South Dakota
McFeely: Five things to watch in the Bison-South Dakota State game
FARGO — It was, if memory serves, after a Football Championship Subdivision playoff game late in head coach Chris Klieman’s tenure. Maybe 2017, more possibly 2018. The North Dakota State football team was steamrolling most everybody, in the midst of a record 39-game winning streak, and Klieman got behind a microphone in the basement of the Fargodome and said the darnedest thing.
“There were people who didn’t believe we could win this football game.”
This caused the staff at Five Things to chortle audibly and snap his head toward local TV luminary Dom Izzo, who was also holding back laughter. NDSU between 2011 and 2018 went 112-8 and won seven national championships. There was nobody anywhere who didn’t believe the Bison were going to win that particular football game, nor any other football game they played.
So the staff at Five Things approached Klieman after the press conference, broad smile evident, and asked the head coach for more information.
“Name one person who didn’t think you were going to win this game,” said Five Things.
“There were people,” said Klieman, who expertly changed the subject to something else.
Coaches are gonna be coaches, looking for an edge or a sliver of bulletin board material wherever they can find it. When you win 93% of your games over an eight-year period, anything is fair game. Maybe Klieman was made aware of some random unfortunate in Kazakhstan who blogged or podcasted that the Bison were not going to win.
It is now 2023 and the Bison are in a different place. They are still one of the top 15 teams in FCS, but not dominant like those glory days throughout the 2010s. That mantle now belongs to South Dakota State, the defending national champion that is crushing everything it its path. It appears the Jackrabbits, much-disliked archrivals of NDSU, are headed toward the stage at the north end of Toyota Stadium in Frisco, Texas, again in January.
And that has led to this strange take during the week of the Dakota Marker game: There are people who don’t believe NDSU can win this game.
Lots of them. A majority of them. A vast majority of them, possibly.
There have been few games during NDSU’s time in Division I — and even going back deeply into its Division II days — when it felt like the Bison had no chance to win.
There might even be zero games in the last 40-plus in which it felt like NDSU had no chance to win. Like, we’re talking, no chance.
This feels like that game.
Five Things was racking its memory, since it’s covered the Bison since 1997, about when the last time NDSU entered a game with no chance to win. Couldn’t come up with anything.
Now, it’s always risky to say no chance. There is always a chance. It’s college football. Things happen. But everything seems to favor SDSU and it’s in Brookings. A Bison victory would be viewed, oddly, as a major upset.
And if that happens, the current head coach, Matt Entz, would be fully within his rights to enter the postgame press conference and say, “There were people who didn’t believe we could win this football game.”
He could look squarely at the Five Things staff while saying it. Our prediction is SDSU 40, NDSU 10.
The Jackrabbits are favored by 11.5 points, according to the betting site 5dimes.
Here are five things to watch in the Bison-South Dakota State game.
Literally, we are cutting and pasting much of this section. Just as we did in January when the teams played for the national title.
Keep an eye on rushing yardage.
If the Bison can outrush the Jacks and, specifically, rush for more than 170 yards, they stand a much better chance of winning the game than if they don’t do those things.
In 24 games between the teams in Division I (19 regular season, four playoff) the team that rushed for more yards has won 23 times. The lone anomaly was 2008, when the Jackrabbits won 25-24 in the Fargodome despite being outrushed 119-104.
About the 170 figure, again.
Former Bison radio voice Jeff Culhane unearthed a nugget that continues to be relevant.
When the Bison rushed for more than 170 yards against SDSU in the Division I era, they’ve won every time but one.
In the 24 games, the Bison are 13-0 when they rush for more than 170 against the Jacks. They are 1-10 when they run for less than 170.
NDSU ran for 127 yards in a 23-21 defeat at the dome in October 2022 and 160 in a 45-21 Jackrabbits rout in the the national championship game in January.
Here are NDSU’s rushing totals against SDSU since the Bison dynasty began in 2011, with the winner and score in parentheses:
- 2022 title game — 160 (SDSU 45-21)
- 2022 — 127 (SDSU 23-21)
- 2021 — 147 (SDSU 27-19)
- 2021 spring — 97 (SDSU 27-17)
- 2019 — 332 (NDSU 23-16)
- 2018 playoffs — 439 (NDSU 44-21)
- 2018 — 207 (NDSU 21-17)
- 2017 — 108 (SDSU 33-21)
- 2016 playoffs — 316 (NDSU 36-10)
- 2016 — 161 (SDSU 19-17)
- 2015 — 202 (NDSU 28-7)
- 2014 playoffs — 181 (NDSU 27-24)
- 2014 — 290 (NDSU 37-17)
- 2013 — 262 (NDSU 20-0)
- 2012 — 171 (NDSU 20-17)
- 2011 — 182 (NDSU 38-14)
In SDSU’s six victories since 2011, the Bison averaged 133.3 yards rushing per game.
In NDSU’s 10 victories since 2011, the Bison averaged 258.2 yards rushing per game.
As the world turnovers …
Quick trivia: What is the significance of the date October 26, 2019?
Answer: It’s the last time NDSU took away the ball from SDSU.
In the subsequent four games, all Jackrabbits victories, SDSU has zero turnovers and the Bison have seven.
Coincidence that the Bison haven’t won since 2019? We think not.
That turnover, a Josh Hayes interception of a Keaton Heide pass with 4:56 remaining in the fourth quarter, was turned into seven points by NDSU when Adam Cofield went 71 yards on fourth-and-1 from the SDSU 29. That broke a 16-16 tie and gave the Bison a 23-16 win.
It seems a million years ago. Hayes went on to play for two more colleges and is now in the NFL.
Turnovers always play a major factor in college football, but even moreso when one team is clearly better than the other. For the inferior team to defeat the superior team, it has to win the turnover battle and perhaps by a significant margin.
If the Bison don’t turn over the ball and get a couple of takeaways, their chances of victory improve vastly.
The Bison had three turnovers in the national championship game in Frisco, Texas, and were blown out. If the Bison have three again on Saturday, the result will likely be similar.
Both teams are good at gathering turnovers. The Bison are tied for third in FCS with a +9 turnover margin. The Jackrabbits are tied for seventh at +8.
SDSU’s defense is the best in FCS, statistically and in reality. That is a large hurdle for NDSU. The Jackrabbits are allowing a subdivision-best 11.4 points per game. So despite averaging 37.4 points, the Bison will find it tough going against SDSU. The Jacks are No. 1 in FCS in points per game and total defense.
So what would be a good offensive output? Twenty points? Twenty-four points? Twenty-seven points? Even 30 points?
Bigger question: Are any of those totals good enough to win the game?
Because the Jackrabbits are likely the best offensive team in FCS, too, even if their statistics don’t match up.
They have the best offensive line in FCS, a likely NFL running back in Isaiah Davis, a quarterback in Mark Gronowski who will likely receive some interest from Big Ten and Big 12 schools wanting him to transfer, a likely NFL tight end in Zach Heins, a couple of receivers in the Janke twins who will at least get a chance with pro teams. The list is long.
So the question is not only, “How can the Bison score on these guys?” It’s also, and perhaps more importantly, “How can the Bison stop these guys from scoring?”
While the Bison rank high nationally in scoring defense (11th) and total defense (10th), they haven’t fared well against ranked teams. South Dakota controlled the ball and scored 24 points on just 41 plays in a 24-19 victory in the Missouri Valley Football Conference opener. North Dakota rang up 49 points and moved the ball at will in a rout in early October.
SDSU’s offense is significantly better than USD and UND. And the Bison will be down at least a couple of key defensive players. Defensive tackle Will Mostaert was lost for the season when he tore an Achilles tendon last Saturday against Murray State. Starting linebacker Julian Wlodarczyk has missed the past two games after a concussion at UND. Starting cornerback Marcus Sheppard left last week’s game with an apparent shoulder injury, but Entz said he should return against the Jacks.
NDSU has long been a top FCS team in time of possession. It goes with the Bison’s historic reliance on the power running game. NDSU runs the ball, gets a lead, runs the ball some more and grinds out the clock.
The other team can’t score if it doesn’t have the ball.
Much of that TOP success is based on getting into manageable third down situations. Converting a third-and-2 into a first down is easy. Not so much for a third-and-8.
So, it boils down to this for the Bison: If they can convert third downs and possess the ball for long stretches, thereby keeping the ball out of the hands of SDSU’s potent offense, they have a chance to win.
NDSU thrived in third-down situations this season, ranking second nationally by converting 52.6% of their third downs.
That’s good. If the Bison can keep the ball, get first downs, run clock … they keep Gronowski, Davis, Heins and Co. on the sideline. It shortens the game, limits SDSU’s possessions, keeps the score down.
The bad news: SDSU is even better on third down. The Jackrabbits are No. 1 in FCS by converting 60.2% on third down.
Funny thing, though. The Jackrabbits have faced only 78 third downs in eight games this season. That’s the second fewest in FCS, behind South Dakota’s 72. Interpretation: SDSU is rarely in third down because they move the chains on first or second down.
NDSU is one of the better teams in FCS in third down defense, and it’ll have to be Saturday. The Bison defense has to get off the field and the Bison offense has to stay on the field. Or it’ll be a long day.
Mark Gronowski is the Valley’s most outstanding quarterback for SDSU. Cam Miller is having an all-conference season for NDSU, even if he’s overshadowed by Gronowski and other QBs in the league. All eyes will be on those two excellent signal-callers.
But what role will Bison backup Cole Payton play against the Jacks?
After starting the year rushing for 206 yards and three TDs in the first two games against Eastern Washington and Maine, Payton has gone mostly silent. He gets a series or two a game, more in blowouts, but the explosive run threat has been absent since early September.
In the past six games, Payton has rushed for a total of 94 yards on 27 carries. In the last two games, against conference doormats Western Illinois and Murray State, he’s ran three times for minus-four yards. He had a single carry for 2 yards against Murray State last week in a 38-6 victory.
If the Bison are hoping to establish a running game and possess the ball against the Jacks, does the “running quarterback” get more chances this week? Payton is no Easton Stick or Trey Lance, but in big games during their careers the Bison had no problem running them 12-15 times. Or more.
In the 2018 playoff semifinals against SDSU, Stick carried 16 times for 147 yards.
In the 2019 title game against James Madison, Lance carried 30 times for 166 yards.
Payton is not as dangerous as those all-timers — and he’s not the starter — but he might give NDSU an offensive option that’s been quiet for some time.
South Dakota
FCS Playoffs Semifinal Preview & Prediction: No. 4 South Dakota at No. 1 Montana State
No. 4 South Dakota travels to No. 1 Montana State in the semifinals of the 2024 FCS Playoffs. Kickoff is scheduled for Dec. 21 at 2:30 p.m. CT on ABC.
The winner will advance to the FCS National Championship game, where they will face the winner of No. 3 South Dakota State at No. 2 North Dakota State.
2024 FCS Playoff Bracket
2024 Prediction Record: 174-45
2022-23 Record: 207-75
Kickoff: 2:30 p.m. CT (ABC)
Line: Montana State (-8)
Series History: Montana State leads 2-0
Key Players: Montana State
Tommy Mellott (QB): 182-for-259 (70.3%), 2,430 Passing Yards, 28 Passing TDs, 2 INTs, 790 Rushing Yards, 12 Rushing TDs
Scottre Humphrey (RB): 177 Carries, 1,325 Rushing Yards, 7.5 YPC, 14 Rushing TDs
Adam Jones (RB): 155 Carries, 1,068 Rushing Yards, 6.9 YPC, 14 Rushing TDs
Brody Grebe (DL): 34 Total Tackles, 9 TFLs, 7.5 Sacks, 5 PBUs, 8 QBHs, 1 FF
McCade O’Reilly (LB): 64 Total Tackles, 8.5 TFLs, 3 Sacks, 3 PBUs, 6 QBHs, 1 FF
Key Players: South Dakota
Aidan Bouman (QB): 194-for-283 (68.5%), 2,723 Passing Yards, 19 Passing TDs, 4 INTs
Charles Pierre Jr. (RB): 163 Carries, 1,187 Rushing Yards, 7.3 YPC, 15 Rushing TDs
Travis Theis (RB): 173 Carries, 1,062 Rushing Yards, 6.1 YPC, 18 Rushing TDs, 305 Receiving Yards
Mi’Quise Grace (DL): 59 Total Tackles, 18 TFLs, 9.5 Sacks, 9 QBHs, 2 FFs, 2 FRs
Gary Bryant III (LB): 101 Total Tackles, 3 TFLs, 2 INTs, 3 PBUs, 1 FF
After exceeding expectations all season, South Dakota has a chance to shake up the national title race with an upset over Montana State, who enters the game as the only undefeated FCS program in the nation. The Coyotes are looking to make their first national title appearance at the FCS level, while the Bobcats have not won the title since 1984.
Everything starts with South Dakota’s ability to limit explosive plays from a dangerous Montana State offense. The Bobcats lead the nation in total offense and yards per play, averaging almost 500 yards per game this season. South Dakota has done an excellent job against the run, ranking No. 10 nationally in rushing defense. However, the Coyotes have not seen a rushing attack this talented. The Bobcats average over 300 yards per game, led by Scottre Humphrey with 1,325 yards and Adam Jones with 1,068 yards.
The Coyotes have held their first two postseason opponents under 100 rushing yards. Mi’Quise Grace and Nick Gaes can create havoc off the edge, combining for 29 tackles for loss and 18.5 sacks. Montana State’s offensive line has been dominant this season, featuring three players that earned All-American honors. The Bobcats allow a negative play on only 4.2% of all offensive snaps and have the lowest pressure rate in the postseason. The Coyotes will have to create some chaos at the line of scrimmage, which no other team has been able to do this season against the Bobcats.
Montana State’s offense may start with the rushing attack, but quarterback Tommy Mellott remains the biggest x-factor this weekend. He’s having the best season of his career, completing over 70% of his passes for 2,430 passing yards, 790 rushing yards, and 40 total touchdowns. South Dakota’s linebackers are extremely athletic and must contain Mellott in this game. Linebackers Gary Bryant III and Nate Ewell have combined for 175 total tackles, eight tackles for loss, and one sack.
South Dakota will also lean on an explosive rushing attack, which ranks third nationally in yards per carry. Charles Pierre Jr. and Travis Theis have combined for over 2,220 rushing yards and 33 rushing touchdowns. Montana State has held its past five opponents under 150 rushing yards, which should make this an interesting matchup in Saturday’s game. South Dakota’s offensive line is one of the best in the nation and has the size to challenge Montana State’s front seven.
Montana State has had a championship-level offense for multiple seasons, but the defense has failed to meet those expectations until this season. The Bobcats rank No. 10 nationally in total defense, holding opponents to 293.9 yards per game. This unit does an excellent job of generating pressure and creating negative plays. Brody Grebe and Kenneth Eiden IV are dangerous off the edge, combining for 17.5 tackles for loss and 14.5 sacks. This will be the ultimate test for the Bobcats as South Dakota’s offense presents a unique challenge.
Despite not losing an FCS game in regulation, South Dakota has continued to be doubted all season. The Coyotes have the talent to pull off the upset in Bozeman, but I have yet to see any major flaws in this Montana State team. The Bobcats have too many weapons and are led by arguably the most dynamic player in the nation. All this will be too much for the Coyotes to overcome as Montana State advances to Frisco.
Prediction: Montana State (31-21)
Behind The Numbers: 2024 FCS Playoffs Semifinals Preview
2025 FBS-To-FCS Football Transfer Tracker
2025 FCS-To-FCS Football Transfer Tracker
2025 FCS-To-FBS Football Transfer Tracker
2024 FCS Playoffs: Official Bracket, Schedule, Scores
Follow FCS Football Central on social media for ongoing coverage of FCS football, including on X, Facebook, and YouTube.
South Dakota
Family seeks justice after man killed in raid near Wagner, South Dakota
WAGNER, S.D. — Federal officers used pepper spray and shot and killed a young man with a criminal history moments after he livestreamed himself brushing his teeth in the basement of a tribal housing unit on the Yankton Sioux Reservation.
Zander Zephier, 23, died Nov. 27 just north of this southeast South Dakota town, about 40 minutes after the U.S. Marshals Service arrived to arrest him on outstanding warrants.
What is not clear from the live video feed and additional security footage outside the house is why marshals used force to apprehend Zephier, especially when his wheelchair-bound, 90-year-old great-grandmother was still in the house.
Federal officials haven’t responded to inquiries about the timing of the operation and what circumstances led to Zephier being shot and killed.
A retired chief inspector with the U.S. Marshals Service raised questions about the use of pepper spray and the decision to enter the house without more attempts at negotiation, possibly involving tribal police.
“Tactically, it gives the impression of deputy marshals operating in the wild, wild West,” said Jason Wojdylo, who worked for the Marshals Service for nearly 25 years and now lives in Tampa, Florida.
“If the fugitive is holed up in the house, our procedures were always to back out, set up a perimeter and contain the fugitive in the residence, not just lob munitions into the house.”
The U.S. Marshals Service, an enforcement arm of the federal judiciary, is primarily responsible for locating and arresting federal suspects and carrying out fugitive operations.
Based on text messages from neighbors and interviews with family members, the law enforcement team arrived at the residence at 8:37 a.m. the day before Thanksgiving and began lobbing gas grenades into the basement at 9:11 a.m.
Shots were fired five minutes later, after at least one deputy marshal entered the house. At 9:46 a.m., Zephier was pronounced dead at Community Memorial Hospital in Wagner.
Zephier’s great-grandmother was on the main floor of the residence when the OC (oleoresin capsicum) gas grenades were tossed into the basement to render “an intense respiratory effect to an non-compliant subject,” according to product materials.
The sound of canisters crashing into the basement through windows is heard on a livestreamed video that Zephier made of himself that morning.
Much of the law enforcement activity and conversation outside the house was also captured on motion-activated security footage that was obtained and analyzed, shaping a basic timeline of events.
In the livestreamed video, Zephier brushes his teeth as officers outside call for him to give himself up. The sound of breaking glass is heard, after which Zephier says “Oh s—!” and eventually begins coughing and holding a rag to his nose and mouth.
“Come out with your hands up, Zander!” an officer calls out in the video. “We have all day. I have 10 more of these (gas grenades).”
Minutes later, at least one deputy marshal enters the front door with a protective shield, gas mask and firearm. The remaining officers complain about how long it’s taking the family to get Zephier’s great-grandmother, Conceta, out of the house.
Then one of the deputy marshals in the driveway says, “Shots fired!” to a fellow officer. The other officer replies, “Good guys or bad guys?”
“We’ve got to get him out of there,” an officer says later.
Video footage shows Zephier being wheeled down the driveway on a gurney, shirtless and in jeans with bandages on his chest.
He was pronounced dead at the hospital by Charles Mix County coroner Chad Peters, who told said he transported the body to Sioux Falls for an autopsy to be performed by forensic pathologist and Minnehaha County medical examiner Kenneth Snell.
Zane Zephier, a University of South Dakota employee and Zander’s older brother, said his family wants to see the autopsy report to determine how many times Zander was shot and the location of the bullet wounds.
Officers discussed body cams
The Zephier family does not dispute Zander’s lengthy criminal record and fugitive status.
At the time of his death, he was considered an escaped prisoner from Charles Mix County Jail in Lake Andes because he was granted furlough in July to attend a family funeral and never returned.
Zander was also on the federal sex offender registry after pleading guilty in 2023 to abusive sexual contact with a minor, for which he was sentenced to 21 months in prison.
Despite his checkered past, family members are calling for an independent investigation into the 23-year-old’s death. They said they don’t trust law enforcement to conduct an impartial inquiry, especially when it comes to operations on tribal land.
The security camera footage reviewed by News Watch shows the following:
- A deputy marshal approaches the front door of the house, hears something over his radio and then appears to say, “Shoot him.” Faint shots can be heard from the house in the video.
- A deputy marshal emerges from the house and says “Little spicy down there!” to another officer in the driveway, likely referring to pepper spray. “Who was involved?” the other officer asks, to which the deputy marshal responds, “Me.” “Are you all good?” he is asked. “Yeah, I’m good,” he says.
- Moments later, the deputy marshal involved in the shooting says, “Are you still live?” to another officer in the driveway. He then points to the man’s body camera and repeats the question.
News Watch has filed a Freedom of Information Act request to the Marshals Service through the Department of Justice to obtain body cam footage from the operation.
U.S. Attorney Alison Ramsdell, the chief federal law enforcement officer in South Dakota, did not respond to an interview request for this story.
— This story first appeared on southdakotanewswatch.org.
South Dakota
Letting go is difficult after going afield with a good dog • South Dakota Searchlight
Mary knew it was time before I did. Or maybe I should say she admitted it before I could.
Giving up on a dog, even when it’s pretty clearly time, can be difficult. And I needed some help from my wife, and from our vet, in recognizing the obvious.
So the time for Rosie, our 14-year-old springer spaniel, came one day last week, after a two-year decline that accelerated over the last six months and especially the last six or eight weeks.
Mary was home sick, so I sat alone with Rosie in an examination room at the animal clinic, talking to her and stroking her head and side as she drifted off, giving in peacefully to the sedative the vet had injected a few minutes earlier. Then I started to sob as I touched the call button summoning the vet and her assistant, who was pushing a cart that would take Rosie into the room where the final drug would be administered.
“I’m so sorry,” the vet said. “We’ll take good care of her.”
I left Rosie in their gentle hands and wept my way out of the exam room, down the hall, through the lobby and on to my pickup.
And when I settled in behind the wheel, I felt Rosie’s leash in the pocket of my jacket and acknowledged through my tears that a dog that had been such an important “is” in my life had become a “was.”
I do not mean to overstate the emotions of this. Obviously, the loss of a dog is not the same as the loss of a human being. But it is the loss of a life. A life that mattered.
For most of her 14 years with us, Rosie was a high-energy force of nature in our home and out across the wild lands of our state, leading me with the gift of her nose through mucky cattails and dense upland grasses and deep-woods aspen groves.
East River. West River. Missouri River country. Black Hills highlands. We explored them all, wet and dry, windy and calm, hot and cold and quite a bit in-between.
She loved best the kind of difficult-to-traverse coverts that Pennsylvania writer Charles Fergus called “thick and uncivil sorts of places,” and I got to know them better and love them more deeply by sharing them with her.
Oh, the things you can learn by going afield with a good dog. Magical, enduring things, about the outdoors, about the dog, about yourself.
We watched more sundowns together than I could count, usually when a bird hunt was done, we were both tired and fulfilled and often enjoying the added gift of coyote song. Rosie always raised her ears and cocked her head at the music, listening intently as if trying to decipher some canine-encrypted code.
The call of the wild? Of course. And she understood it much better than I did.
Oh, the things you can learn by going afield with a good dog. Magical, enduring things, about the outdoors, about the dog, about yourself.
But she wasn’t just a strong bird dog. She also was a talented backyard escape artist and unreconstructed garbage gut with a special affinity for kids’ sweat socks, the sweatier and dirtier the better.
I’ll skip the undignified details about how those socks, once swallowed, worked their way out, one way or the other. But Rosie processed a dozen or so over the years, with great effort but without requiring emergency room care.
She was a licker, not a fighter, that dog, known in our family and throughout our neighborhood for her sweet, outgoing personality. And she was especially fond and tolerant of the 19 grandchildren — now ranging in age from a gainfully employed college graduate to a toddler — who got to bask in her affection and be her pal.
I bought her from a kennel out in the James River breaks when she was eight weeks old and officially named her James River Rose. But I rarely called her anything but Rosie.
She was the most headstrong and challenging dog I’ve had to train, or to control in the field, but also the most athletic and relentless on bird scent. And despite the occasional adrenaline-driven indiscretion, at her core Rosie aimed to please.
She was six months old when she flushed and retrieved her first prairie grouse and a few weeks older when she did the same with her first rooster pheasant. And a year or two later, she led me to three ruffed grouse — a noteworthy limit on the first day I ever saw a Black Hills ruffy — in a disorderly gathering of willow and aspen and birch deep in a spring-fed hollow up off Tinton Road south of Spearfish.
She made a four-hour round-trip drive for a two-hour hunt worth it every time, even if all we trailed and flushed were a couple of hen pheasants. “No shot, girl,” I would say, and I praised her just as effusively as if we’d bagged three roosters.
She was puzzled whenever I missed a bird, ecstatic when I hit one and even in the most inhospitable of cover rarely missed a retrieve.
When we weren’t hunting pheasants or grouse, we were often up on the trails in the forest above our house in Rapid City, where Rosie maintained her nosy optimism, fervently believing — despite overwhelming odds to the contrary — that there was a pheasant or grouse waiting to be flushed around the next bend.
Never a slacker, she stayed blue-collared busy, whether snuffling her way through a Lyman County sorghum field or — in her younger days, at least — frantically chasing butterflies and even bird shadows back and forth across the backyard grass.
She was unremittingly upbeat and never failed to lift my spirits, even at the lowest of times.
Then came the decline, slow at first, much faster near the end. It was nothing out of the ordinary: an old dog with a bunch of old-dog ailments that finally reached her time.
And an old-dog lover who needed some help in admitting it.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
-
Politics1 week ago
Canadian premier threatens to cut off energy imports to US if Trump imposes tariff on country
-
Technology1 week ago
Inside the launch — and future — of ChatGPT
-
Technology7 days ago
OpenAI cofounder Ilya Sutskever says the way AI is built is about to change
-
Politics7 days ago
U.S. Supreme Court will decide if oil industry may sue to block California's zero-emissions goal
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta asks the US government to block OpenAI’s switch to a for-profit
-
Politics1 week ago
Conservative group debuts major ad buy in key senators' states as 'soft appeal' for Hegseth, Gabbard, Patel
-
Business5 days ago
Freddie Freeman's World Series walk-off grand slam baseball sells at auction for $1.56 million
-
Technology5 days ago
Meta’s Instagram boss: who posted something matters more in the AI age