Connect with us

Ohio

Ohio Sec. of State LaRose has repeatedly abused the power of his office for extreme partisanship – Ohio Capital Journal

Published

on

Ohio Sec. of State LaRose has repeatedly abused the power of his office for extreme partisanship – Ohio Capital Journal


Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose must think we were all born yesterday. The overtly partisan elections chief removed all doubt with voters this year about his willingness to play dirty in tipping the scales on free and fair elections. Yet he ludicrously sent out a tweet last week to remind Ohioans “that election officials are THE trusted sources for election information.” 

LaRose was plugging an initiative of the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) launched ahead of the 2024 election to have voters “always turn to state and local elections officials for reliable, timely information.” (#TrustedInfo2024.) “Get all your trusted information from my office,” LaRose tweeted blithely without any self-awareness of the distrust he has sown in his office with brazen partiality and prejudice.    

Yet there he is, in a group photo with his fellow secretaries of state on the association’s website purporting to be an elections chief people should rely on for the straight scoop “in the age of mis-, dis-, and mal-information campaigns.” LaRose is an imposter in that picture. He dropped any pretense of being an impartial elections chief people could trust in two statewide elections in 2023. He abused the power of his office to promote a one-sided agenda.   

But far from being contrite over the preferential treatment he gave anti-abortion extremists in ballot issues he campaigned for and soundly lost, the unapologetic LaRose is using his unethical conduct as a selling point in his U.S. Senate campaign. At a recent Republican Party candidate forum, according to a cleveland.com report, LaRose tried to ingratiate himself with a questioner by emphasizing his underhandedness in thwarting the abortion rights amendment. 

Advertisement

Wrap your head around his reported admission of election sabotage to score political points. At the event, the top elections official in Ohio — whose primary duty is to impartially administrate above board state elections — confessed to collaborating with three prominent anti-abortion groups to alter the ballot language on the Nov. 7 referendum in order to defeat it. 

Imagine the Republican uproar if a Democratic secretary of state did the same thing with prominent abortion rights groups to skew ballot language in their favor. What LaRose revealed in colluding with anti-Issue 1 lobbyists to massage the text of a ballot initiative to benefit their campaign was public corruption beyond the pale. The Republican officeholder, entrusted with preserving election integrity in Ohio as a neutral arbiter, bragged about accommodating anti-Issue 1 groups with ballot wording “they wanted” and thought “would be helpful to them.” 

Maybe LaRose figured disclosure of his disgraceful scheme to fashion “helpful” ballot language for abortion opponents of Issue 1 would convince skeptics at the recent GOP affair of his good faith efforts to prevent passage of the abortion rights amendment. Maybe the Senate hopeful figured his blatantly biased and misleading summary of the abortion rights initiative, written in sync with the anti-Issue 1 campaign, would boost his anti-abortion bona fides with the audience.

But here on Earth 1, what the state elections chief pulled in his official capacity as chair of the Ohio Ballot Board (that determines what voters see on their ballots before casting them) was an outrageous breach of public trust. LaRose took a side in an election he was overseeing and corruptly manipulated the ballot language on behalf that side to win. That is about as reprehensible as it gets from a secretary of state elected not, as his spokesperson lamely proffered, “to represent the consversative values,” but to equitably serve all Ohio voters. 

LaRose doesn’t seem to care how many ethical lines he crosses to snare a U.S. Senate seat. Under the auspices of a Secretary of State newsletter (paid for by taxpayers) he promoted his candidacy to replace incumbent Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown. At a cost of more than $600,000 LaRose surreptitiously transferred his entire department into a building that coincidentally houses his Senate campaign offices — which he conceded using for campaign activities presumably when he’s not masquerading as a nonpartisan referee of state elections.

Advertisement

At this writing, Ohio’s chief elections officer has still not complied with a federal law requiring candidates for U.S. House and Senate to file financial disclosure forms about their income and assets. LaRose is weeks past due on submitting the legally required financial information that might shed light on how a politician who portrays himself as an everyman of modest means could make a $250,000 loan to his campaign.

Yet the secretary of state appears increasingly emboldened to continue flouting the law, pandering to the political extreme and using his politically nonaligned office to side with an exceedingly unhinged and dangerous criminal defendant/ex-president who tried to overturn a democratic election by fraud and force. (Friday, LaRose signed on to a Colorado Supreme Court brief, with two other MAGA-pandering secretaries of state, taking umbrage with a lower court’s ruling that recognized the culpability of the Oval Office insurrectionist).

The same Ohio elections chief who once defended the integrity of the 2020 presidential election and called claims by Trump and Co. about rigged results harmful and unsupported by the evidence, has sold his soul to become a U.S. Senator. Yet ludicrously, LaRose asks us to trust him with the truth about the 2024 elections. We weren’t born yesterday.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Ohio

Big Ten Show: Michigan and Ohio State Roster Breakdown

Published

on

Big Ten Show: Michigan and Ohio State Roster Breakdown


Adam and Rhett are back with their usual discussion about the Big Ten, this time putting the conference against the SEC to see which league is tougher. This episode also includes roster breakdowns of the Michigan Wolverines and Ohio State Buckeyes coming into this year.

Stay up to date on all things Huskers by bookmarking Nebraska Cornhuskers On SI, following HuskerMax on X, and visiting HuskerMax.com daily.





Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Who is funding Ohio’s redistricting amendment?

Published

on

Who is funding Ohio’s redistricting amendment?


COLUMBUS, Ohio — The campaign aiming to end gerrymandering in Ohio has raised more than $23 million, according to a newly released campaign finance disclosure form. That money mainly came from groups outside of Ohio.

Cash continues to pour in to support a proposal on the November ballot. Ohio voters will decide how the state draws district maps.

Citizens Not Politicians collected enough signatures to get their amendment on the ballot, one that spokesperson Chris Davey said is meant to stop partisan gerrymandering.

“Democrats, Republicans — politicians — for years, have been rigging the game in Ohio,” Davey said. “This is a nonpartisan issue.”

Advertisement

Click here to read more about the fight for redistricting reform.

Currently, Ohio lawmakers draw the maps — ones that directly impact them and their colleagues.

The Ohio Redistricting Commission (ORC) is made up of seven spots. Two will always go to Republicans and two to Democrats in the Statehouse. The three remaining seats include the governor, secretary of state and auditor.

This led to the Ohio Redistricting Mess of 2022, where a bipartisan Ohio Supreme Court struck down seven different passed maps, citing that the GOP members of the commission were drawing lines to unfairly benefit their party.

The proposal creates the 15-member Ohio Citizens Redistricting Commission (OCRC), made up of Republican, Democratic and independent citizens who broadly represent the different geographic areas and demographics of the state.

Advertisement

It bans current or former politicians, political party officials, lobbyists and large political donors from sitting on the commission.

It requires fair and impartial districts by making it unconstitutional to draw voting districts that discriminate against or favor any political party or individual politician. It also mandates the commission to operate under an open and independent process.

A newly released campaign finance report proves that people around the state and country are backing the change.

“Our support is coming from a broad coalition of Republicans, independents and Democrats who want to get the politicians out of the process because they’ve demonstrated repeatedly that they are either unwilling or unable to pass fair maps,” Davey said.

CNP raised more than $23 million since the beginning of 2024.

Advertisement

Gov. Mike DeWine, who is opposing the amendment, warned that this isn’t the grassroots movement Davey is portraying.

“Voters ought to know that this is being funded by people outside Ohio, primarily,” DeWine said.

DeWine is adamantly opposed to the anti-gerrymandering constitutional amendment that will be on the November ballot, saying he plans to create another proposal that voters should “trust.” It is worth noting that DeWine and his colleagues have nothing to gain and power to lose if CNP is successful.

Gov. DeWine says he opposes anti-gerrymandering proposal on November ballot, wants to put forth new proposal

Advertisement

Gov. DeWine says he opposes anti-gerrymandering proposal on November ballot, wants to put forth new proposal

Breakdown

Of the $23 million raised, 85% has come from out of state.

Below are the states (including D.C.) that provided at least a million:

Advertisement
  1. Washington, D.C.: $11.1 million
  2. Ohio: $3.6 million
  3. Virginia: $3.4 million
  4. California: $2.1 million
  5. New York: $1.6 million
  6. Massachusetts: $1 million

Numbers are rounded.

The largest contributors of money are progressive or nonpartisan groups in the Washington, D.C. area, funding about 60% of the campaign so far. The Virginia donations came from Arlington, which can be referred to as the D.C. area.

The Sixteen Thirty Fund has given the largest chunk of money — $6 million.

Groups make up 98% of the funding, while 2% comes from individual donors. To be clear, individual donors donate to the larger groups.

Senate President Matt Huffman (R-Lima) said that people should question why funders from the “so-called” anti-gerrymandering are mainly liberal groups.

“They’re not interested in moderate Republicans or conservative Democrats,” Huffman said back in March. “They’re interested in making sure their far-left agenda gets passed.”

Advertisement

It’s hypocritical for lawmakers to criticize the acceptance of out-of-state money since each side of the past several proposals was all primarily funded by non-Ohio groups, Davey argued.

In August of 2023, the GOP-backed amendment to make it more difficult to change the Ohio Constitution, which failed spectacularly, raised $4.8 million. An Illinois billionaire donated $4 million, which is 83%.

Election to stop out-of-state special interests funded by out-of-state special interests

In November of 2023, the GOP-backed campaign to stop abortion from being enshrined into the Constitution was also primarily funded by out-of-state groups.

Supporters of Ohio abortion rights amendment far outraising opponents

Advertisement

“If you look at the people and organizations who have supported us financially, it’s diverse,” he said. “It includes people all across the political spectrum because this is not red vs blue, it’s not Republican vs Democrat.”

Of the nearly 800 donors, the majority gave between $5 and $25, my analysis found. The most common amount to donate was $6.20. Of the individual contributions, the majority came from Ohioans.

CNP has spent millions on digital and TV ads, which should be hitting the airwaves soon, Davey said.

Follow WEWS statehouse reporter Morgan Trau on Twitter and Facebook.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Ohio

Ohio historical society settles with golf club to take back World Heritage tribal site

Published

on

Ohio historical society settles with golf club to take back World Heritage tribal site


COLUMBUS, Ohio — Ohio’s historical society announced a deal Thursday that will allow it to take control of an ancient ceremonial and burial earthworks site long located on the site of a golf course.

Ohio History Connection will pay Moundbuilders Country Club in Newark to buy out its lease and end the long-running legal dispute over the Octagon Earthworks, although the sum is confidential under a settlement agreement. The deal avoids a jury trial to determine the site’s fair market value that had been repeatedly postponed over the years.

The Octagon Earthworks are among eight ancient areas in the Hopewell Earthworks system that were named a UNESCO World Heritage Site last year. The historical society, a nonprofit state history organization, takes control of them Jan. 1 and plans to open them to visitors.

“Our guiding principles throughout this process have been to enable full public access to the Octagon Earthworks while ensuring Moundbuilders Country Club receives just compensation for the value of its lease on the property,” said Megan Wood, executive director and CEO of the Ohio History Connection. “And now we have accomplished those things.”

Advertisement

Charles Moses, president of the organization’s board of trustees, said the History Connection is excited for the location to be “fully open to the citizens of Ohio — and the world.”

Built between 2,000 and 1,600 years ago by people from the Hopewell Culture, the earthworks were host to ceremonies that drew people from across the continent, based on archeological discoveries of raw materials from as far west as the Rocky Mountains.

Native Americans constructed the earthworks, including eight long earthen walls, that correspond to lunar movements and align with points where the moon rises and sets over the 18.6-year lunar cycle. The History Connection calls them “part cathedral, part cemetery and part astronomical observatory.”

The historical society owns the disputed earthworks site, but it had been leased to the country club for decades. History Connection had put the value of the site at about $2 million, while the country club was seeking a much higher amount.

In 1892, voters in surrounding Licking County enacted a tax increase to preserve what was left of the earthworks. The area was developed as a golf course in 1911, and the state first deeded the 134-acre property to Moundbuilders Country Club in 1933.

Advertisement

A county judge ruled in 2019 that the historical society could reclaim the lease via eminent domain. But the club challenged the attempt to take the property, saying the History Connection didn’t make a good faith offer to purchase the property as required by state law. The country club argued that it had provided proper upkeep of the mound and allowed public access over the years — albeit only a few days a year.

A message was left with the country club’s board president seeking comment.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending