Connect with us

North Dakota

Here’s what North Dakota leaders think of term limits

Published

on

Here’s what North Dakota leaders think of term limits


BISMARCK — North Dakotans will quickly vote on whether or not there needs to be time period limits imposed on their representatives in Bismarck. The state’s foremost political leaders oppose the concept with one notable exception.

After a contentious authorized combat,

a constitutional measure to set an eight-year cap on service by the governor and state legislators will seem on the November poll.

Lawmakers would have the ability to serve as much as eight years every within the Home of Representatives and the Senate. The measure additionally features a grandfather clause for anybody at the moment serving in state authorities, so the clock would not begin ticking on their tenures till after voters approve time period limits.

Advertisement

If the measure passes, North Dakota would be part of

15 different states

in having time period limits on legislators and 36 different states in having time period limits on governors.

The place North Dakota leaders stand on time period limits

Gov. Doug Burgum stated in a press release he totally helps time period limits and has for years, although a spokesman for Burgum didn’t reply when requested why the Republican governor helps the measure.

Advertisement

“Whereas most statewide places of work aren’t included within the measure, it’s a superb first step and we assist it and encourage North Dakotans to present it their full consideration,” Burgum stated.

Burgum, a former tech govt, has been one of many state’s

most prolific political donors

over the past three years by way of a committee referred to as Dakota Management PAC, however the group’s chairman stated it is not going to spend cash or produce adverts in poll measure campaigns this election cycle.

North Dakota’s all-Republican congressional delegation wouldn’t be affected by the measure, however those that responded do not favor the concept.

Advertisement

“I get that (time period limits) are fashionable, however I don’t know why in a free system like ours… we’d ever wish to restrict our selections as free folks,” stated U.S. Sen. Kevin Cramer in a current radio interview.

U.S. Sen. John Hoeven hinted that he disagrees with time period limits, however he stated it’s as much as the voters.

“I feel every election creates a doable time period restrict however respect and assist regardless of the voters resolve,” Hoeven stated in a press release.

U.S. Rep. Kelly Armstrong didn’t reply to a request for remark.

North Dakota Republican Social gathering Chairman Perrie Schafer informed Discussion board Information Service he personally believes the time period limits measure is “ill-advised and ill-conceived,” however the North Dakota GOP has chosen to not take an official stance.

Advertisement

Imposing time period limits would trigger a shift in institutional information from skilled lawmakers to bureaucrats and lobbyists, Schafer stated. That might imply extra energy within the arms of unelected and unaccountable folks, he stated.

“I might quite see time period limits on bureaucrats than lawmakers,” Schafer stated.

Patrick Hart, the Democratic-NPL candidate for North Dakota state auditor. (Particular to Discussion board Information Service)
Advertisement

Democratic-NPL Chairman Patrick Hart stated his social gathering formally opposes the measure as a result of it might compromise North Dakota’s potential to keep up a part-time citizen legislature.

Home Majority Chief Chet Pollert, R-Carrington, stated the state’s election system already works as a result of voters can resolve their legislators’ future each 4 years and there’s pure turnover because of this.

A median of 15 to 25 newly elected lawmakers enter the 141-member legislature every biennial session, however that quantity will rise this 12 months to about 30, stated Legislative Council Director John Bjornson.

Senate Majority Chief Wealthy Wardner, R-Dickinson, stated he’s “lifeless towards” time period limits as a result of they might push well-intentioned, educated lawmakers off the poll.

Some residents have misplaced frustrations with the legislature stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic, however the state is “in the very best form it’s ever been” underneath lawmakers’ stewardship, Wardner stated.

Advertisement

Pollert and Wardner are retiring this 12 months after greater than 20 years every within the legislature.

wardner.jpg

Senate Majority Chief Wealthy Wardner, R-Dickinson, speaks at a information convention on Dec. 1, 2020, within the North Dakota Capitol.

Jeremy Turley / Discussion board Information Service

Home Minority Chief Josh Boschee, D-Fargo, stated time period limits would seemingly profit Democrats electorally, however he nonetheless opposes the concept. The part-time nature of the North Dakota legislature means it takes longer to construct up experience, and time period limits would create a barrier to good governance, he stated.

Advertisement

“I really feel now 10 years in, I’ve a agency grip of the price range,” Boschee stated. “That took lots of conferences.”

Not all state legislators oppose time period limits — 4 Home members and three senators, all Republicans, sit on the measure’s sponsoring committee, together with Rep. Rick Becker, who’s operating for U.S. Senate as an impartial conservative.

Rep. Jeff Magrum, a Hazelton Republican who will serve within the Senate subsequent 12 months, stated time period limits would open the door for brand new candidates with contemporary concepts to make constructive change in Bismarck. Proper now, longtime incumbents have an enormous electoral benefit that deters would-be challengers, he stated.

Time period limits would assist forestall corruption as a result of legislators develop relationships with bureaucrats and lobbyists the longer they keep in workplace, Magrum famous.

Magrum stated he’s not nervous a few drain on institutional information since term-limited legislators could be extra prepared to share their experience with incoming members.

