Connect with us

North Dakota

North Dakota lawmakers hear extensive testimony on controversial library bill

Published

on

North Dakota lawmakers hear extensive testimony on controversial library bill


BISMARCK — North Dakota lawmakers listened to lengthy testimony Tuesday, March 18, on a bill that would require schools and public libraries to hide materials with “obscene” content from minors.

Senate Bill 2307

would direct such facilities to move “offensively sexual” content out of the main area of a library to a restricted section — whether that be in a cabinet, a roped-off aisle or on a higher shelf.

Another section of the bill requires school districts, state agencies and public libraries to filter out material found to be obscene in online library resources.

Advertisement

If passed, entities would be tasked with reviewing, removing and/or relocating those materials by January 2026 and providing the state with a compliance report before May 2026.

Those found to be in violation of the law could lose all state funding.

The cost associated with implementing the bill is over $2 million.

Confusion around what content would be considered obscene, ways a person could file a complaint about such content, and how someone could be found guilty of violating the rules was discussed at length during a three-hour House Judiciary Committee hearing on the bill Tuesday.

Bill sponsor Sen. Keith Boehm, R-Mandan, said the bill is purely about protecting children.

Advertisement

“This bill is not an attack on library staff or schools,” he said. “It is a necessary safeguard against a small number of activists who exploit legal loopholes to push an agenda that does not align with the values of our families and communities.”

Boehm brought

a similar bill

during the 2023 legislative, which was passed by lawmakers but vetoed by former Gov. Doug Burgum,

who said enacting the law would have an “enormous burden” on libraries.

Advertisement
Sen. Keith Boehm, R-Mandan, answers questions from House Judiciary Committee members about Senate Bill 2307 during a hearing Tuesday, March 18, 2025, at the North Dakota Capitol.

Peyton Haug / Forum News Service

SB 2307 adds to House Bill 1205, enacted in 2023, which bans “sexually explicit” materials from the children’s section of a library and allows people to ask libraries to remove such content if they find it to be “inappropriate.”

Sara Planteen, a mother from Cogswell, said her concerns about materials she found to be offensive weren’t taken seriously at the local level.

Advertisement

“When schools fail to follow their own policies, when they dismiss parental concerns, then it is the duty of the elected officials to step in,” she said.

031825.Libraryhearing3

Sara Planteen testifies to the House Judiciary Committee in favor of Senate Bill 2307 on Tuesday, March 18, 2025, in the North Dakota Capitol.

Peyton Haug / Forum News Service

Rep. Mike Brandenburg, R-Edgeley, Rep. Vicky Steiner, R-Dickinson, and a family therapist also voiced their support of the bill.

Advertisement

Opponents then lined up to share their testimony in person, except for Kelsi LeBaron, a sixth grader from Williston, who testified remotely.

031825.Libraryhearing4

People listen to testimony on Senate Bill 2307 before the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, March 18, 2025, in the North Dakota Capitol.

Peyton Haug / Forum News Service

“I understand that some books deal with difficult topics, but I believe that removing them from schools and libraries will do more harm than good,” LeBaron said. “For some students, reading a certain book might be the first time they feel understood.”

Advertisement

LeBaron also said parents, teachers and librarians should be guiding what children read, not the government.

A librarian, a bookstore owner and the North Dakota Library Association echoed LeBaron’s plea.

They collectively characterized the bill as a costly one-size-fits-all solution that would unjustly stigmatize certain books, disproportionately impact small and rural libraries, and jeopardize First Amendment rights.

“Parents are responsible for approving content for the children, not the state. It is also not one family’s right to decide what is appropriate for other families to access,” said Gail Reiten, chair of Right to Read North Dakota.

Those who provided neutral testimony Tuesday maintained that regulating access to explicit material while fulfilling educational needs is a delicate balance.

Advertisement

031825.Libraryhearing6

Rep. Jeff Hoverson, R-Minot, shows Julie Reiten, a librarian, illustrations in “Heart Stopper” by Alice Oseman, a book those in favor of Senate Bill 2307 deem “inappropriate,” during a committee hearing Tuesday, March 18, 2025, in Bismarck.

Peyton Haug / Forum News Service

Over 370 entries of online testimony had been submitted before the hearing. Nearly 85% opposed the bill, including dozens of North Dakota libraries and individual librarians, as well as social work associations, education lobbying groups, university leaders, parents and teachers.

Those in favor were Christian lobbying groups, South Dakota-based therapists and around a dozen North Dakotans.

Advertisement

The committee did not take any immediate action on the bill Tuesday.





Source link

North Dakota

Morton County did not violate North Dakota’s open records law when the County Auditor, within a reasonable time, informed the requester that the requested records were not in the County’s possession.. – North Dakota Attorney General

Published

on


Morton County did not violate North Dakota’s open records law when the County Auditor, within a reasonable time, informed the requester that the requested records were not in the County’s possession..

February 27, 2026

Media Contact: Suzie Weigel, 701.328.2210

BISMARCK, ND – Karen Jordan requested an opinion from this office under N.D.C.C. § 44-04-21.1 asking whether Morton County violated N.D.C.C. § 44-04-18 by failing or refusing to provide records.

Conclusion: It is my opinion that Morton County’s response was in compliance with N.D.C.C. § 44-04-18.

Advertisement

Link to opinion 2026-O-06

###



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

ND Supreme Court Justice Daniel Crothers retiring, stepping onto new path

Published

on

ND Supreme Court Justice Daniel Crothers retiring, stepping onto new path


BISMARCK, N.D. (KFYR) – The North Dakota Court System threw a reception for a retiring member of the state Supreme Court.

Justice Daniel Cothers is leaving after serving for more than 20 years.

He plans to step down on Feb. 28.

Before Crothers became a judge, he served as a lawyer and as president of the State Bar Association of North Dakota.

Advertisement

Mark Friese is set to replace Crothers starting March 9.

“He knows what is important and what to keep focused on. Justice Friese will be an exceptional replacement to me on the bench,” said Crothers.

Crothers plans to keep up on teaching gigs and spend time at his family’s farm as he steps into retirement.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

North Dakota ambulance providers losing money on every run, according to survey

Published

on

North Dakota ambulance providers losing money on every run, according to survey


By: Michael Achterling

FARGO (North Dakota Monitor) – North Dakota ambulance service providers lost nearly $500 on average for every patient transported to a medical facility last year, according to a survey.

The recent survey of three dozen providers in the state, conducted by PWW Advisory Group, was the result of a study created by House Bill 1322 passed during the 2025 legislative session.  The group presented the results to the Legislature’s interim Emergency Response Services Committee on Wednesday.

The average revenue generated from an ambulance transport was about $1,100 during 2025, but the expenses were nearly $1,600, said Matt Zavadsky, an EMS and mobile health care consultant with PWW, based in Pennsylvania.

Advertisement

“They are losing money every time they respond to a call,” Zavadsky said during the meeting. “That financial loss has to be made up, typically, by local tax subsidies, fundraisers, bake sales, or all too often, service reductions to try and match expenses with the revenue they can generate.” 

He said the problem cannot be fixed by billing reform alone because the revenue generated isn’t enough to fund the cost of readiness, such as personnel, equipment and supplies, among other items.

The survey highlighted 74% of ambulance provider expenses went to personnel costs, but equipment costs have also increased in recent years.

Zavadsky said survey respondents plan to invest about $12.9 million into vehicle and equipment purchases over the next five years, averaging to about $358,000 per provider. However, the cost of a new ambulance has risen to between $275,000 to $480,000 per vehicle. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, a new ambulance could cost up to $250,000, he said.

There are more than 100 ambulance service providers in North Dakota. The 36 survey respondents represented a diverse group of providers from city and county services to district-owned, hospital-based and private providers, he said. The average patient transport distance is 34 miles, according to the survey.

Advertisement

Zavadsky said the survey respondents reported 53% of their total revenue was generated from fees for service with the remaining 47% coming from local tax subsidies, state grants and other fundraising.

“What you guys are experiencing in North Dakota and what is happening in the local communities … is not the fault of the local communities, not the fault of the state, this is just our new normal,” Zavadsky said.

Rep. Todd Porter, R-Mandan, owner of Metro-Area Ambulance Service which serves Morton and Burleigh counties, said Medicare patients reimburse ambulance providers at a much lower rate than private insurance and Medicaid patients. He added Medicare patients make up about 60% of the call volume in the Bismarck-Mandan area.

“If we’re being underpaid for 60% of our call volume, then we have to make it up some place,” Porter said.

He said some providers can make up that difference in reimbursement with tax dollars, but not all providers have that option.

Advertisement

“We do other contracted work for nursing homes, hospitals, funeral homes in order to make up that difference,” Porter said. “This is a federal government problem. This is a CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) problem that we’ve known about for years.”

Porter also said ambulance services are not reimbursed for responding to a call with a Medicare patient that doesn’t require a transport to a hospital. According to the survey, about 17% of all ambulance calls don’t require transport to a medical facility.

The survey also showed about 2,300 of the nearly 33,600 patient transports billed last year ended up in collections after being more than 90 days delinquent, totalling $2.7 million, Zavadsky said. The average total of a claim sent to collections was about $1,100.

Zavadsky estimated the total of unpaid claims for more than 100 providers across North Dakota was about $5.8 million in 2025. Some providers don’t have procedures to pursue delinquent billing in collections, he said.

Rep. Jim Grueneich, R-Ellendale, chair of the committee, said the committee will take a deeper look at the data presented on Wednesday and may have recommendations, and possible draft legislation, to address the issue in the 2027 legislative session.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending