Connect with us

Ohio

Ohio Voters to Decide If Non-US Citizens Can Vote in Local Elections

Published

on

Ohio Voters to Decide If Non-US Citizens Can Vote in Local Elections


Ohio voters are heading to the polls to resolve if non-U.S. residents can vote in state or native elections.

If handed, Subject 2 would change the Ohio Structure. It proposes that solely grownup U.S. residents who legally reside and are registered to vote in Ohio for at the very least 30 days can forged a poll in future state and native elections.

The present Ohio Structure states that “each citizen of america, of the age of eighteen years and has been registered to vote for thirty days is entitled to vote in any respect elections.”

The state structure doesn’t say that noncitizens can’t vote.

Advertisement

Federal legislation prohibits noncitizens from casting ballots in federal elections.

A 1917 ruling by the Ohio Supreme Courtroom decided that the state structure’s dwelling rule, which provides cities management over their native points, supplied municipalities permission to increase voting rights in metropolis elections.

Subject 2 would be sure that a metropolis’s dwelling rule doesn’t circumvent the legislation that solely grownup U.S. residents can forged ballots.

Supporters of Subject 2 imagine the modification will uphold the integrity of citizenship if it turns into legislation, whereas opponents declare it’s an effort to “limit voting entry.”

On the forefront of Subject 2 is the village of Yellow Springs, which is positioned east of Dayton in southwest Ohio.

Advertisement

In 2019, village officers handed a referendum permitting residents who weren’t U.S. residents to vote in native elections. Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose ordered the Greene County Board of Elections to not settle for voter registration kinds from noncitizens.

The referendum violated the U.S. and Ohio Constitutions, LaRose mentioned. In a press launch, he added, “Simply once you thought 2020 couldn’t get any weirder, the village of Yellow Springs forces me, as Ohio’s chief elections officer, to restate the apparent – solely U.S. residents might vote.”

With a Norman Rockwell-esque historic district teeming with eclectic retailers and a paved bicycle path that stretches by the village, Yellow Springs is a thriving day journey and weekend getaway vacation spot.

This village of three,697 residents can be dwelling to the unapologetically liberal Antioch School. Many homes on its tree-lined streets have yards dotted with indicators that promote Black Lives Matter and LGBTQ causes.

Through the COVID-19 pandemic, a banner positioned throughout Predominant Avenue inspired drivers to be sort and put on a masks.

Advertisement

Positioned in Greene County, the place Republicans routinely win elections and Donald Trump defeated Joe Biden by 20 proportion factors within the 2020 presidential election, Yellow Springs favored Biden, 92 p.c to 7 p.c.

“Ohio was based with this glorious, wonderful House Rule means, which permits municipalities to institute the form of legal guidelines that make their villages and their cities and their cities a greater place of their eyes,” Yellow Springs Mayor Pam Conine mentioned after the referendum handed. “And if I could, I simply need to be certain everybody understands that at present, in accordance with the Ohio Structure, each citizen of america is entitled to vote.”

Yellow Springs Council President Brian Housh mentioned that the referendum would have allowed about 30 noncitizens who lived within the village to vote in native elections.

“Truthfully, we actually didn’t suppose it was that massive as a deal,” Housh instructed the Dayton Every day Information. “It’s an area situation, it’s about native points.”

“We weren’t making an attempt to begin something with the state; folks right here simply believed their neighbors who’re a part of this group ought to have a say in how it’s run,” Housh added.

Advertisement

Housh believes there may be political motivation behind Subject 2.

“It appears to me like a method for the Republicans to bait their base and get them fired up in regards to the election,” Housh instructed reporters. “There’s a number of hostility in direction of immigrants on the market.”

The modification simply handed by the GOP-controlled Ohio legislature earlier this 12 months.

LaRose has mentioned that permitting noncitizens to vote would “cheapen the worth of citizenship.”

“The state legislation has all the time been clear that solely U.S. residents can vote in state elections and there’s a federal legislation that forestalls non-citizens from voting in federal elections,” LaRose mentioned in an announcement.

Advertisement

A Spectrum Information/Siena School survey of Ohio voters on Sept. 28 revealed that 59 p.c will vote “sure” on Subject 2, whereas 38 p.c mentioned they may vote no.

In accordance with the ballot, 54 p.c of Democrats responded that they might oppose “a state constitutional modification that will prohibit native governments from permitting noncitizens to vote in native elections,” whereas 43 p.c mentioned they might help the measure.

Amongst Republicans, 72 p.c mentioned they may help the modification and 28 p.c oppose it.

LaRose is searching for re-election towards Democrat Chelsea Clark and unbiased Terpsehore Maras.

“I’ve had newly sworn residents inform me that they suppose that permitting non-citizens to vote is flawed; they are saying, ‘Don’t cheapen the factor I’ve labored so laborious to get—the fitting to vote,’” LaRose instructed the Dayton Every day Information.

Advertisement

Merely put, LaRose added, the modification ought to be thought of “frequent sense.”

“Subject 2 will actually simply codify into our state structure the factor that has been assumed for a very long time and that’s the proper to vote in Ohio is a proper reserved solely for U.S. residents,” LaRose mentioned.

Comply with

Jeff Louderback is a nationwide reporter for The Epoch Instances who relies in Ohio and covers U.S. Senate, U.S. Home and gubernatorial races in Ohio and surrounding states.

Advertisement



Source link

Ohio

Ohio voter advocates warn group is making troubling challenges, ask Sec. of State to guide counties • Ohio Capital Journal

Published

on

Ohio voter advocates warn group is making troubling challenges, ask Sec. of State to guide counties • Ohio Capital Journal


Voting rights advocacy organizations are calling on the Ohio Secretary of State to create consistency within the county boards of elections when it comes to voter registration challenges.

