In her quest to become the first female president, Vice President Kamala Harris portrayed herself as a champion of women’s rights, putting abortion rights at the forefront of her campaign. 

But she fell short, South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem explains in an interview, because in doing so, Harris and the Democrats failed to meet voters where they are. 

“I think what was so interesting during this campaign is we consistently saw Kamala Harris and the Democrats try to put women in a box,” Noem told Fox News Digital. “They tried to define women as only caring about abortion and their health care. They didn’t really give them due credit for being the individuals out there that are raising families and caring about their children’s education and paying their bills and pursuing their careers.”

Among the more surprising findings from the 2024 election is that Harris under-performed with women compared to President Biden’s support four years ago.

HARRIS FORMALLY CONCEDES ONE DAY AFTER TRUMP’S SWEEPING VICTORY

President-elect Trump prevailed Tuesday in a decisive victory, sweeping all the key battleground states and winning a majority in the national popular vote – the first time a Republican has done so in 20 years. Voter concerns about the economy and immigration propelled Trump’s triumphant return to the White House. But he also expanded his base with traditionally Democratic constituencies, including Black, Hispanic and young voters, according to the Fox News Voter Analysis. 

The election showcased many of the nation’s deep divides, particularly in gender. Men voted for Trump by 10 points, while women supported Harris by 8 points. The 18-point gender gap was slightly bigger than in the 2020 presidential election (17 points).

That widening was due to Trump improving 5 points among men since 2020. But Harris also under-performed with women compared to President Biden, who won the female vote by 12 points. 

Harris became the Democratic frontrunner after President Biden suspended his bid for re-election in July amid reports of his declining mental acuity in the wake of a poor debate performance against Trump in June. Biden quickly endorsed Harris, who made “reproductive rights” a top issue on the campaign trail, a strategy that would ultimately not win over enough swing state voters. Harris was the Democrat nominee for only about four months.

DONALD TRUMP JR., KRISTI NOEM JOIN FRANKLIN GRAHAM IN HELENE-TORN NORTH CAROLINA WITH SAMARITAN’S PURSE

Vice President Kamala Harris put abortion and women’s rights at the forefront of her unsuccessful 2024 campaign.  (Getty Images)

GOP strategists told Fox News Digital that the Harris campaign’s abortion strategy was ineffective against Trump, who had argued the issue returned to the states after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. 

Noem added that abortion is just not the only priority for women in America.  She campaigned for Trump in Pennsylvania and other swing states, promoting his policies and taking questions from voters. 

“We’ve got women running businesses that want their communities to be safe. They want to thrive. And they certainly don’t want a president that doesn’t protect women and the opportunities they have in front of them,” she told Fox News Digital. 

The governor also criticized Harris’ team for “minimizing women” in the closing weeks of the election, referencing how Harris surrogate Mark Cuban had said Trump never surrounds himself with “strong, intelligent women.” 

SOUTH DAKOTA GOV. KRISTI NOEM SIGNS BILL BANNING SOME GENDER-RELATED MEDICAL, SURGICAL PROCEDURES FOR MINORS

South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem greets attendees as she speaks on Day 1 of the Republican National Convention (RNC) at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on July 15, 2024.  (REUTERS/Brian Snyder)

“They even went so far as to call women weak and dumb, you know, by their surrogtates. And I think that was offensive to many of us across the country,” said Noem. 

She also said the Democrats’ far-left positions on abortion and transgender issues have made it easier for Republicans to take “common sense” positions that most Americans agree with.

“Kamala Harris and her Democratic Party have become more and more extreme on gender issues, on abortion. It’s easier for Republicans and our candidates and President Trump to use common sense to talk to the American people about truly how extreme the Democrats want to take this country and what we can do to make sure that every single person in this country, whether you’re a man or woman, that you get an opportunity,” she said. 

The Trump campaign and associated political action committees leaned in to the culture wars with millions of dollars spent on ads that attacked Democrats and Harris as too liberal on gender issues.

Governor of South Dakota, Kristi Noem visits FOX Business Network’s “Varney & Co” at Fox Business Network Studios on May 7, 2024, in New York City.  (John Lamparski/Getty Images)

“Kamala is for they/them. Trump is for you,” one of Trump’s strongest attack ads concluded. The New York Times reported that Trump’s anti-trans ads shifted the race 2.7 percentage points in Trump’s favor after viewers watched it. 

Noem has also fought the culture wars. In South Dakota, she signed legislation that banned puberty blockers, cross-sex hormone treatments and sex-change operations for transgender individuals under the age of 18. She has spoken repeatedly about keeping biological men who identify as transgender out of women’s sports and protecting opportunities for women and girls.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“President Trump is not going to let mediocre men take away opportunities for our outstanding women,” Noem said. It was Harris, she argued, who would have women on an “uncompetitive playing field.” 

Asked if she had discussed joining the new administration, Noem said she had not had any conversations with the president-elect about a job. 

“He knows I’ll help him any way that I can. But I spoke to him today, and he’s in great spirits. He’s looking forward to getting his administration set up. And I think he’s already getting phone calls from world leaders and working with people on his transition team to make sure that he’s ready to hit the ground running.” 

“I love being the governor of South Dakota,” she added. “So we’ll continue to be a strong advocate for President Trump. He’s my friend, I’m so happy for him. And if he asks me to do something, well, we’ll make a decision at that time.” 

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (Dakota News Now) – On Election Day, South Dakota voters made the final decision on seven ballot questions.

One of the highly-debated initiatives was Referred Law 21, which would have put Senate Bill 201 into law with a Landowner Bill of Rights.

It was voted down by 59% of voters.

The measure was widely criticized for transferring control from local authorities to the state. Proponents argued it would have benefitted South Dakota’s economy.

Landowners who opposed Referred Law 21 and pipeline projects in the state viewed its rejection by voters as a “huge blow” to Summit Carbon Solutions and the carbon pipeline industry.

They held a victory press conference on Wednesday to celebrate, but both sides on the issue are looking at what comes next.

The attorney for landowners, Brian Jorde, pointed out in the press conference that Summit Carbon Solutions’ website no longer has a map specifically showing the project footprint in South Dakota.

Opponents to Referred Law 21 took a victory lap in the aftermath of election night. The final numbers looked closer than it was.

Of South Dakota’s 66 counties, 65 voted against Referred Law 21.

They celebrated what they believed to be momentum towards property rights and local control.

“This has been a grueling fight that we’ve been going on for three and a half years and I will say last night’s results were particularly gratifying and humbling,” said Ed Fischbach, a Spink County landowner.

Landowners said that they feel like it was also a victory to see the candidates who went against pipeline projects like Hohn from across the state won yesterday, some by wide margins as Fischbach explained.

“My county that I live in is Spink County and in the original route, we were going to get the most miles of that pipeline and if you are looking for a referendum on how our county feels, that also happened last night. Our county commission chairperson was up for reelection and she was targeted by an employee of the ethanol plant here in our county. Suzanne Smith was reelected with 73% [of the vote],” Fischbach said.

“The people supporting the bill made constant reference to the idea that we were all just a loud minority, extremists, folk who don’t live here or don’t have a commitment to this place. We have truly shown in a resounding 60-40 split that we are the loud majority on this issue and the fact that only one county was won in the entire state shows the statewide nature of our unified voice,” said Dakota Rural Action senior organizer Chase Jensen.

Proponents are disappointed but said they will get back to working on new ways forward.

Summit Carbon Solutions, the company that’s been trying to build its carbon capture pipeline project in South Dakota, plans on applying for a permit in the state later this month.

In a statement, they said:

“Summit Carbon Solutions will apply for a permit in South Dakota on November 19, 2024. Our focus continues to be on working with landowners and ensuring the long-term viability of ethanol and agriculture in the state. Projects like ours have successfully navigated South Dakota’s existing regulatory landscape in the past. We will continue to operate within the current framework, knowing that the future of ethanol and agriculture is vital to our shared success.”

Opponents to Referred Law 21 said they were prepared for the next steps as well. They were glad that companies would have to work with localities and they now turn their attention to what they call “True Reform” in the legislature.

“We really have had a grassroots movement across South Dakota with a lot of new conservative legislators and I am hopeful and think that we will bring forth a lot of good legislation that will protect our private property rights and keep our freedoms intact where they should be,” District 9 Senator-elect Joy Hohn.

Hohn said that legislators she spoke to have their eyes on putting together legislation that will specifically address eminent domain using Minnesota as a model because she said no eminent domain can be used for carbon pipelines in Minnesota.

“We look forward to this next session where we will actually get to some of the root causes that this bill or that this project has raised in our state. We will not settle for false compromise bills like Referred Law 21 was,” Jensen said.

Jorde said he was not surprised to hear that Summit Carbon Solutions intends to apply for another permit.

“They have to. Their investors are demanding they try again. It’s going to be very telling if that application is simply a copy and paste from last time that will tell us that they have learned nothing, that they don’t respect the will of the people, they don’t respect the vote that just occurred. The routes better be rerouted around the counties with the ordinances in place. It better be drastically different and we trust the PUC to hold the line as they did in Navigator and upholding county ordinances,” Jorde said.

Landowners are confident that if Summit Carbon Solutions follows through with its promise to submit another permit application, it will get the same result from the Public Utilities Commission and county ordinances will be respected.

Copyright 2024 Dakota News Now. All rights reserved.