Connect with us

Ohio

A Small Ohio Startup is Testing Something Big – A Small Hypersonic Engine

Published

on

A Small Ohio Startup is Testing Something Big – A Small Hypersonic Engine


Air-breathing hypersonic powerplants are typically fighter-jet engine-sized. But Velontra has just test-run an 11-inch diameter, five foot-long turbojet that will be the core of its Bronco hypersonic propulsion system.

The Ohio-based company was launched in 2021 with a goal of one day producing a low earth orbit spaceplane to serve the satellite launch market. Like every other would-be hypersonic transport/launch developer, it will pursue government and defense technology contracts on the way there.

Advertisement

The small size of the Bronco propulsion system makes Velontra stand out. A ready-made hypersonic engine for smaller drones and other air vehicles is of obvious interest to a variety of national defense and commercial organizations, particularly if it can be delivered cost-effectively.

Velontra leaves little doubt on that point, claiming that the unit cost for Bronco will be “less than $200,000”. The company was started with cost and rapid development firmly in mind taking inspiration from SpaceX says Velontra CTO, Joel Darin.

“We don’t want to just ask investors to trust us with a ton of money and ten years later see if our idea works or not. We want to produce actual products at each stage that develop the technology we’ll eventually need. This small application lets us develop a product at a fraction of the cost [of full scale hypersonics] that people will buy.”

According to Darin, large hypersonic propulsion system testing in full-scale wind tunnel facilities can cost up to $50,000 per hour. “We’re paying $300,000 to get two to three months of testing,” he says. “The development is much cheaper but the lessons we learn are scale-able to bigger applications.”

Advertisement

Applications, particularly drone and test vehicle roles, are something Velontra expects to rapidly move its small hypersonic propulsion system into. The company has already taken the first step in doing so in signing a contract with hypersonic transport developer, Venus Aerospace to provide four Bronco propulsion systems to power a small-scale near-hypersonic UAV which Venus will use to test its own hypersonic propulsion technology.

I previously wrote about Venus’ efforts to realize its own hypersonic airliner and the likely defense technology development/sales route it will take to get there. I was unable to get confirmation of the supplier contract with Velontra from Venus by publication time.

However, it would seem reasonable that the Texas company may subcontract the air-breathing powerplant for a hypersonic test vehicle to perfect its own liquid-propellant rotating detonation rocket engine (RDRE). Darin asserts that it is remarkable for a seed-phase startup like Velontra to already have a hardware contract in hand. He also alluded to the model it establishes for his company.

“They’re [Venus] like an airframer buying our propulsion system,” Darin says. That could be a replicable business proposition for the small Ohio firm (currently it has a dozen staff) if anticipated flight testing of Bronco late this year in Venus Aerospace’ hypersonic drone is successful. Darin did not disclose the value of the Venus contract but did affirm that Velontra currently has a total of $2 million in contracts for Bronco.

A successful flight test and program with Venus would logically be watched by DoD’s science and technology community. Darin told me that Velontra has four Phase 1 research contracts with the Air Force’s AFWERX innovation hub although the organization confirmed only two Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) projects.

Nevertheless, compact hypersonic propulsion systems will be avidly sought by the defense community which has repeatedly expressed its desire for a quick expansion of hypersonic development test resources. The Pentagon’s National Security Innovation Capital (NSIC) organization has already demonstrated such appetite, laying out $1.5 million in development funding earlier this year for a 3D-printed hypersonic rocket engine called “Mjölnir” from Seattle-based New Frontier Aerospace (NFA).

The size of Mjölnir isn’t clear but it appears to be small-ish. The engine has yet to run (testing is slated for 2024) and it is apparently not an air-breathing system. That Bronco is an already-tested, air-breathing hypersonic propulsion unit speaks to its advantages.

Its cost advantage derives from using an unconventional off-the-shelf core. Rather than a full-fledged turbojet engine like the GE J85 that hypersonic developer Hermeus uses in its Chimera powerplant, Bronco makes use of a small turbojet used in military target drones and hobbyist radio-controlled jet models – Atlanta-based PBS
PBS
Aerospace’ PBS TJ150.

Advertisement

In stock configuration the small engine provides 337 pounds of thrust. The Bronco design adds a Velontra-developed afterburner and a ramjet to get the system to hypersonic speeds. Joel Darin says the company is shooting for 500 to 600 pounds of thrust from the TJ150 core, enough to propel air vehicles with 700 to 1000 pounds dry weight to supersonic speeds and then to accelerate to hypersonic velocities as Bronco’s ramjet comes online.

The combination (including the ramjet) was tested this Spring in Purdue’s Zucrow Laboratories in a High Pressure Combustion Lab. Velontra CEO, Robert Keane III, said the Bronco was tested, “at speeds over Mach 4.5 and altitude simulated over 100,000 feet, and it successfully screamed through vigorous testing with flying colors.”

The results, combined with a real piece of hardware, have generated significant enthusiasm Darin says. “We’ve gotten nothing but good reaction to the test and even the [general] idea before that. With the [test] milestone we hit recently, we can start making the rounds, reminding [potential investors] we’ve done what we said we were going to do.”

As noted, investment could come from a variety interested parties including companies looking to meet the U.S. Air Force’s desire for attritable Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCAs) for which the first performance metric is supposed to be cost. Low cost with hypersonic capability would indeed be big.

The next phase will see Velontra work towards optimizing Bronco for thrust, thrust vectoring, and durability as well as pushing to first-flight in the Venus Aerospace UAV Derin says. Success in such near-term development could attract both more attention and more money though Velontra’s CEO insists the company’s goal is to learn as quickly as possible by selling Broncos.

Advertisement

“This is not something that looks cool to raise money off of. This is a product.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Ohio

One Ohio State Star Who Desperately Needs Revenge vs Oregon

Published

on

One Ohio State Star Who Desperately Needs Revenge vs Oregon


The Ohio State Buckeyes are preparing to face the Oregon Ducks in the Rose Bowl in what they hope will serve as some desirable revenge.

Remember: Oregon defeated Ohio State back in Week 7, handing the Buckeyes their first loss of the season. The Ducks would go on to go undefeated. Ohio State went 10-2 (now 11-2 thanks to its win over the Tennessee Volunteers).

The first meeting between the two teams was close, with Oregon emerging with a 32-21 victory. For on of the only times this season, the Buckeyes’ defense looked vulnerable.

But there was one player in particular who looked particularly exposed: cornerback Denzel Burke.

Advertisement

Burke entered the season widely considered one of the best cornerbacks in the country and was also viewed as a potential first-round pick in the 2025 NFL Draft.

However, his performance against the Ducks altered his fate.

Burke surrendered eight catches for 179 yards and was burned for a couple of touchdowns in Ohio State’s loss, and since then, the 22-year-old has not quite looked the same.

His draft stock has plummeted, and his confidence also appears to have been adversely affected.

And it all started in Eugene, Or. back in October.

Advertisement

Can Burke right the ship and come through with a bounceback showing against the top-ranked eam in the country?

The Buckeyes will need Burke. That’s for sure. After all, Oregon boasts one of the most explosive offenses in the country, and that’s due much in part to the Ducks’ high-octane aerial attack led by quarterback Dillon Gabriel.

Not only that, but Burke needs it for himself. A strong outing versus the Ducks would go a long way in gaining the attention of NFL scouts once again, and it could serve as a springboard for Burke the remainder of the College Football Playoff.

Burke has lost a bit of his shine since that disastrous performance at Oregon. If there is any Ohio State player who desperately needs revenge on New Year’s Day, it’s Burke.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Ohio

Cheers! A look back on beer and breweries in NE Ohio in 2024

Published

on

Cheers! A look back on beer and breweries in NE Ohio in 2024


Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Mark Pope explains what went wrong on defense against Ohio State

Published

on

Mark Pope explains what went wrong on defense against Ohio State


Kentucky dropped to No. 61 in the latest KenPom defensive efficiency ratings after allowing Ohio State to score 85 points on 56.6 percent shooting overall and 68.4 percent from two. It was an abysmal effort on that end of the floor — and that’s with the Buckeyes going just 4-15 from three after entering the matchup shooting 41 percent from deep as one of the best in college basketball.

Mark Pope said the team’s magic number to open the season was 39 percent, hoping to hold teams to that hit rate defensively throughout the year. After hitting that mark in the first six games of the year, the Wildcats have done it just once in the last six. They’ve regressed in a major way and the staff is now looking for answers during the time off with SEC play coming in January.

What is Pope’s best assessment of what went wrong in New York City?

“Defensively, we gave up 15 points on rejects alone,” the Kentucky head coach explained Monday evening during his call-in radio show. “It’s just so uncharacteristic for us, just going away from where we’re leading the ball screen, right? I had made a huge emphasis about pushing our bigs up to try and get a little bit more of a presence at the point of the screen. When you let teams reject, it’s the worst thing to do, to push up the bigs.

Advertisement

“Out of seven possessions, it was 15 points — all twos and an and-one, a perfect field-goal percentage. There was a lot we didn’t do well. A lot of things that are going to help us get better, and get better faster.”

He actually liked the way things started against the Buckeyes, holding firm in the first 10 minutes — plenty good enough to stay competitive while waiting for the offense to figure itself out. Then it was a disaster finish before halftime, then more of the same after the brea.

“It was interesting. We started the game well, we gave up an early three, but we were pretty solid-ish in the first 10 minutes, and then it started to get away from us,” Pope said. “There were a couple of real issues that we were struggling with. We were really struggling with — you know, it was very uncharacteristic of us, but we give up 15 points on rejects of high ball screens, which is exactly the opposite of what our defense is designed to do. That was really surprising. We took a bunch of different paths, but some of that — this is some that’s on me, some of that is my responsibility — is trying to solve some other things and push up our bigs. It gave us less security. And I was really surprised that we were having the issue we did.”

There were a number of reasons for it, not just one glaring weakness or culprit. You could call it an all systems failure on that end.

“We were getting beat going under on ball screens as the game went on. We threw out some zone, we blitzed some ball screens, but I was really surprised by that,” he said. “You’re just very much surprised that the issue actually arose. And it’s probably a bunch of stuff.

Advertisement

“It’s a little bit personnel, it’s a little bit us getting a little extended, it’s a little bit maybe being distracted by other things, maybe some foul issues, but that was clearly — ball screens was an issue for us throughout the night. (Bruce) Thornton was a major issue for us, for sure. And so those are two things that we were trying to address personnel-wise, and dedication-wise, this game-wise.”

Fortunately for the Cats, they have plenty of time to go back to the drawing board and get this thing right.

“We just have to come up with the right answers in the right amount of time.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending