North Dakota
North Dakota lawmakers hear extensive testimony on controversial library bill
BISMARCK — North Dakota lawmakers listened to lengthy testimony Tuesday, March 18, on a bill that would require schools and public libraries to hide materials with “obscene” content from minors.
Senate Bill 2307
would direct such facilities to move “offensively sexual” content out of the main area of a library to a restricted section — whether that be in a cabinet, a roped-off aisle or on a higher shelf.
Another section of the bill requires school districts, state agencies and public libraries to filter out material found to be obscene in online library resources.
If passed, entities would be tasked with reviewing, removing and/or relocating those materials by January 2026 and providing the state with a compliance report before May 2026.
Those found to be in violation of the law could lose all state funding.
The cost associated with implementing the bill is over $2 million.
Confusion around what content would be considered obscene, ways a person could file a complaint about such content, and how someone could be found guilty of violating the rules was discussed at length during a three-hour House Judiciary Committee hearing on the bill Tuesday.
Bill sponsor Sen. Keith Boehm, R-Mandan, said the bill is purely about protecting children.
“This bill is not an attack on library staff or schools,” he said. “It is a necessary safeguard against a small number of activists who exploit legal loopholes to push an agenda that does not align with the values of our families and communities.”
Boehm brought
a similar bill
during the 2023 legislative, which was passed by lawmakers but vetoed by former Gov. Doug Burgum,
who said enacting the law would have an “enormous burden” on libraries.
Peyton Haug / Forum News Service
SB 2307 adds to House Bill 1205, enacted in 2023, which bans “sexually explicit” materials from the children’s section of a library and allows people to ask libraries to remove such content if they find it to be “inappropriate.”
Sara Planteen, a mother from Cogswell, said her concerns about materials she found to be offensive weren’t taken seriously at the local level.
“When schools fail to follow their own policies, when they dismiss parental concerns, then it is the duty of the elected officials to step in,” she said.
Peyton Haug / Forum News Service
Rep. Mike Brandenburg, R-Edgeley, Rep. Vicky Steiner, R-Dickinson, and a family therapist also voiced their support of the bill.
Opponents then lined up to share their testimony in person, except for Kelsi LeBaron, a sixth grader from Williston, who testified remotely.
Peyton Haug / Forum News Service
“I understand that some books deal with difficult topics, but I believe that removing them from schools and libraries will do more harm than good,” LeBaron said. “For some students, reading a certain book might be the first time they feel understood.”
LeBaron also said parents, teachers and librarians should be guiding what children read, not the government.
A librarian, a bookstore owner and the North Dakota Library Association echoed LeBaron’s plea.
They collectively characterized the bill as a costly one-size-fits-all solution that would unjustly stigmatize certain books, disproportionately impact small and rural libraries, and jeopardize First Amendment rights.
“Parents are responsible for approving content for the children, not the state. It is also not one family’s right to decide what is appropriate for other families to access,” said Gail Reiten, chair of Right to Read North Dakota.
Those who provided neutral testimony Tuesday maintained that regulating access to explicit material while fulfilling educational needs is a delicate balance.
Peyton Haug / Forum News Service
Over 370 entries of online testimony had been submitted before the hearing. Nearly 85% opposed the bill, including dozens of North Dakota libraries and individual librarians, as well as social work associations, education lobbying groups, university leaders, parents and teachers.
Those in favor were Christian lobbying groups, South Dakota-based therapists and around a dozen North Dakotans.
The committee did not take any immediate action on the bill Tuesday.

North Dakota
North Dakota Senate passes bill on start of term limits; differs from bill passed by House

BISMARCK — The North Dakota Senate passed a bill on Friday, March 28, clarifying when term limits passed by voters in 2022 officially went into effect.
The date differs from the effective date passed by the House of Representatives after Sen. Janne Myrdal, R-Edinburg, a co-sponsor on House Bill 1300, amended it in committee.
