South Dakota
McFeely: Five things to watch in the Bison-South Dakota State game
FARGO — It was, if memory serves, after a Football Championship Subdivision playoff game late in head coach Chris Klieman’s tenure. Maybe 2017, more possibly 2018. The North Dakota State football team was steamrolling most everybody, in the midst of a record 39-game winning streak, and Klieman got behind a microphone in the basement of the Fargodome and said the darnedest thing.
“There were people who didn’t believe we could win this football game.”
This caused the staff at Five Things to chortle audibly and snap his head toward local TV luminary Dom Izzo, who was also holding back laughter. NDSU between 2011 and 2018 went 112-8 and won seven national championships. There was nobody anywhere who didn’t believe the Bison were going to win that particular football game, nor any other football game they played.
So the staff at Five Things approached Klieman after the press conference, broad smile evident, and asked the head coach for more information.
“Name one person who didn’t think you were going to win this game,” said Five Things.
“There were people,” said Klieman, who expertly changed the subject to something else.
Coaches are gonna be coaches, looking for an edge or a sliver of bulletin board material wherever they can find it. When you win 93% of your games over an eight-year period, anything is fair game. Maybe Klieman was made aware of some random unfortunate in Kazakhstan who blogged or podcasted that the Bison were not going to win.
It is now 2023 and the Bison are in a different place. They are still one of the top 15 teams in FCS, but not dominant like those glory days throughout the 2010s. That mantle now belongs to South Dakota State, the defending national champion that is crushing everything it its path. It appears the Jackrabbits, much-disliked archrivals of NDSU, are headed toward the stage at the north end of Toyota Stadium in Frisco, Texas, again in January.
And that has led to this strange take during the week of the Dakota Marker game: There are people who don’t believe NDSU can win this game.
Lots of them. A majority of them. A vast majority of them, possibly.
There have been few games during NDSU’s time in Division I — and even going back deeply into its Division II days — when it felt like the Bison had no chance to win.
There might even be zero games in the last 40-plus in which it felt like NDSU had no chance to win. Like, we’re talking, no chance.
This feels like that game.
Five Things was racking its memory, since it’s covered the Bison since 1997, about when the last time NDSU entered a game with no chance to win. Couldn’t come up with anything.
Now, it’s always risky to say no chance. There is always a chance. It’s college football. Things happen. But everything seems to favor SDSU and it’s in Brookings. A Bison victory would be viewed, oddly, as a major upset.
And if that happens, the current head coach, Matt Entz, would be fully within his rights to enter the postgame press conference and say, “There were people who didn’t believe we could win this football game.”
He could look squarely at the Five Things staff while saying it. Our prediction is SDSU 40, NDSU 10.
The Jackrabbits are favored by 11.5 points, according to the betting site 5dimes.
Here are five things to watch in the Bison-South Dakota State game.
Literally, we are cutting and pasting much of this section. Just as we did in January when the teams played for the national title.
Keep an eye on rushing yardage.
If the Bison can outrush the Jacks and, specifically, rush for more than 170 yards, they stand a much better chance of winning the game than if they don’t do those things.
In 24 games between the teams in Division I (19 regular season, four playoff) the team that rushed for more yards has won 23 times. The lone anomaly was 2008, when the Jackrabbits won 25-24 in the Fargodome despite being outrushed 119-104.
About the 170 figure, again.
Former Bison radio voice Jeff Culhane unearthed a nugget that continues to be relevant.
When the Bison rushed for more than 170 yards against SDSU in the Division I era, they’ve won every time but one.
In the 24 games, the Bison are 13-0 when they rush for more than 170 against the Jacks. They are 1-10 when they run for less than 170.
NDSU ran for 127 yards in a 23-21 defeat at the dome in October 2022 and 160 in a 45-21 Jackrabbits rout in the the national championship game in January.
Here are NDSU’s rushing totals against SDSU since the Bison dynasty began in 2011, with the winner and score in parentheses:
- 2022 title game — 160 (SDSU 45-21)
- 2022 — 127 (SDSU 23-21)
- 2021 — 147 (SDSU 27-19)
- 2021 spring — 97 (SDSU 27-17)
- 2019 — 332 (NDSU 23-16)
- 2018 playoffs — 439 (NDSU 44-21)
- 2018 — 207 (NDSU 21-17)
- 2017 — 108 (SDSU 33-21)
- 2016 playoffs — 316 (NDSU 36-10)
- 2016 — 161 (SDSU 19-17)
- 2015 — 202 (NDSU 28-7)
- 2014 playoffs — 181 (NDSU 27-24)
- 2014 — 290 (NDSU 37-17)
- 2013 — 262 (NDSU 20-0)
- 2012 — 171 (NDSU 20-17)
- 2011 — 182 (NDSU 38-14)
In SDSU’s six victories since 2011, the Bison averaged 133.3 yards rushing per game.
In NDSU’s 10 victories since 2011, the Bison averaged 258.2 yards rushing per game.
As the world turnovers …
Quick trivia: What is the significance of the date October 26, 2019?
Answer: It’s the last time NDSU took away the ball from SDSU.
In the subsequent four games, all Jackrabbits victories, SDSU has zero turnovers and the Bison have seven.
Coincidence that the Bison haven’t won since 2019? We think not.
That turnover, a Josh Hayes interception of a Keaton Heide pass with 4:56 remaining in the fourth quarter, was turned into seven points by NDSU when Adam Cofield went 71 yards on fourth-and-1 from the SDSU 29. That broke a 16-16 tie and gave the Bison a 23-16 win.
It seems a million years ago. Hayes went on to play for two more colleges and is now in the NFL.
Turnovers always play a major factor in college football, but even moreso when one team is clearly better than the other. For the inferior team to defeat the superior team, it has to win the turnover battle and perhaps by a significant margin.
If the Bison don’t turn over the ball and get a couple of takeaways, their chances of victory improve vastly.
The Bison had three turnovers in the national championship game in Frisco, Texas, and were blown out. If the Bison have three again on Saturday, the result will likely be similar.
Both teams are good at gathering turnovers. The Bison are tied for third in FCS with a +9 turnover margin. The Jackrabbits are tied for seventh at +8.
SDSU’s defense is the best in FCS, statistically and in reality. That is a large hurdle for NDSU. The Jackrabbits are allowing a subdivision-best 11.4 points per game. So despite averaging 37.4 points, the Bison will find it tough going against SDSU. The Jacks are No. 1 in FCS in points per game and total defense.
So what would be a good offensive output? Twenty points? Twenty-four points? Twenty-seven points? Even 30 points?
Bigger question: Are any of those totals good enough to win the game?
Because the Jackrabbits are likely the best offensive team in FCS, too, even if their statistics don’t match up.
They have the best offensive line in FCS, a likely NFL running back in Isaiah Davis, a quarterback in Mark Gronowski who will likely receive some interest from Big Ten and Big 12 schools wanting him to transfer, a likely NFL tight end in Zach Heins, a couple of receivers in the Janke twins who will at least get a chance with pro teams. The list is long.
So the question is not only, “How can the Bison score on these guys?” It’s also, and perhaps more importantly, “How can the Bison stop these guys from scoring?”
While the Bison rank high nationally in scoring defense (11th) and total defense (10th), they haven’t fared well against ranked teams. South Dakota controlled the ball and scored 24 points on just 41 plays in a 24-19 victory in the Missouri Valley Football Conference opener. North Dakota rang up 49 points and moved the ball at will in a rout in early October.
SDSU’s offense is significantly better than USD and UND. And the Bison will be down at least a couple of key defensive players. Defensive tackle Will Mostaert was lost for the season when he tore an Achilles tendon last Saturday against Murray State. Starting linebacker Julian Wlodarczyk has missed the past two games after a concussion at UND. Starting cornerback Marcus Sheppard left last week’s game with an apparent shoulder injury, but Entz said he should return against the Jacks.
NDSU has long been a top FCS team in time of possession. It goes with the Bison’s historic reliance on the power running game. NDSU runs the ball, gets a lead, runs the ball some more and grinds out the clock.
The other team can’t score if it doesn’t have the ball.
Much of that TOP success is based on getting into manageable third down situations. Converting a third-and-2 into a first down is easy. Not so much for a third-and-8.
So, it boils down to this for the Bison: If they can convert third downs and possess the ball for long stretches, thereby keeping the ball out of the hands of SDSU’s potent offense, they have a chance to win.
NDSU thrived in third-down situations this season, ranking second nationally by converting 52.6% of their third downs.
That’s good. If the Bison can keep the ball, get first downs, run clock … they keep Gronowski, Davis, Heins and Co. on the sideline. It shortens the game, limits SDSU’s possessions, keeps the score down.
The bad news: SDSU is even better on third down. The Jackrabbits are No. 1 in FCS by converting 60.2% on third down.
Funny thing, though. The Jackrabbits have faced only 78 third downs in eight games this season. That’s the second fewest in FCS, behind South Dakota’s 72. Interpretation: SDSU is rarely in third down because they move the chains on first or second down.
NDSU is one of the better teams in FCS in third down defense, and it’ll have to be Saturday. The Bison defense has to get off the field and the Bison offense has to stay on the field. Or it’ll be a long day.
Mark Gronowski is the Valley’s most outstanding quarterback for SDSU. Cam Miller is having an all-conference season for NDSU, even if he’s overshadowed by Gronowski and other QBs in the league. All eyes will be on those two excellent signal-callers.
But what role will Bison backup Cole Payton play against the Jacks?
After starting the year rushing for 206 yards and three TDs in the first two games against Eastern Washington and Maine, Payton has gone mostly silent. He gets a series or two a game, more in blowouts, but the explosive run threat has been absent since early September.
In the past six games, Payton has rushed for a total of 94 yards on 27 carries. In the last two games, against conference doormats Western Illinois and Murray State, he’s ran three times for minus-four yards. He had a single carry for 2 yards against Murray State last week in a 38-6 victory.
If the Bison are hoping to establish a running game and possess the ball against the Jacks, does the “running quarterback” get more chances this week? Payton is no Easton Stick or Trey Lance, but in big games during their careers the Bison had no problem running them 12-15 times. Or more.
In the 2018 playoff semifinals against SDSU, Stick carried 16 times for 147 yards.
In the 2019 title game against James Madison, Lance carried 30 times for 166 yards.
Payton is not as dangerous as those all-timers — and he’s not the starter — but he might give NDSU an offensive option that’s been quiet for some time.
South Dakota
North Dakota tribal leaders see Burgum as ally in Interior, energy role • Alaska Beacon
Mark Fox, chairman of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation, called Gov. Doug Burgum’s recent nomination for secretary of the Interior and National Energy Council chair a “match made in heaven” for North Dakota tribes.
President-elect Donald Trump announced his unique plans for Burgum on Friday. In the combined role, Burgum would not only lead the Department of the Interior — which includes the Bureau of Indian Affairs — but also wield power over all federal agencies that regulate energy.
Fox and other North Dakota and South Dakota tribal leaders welcomed the news.
Burgum, who first took office in 2016, is credited with improving North Dakota’s once-tenuous relationship with local tribes.
While in office, Burgum advocated for tax-sharing agreements with Native nations, added a permanent display of all five tribal flags outside the governor’s office and pushed for law enforcement partnerships to improve emergency response times on reservations.
“Governor Burgum understands Indian country and the challenges we face, such as the need for public safety, better tribal education, and economic development in Indian country, among other needs,” David Flute, former chair of the Sisseton Wahpeton Sioux Tribe, said Friday in a statement to the North Dakota Monitor. Flute is now secretary of the South Dakota Department of Tribal Relations.
Burgum will succeed Interior Secretary Deb Haaland of New Mexico, a member of the Pueblo of Laguna and the first Native American Cabinet secretary.
Tribal officials say Burgum could be a crucial ally in Washington.
“I would have been so disappointed had he not been appointed to a Cabinet position,” Fox said Friday.
Brad Hawk, executive director of North Dakota’s Indian Affairs Commission, said Burgum has a unique opportunity to reduce red tape for Native nations.
Hawk said he wasn’t familiar with every aspect of Haaland’s administration, but appreciated her department’s work investigating the history of federal Indian boarding schools and their impact on Native communities.
State Rep. Lisa Finley-DeVille, D-Mandaree, whose district includes Fort Berthold, recognized Burgum’s progress in establishing meaningful relationships with tribes, but said she worries about Trump administration policies.
“I hope that future Secretary Burgum remembers the trust and relationships that he’s built with North Dakota’s five Tribal Nations,” Finley-DeVille said in a statement. “My hope is that future Secretary Burgum will work collaboratively with tribes to ensure our voices are heard in decision-making processes. Together, we can address critical issues such as sustainable development, cultural preservation, and economic opportunity.”
Finley-DeVille added the Department of the Interior needs to protect tribal sovereignty, honor treaty rights, and ensure that development is conducted responsibly and with the full consultation of all impacted tribal nations.
Fox said Friday he’s hopeful Burgum will use his position in Washington to help create a friendlier regulatory environment for the MHA Nation and other oil-rich tribes. The MHA Nation is based on the Fort Berthold Reservation, home to nearly 3,000 active oil wells.
“We’re able to sit down and talk,” Fox, the MHA Nation chair, said of Burgum earlier this year. “That’s the key.”
Fox noted that in contrast, the MHA Nation has never gotten an audience with Haaland, despite several attempts to speak with her.
This past June, Burgum acknowledged at an event that relations between the state and tribes were at a low point when he took office in 2016. At the time, protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline in southern North Dakota were ongoing, involving thousands of demonstrators who flocked to the state to camp in solidarity with the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe in opposition to the pipeline.
Burgum said one of the first things he did as governor was reach out to Dave Archambault, chair of Standing Rock at the time, and offer to come meet with tribal leaders.
“That’s where we were starting from: with a commitment to each other to listen to each other,” Burgum said during this year’s Strengthening Government to Government conference, an annual event started under his leadership that brings together state and tribal leaders.
U.S. Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., said he thinks Burgum’s experience working with North Dakota tribal leaders makes him a good fit for leading Interior. He characterized the current BIA as unresponsive and bureaucratic.
“Doug has done more for Indian relations in North Dakota than any governor in my lifetime, for sure, and maybe ever,” Cramer said.
Michael Achterling contributed to this report.
North Dakota Monitor is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. North Dakota Monitor maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Amy Dalrymple for questions: [email protected]. Follow North Dakota Monitor on Facebook and X.
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.
South Dakota
Judge dismisses a lawsuit over South Dakota abortion-rights measure that voters rejected
A South Dakota judge dismissed a lawsuit that an anti-abortion group filed in June targeting an abortion rights measure that voters rejected this month.
In an order dated Friday, Circuit Court Judge John Pekas granted Life Defense Fund’s motion to dismiss its lawsuit against Dakotans for Health, the measure group.
In a statement, Life Defense Fund co-chair Leslee Unruh said: “The people have decided, and South Dakotans overwhelmingly rejected this constitutional abortion measure. We have won in the court of public opinion, and South Dakotans clearly saw the abortion lobby’s deception.”
Dakotans for Health co-founder Rick Weiland said he had expected the lawsuit to be dismissed.
“The Life Defense Fund’s accusations were part of a broader, failed effort to keep Amendment G off the ballot and silence the voices of South Dakota voters,” Weiland said in a statement. “But make no mistake — this dismissal is just one battle in a much larger war over the future of direct democracy in South Dakota.”
Life Defense Fund’s lawsuit had challenged petitions that got the measure on the ballot, saying they contained invalid signatures and circulators committed fraud and various wrongdoing. The anti-abortion group sought to invalidate the ballot initiative and bar the measure group and its workers from doing ballot-measure work for four years.
The judge initially dismissed the lawsuit in July, but the state Supreme Court sent it back to him in August. In September, an apparent misunderstanding between attorneys and the court regarding scheduling of the trial pushed the case back until after the election.
Even before the measure made the ballot in May, South Dakota’s Republican-led Legislature cemented its formal opposition and passed a law allowing people to withdraw their petition signatures.
A South Dakota law that took effect after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 outlaws abortion and makes it a felony to perform one except to save the life of the mother.
South Dakota was one of three states where abortion rights measures failed this month. The others were Florida and Nebraska. Voters in six other states passed such measures.
___
Dura reported from Bismarck, North Dakota.
South Dakota
Cluff’s 14 help South Dakota State down Mount Marty 89-41
google-site-verification: google9919194f75dd62c5.html
-
News1 week ago
Herbert Smith Freehills to merge with US-based law firm Kramer Levin
-
Technology1 week ago
The next Nintendo Direct is all about Super Nintendo World’s Donkey Kong Country
-
Business7 days ago
Column: OpenAI just scored a huge victory in a copyright case … or did it?
-
Health7 days ago
Bird flu leaves teen in critical condition after country's first reported case
-
Business3 days ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
Politics1 week ago
Editorial: Abortion was on ballots across the country in this election. The results are encouraging
-
World1 week ago
Sarah Palin, NY Times Have Explored Settlement, as Judge Sets Defamation Retrial
-
Politics2 days ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'