The urgency comes in particular because of one group, the Ohio Election Integrity Network, which advocates say has been approaching multiple Ohio counties with lists of hundreds of voters they say are ineligible to vote in Ohio and should be removed from rolls. The way in which they are approaching county boards goes against the existing process of maintaining voting rolls, elections advocates say.

“Really all of it is centered around poking holes in the election systems and the processes we’ve been using,” said Kelly Dufour, voting and elections manager for Common Cause Ohio.

“Troubling challenges” are playing out in multiple counties because of the OEIN and similar groups, according to Common Cause Ohio, impacting the way in which board of elections are able to move forward with election processes, and spotlighting the varied resources and workloads each county has.

Advertisement

“We know election officials have a critical role to play, but they’re already playing it,” Dufour said in a press briefing on Wednesday. “They don’t need outside interference trying to lighten their load.”

She said she watched a voter challenge hearing in Hamilton County that lasted more than an hour. The subject of the hearing was a 34-year-old doctor who was matched by her medical school to work in Kentucky, but still shared a residence with her mother in Ohio.

“I watched her be cross-examined by an attorney as she defended her housing choices, her employment choices,” Dufour said, adding that she was asked what jobs she’d turned down as well.

Advocacy groups were also alerted to OEIN approaching the Licking County Board of Elections with “hundreds” of voter registration challenges through a news article by The Reporting Project.

At a public comment period during the Montgomery County Board of Elections’ July 9 meeting, Scott Taylor identified himself as a member of a “research team” in the county for the OEIN, and made a presentation about more than 50 voter registration challenges being made by the group in the county. He asked for a timeline on when the challenges would be dealt with.

Advertisement

Board director Jeff Rezabek was the first to speak after Taylor’s presentation, and started off by saying he found it “absolutely disingenuous of Scott to come before the board and throw these questions out there.”

“He knows these answers,” Rezabek said.

The director said they had spoken through phone calls and “several” emails, and he had explained that the voters would need to be notified of the challenge and allowed to provide proof of residency or allowed to confirm they were no longer Ohio residents.

He told the board that the data provided by the OEIN was only through the year 2022.

Rezabek said he was also waiting for the already in-process change of address verification to work its way through the system, to see if any of the names were removed automatically.

Advertisement

“Anybody that is not removed from the current purge process, we will be having a hearing for and I think that’s what required of the law under the spirit of the law,” Rezabek told the board.

Common Cause of Ohio, the ACLU of Ohio, and the All Voting is Local’s Ohio chapter — combining to call themselves the Ohio Voter Rights Coalition — came together in a letter to Secretary of State Frank LaRose asking him to guide the local boards in their interactions with these groups.

“It is our assertion that this process that Ohio EIN is implementing is actually circumventing the process of voter challenges,” Kayla Griffin, state director for All Voting is Local, said in the Wednesday press call.

The letter calls on LaRose to “issue a directive to summarily ignore voter flags from private groups” that do not follow provisions in Ohio law, including the cancellation procedure that voters can only be removed after a challenger has signed a form “under penalty of election falsification” and after notification of the actual voter.

Advocates at the press briefing and in the letter to LaRose criticized the departure of the state from the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), a system used by multiple states to share data from motor vehicle registration departments to verify voter addresses.

Advertisement

“In the absence of (ERIC), the Secretary of State’s Office has created a void in our system which has allowed an unauthorized private group to swoop in and conduct a function that belongs to the state,” the letter from voting rights groups stated.

According to their website, OEIN supports House Bill 472, a GOP-sponsored bill still sitting in the Ohio House Homeland Security Committee which would require that an elector have a state ID or driver’s license in order to vote and would also require election officials to compare an elector’s photo ID with “the elector’s appearance or with a photo on file, and if they do not match, to challenge the elector’s right to vote,” according to the bill.

Neither the Secretary of State’s Office nor the OEIN responded to requests for comment from the Capital Journal.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Ohio

Fatal officer-involved shooting at Medina County Sheriff’s, Ohio BCI says

Published

on

Fatal officer-involved shooting at Medina County Sheriff’s, Ohio BCI says


MEDINA COUNTY, Ohio (WOIO) – According to Steve Irwin of the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation, there was a fatal officer-involved shooting Wednesday at the Medina County Sheriff’s Department.

BCI was called after the incident to investigate the shooting that occurred around 6pm.

There were no deputies hurt in the shooting.

The circumstances around the shooting are not known at this time.

Advertisement

There is a 19 News crew on the way to the scene.

This is a developing story. Check back with 19 News for the latest information.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Ohio

How to vote for Ohio State Highway Patrol cars in national best looking cruiser contest

Published

on

How to vote for Ohio State Highway Patrol cars in national best looking cruiser contest


play

You probably don’t want to see an Ohio State Highway Patrol car in your rearview mirror while you’re driving (especially if they’re pulling you over for speeding when you have to pee).

But what if it’s part of a showcase in which you can vote for the best-looking highway patrol cruiser in the county?

Advertisement

The American Association of State Troopers has opened their contest for Best Looking Cruiser in the U.S. Ohio is up against highway patrol and state trooper cars from the other 49 states. OSHP’s vehicle of choice is a dark gray Dodge SUV with a white accent stripe and the wheeled wing logo on the front door.

The OSHP could use your help. Arkansas, Florida and Kentucky are vying for the top spot in the poll, according to an AAST voting results post. Ohio had less than 1,900 votes as of July 17.

Is OSHP’s gray SUV better-looking than Colorado’s sleek Ford Mustang? Fancier than Florida’s Dodge Charger? Sleeker than South Dakota’s all-white Camaro. You get to back the Buckeye State if you want.

What a bust: Ohio Highway Patrol finds more than 100 pounds of cocaine during traffic stop



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending