North Dakota
Port: North Dakota Democrats in tough financial shape as election year looms
MINOT — There is chaos in the North Dakota Republican Party. Power struggles and in-fighting between traditional conservatives and an upstart faction of Donald Trump-aligned populists are tearing the party apart.
Party chair Sandi Sanford,
elected in no small part due to that chaos,
is proving to be a less-than-effective leader. The party’s
fundraising has suffered,
key staff has abandoned ship
and the party’s new executive director
is a misogynistic cartoon character.
This would seem to present an opportunity for the North Dakota Democratic-NPL. At nearly rock bottom in terms of holding elected offices in our state, they really have nowhere to go but up, and the chaos in the NDGOP could be a ladder for them. But if the party is building momentum heading into what could be a tumultuous election year, it’s not showing up as dollars and cents.
Over the last two years, the party’s finances have plummeted, with its cash on hand, as reported in monthly reports to the Federal Election Commission, bottoming out this summer at a level that’s roughly half of the party’s monthly spend on staff and other expenses.
The Dem-NPL got an infusion of cash — a bailout, you could say — from the Democratic National Committee in September, but that only casts the party’s paltry fundraising in a sharper light. Of the just over $38,000 the state party
raised in the September reporting period,
$25,000 came from the DNC. The party raised just a bit more than $13,000 on its own, less than half the $30,267.44 in expenditures it reported for the month.
It’s not unusual for state political parties to see their cash reserves take a hit during non-election years. Americans are most engaged with politics and most willing to open their wallets and make a donation during campaign years. The parties themselves are also far more active in fundraising during election years.
But the roughly $53,000 in cash on hand the Democratic-NPL reported in September was less than half what it reported in cash on hand at this same point in the last election cycle, even with the bailout from the DNC.
I asked Dem-NPL chair Adam Goldwyn about the state of his party’s finances, and he suggested this represents a shift in tactics. “The Democratic-NPL is going to contest every race up and down the ballot and all across the state, and that is the basis for our financial model,” he told me. “Our fundraising is meant to empower local leaders running to represent their neighbors rather than a central state party.”
That might make sense if the Democratic-NPL had active candidates, but it doesn’t. Not outside of U.S. Senate candidate Katrina Christiansen,
who has restarted her unsuccessful campaign from last cycle
for an early jump on the 2024 election, and she just reopened her campaign earlier this month.
I also asked Goldwyn about some recent staff changes made at the party, which I’ve been told by some Dem-NPL party members were related to fundraising difficulties. He didn’t have much to offer in the way of specifics.
“The Democratic-NPL is always evaluating and reevaluating staffing needs to put us in the best position to be competitive across the state,” he said. “Staffing changes are a normal part of the ebb and flow of campaign cycles, especially now as we gear up to reelect President Biden and bring balance to the state Legislature.”
It’s hard to say what’s causing the downturn in fundraising for the Democratic-NPL.
Maybe some donors are disillusioned after the last cycle, which saw Dem-NPL bigwigs
push out the party’s endorsed and nominated U.S. House candidate
in favor of late-to-the-game celebrity candidate Cara Mund, a former Miss America.
Maybe the paltry fundraising has to do with staff issues.
Whatever the case, I don’t buy Goldwyn’s spin about the refocus on campaigns. With the NDGOP looking more vulnerable than it has in a generation, you’d expect the Dem-NPL to be on top of its game and ready to provide stiff competition next year.
They’re not, and insofar as competition is good for democracy, that’s not a good sign for North Dakota.
North Dakota
Airports hope to land state funding for major projects
BY: JEFF BEACH
FARGO (North Dakota Monitor) – Three North Dakota airports have plans for major upgrades and will be asking the state Legislature to approve a combined $120 million for the projects.
Fargo’s Hector International Airport had its official groundbreaking Monday for a terminal expansion and parking garage. The airports in Grand Forks and Dickinson also have what airport officials call “generational projects,” that might come along every 30 to 40 years.
Fargo is seeking $60 million for its project and Grand Forks and Dickinson each are requesting $30 million.
At Monday’s event in Fargo, Kyle Wanner, director of the North Dakota Aeronautics Commission, called airports “economic engines” for the state.
“They sometimes need a major overhaul or an upgrade,” Wanner said.
Kelly Braun, manager of the Dickinson Theodore Roosevelt Regional Airport, said there is not another viable source of funding for its plans to build a new terminal next to the existing runways.
He said the plans for a new terminal are in the design stage for the $48 million project. He said there is local and federal funding for the project.
It is upgrading a secondary runway in preparation for that project.
Ryan Riesinger, executive director of the Grand Forks International Airport, said it plans to reconstruct its main runway – an approximately $75 million project.
That means ripping up asphalt that is about 1 foot deep and the original concrete that is 1 foot deep.
Riesinger said the concrete was poured on top of a clay soil base. The modern runway will be dug down about 4 feet and be better engineered to handle the weight of large planes as well as better drainage.
“So it’s much like reconstructing the interstate, only deeper, thicker,” Riesinger said.
The Grand Forks airport is currently upgrading its secondary runway to keep the airport humming while the main runway is redone over several construction seasons.
Wanner said while there are smaller airport projects all over the state, these three high-priced upgrades have been identified as needing extra state funding.
“There’s just no other path forward,” Wanner said in an interview.
North Dakota House Majority Mike Lefor, R-Dickinson, said he has been briefed on the projects and is supportive, as long as the revenue is available when lawmakers convene in January. He said a proposed property tax reform measure on the November ballot could change the budget picture dramatically.
“I’m generally supportive of this proposal, because I see the need,” Lefor said.
North Dakota’s commercial airports in 2023 had 1.1 million boardings, an 11% overall increase from calendar year 2022, according to the Aeronautics Commission. Fargo and Devils Lake recorded their best year on record.
North Dakota airports also had their busiest May on record, according to the Aeronautics Commission. Airline passenger boarding numbers reached 103,068 passengers for the month, breaking a May record set in 2014 during the oil boom.
Braun said the Dickinson airport was designed for about 9,000 passengers annually but last year had about 25,000, with projections of more than 30,000 in the next couple of years.
He said officials hope to have the new terminal open in late 2027.
The $200 million Hector project that is underway is for a four-story parking structure with about 1,000 spaces and a skyway to the terminal.
The terminal will add four more gates and there will be upgrades to the terminal interior. The project is expected to be completed in 2026.
At Monday’s groundbreaking, U.S. Sen. John Hoeven touted recent airport upgrades in Minot and Williston and called Fargo’s airport “the flagship” for the state.
“This is a quality of life issue,” Hoeven said of air travel. “So we’re going to have the best airport to go with the greatest people and the best state in the country.”
North Dakota
Behind the Badge – Boating Accident on Fourth of July Weekend
Boating Accident – Fourth of July Weekend
District Game Warden Noah Raitz
The Fourth of July weekend is one of the busiest stretch of days game wardens have during the summer.
Sure, there are busy days when the fish are biting, or the weather is perfect for a lake day.
But, without a doubt the Fourth of July will have recreators flocking to their lakes to get the boat on the water and enjoy the long weekend.
As lakes get crowded it becomes more important for boat operators to understand boating regulations and how to be safe on the water.
This starts at home before the boat is even hooked up.
One of the most common violations I find is not having the required number of personal flotation devices.
PFDs are usually stored in one of the front compartments or under the seats, depending on the type of boat.
It’s not uncommon for boat owners, who have enough PFDs, to struggle to remember which storage compartment they put them in.
Not knowing where your PFDs are stored on your boat is a safety concern because you never know when you might be put in an emergency where the PFD is needed.
While working the Fourth of July weekend in 2023, I received a call that a personal watercraft and a boat had collided.
I was at a nearby lake when it happened and was able to respond quickly.
I was told the boat had quickly started heading toward the boat ramp.
The caller told me it sounded like a shotgun blast when they collided.
The boat, almost full of passengers, was pulling a tuber and was making the typical “S” shaped maneuver as they followed the shoreline to a bend in the lake.
The PWC was heading toward this same bend from the opposite direction.
Once they recognized each other, they both attempted a turn but neither one was able to get out of the way.
A lot of questions started running through my head because an “accident” where nobody made a mistake is uncommon.
How close were they to the shoreline? Where was the attention of the driver? Who was the give-way vessel and who was the stand-on vessel? Was the throttle applied when the PWC attempted to turn? Almost all accidents are avoidable if state boating regulations are followed.
Upon arrival at the boat ramp, I could immediately see the boat that was involved in the collision was on a trailer with a large piece of the boat on the ground and a hole that matched it on the stern.
The driver said that when the collision happened, he could see water rushing in the back almost immediately.
He expressed that if he had not been able to drive the boat, they would have sunk within a few minutes.
The impact had enough force to bend the bow eye to one side along with multiple chunks of fiberglass missing on the PWC.
After the PWC collided with the boat, the momentum of both vessels caused the tuber to continue forward and collide with the PWC as well.
The tuber was able to lean to his side and keep the inner tube between himself and the PWC, acting as a cushion and bouncing him off.
The collision did not result in any injuries, but it was an extremely close call for everyone.
It’s hard to speculate what could have happened to the passengers if the collision happened a few seconds earlier or later, but I am almost certain there would have been more injuries.
Had the boat sunk, would all the passengers been able to swim to shore or locate a PFD?
What if the PWC operator hit his head and was knocked unconscious while the boat took off toward shore?
What if the tuber was unable to react fast enough and collided with the PWC before he could lean to his side?
Boat safety equipment and boating regulations are crucial for the safety of yourselves and others on the water.
The purpose of a PFD is to keep you upright in the water, even if you are unconscious.
Obviously, a PFD can’t stop a collision from happening, but it could save your life in an emergency.
It goes beyond just having a PFD though.
I would encourage everyone to review our boating regulations and if you have a question, call your local game warden.
North Dakota
North Dakota city’s mayoral race remains tied after recount
VALLEY CITY, N.D. (NewsDakota.com) – A recount was held July 1st to determine the mayor of the City of Dazey.
Barnes County Auditor Julie Mindt said the results remain unchanged with Daryl Kunze receiving 19 votes and Shawn McClintock receiving 19 votes. The contest remains tied and now goes before the City of Dazey Board of Commissioners to resolve the tie.
The population of Dazey was 78 as of the 2020 census.
Copyright 2024 KVLY. All rights reserved.
-
News1 week ago
A Florida family is suing NASA after a piece of space debris crashed through their home
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Film Review: Everyday of the Dead (2023) by Yuyuma Naoki
-
Politics1 week ago
Biden official says past social media posts don’t reflect ‘current views,’ vows to support admin ‘agenda’
-
World1 week ago
New Caledonia independence activists sent to France for detention
-
World1 week ago
Israel accepts bilateral meeting with EU, but with conditions
-
World1 week ago
Netanyahu says war will continue even if ceasefire deal agreed with Hamas
-
News1 week ago
Arkansas police confirm 4th victim died in grocery store shooting
-
Politics1 week ago
DeSantis signs bill allowing residents to kill bears, vetoes bill that fines slow left lane drivers