South Dakota

Expert panel says teachers need respect, not criticism

Published

3 years ago

June 19, 2022

Expert panel says teachers need respect, not criticism

With exterior political forces including new stress to South Dakota lecturers, a panel of 4 training consultants harassed the significance of restoring belief in skilled educators to do their jobs nicely and focus extra on instructing than worrying about potential criticism from past the classroom.

The hourlong dialogue typically debunked claims that public faculty lecturers and directors in South Dakota are indoctrinating college students to suppose a sure method, and harassed the significance of treating lecturers with respect and offering them with some autonomy within the classroom to achieve college students from all kinds of backgrounds. Panelists agreed that throughout South Dakota, and particularly amongst among the most outspoken critics of public training, there’s a basic lack of awareness of what’s taking place in South Dakota school rooms and the general good intentions and actions of classroom lecturers.

The panel famous that the brand new stress on lecturers is making an ongoing lecturers scarcity worse in South Dakota. In spring of 2022, the state had greater than 500 open trainer positions, excess of in a typical 12 months.

The current shift to destructive consideration towards classroom content material has left veteran lecturers uneasy, however the subsequent era of educators in South Dakota could also be feeling probably the most disenfranchised, panelists stated. Many skilled lecturers are retiring early or altering careers and up to date instructing graduates are eschewing South Dakota for different states the place pay is healthier and the political stress is decrease.

The web panel dialogue was hosted by South Dakota Information Watch by way of Zoom and Fb Reside as a part of a particular report on the rising affect of politics in public training. Featured panelists had been Augustana training professor Sharon Andrews, retired Parker Excessive Faculty trainer Phil Bjorneberg, Fast Metropolis faculty board member-elect Michael Birkeland, and Jim Holbeck, board improvement director for the Related Faculty Boards of South Dakota. The dialogue, the latest phase in Information Watch’s ongoing “South Dakota Issues” sequence of polls and panel discussions, was held June 16 and is obtainable for viewing on the South Dakota Information Watch Fb web page.

WATCH THE PANEL DISCUSSION ANYTIME

Click on this hyperlink to look at a tape of the June 16, 2022 panel dialogue on politics in training and the continued trainer scarcity in South Dakota.

Panelists stated that many people really feel that they’re certified to have a voice in guiding classroom training, curriculum and instructing requirements with out having the required expertise or coaching of pros within the classroom.

“I’ve been in faculties constantly for the final 4 many years and lecturers are simply making an attempt to do what they’ve a ardour to do and what they’ve been skilled to do,” stated Andrews. “I don’t see this indoctrination or know these agendas.”

Birkeland additionally highlighted a disconnect he has seen between some dad and mom and lecturers. Many dad and mom belief their very own kids’s lecturers, having seen what they’re doing of their school rooms, however stay skeptical about lecturers general. Birkeland stated that discovering methods to indicate what lecturers are doing of their school rooms in a extra public method could also be a key to serving to bridge the hole between educators and fogeys and scale back the stress felt in some districts.

Placing extra religion in skilled lecturers to do their jobs in line with faculty requirements can be crucial, stated Andrews.

“[Educators] know what to do. We all know quite a bit about how studying occurs. We all know quite a bit about the way to educate with a multicultural, inclusive stance however nonetheless acknowledge range. Simply doing that alone is sufficient for lecturers, not to mention that now we have some hidden agenda that we’re making an attempt to indoctrinate our college students.”

Whereas the uproar over what’s being taught is comparatively new, Holbeck stated that there have been no main adjustments in how faculty curriculum has been developed and carried out in recent times. A lot of the Ok-12 curricula in South Dakota are designed round textbooks picked by the college or by curriculum administrators charged with making certain their faculty system is instructing by cohesive pointers, Holbeck stated. He feels that the problems with what’s being taught may be traced again to disagreements between political events.

“[Educators are] on the market making an attempt to indicate each side of issues, however I’m afraid generally in the present day there’s individuals who don’t need to hear each side, they need to hear their facet,” stated Holbeck. He additionally harassed the significance for voters to be taught concerning the positions and values of the candidates operating for positions influencing training on the native and state ranges previous to elections.

The panel agreed that encouraging present and future educators to remain within the area and thrive of their jobs will play a task in making certain high quality public training for college students.

Andrews stated she has seen some college students get discouraged concerning the career due to the political and monetary points the state is experiencing, however she noticed extra proceed to be energetic and exhibit their enthusiasm to affect and educate youthful generations. She hopes to proceed to encourage younger educators to proceed their paths and careers in South Dakota school rooms.

The panelists stated extra open communication about all the nice issues taking place in public faculties might tamp down among the criticism and political strain. In addition they urged lecturers to assist each other and strengthen camaraderie within the career as a method to assist lecturers get by the tough early years and stay within the career long run.

Source link

South Dakota

Landowners appeal Summit carbon storage decision • South Dakota Searchlight

Published

7 hours ago

January 10, 2025

Press Room

Landowners appeal Summit carbon storage decision • South Dakota Searchlight

A group of North Dakota landowners is appealing the state’s approval of an underground carbon storage area for Summit Carbon Solutions, the company attempting to build the world’s largest carbon capture and storage project.

The group represented by Bismarck attorney Derrick Braaten on Thursday filed the appeal in Burleigh County District Court, asserting that the North Dakota Industrial Commission withheld information and violated state law in approving the storage permit plan on Dec. 12.

The permanent underground carbon storage sites in western North Dakota are a key piece of Summit’s planned five-state pipeline network (including South Dakota) capturing greenhouse gas emissions from ethanol plants. Approving the storage wells was one of the last decisions of Gov. Doug Burgum as chair of the Industrial Commission, which also included Attorney General Drew Wrigley and Agriculture Commissioner Doug Goehring.

State schedules public input meetings on Summit carbon pipeline application

The unanimous vote by the commission means that landowners who had not signed an agreement with Summit will be forced to allow the carbon storage on their property.

The landowners assert that the Industrial Commission, which includes the state Department of Mineral Resources, illegally refused to disclose information to landowners under North Dakota open records laws. Braaten and his clients were seeking computer-generated models that predict where the carbon dioxide will go when it is pumped underground for permanent storage.

The appeal says former Department of Mineral Resources Director Lynn Helms refused to provide the models before, during and after public hearings on the case in June, shortly before Helms retired.

The order passed by the Industrial Commission said that if any open records requests were not fulfilled, it is because the Braaten Law Firm did not inform the agency that it had not received the records.

“That’s a lie,” Braaten told the North Dakota Monitor.

The appeal said Braaten’s firm was able to obtain the records in November. Braaten contends the computer models aren’t accurate but landowners were not given a chance to dispute that. He said multiple requests for a rehearing were ignored.

Another issue raised in the appeal are the state’s rules on underground storage. Under a process called amalgamation, if 60% of the landowners in a proposed storage area agree to the plan, the state can force the other 40% to comply.

Summit has obtained more than 92% of the pore space lease agreements across all three areas, according to the order approved in December.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

After the commission’s Dec. 12 decision, Summit Executive Vice President Wade Boeshans said the permits resulted from “years of rigorous scientific study, engineering design, and input from regulators, landowners, and local leaders.”

Braaten also is representing the Northwest Landowners Association that has a separate lawsuit before the North Dakota Supreme Court on the amalgamation issue that he contends is unconstitutional.

He said a ruling on either that lawsuit or the storage decision appeal should clarify the constitutionality of the rules.

Braaten’s law firm also is representing Emmons County in a separate legal challenge to the state Public Service Commission’s approval of the pipeline route through North Dakota. Emmons County and Burleigh County are challenging the PSC’s interpretation of state law that concluded state zoning rules preempt local ordinances on where pipelines are allowed.

Another group of landowners also is appealing the PSC permit decision.

Braaten said those appeals may be combined into one case.

This story was originally published by the North Dakota Monitor. Like South Dakota Searchlight, it’s part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. North Dakota Monitor maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Amy Dalrymple for questions: [email protected].

Source link

South Dakota

Former South Dakota DSS employee indicted for allegedly stealing voucher to buy groceries

Published

15 hours ago

January 9, 2025

Press Room

Former South Dakota DSS employee indicted for allegedly stealing voucher to buy groceries

A former South Dakota Department of Social Services employee was indicted on one count of social services fraud Thursday, according to a press release from the South Dakota Attorney General’s Office.

Amalia Escalante Barrientos, 28, allegedly used a stolen DSS voucher to purchase groceries for personal use, according to the press release. The incident occurred at a Brookings business Oct. 11.

The Brookings woman has not yet appeared for an initial hearing, according to Minnehaha County court documents.

According to Open SD, Barrientos’ wage is listed at $26.58 hourly.

If convicted, Barrientos could serve up to one year in the county jail, a $2,000 fine, or both, according to the press release.

Source link

South Dakota

South Dakota Lottery Powerball, Lucky For Life results for Jan. 8, 2025

Published

23 hours ago

January 9, 2025

Press Room

South Dakota Lottery Powerball, Lucky For Life results for Jan. 8, 2025

The South Dakota Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big. Here’s a look at Jan. 8, 2025, results for each game:

Winning Powerball numbers from Jan. 8 drawing

01-20-36-38-43, Powerball: 24, Power Play: 2

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Lucky For Life numbers from Jan. 8 drawing

13-14-24-37-38, Lucky Ball: 13

Check Lucky For Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Lotto America numbers from Jan. 8 drawing

04-15-33-39-41, Star Ball: 07, ASB: 02

Check Lotto America payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Dakota Cash numbers from Jan. 8 drawing

05-15-25-26-33

Check Dakota Cash payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your prize

Prizes of $100 or less: Can be claimed at any South Dakota Lottery retailer.
Prizes of $101 or more: Must be claimed from the Lottery. By mail, send a claim form and a signed winning ticket to the Lottery at 711 E. Wells Avenue, Pierre, SD 57501.
Any jackpot-winning ticket for Dakota Cash or Lotto America, top prize-winning ticket for Lucky for Life, or for the second prizes for Powerball and Mega Millions must be presented in person at a Lottery office. A jackpot-winning Powerball or Mega Millions ticket must be presented in person at the Lottery office in Pierre.

When are the South Dakota Lottery drawings held?

Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
Mega Millions: 10 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
Lucky for Life: 9:38 p.m. CT daily.
Lotto America: 9:15 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
Dakota Cash: 9 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a South Dakota editor. You can send feedback using this form.

Source link