Advertisement

magrum_burgum.jpg

North Dakota Rep. Jeff Magrum, R-Hazelton, stares down Gov. Doug Burgum because the Republican governor enters the Home of Representatives chamber on Nov. 8, 2021.

Jeremy Turley / Discussion board Information Service

Measure chairman Jared Hendrix stated time period limits deal with “institutional inertia,” which he defines as the purpose when elected officers turn out to be extra centered on sustaining the system of energy than serving the general public curiosity. With out time period limits, lawmaking our bodies turn out to be stagnant and imperceptive to new concepts, he stated.

The political organizer from Minot stated he believes voters will approve time period limits in November. After that, Hendrix stated folks may push to place limits on the phrases of different govt places of work in state authorities.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

Hawks stumble late against Oral Roberts – University of North Dakota Athletics

Published

on

Hawks stumble late against Oral Roberts – University of North Dakota Athletics


TULSA, Okla. – North Dakota men’s basketball was unable to finish off Oral Roberts on Saturday night inside the Mabee Center as the Summit League contest, which saw ten tied scores and seven lead changes, went the way of the Golden Eagles as a late three by Issac McBride, just the fourth by the host all night, cushioned ORU’s advantage in the final seconds with the host winning 83-79.
 
Sophomore Mier Panoam scored inside to pull UND to within one at 78-77 and then denied a driving attempt by McBride two possessions later with 58 seconds to play, but the latter would net a cushion triple following an empty opportunity from the Hawks.
 
Three pointers by senior Deng Mayar and a pair from junior Dariyus Woodson aided the Hawks in taking a 53-50 lead as the second half clock neared the 15-minute mark, but the Golden Eagles dominated inside with 50 total paint points and missed just twice inside in the final eight minutes of action after tying the contest at 65.
 
North Dakota led by as much as nine points in the first half which saw the Hawks hit four early three-pointers kickstarted by a far wing trifecta from Amar Kuljuhovic who led UND with a dozen points in the first twenty minutes. After a handful of made three-pointers, the Hawks struggled going 1-for-8 the rest of the way in the first half. ORU controlled the paint with two dozen points which aided the Golden Eagles’ 59.3% shooting clip in 27 attempts from the floor in the first half.
 
The Hawks led for over 18 minutes in the opening half of action, but a scoreless stretch in the half’s final 2:11 and a 9-2 ORU run over the 3:12 sent the host into the intermission with the advantage.
 
North Dakota prepares for a Thursday night matchup in Brookings against South Dakota State, before playing host to Kansas City on Saturday. The Hawks and the Jackrabbits tip off at 7 p.m. on January 16 from inside First Bank & Trust Arena. The action can be seen on Midco Sports and the Summit League Network. Fans can follow the action live with Fighting Hawks men’s basketball radio play-by-play voice Paul Ralston on KSNR 100.3 FM The Cat or on the iHeart Radio app. Live stats for the contest will be available at www.FightingHawks.com.
 
Postgame Notes

  • Kuljuhovic led UND with 17 points on 6-of-11 shooting with six rebounds and two assists
  • Treysen Eaglestaff followed with 15 points and Panoam added 13
  • Eaglestaff led with five assists and Panoam matched Kuljuhovic in boards with six
  • UND’s 15 offensive rebounds marks the 18th straight game with 12+ such boards
  • UND’s 14 defensive rebounds are a season low
  • The Hawks committed just eight turnovers and have committed less than ten in five of their past six games
  • UND finished at +12 in points off of turnovers
  • North Dakota was unable to absorb 28 points from McBride and 26 points from JoJo Moore
  • ORU shot an opponent-best 60.8% from the floor
  • The Eagles produced opponent season lows in three-pointers (4) and steals (3)

 
How It Happened
 
First Half
14:13 – UND 12, ORU 10 (ORU +8 paint, 0-of-4 3PT FG)
11:53 – UND 20, ORU 16 (UND 3-of-7 3PT FG)
7:24 – UND 31, ORU 24 (UND 4-of-last-5 FG, UND +4 TOs)
3:49 – UND 37, ORU 34
HALF – ORU 43, UND 42
 
Second Half
15:42 – UND 51, ORU 50
10:39 – UND 61, ORU 60
6:40 – UND 67, ORU 67
5:28 – UND 71, ORU 69
3:55 – ORU 75, UND 73
FINAL – ORU 83, UND 79
 
For more information on North Dakota men’s basketball, visit FightingHawks.com or follow on social media @UNDmbasketball.

— UND —

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

Crash of two semis leaves one driver with serious injuries

Published

on

Crash of two semis leaves one driver with serious injuries


GRENORA, N.D.— One man had serious injuries and another man had minor injuries after a crash between two semis Friday morning near this town in northwest North Dakota.

Hunter McLean, a 27-year-old Williston man, was seriously injured after his semi rear-ended the other semi about one mile south of Grenora on Williams County Road 5 around 9:06 a.m. Friday, Jan. 10.

Anthony Brumfield, a 58-year-old Williston man, was driving north on Williams County Road 5 in a 2020 Kenworth semi when he slowed down to turn into a disposal site. McLean, driving a 2015 Freightliner semi, was also driving north behind Brumfield.