The original bill, sponsored by Rep. Ben Koppelman, R-West Fargo, stated that “the time for calculating the number of years of service for members of the legislative assembly” with regard to term limits, did not start until after Nov. 7, 2022, the day the voters passed term limits.
This date would mean that any legislators elected in even districts in the 2020 general election would not have the clock start for term limits until they start their term after the 2024 general election, but those elected in the 2022 general election – the same election voters adopted term limits – would have the clock start when they took office for the 2023 legislative session.
“If you went to the ballot, or to the poll and cast a ballot that day for legislator X,” Koppelman said, “Then at the same time, you cast your ballot for or against the term limit, then a reasonable person — which is the standard we use in law, often — would say, ‘Yeah, I understood that if that passed, however I felt about term limits, that the guy I just voted for in alleged District 10 would now get eight years, starting now.’”
Contributed / North Dakota Legislative Assembly
Koppelman’s version of the bill passed the House in a 64-28 vote.
Myrdal’s amendment would set the effective date for the start of term limits as Jan. 1, 2023, meaning legislators elected in 2022 would not have their time in office count toward term limits until they take office following the 2026 general election.
She said that the Nov. 7, 2022, date is arbitrary and the Jan. 1, 2023, date is dictated by law under Article 15 of the North Dakota Constitution as the effective date for the ballot measure.
“The Election Day is an arbitrary date because it’s not a date set in stone,” Myrdal said. “Legislative interpretation from the language of Article 15 is that it’s prospective and the law says it went into effect on January 1, 2023, so I don’t think there’s a controversy there at all.”
Myrdal also said she felt the date was a better choice in the event of a constitutional challenge to term limits.
Her amended version of the bill passed the Senate in a 40-6 vote. It now goes back to the House for a vote of concurrence.
Koppelman disagreed with the Senate’s interpretation.
“It’s saying that, ‘Well, even though I voted for term limits and I voted for my (representative) in District 9, this time doesn’t count. So four years from now, when I vote for the person in District 9, then it starts, it starts the clock,’” Koppelman said. “So in essence, the odd number districts would get 12 years, and the even number districts would get 10 years … I think to add a whole other term on is not as reasonable of an interpretation for the Legislature, and I have much more concern of judicial scrutiny if we get challenged in court.”
He said that he believes if the House version had passed, it would not have been challenged in court.
Koppelman said he would encourage the House to send the bill to a conference committee to work out the differences between the two versions.
North Dakota
North Dakota Game and Fish biologists offer spring fishing previews in video series
The North Dakota Game and Fish Department has released its first four spring fishing previews. Bottom line: Things are looking pretty good out there going into another open water season. This week’s previews include the Northeast, North Central and South Central fishing districts along with Lake Sakakawea, Lake Audubon and the Missouri River System.
North Dakota
North Dakota legislative resolution marks first step toward federal protection for wild horses

MEDORA, N.D. — A resolution passed by the North Dakota Legislature is the first step in seeking federal protection to ensure the future of the wild horse herd at
Theodore Roosevelt National Park.
Legislators this week overwhelmingly
passed
Senate Concurrent Resolution 4006,
which urges Congress to pass legislation protecting the herd.
“It’s important because it puts North Dakota on record saying they’re important and should have full protection,” said Chris Kman, president of Chasing Horses Wild Horse Advocates of Dickinson, a leading proponent for keeping a viable herd.
Park officials proposed eliminating the wild horses from the park in a recent environmental review and are injecting the mares with birth control to prevent reproduction in the herd.
The resolution notes “significant concerns regarding the management of the wild horse herd by Theodore Roosevelt National Park and the long-term health and preservation of the herd” and urges Congress to enact legislation “establishing federal protections for the wild horses to ensure the herd’s long-term health and preservation.”
A herd of about 200 wild horses, grouped in separate bands, has roamed the south unit since before Theodore Roosevelt National Park was established in 1947. A study found
the ancestry of the herd likely traces back to the open-range ranching era of the 1880s,
when Roosevelt ranched in the Badlands.
Following public outcry,
park officials in April 2024 abandoned an environmental review
— which Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., flatly called a horse-removal process — and agreed to maintain a herd of horses but said they would reduce the size of the herd.
Six months later, in October 2024,
the park conducted a helicopter roundup of the horses.
During the roundup, all mature mares were injected with GonaCon, a birth-control drug the park has used aggressively since 2009.
Most of the mares have received multiple injections of the drug, which Colorado State University researchers found to be highly effective after two doses — and determined that
19 of 24 mares failed to regain fertility after two doses.
Patrick Springer / The Forum
As a result of the park’s use of GonaCon, horse advocates fear the park is deliberately creating a non-reproductive herd. Kman said Bruce McCann, the park’s chief of natural resources, told her late last year that the park is using GonaCon with the intent of creating a sterile herd.
The park has not responded to The Forum’s request for comment on the assertion that it is deliberately working to sterilize the herd.
Rangers were out darting mares in the park on Thursday, March 27. Park records show every mare was dosed with GonaCon last year, Kman said.
“GonaCon is not meant to be used every year, so what are they doing?” she said. “Eradicating the herd.”
Now that legislators have sent a clear message to Congress, Kman said she will ask the North Dakota congressional delegation to press the National Park Service to impose a moratorium on any further horse removals and the use of birth-control drugs.
“Federal legislation takes a long time, as you could imagine,” and likely would take several years to pass, if successful, she said.
Hoeven is preparing to take legislative action to protect the horses, spokesperson Alex Finken said.
“Last year, Senator Hoeven secured a commitment from the National Park Service to maintain wild horses at Theodore Roosevelt National Park, and he is working to introduce legislation to ensure the NPS maintains a herd of free-roaming horses on a permanent basis,” Finken said.
The herd, which the State Historical Society of North Dakota has said is historically significant, is threatened by the park’s usage of birth control, Kman said.
“The use of GonaCon absolutely has to stop,” she said. Births in the horse herd have dropped sharply, with 10 foals born last year, two of which died. There were more than 40 births in 2017, a number Kman said was too high. A healthy balance must be struck to maintain the herd’s genetic viability, she said.
As a result of the removal of young horses and the aggressive use of birth control, the horse herd is rapidly aging, Kman said. A 24-year-old mare named Tanker recently died, and many other horses are also reaching the end of their lifespan, Kman said.
“There’s a lot of older horses in the park that are going to be dying over the next few years,” adding urgency to the need for federal protection, she said.
There are precedents for federal protection of National Park Service horses, Kman said. The horses at Cape Lookout National Seashore on North Carolina’s Outer Banks and Ozark Scenic Riverways in southern Missouri are protected by federal law, she said.
Patrick Springer first joined The Forum in 1985. He covers a wide range of subjects including health care, energy and population trends. Email address: pspringer@forumcomm.com
Phone: 701-367-5294
-
World1 week ago
Commission warns Alphabet and Apple they're breaking EU digital rules
-
News1 week ago
Zelenskyy says he plans to discuss Ukraine ceasefire violations in a call with Trump
-
News1 week ago
Trump’s Ending of Hunter Biden’s Security Detail Raises Questions About Who Gets Protection
-
Technology1 week ago
Streaming services keep getting more expensive: all the latest price increases
-
Sports1 week ago
The BookKeeper – Exploring Manchester City’s finances during a season of change
-
Business1 week ago
Trump Administration Lifts Ban on Sugar Company Central Romana Over Forced Labor
-
News1 week ago
NASA Astronauts Don’t Receive Overtime Pay for Space Mission But Get $5 a Day
-
Culture1 week ago
‘Can’t-miss’ Men’s NCAA Tournament games on Thursday and Friday: truTV FTW?