and behavioral health under one leadership structure. Other states have created similar divisions.
Lawmaker Reactions
However, lawmakers have questions on what’s changed and what’s next.
Mitchell Rep. Jeff Bathke used to work as a licensed counselor for the Department of Corrections. He’s wondering what’s changed over time, because the report didn’t feel like news to him.
“When you look back of the [programming] 15 years ago, everything that they mentioned today that we should have or should do better, we did that 15 years ago. So, I think what they need to do is go back and look at what changed in that last 15 years,” Bathke said. “Why do we no longer do what worked then? Another part is we need to look at what was our recidivism 1, 2 and 3 years out of prison 15 years ago, what is it today, and what’s our goal for that? And I’m not sure many people in the room today actually know those numbers.”
Bathke said there were good questions asked but noted what he feels is a lack of knowledge of the prison system amongst task force members. He expressed a desire to see what had changed in the department over time and when programming changed and how.
The report showed there’s a lack of tribal-specific programming in the system for Native American inmates.
Sen. Tamara Grove represents District 26, which includes the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Reservation. She said she’s excited at the acknowledgement that South Dakota needs more on tribal programming.
“It sounds like we’re going to have deeper conversations in that area, so I look forward to hearing what more are they wanting to do. I think probably it will be more of an emphasis on the cultural side and dealing with the traumas, the past experiences, the generational kind of stuff, which is huge. It is key when you’re talking about substance abuse disorder.”
Task Force members are expected to hear more about programming gaps and recommendations at the task force’s June meeting.
South Dakota
SD Lottery Millionaire for Life winning numbers for April 23, 2026
The South Dakota Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.
Here’s a look at April 23, 2026, results for each game:
Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from April 23 drawing
01-25-37-47-53, Bonus: 04
Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your prize
- Prizes of $100 or less: Can be claimed at any South Dakota Lottery retailer.
- Prizes of $101 or more: Must be claimed from the Lottery. By mail, send a claim form and a signed winning ticket to the Lottery at 711 E. Wells Avenue, Pierre, SD 57501.
- Any jackpot-winning ticket for Dakota Cash or Lotto America, top prize-winning ticket for Lucky for Life, or for the second prizes for Powerball and Mega Millions must be presented in person at a Lottery office. A jackpot-winning Powerball or Mega Millions ticket must be presented in person at the Lottery office in Pierre.
When are the South Dakota Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Mega Millions: 10 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
- Lucky for Life: 9:38 p.m. CT daily.
- Lotto America: 9:15 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
- Dakota Cash: 9 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
- Millionaire for Life: 10:15 p.m. CT daily.
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a South Dakota editor. You can send feedback using this form.
South Dakota
SDDOT reminds public not to put election signs on state highway rights-of-way
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (Dakota News Now) – The South Dakota Department of Transportation is reminding the public that political campaign and ballot-issue signs are not allowed on state highway rights-of-way.
“This time of year, it is common to find election signs placed along the state’s roadways,” says Craig Smith, Director of Operations.
“Illegal signs create a safety hazard and may distract motorists from seeing important regulatory or directional signage.”
The right-of-way is for official highway signage only.
Signs not required for traffic control, as per SDCL 31-28-14, are prohibited and will be removed by SDDOT crews.
Municipal ordinances on campaign signs do not take precedence over state jurisdiction over state highway rights-of-way.
You can learn more about sign placement guidelines here.
Copyright 2026 Dakota News Now. All rights reserved.
-
Louisiana4 minutes agoMartha Odom, killed in Mall of Louisiana shooting, loved ballet, Dr Pepper, writing
-
Maine10 minutes agoNorway fires auditor over stalled 2024 audit
-
Maryland16 minutes agoMaryland Supreme Court throws out Baltimore’s opioid win
-
Michigan22 minutes agoPodcast: Michigan basketball — recapping an elite season, the portal, who starts at the ‘3,’ more
-
Massachusetts28 minutes agoNew Mass. rideshare safety rules would boost driver background checks and more
-
Minnesota34 minutes agoLocked capitol doors, more security funds are new normal after Minnesota assassination
-
Mississippi40 minutes agoMississippi powered Artemis II
-
Missouri46 minutes agoKansas City, Missouri, police launch homicide investigation, after shooting at 55th and Prospect