As Brumfield began making the left turn, McLean came up over the crest of a small hill, saw the Kenworth semi and began applying the brakes, the North Dakota Highway Patrol reported.

Advertisement

Due to the extremely icy road conditions, McLean’s Freightliner began sliding and struck the rear end of the trailer attached to the Kenworth semi.

McLean was taken by Ambulance to CHI St. Alexis Hospital in Williston for serious injuries. Brumfield sustained minor injuries, the North Dakota Highway Patrol release said.

Both drivers were wearing seatbelts.

A small section of Williams County Road 5 was shut down for about nine hours while the scene was cleared.

The crash remains under investigation.

Advertisement

Our newsroom occasionally reports stories under a byline of “staff.” Often, the “staff” byline is used when rewriting basic news briefs that originate from official sources, such as a city press release about a road closure, and which require little or no reporting. At times, this byline is used when a news story includes numerous authors or when the story is formed by aggregating previously reported news from various sources. If outside sources are used, it is noted within the story.





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

North Dakota bill would allow children to live with mothers in prisons

Published

on

North Dakota bill would allow children to live with mothers in prisons


BISMARCK — A North Dakota bill could allow children to temporarily live with their mothers in prison.

The North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation has requested legislation that would let children reside at the Heart River Correctional Center in Mandan with their mothers.

Senate Bill 2115

would let the DOCR hire staff and develop policy to achieve that goal.

Advertisement

The bill also would prevent the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and its staff from being held liable for any injuries to the children unless “the injury is affirmatively caused by the negligent act of a state employee.”

Mothers would be responsible for their children, including medical expenses, DOCR Director Colby Braun told The Forum. Medical care would have to be sought outside the facility, he said.

The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to work on the bill — a hearing for SB 2115 is scheduled for 10 a.m. Wednesday, Jan. 15.

The legislation is focused on mothers who come to Heart River while pregnant, Braun said. If a woman births her child while in custody, SB 2115 would allow the mother and baby to stay together for some time after birth, he said, adding that doing so provides better outcomes for families.

“What we’re trying to do is really support the goal of … making sure that we’re keeping good contact with mom and their children prior to them leaving prison,” he said.

Advertisement

The bill doesn’t limit the age of a child who could live with their mother in prison. That could allow children to spend time with their mothers over a short time period, such as a weekend, shortly before a woman is released from prison, Braun said.

The legislation would give children the opportunity to reconnect with mothers as they prepare to leave prison and return to their families, he said.

The bill doesn’t say how long a child could live in the prison. It’s unclear how much the change could cost the state, according to a fiscal note attached to the bill.

The DOCR is still working on the policy that would detail the logistics of allowing children to live in Heart River. For now, the bill only addresses liability and creates the authority to allow mothers to have their children with them in the prison.

Parental separation impacts

Advertisement

Parental separation due to incarceration can have extreme effects on children, said Wanda Bertram, communication strategist for the

Prison Policy Initiative.

That includes lower educational performance in school, a higher likelihood that children end up in the foster care system and termination of parental rights, the nonprofit said.

“This is all documented to lead to a host of different negative factors in the child’s life,” Bertram told The Forum. “So, anything that can be done to mitigate that is a step in the right direction.”

The nonprofit that researches criminal justice reform has advocated for releasing incarcerated parents of young children, Bertram said. At least a dozen states have made laws addressing family separation.

Advertisement

Sometimes called a nursery prison program, a small number of states allow children to temporarily live with their mothers in prisons.

South Dakota

allows incarcerated mothers to bond with their children for 30 months after the child’s birth.

Some states and the federal government have proximity laws, which set a maximum distance between the facility where a parent is incarcerated and where their children live.

Minnesota

Advertisement

allows mothers who have been sentenced to prison to live at home with their children for up to a year after birth.

The DOCR hasn’t discussed releasing mothers from custody so they could care for children outside of prisons, Braun said.

States have been slow to adopt a program like North Dakota could because they don’t have the facilities to do so, Bertram said.

“Something like a prison nursery program involves a lot of investment in new infrastructure,” she said, noting increasing funds for the prison system can move slowly.

States also typically incarcerate a small number of women, she said. Of the 2,033 inmates who are incarcerated in North Dakota, 260, or 13%, are women, according to data from the DOCR.

Advertisement

“When you’re talking about programs that involve building new infrastructure or allocating resources to new programs, and something that’s going to impact a quite small number of people, it’s understandable why movement on that would be slow,” Bertram said.

Allowing incarcerated mothers to keep their babies with them in North Dakota has been a topic of discussion for “a long time,” Braun said. North Dakota previously didn’t have the space to do it, he said.

“As we’re looking at a new women’s facility, … one of the goals that we had is being able to have a unit where mom and baby could be together,” he said.

Heart River and the Dakota Women’s Correctional and Rehabilitation Center in New England are North Dakota’s only female prisons. Until recently, the New England facility was the state’s only prison for women.

North Dakota plans to

Advertisement

build a 260-bed women’s prison at Heart River

to replace the New England facility. The $161.2 million project was approved in 2023 and is expected to take three years to complete.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending