South Dakota
Open primaries effort attracts big contributions from South Dakotans and Colorado group – Colorado Newsline
This story originally appeared in the South Dakota Searchlight.
An ongoing effort to create open primary elections received some big contributions from South Dakotans in 2023, and also received a little more than half of its donations from a Colorado-based political action committee funded in large part by a Georgia billionaire, according to recently filed campaign finance reports.
“Our open primaries effort in South Dakota has caught the attention of many groups nationally,” said Joe Kirby, a leader of the open primaries effort, in an emailed statement.
The Colorado PAC is Unite America. It raised $3.67 million in 2023, according to its federal campaign finance reports. Its biggest contributor was Arthur Blank, co-founder of the Home Depot and owner of the NFL’s Atlanta Falcons, who gave the group $1 million. That was one of seven individual contributions of $200,000 or more that Unite America received last year.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Unite America gave contributions totaling $451,150 to the South Dakota Open Primaries ballot question committee. The committee, which received $818,000 in total contributions in 2023, is circulating petitions to place a measure on statewide ballots Nov. 5 that would establish top-two primaries for gubernatorial, congressional, legislative and county races. Candidates for each office would run in an open primary, regardless of their party affiliation.
“Unite America is an organization which advocates for election reform around the country,” Kirby said. “They are funded by individuals who believe that election reforms like open primaries and ranked choice voting will improve the quality of politics in America.”
South Dakota’s primary elections are currently split by political party. Democrats allow the state’s nearly 150,000 independents and non-politically affiliated voters to vote in their primaries, but Republicans do not. Republicans dominate general elections and hold every statewide office, while Democrats hold only 11 of the state’s 105 legislative seats. Kirby has said the primary system “discourages competition, encourages hyper partisanship and excludes hundreds of thousands of voters.”
The committee’s state campaign finance report for 2023 shows it also received large donations from a group of Sioux Falls residents, among other, smaller individual contributions. The large contributions included a combined $82,500 from David and Deanna Knudson; a combined $80,000 from Joe and Jennifer Kirby; $50,000 apiece from Tom Heinz, Dan Kirby and Drey Samuelson; and $25,000 from John Fiksdahl.
Unspecified “consulting” costs of $657,000 constituted most of the committee’s expenditures. The committee started 2023 with about $45,000 and ended it with a balance of about $204,000.
Unlike some other states, South Dakota’s campaign finance laws and rules allow disclosures such as “consulting” without specific information revealing who was paid and for what.
The open primaries group is just one of the South Dakota ballot question committees that recently submitted required year-end campaign finance reports.
According to their reports, the committees raised a combined total of $1.25 million and spent $1.12 million last year. In the early stages of a ballot question campaign, expenses may include paying petition circulators to gather the thousands of signatures needed from registered voters to place a question on the ballot.
Supporters of eight potential ballot questions are circulating petitions. Additionally, the Legislature has exercised its authority to place one measure on the ballot.
There are no limits on contributions to ballot question committees in South Dakota.
Following are summaries of the campaign finance reports from committees with significant financial activity in 2023.
Dakotans for Health
Dakotans for Health is the committee circulating ballot measures that would reestablish abortion rights in South Dakota and repeal the state sales tax on food.
The group’s campaign finance report for 2023 shows about $185,000 in donations, including $119,706 from individual contributions. The biggest individual donations were $5,000 apiece from Elizabeth Zieglmeier, of Rapid City; Stan Adelstein, of Rapid City; Evelyne Rozner, of Seattle; Vincent Ryan, of Boston; and Susan Cullman, of Stamford, Connecticut.
The organization started the year with about $96,000 and spent about $249,000. Expenses included $167,000 on consulting, $44,000 on salaries, and $1,950 on advertising. The group’s ending balance was about $32,000.
Dakotans for Health’s fundraising included a $55,000 contribution from another committee, Takeitback.Org-Advocacy. Democratic political activist and former congressional candidate Rick Weiland is the chair and treasurer of both Takeitback.org and Dakotans for Health.
Committees are not required to disclose the names of contributors who donate $100 or less. Takeitback.org’s report shows $33,845 worth of those contributions and $23,559 of individual contributions of more than $100 from people in multiple states.
Life Defense Fund
The Life Defense Fund is the group encouraging South Dakotans to “decline to sign” the abortion rights ballot petitions, hoping to prevent the measure from getting on the ballot.
The group’s campaign finance report shows about $211,000 in income, including $87,931 from entities such as local or regional right-to-life committees.
Another $28,000 came from individuals who gave $100 or less, and $92,000 came from individuals who gave more than $100.
The biggest individual donation came from Adam and Joy Broin of Sioux Falls, who gave $5,050.
The committee spent about $209,0000, including $61,000 on advertising and $120,000 on consulting. The committee started 2023 with about $17,000 and ended with about $19,000.
Marijuana
Petitions are circulating for two marijuana-related measures. One proposes to legalize a limited form of recreational adult marijuana use, possession and distribution. The other would repeal the state’s existing medical marijuana program.
The Grow South Dakota Ballot Committee raised about $24,000. The group aims to legalize recreational marijuana for people over 21 years old.
HomeSlice Media Group donated $16,300 worth of creative services and travel expenses to the committee. The committee’s chairman, Brad Jurgenson, is president of HomeSlice Media. Major cash donors included Puffy’s marijuana dispensary in Rapid City and the Flower Shop of Dell Rapids. Both gave $10,000. Grow South Dakota spent about $800.
South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Laws Inc. also works to legalize marijuana. It raised no money and spent no money, but received $5,000 worth of staff time and website operations from the Marijuana Policy Project in Washington, D.C.
On the other side of the issue, Protecting South Dakota Kids (the group that opposed legalizing marijuana in 2022) took in about $4,400 and spent $176.
South Dakota Searchlight is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. South Dakota Searchlight maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Seth Tupper for questions: [email protected]. Follow South Dakota Searchlight on Facebook and Twitter.
South Dakota
Black Hills Bottlenecks: Road work update for the week of May 11
RAPID CITY, S.D. (KOTA) – More road work and travel impacts are set to begin across western South Dakota this week, with projects ranging from highway striping and crack sealing to temporary rest area closures as well as an upcoming public meeting on a bridge replacement project in Keystone.
The first projects begin Monday, May 11.
S.D. Highway 44: Striping work
On S.D. Highway 44, crews will complete striping work from about 1.5 miles east of Farmingdale to roughly 10.75 miles east of the community.
Work is scheduled from 6 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday and is expected to continue through Tuesday evening. Drivers should expect daytime lane impacts in the area.
U.S. Highway 385: Striping work
Also beginning Monday, striping operations are scheduled on U.S. Highway 385 from about one mile south of the U.S. Highway 85 junction near Deadwood to the junction itself. Work is expected to take place during daytime hours Monday through Tuesday.
Pavement preservation project on S.D. Highway 20
A pavement preservation project is also scheduled to start Monday on S.D. Highway 20 between Buffalo and Camp Crook. Crews will be sealing cracks in the roadway as part of the project. Traffic will be reduced to one lane during daytime hours, with flaggers and a pilot car guiding motorists through the work zone. Delays of up to 15 minutes are expected.
The contractor for the $112,155 project is Highway Improvement, Inc. of Sioux Falls. The overall completion date is scheduled for Dec. 4.
Drivers are reminded to slow down and use caution around crews and construction equipment in all work zones.
Wasta rest area spring cleaning
Additional travel impacts are expected latter this week with temporary closures planned at the Wasta Rest Areas along Interstate 90 for annual spring cleaning.
The eastbound Wasta Rest Area near mile marker 98 will close at 7 a.m. Tuesday, May 12, and reopen at 9 a.m. Wednesday, May 13. After that reopening, the westbound rest area will close from 9 a.m. Wednesday until 9 a.m. Thursday, May 14. Travelers are encouraged to make alternate plans during the closures.
Public meeting on future bridge replacement project along U.S. Highway 16A in Keystone
On Thursday, May 14, the South Dakota Department of Transportation and Complete Concrete, Inc. will host a public informational meeting on a future bridge replacement project along U.S. Highway 16A in Keystone.
The open house-style meeting will run from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. at the Keystone Community Center, 1101 Madill St. Officials say the meeting is intended to provide project details and answer questions from residents, businesses and emergency personnel.

The bridge replacement project is scheduled to begin in October. Plans call for replacing the existing bridge with a box culvert and include additional improvements such as intersection upgrades, resurfacing, pavement markings, traffic signals, ADA upgrades and erosion control. Pedestrian access on both sides of the structure will also be improved.
More information on the Keystone project is available at South Dakota Department of Transportation’s project page.
Current road conditions, closures and construction updates can be found at SD511 or by dialing 511.
See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.
Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.
Copyright 2026 KOTA. All rights reserved.
South Dakota
SD Lottery Millionaire for Life winning numbers for May 10, 2026
The South Dakota Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.
Here’s a look at May 10, 2026, results for each game:
Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from May 10 drawing
01-03-20-35-46, Bonus: 05
Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your prize
- Prizes of $100 or less: Can be claimed at any South Dakota Lottery retailer.
- Prizes of $101 or more: Must be claimed from the Lottery. By mail, send a claim form and a signed winning ticket to the Lottery at 711 E. Wells Avenue, Pierre, SD 57501.
- Any jackpot-winning ticket for Dakota Cash or Lotto America, top prize-winning ticket for Lucky for Life, or for the second prizes for Powerball and Mega Millions must be presented in person at a Lottery office. A jackpot-winning Powerball or Mega Millions ticket must be presented in person at the Lottery office in Pierre.
When are the South Dakota Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Mega Millions: 10 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
- Lucky for Life: 9:38 p.m. CT daily.
- Lotto America: 9:15 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
- Dakota Cash: 9 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
- Millionaire for Life: 10:15 p.m. CT daily.
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a South Dakota editor. You can send feedback using this form.
South Dakota
After Standing Rock, could a canceled mine project offer a roadmap for opponents of a new oil pipeline in South Dakota?
Almost exactly a decade since the start of the Standing Rock protests against the Dakota Access pipeline gained national and international attention, new disputes are simmering over tribal rights in the Black Hills of South Dakota.
Earlier this month, an environmental organization and a Native American advocacy group sued the US Forest Service, claiming that an exploratory graphite drilling project on national forest land threatened a recognized ceremonial site on mountain meadows known as Pe’ Sla, or Reynolds Prairie.
But on Friday, Pete Lien and Sons, the company behind the project, abruptly withdrew, saying it would perform reclamation on the site and would not seek to file another plan. The decision came as a striking victory for Native American tribes and environmental groups that had opposed it – but other projects in the works may not meet the same conclusion.
The project, claimed nine groups within the Sioux Nation, including the Standing Rock Sioux, would “directly and significantly” affect the use of Pe’ Sla, which sits within Ȟe Sápa, the Lakota name for the sacred Black Hills of South Dakota, itself the locus of Lakota creation myths.
A second exploratory project by a Canadian company looking to mine uranium on state-owned land could affect Craven Canyon, an area that contains 7,000-year-old sites of importance to Indigenous tribes, historians and archaeologists.
Opposition to the twin projects – backed by Pete Lien, of Rapid City, and by Clean Nuclear Energy Corp – comes as a proposed Alberta-to-Wyoming pipeline for carrying Canadian crude oil to the US is close to securing commitments from oil companies after Donald Trump granted permitting through an executive order.
All the projects have at their heart issues of extraction, water safety and sacred sites, much as the Standing Rock dispute of 2016 that saw “water protesters” gather in a standoff with law enforcement over concerns regarding water safety and sacred sites.
That case began when the Standing Rock Sioux passed a resolution stating that “the Dakota Access Pipeline poses a serious risk to the very survival of our Tribe and … would destroy valuable cultural resources” and was a violation of the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty guaranteeing the “undisturbed use and occupation” of reservation lands surrounding the pipeline.
In the aftermath, the environmental group Greenpeace was ordered to pay damages of $345m by a North Dakota judge to pipeline company Energy Transfer and subsidiary Dakota Access in connection with the protests, an order that is set to go to appeal. Greenpeace claims the legal action is designed to silence activists.
Most of the current disputes relate to energy, reflecting the Trump administration’s drive toward US energy independence and away from dependence on foreign sources, particularly China. Graphite, used in electric vehicle batteries, is almost exclusively imported. Roughly 95%–99% of uranium is purchased from foreign sources, including Russia and Kazakhstan.
The pipeline deal, meanwhile, is expected to help increase oil output from Canada, the world’s fourth-largest producer, to around 6.1m barrels a day, up from 5.5m now. Bridger, the company behind the Alberta-to-Wyoming pipeline, has said the project was being developed in response to identified market interest.
Wizipan “Little Elk” Garriott, a member of NDN Collective, an Indigenous rights group opposing the mining at Pe’ Sla, says the entire process of approval for the planned mine “happened in the dark”.
“There was no notice that they were proceeding provided to us, nor to the sovereign tribal nations,” he says, in violation of environmental and cultural impact study requirements and consultations with the tribes.
Lilias Jarding, director of the Black Hills Clean Water Alliance, one of the parties in the victorious Pe’ Sla action, says the decade since Standing Rock has seen a huge growth in projects attempting to mine tribal lands and areas of ceremonial significance.
Since the start of the second Trump administration, the push for both minerals extraction and energy has dramatically increased. “They’re being more aggressive,” Jarding says. In the case of Pe’ Sla, he adds, the company didn’t stop drilling when the lawsuits was filed: “They started drilling 24 hours a day.”
The alliance, along with tribes, claim the graphite project violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and that the US Forest Service improperly used a process known as a “categorical exclusion” to bypass reviews.
Oglala Sioux president Frank Star Comes Out said in a statement that the Sioux tribes never ceded to the US the lands in the Black Hills, which, he said, “remain the spiritual center of the Great Sioux Nation and they are not for sale, lease or exploitation” and that the lawsuit is a “united tribal response to protect a sacred site from those who continue to desecrate our ancestral lands”.
Oglala activist Taylor Gunhammer said that drilling at Pe’ Sla was akin to “drilling under the Vatican or at a sacred site in Jerusalem”.
A representative of Clean Nuclear Energy Corp, Mike Blady, said the company was “aware of the cultural significance and are doing everything in our power to ensure that there is no collateral damage”.
Will this amount to a populist action similar to Standing Rock?
The Pe’ Sla dispute did not provoke the kind of Indigenous-led, grassroots resistance to fossil-fuel infrastructure projects that accompanied the Dakota Access pipeline, which in some ways became a template for contemporary protests, powered by social media, celebrities and politicians.
The tribes were not in favor of following in that direction, Jarding says: “It’s a deeply sacred spiritual and ceremonial site, and elders have made it clear that it’s not a good place for another Standing Rock with thousands of people. They say this is not the place.”
Under the Biden administration, the tribal groups felt they were entering into a period of co-management policy over federal lands that in many cases lie within treaty agreements. But under the Trump administration, that sense of co-operation has diminished.
“We’ve seen a ramp-up of opening up federal lands for mineral and gas exploration, but as a planet we need to be moving away from fossil fuels and toward policies that are sustainable into the future,” says NDN’s Garriott.
What was planned for Pe’ Sla now, or was happening at Standing Rock a decade ago, or has indeed happened over a long history of disputes between sovereign tribal groups and the US government, he says, is “protecting our land and protecting our water, not only for ourselves but for the planet. We’re not random protesters out there – we’re protecting our own land”.
-
Louisiana5 minutes agoNeuty, the beloved Bucktown nutria rat that charmed Louisiana, has died
-
Maine11 minutes agoHow a data center derailed $240,000 for affordable housing in Wiscasset
-
Maryland17 minutes agoDC man wins $5M in Maryland lottery – WTOP News
-
Michigan23 minutes agoMichigan groom sentenced for killing his best friend on his wedding night
-
Massachusetts29 minutes agoSmoke from North Attleborough fire visible for miles
-
Minnesota35 minutes agoMinnesota gas prices surge: Twin Cities hits $4.18, costs climb $1.28 from 2025
-
Mississippi41 minutes ago
Vote Clarion Ledger Mississippi girls high school athlete of the week May 4-9
-
Missouri47 minutes agoJudge denies Missouri AG’s bid to immediately halt 7-OH kratom sales by American Shaman


