BISMARCK, N.D. (KFYR) – North Dakota anglers need a new fishing license by April 1.

Mike Anderson reports on what anglers can expect.

Every year in February, fisheries biologists conduct dissolved oxygen testing on many lakes in North Dakota to determine potential winterkill.

“We should be in good shape,” said Greg Power, the North Dakota Game and Fish Fisheries Chief. “Ice is going off, we’re not seeing much for dead fish, we don’t expect to see much for dead fish.”

With little or no snow on the landscape, many of North Dakota’s waters will likely receive little runoff in spring.

“As you go east, we’re in better shape water level-wise,” said Power. “The mountains are going to provide Sakakawea and Oahe with a little bit more flush of water than was expected a couple of months ago, because there is, you know, snow in the mountains. But in the big picture, we’re still in good shape.”

With an eye always focused on walleye, anglers should be pleased with what the season holds.

“All species we’re doing okay with, but in particular in North Dakota here in the last 20 years, people like their walleye and the walleye populations, especially in the district lakes and central, southeast North Dakota, are at historic highs,” said Power. “The big three, that being Sakakawea, Oahe, and Devils Lake, maybe not record high walleye populations, but still really, really good shape.”

There’s a great resource on the Game and Fish Department’s website at gf.nd.gov that can help anglers find a place to go fishing in North Dakota.

“If somebody is new to fishing or it’s not just new to fishing, it’s everybody out there, utilize our Where to Fish tab on the department’s website. And there’s a whole lot of information in there from species, what species are in the lakes, to where to go,” said Power. “In some cases, contour maps, stocking records, catch records, a little bit of development, boat ramp access, stuff like that, a little bit of everything you can find at one stop shopping.”

Power said fishing over the last few years has never been better in North Dakota, and this year should be more of the same.

Copyright 2025 KFYR. All rights reserved.

WEST FARGO, N.D. (Valley News Live) – The Polar Plunge event kicked off at The Lights in the Essentia Health Plaza on Saturday, March 29th.

153 people signed up to make a splash in what contributes to the fundraising effort for Special Olympics North Dakota.

“This is the biggest plunge we’ve ever had so far. The support for our Special Olympics athletes is just overwhelming,” said Renee Dufner, law enforcement Torch Run manager for Special Olympics North Dakota.

Plungers raise a minimum of $100 to jump into icy water.

The Polar Plunge is a fundraising effort through the Law Enforcement Torch Run for Special Olympics.

Law enforcement agencies came to judge the contests, including the North Dakota Highway Patrol, Cass County Sheriff’s Department, Fargo Police Department, and West Fargo Police Department.

Captain Matt Christensen of the Fargo Police Department participated in being a judge for the first time.

“I get to do some fun judging for different contests for costumes and belly flops, so I’m just looking forward to seeing everyone come out and raise money for a good cause,” said Christensen.

A handful of contests were in store for plungers at the event, including the Best Belly Flop, Best Costume, and Most Money Raised by an Individual.

Plungers that raise $500 will receive a Polar Plunge gift and polar plunge towel.

Registration to participate in the plunge began at 12:00 p.m.

Copyright 2025 KVLY. All rights reserved.

BISMARCK — The North Dakota Senate passed a bill on Friday, March 28, clarifying when term limits passed by voters in 2022 officially went into effect.

The date differs from the effective date passed by the House of Representatives after Sen. Janne Myrdal, R-Edinburg, a co-sponsor on House Bill 1300, amended it in committee.

The original bill, sponsored by Rep. Ben Koppelman, R-West Fargo, stated that “the time for calculating the number of years of service for members of the legislative assembly” with regard to term limits, did not start until after Nov. 7, 2022, the day the voters passed term limits.

This date would mean that any legislators elected in even districts in the 2020 general election would not have the clock start for term limits until they start their term after the 2024 general election, but those elected in the 2022 general election – the same election voters adopted term limits – would have the clock start when they took office for the 2023 legislative session.

“If you went to the ballot, or to the poll and cast a ballot that day for legislator X,” Koppelman said, “Then at the same time, you cast your ballot for or against the term limit, then a reasonable person — which is the standard we use in law, often — would say, ‘Yeah, I understood that if that passed, however I felt about term limits, that the guy I just voted for in alleged District 10 would now get eight years, starting now.’”

Koppelman’s version of the bill passed the House in a 64-28 vote.

Myrdal’s amendment would set the effective date for the start of term limits as Jan. 1, 2023, meaning legislators elected in 2022 would not have their time in office count toward term limits until they take office following the 2026 general election.

She said that the Nov. 7, 2022, date is arbitrary and the Jan. 1, 2023, date is dictated by law under Article 15 of the North Dakota Constitution as the effective date for the ballot measure.

“The Election Day is an arbitrary date because it’s not a date set in stone,” Myrdal said. “Legislative interpretation from the language of Article 15 is that it’s prospective and the law says it went into effect on January 1, 2023, so I don’t think there’s a controversy there at all.”

Myrdal also said she felt the date was a better choice in the event of a constitutional challenge to term limits.

Her amended version of the bill passed the Senate in a 40-6 vote. It now goes back to the House for a vote of concurrence.

Koppelman disagreed with the Senate’s interpretation.

“It’s saying that, ‘Well, even though I voted for term limits and I voted for my (representative) in District 9, this time doesn’t count. So four years from now, when I vote for the person in District 9, then it starts, it starts the clock,’” Koppelman said. “So in essence, the odd number districts would get 12 years, and the even number districts would get 10 years … I think to add a whole other term on is not as reasonable of an interpretation for the Legislature, and I have much more concern of judicial scrutiny if we get challenged in court.”

He said that he believes if the House version had passed, it would not have been challenged in court.

Koppelman said he would encourage the House to send the bill to a conference committee to work out the differences between the two versions.