Connect with us

Nebraska

How Nebraska’s Governor Became A General In A Right-Wing Disinformation War

Published

on

How Nebraska’s Governor Became A General In A Right-Wing Disinformation War


Margaret Byfield wasn’t going to attend for precise info. She’d shortly concluded that the Biden administration’s objective of conserving 30% of America’s lands and waters by 2030, identified informally as “30×30,” was a “huge federal land seize” within the making. What she wanted now had been troopers for her opposition marketing campaign. The extra highly effective, the higher.

Byfield, the chief director of American Stewards of Liberty, a fringe, right-wing group that has ties to the fossil gasoline trade and has grow to be a magnet for anti-federal land zealots, would discover her star in Nebraska Republican Gov. Pete Ricketts.

Earlier than lengthy, American Stewards constructed a comfortable relationship with Ricketts’ workplace — one which catapulted the Republican governor to the very high of a rising and profitable anti-30×30 disinformation marketing campaign.

Inside communications HuffPost obtained through a public document request to Ricketts’ workplace present Byfield performing as a shadow adviser of the governor, not solely on 30×30 however different environmental coverage points. She even performed a direct function in crafting an government order the governor signed in late June geared toward stopping President Joe Biden from implementing his 30×30 plan in Nebraska.

Advertisement

One of many governor’s high aides, Taylor Gage, was in common contact with Byfield between February and November of final 12 months. The 2 saved each other abreast of their anti-30×30 efforts and shared supplies forward of a collection of city halls the governor held across the state to “increase consciousness in regards to the risk 30×30 poses to our lifestyle right here in Nebraska.” Additionally they strategized about coping with reporters and which media retailers may greatest assist them get their message out.

Byfield’s emails embrace language resembling what a top-ranking staffer would possibly say: issues like “we have to reply” and “I don’t suppose we have to touch upon this.” At one level she acted as a liaison between Ricketts’ workplace and fellow 30×30 foe Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), requesting and apparently securing a assertion from Ricketts in help of Boebert’s laws geared toward blocking the Biden 30×30 pledge.

On Friday, which is Earth Day, American Stewards will sponsor a “STOP 30×30 Summit” in Lincoln, Nebraska — what Byfield has described as “a very powerful convention” her group has ever organized. It is going to be a who’s who of land switch proponents, local weather change deniers, conservation foes and sympathizers of anti-government extremists.

A launch in regards to the summit that went out final month boasted that it’ll “spoil environmentalist’s [sic] Earth Day” and “ship the clear message that America’s landowners wouldn’t be ‘voluntarily’ surrendering their property rights to the environmental agenda.”

Ricketts is internet hosting the occasion and can share the stage with Byfield, Boebert, Trump-era Inside Secretary David Bernhardt, anti-federal land Utah state Rep. Ken Ivory (R) and different main figures of the anti-30×30 motion.

Advertisement

The occasion’s sponsors embrace three of the nation’s fiercest proponents of local weather change denialism — the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, The Heritage Basis, and The Heartland Institute — and Shield the Harvest, a pro-agriculture, anti-animal rights group based by oil tycoon Forrest Lucas.

Lucas and Shield the Harvest performed an outsized function in securing President Donald Trump’s pardons for Dwight Lincoln Hammond Jr. and Steven Hammond, the father-son Oregon ranchers whose arson conviction sparked the armed takeover of the Malheur Nationwide Wildlife Refuge.

Byfield, Ricketts’ workplace and Gage, who’s now government director of the Nebraska Republican Occasion, didn’t reply to HuffPost’s requests for remark.

And American Stewards was selective about which media can attend the “most essential convention” in its historical past: The group denied HuffPost credentials to cowl it.

Margaret Byfield, government director of American Stewards of Liberty, speaks at an anti-30×30 info session in Lea County, New Mexico, in July 2021. Her Texas-based nonprofit is main the cost towards the Biden administration’s conservation goal.

Blake Ovard/Hobbs Information-Solar

Advertisement

30×30 And The Proper’s Misleading Struggle

Biden’s 30×30 goal is in keeping with a proposed United Nations framework for safeguarding biodiversity amid the deepening extinction and local weather crises, and has rising help inside the world scientific neighborhood.

Per week after taking workplace, Biden adopted by means of on a marketing campaign promise and set 30×30 as a nationwide objective. His government order established a course of for participating with a broad vary of stakeholders, from states and Native American tribes to farmers and anglers, to get enter about how greatest to attain the 30% goal. (Roughly 12% of all U.S. lands at the moment are completely protected, based on the U.S. Geological Survey.)

There may be completely nothing to counsel the plan, which the administration has since branded “America the Stunning,” will contain confiscating property or misleading techniques to realize management of personal land. In an preliminary report outlining its imaginative and prescient for safeguarding and restoring 30% of lands and waters by the tip of the last decade, the Biden administration dedicated to “collaboration, help for voluntary and domestically led conservation and honoring of Tribal sovereignty and personal property rights.”

The general lack of element in Biden’s preliminary directive, nonetheless, allowed paranoia and conspiratorial considering to permeate conservative circles. Nearly instantly, American Stewards labeled 30×30 a “land seize” and warned its viewers that the Biden initiative “fingers the powers of the Federal regulatory businesses to a motion that has been working to abolish non-public property for many years.”

Inside weeks, Ricketts can be a high soldier within the anti-30×30 motion.

Advertisement

In line with the paperwork obtained by HuffPost, American Stewards started to speak with Ricketts’ staffer inside weeks of Biden’s order. On Feb. 17, 2021, Byfield obtained an e-mail from Tanya Storer, a rancher and commissioner in rural Cherry County, Nebraska, who’d lately requested her to assist struggle a proposed conservation easement at a non-public ranch within the space.

Storer knowledgeable Byfield that she’d lately mentioned the 30×30 initiative along with her “good friend” and “colleague” Gage, then the governor’s director of strategic communications, and wished to introduce the 2 of them so they might coordinate a time for Byfield to sit down down with Ricketts. “I’m anxious for the 2 of you to go to,” Storer wrote.

In a response the next day, Byfield expressed her curiosity in briefing Ricketts on Biden’s “very regarding” effort. She declared that the president’s crew had been “populated by the acute faction of the environmental motion.” And he or she shared supplies with Gage that her small nonprofit had put collectively on 30×30, together with “reality sheets” and mannequin resolutions that native governments may move to oppose this system.

“We consider States and native governments want to talk out towards this,” Byfield wrote to Gage. “Land possession and administration shouldn’t be dictated from Washington, D.C., however needs to be decided on the native stage.”

Byfield met with Ricketts on the state capitol in Lincoln on March 10, emails present. And shortly after, Ricketts was publicly echoing Byfield’s “land seize” rhetoric and different anti-30×30 speaking factors.

Advertisement

“When the agriculture secretary [Tom Vilsack] says it’s not a land seize, then you already know it’s a land seize,” Ricketts instructed a crowd at one in all his anti-30×30 city corridor conferences again in June. Projected on a display behind him was a picture of a distant highway beneath storm clouds and the phrases “30×30 LAND GRAB.” It was taken straight from American Stewards’ web site.

Nebraska Gov. Pete Ricketts (R) held a series of town halls last year, helping to turn the Cornhusker State into ground zero for 30x30 opposition. To date, more than 60 counties have passed resolutions opposed to the conservation initiative, according to American Stewards of Liberty.
Nebraska Gov. Pete Ricketts (R) held a collection of city halls final 12 months, serving to to show the Cornhusker State into floor zero for 30×30 opposition. So far, greater than 60 counties have handed resolutions against the conservation initiative, based on American Stewards of Liberty.

MIKE THEILER/AFP through Getty Pictures

American Stewards of Liberty was shaped in 2009, but it surely has its roots within the anti-government Sagebrush Riot motion that began within the Nineteen Seventies and sought to take away lands from federal management. One among its precursors is Stewards of the Vary, which was established in 1992 to defend Byfield’s father, Nevada rancher and sagebrush insurgent Wayne Hage, who battled with the Forest Service for years over unpermitted grazing on public lands — a prequel of kinds to the armed standoff at Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy’s ranch that gave rise to an extremist militia motion.

American Stewards is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. The vast majority of its income comes from donations, main presents, and earnings from trainings, talking charges and consulting contracts with native governments. Between 2015 and 2019, Kane County, Utah, paid the group $483,000 for land-use consulting and authorized companies, The Salt Lake Tribune reported. Over that very same five-year interval, Donors Capital Fund and Donors Belief, two teams that obtained tens of millions from the fossil gasoline moguls Charles and David Koch and have funneled big quantities of darkish cash to local weather change denial and different conservative causes, gave American Stewards not less than $170,000, based on the Heart for Media and Democracy.

Byfield and her husband are the group’s solely full-time workers. In 2019, the latest 12 months for which tax info is on the market, their mixed salaries accounted for $192,381 of a complete of $308,647 in spending.

On its web site, the group says it’s “devoted to defending non-public property rights, defending the usage of our land, and restoring native management.” Previously, fulfilling that mission has largely consisted of consulting on the county stage on land administration points, working to get imperiled species faraway from the federal endangered species record and contesting environmental guidelines.

Advertisement

However when Biden dropped his 30×30 plan in early 2021, the group latched on and didn’t let go. It has fought the conservation goal with a mix of misinformation, conspiracy theories and fear-mongering, because the left-leaning Heart for Western Priorities exhaustively detailed in a report earlier this week. Some have questioned if the group’s anti-30×30 marketing campaign flouts federal guidelines for tax-exempt nonprofits.

At a latest look earlier than the San Juan County Fee in New Mexico, Byfield declared that non-public land is a “main goal” of 30×30 and that “the final word objective is to eradicate use of the land.”

Different rhetoric has been utterly outlandish. At one in all her anti-30×30 coaching periods in South Dakota, Byfield promptly agreed when an attendee in contrast 30×30 to the Holodomor, a man-made famine that occurred in Ukraine throughout Soviet Union dictator Josef Stalin’s rule and resulted within the deaths of an estimated 3.9 million individuals.

At that very same occasion, Trent Loos, a Nebraska rancher and radio present host who served on former President Donald Trump’s agricultural advisory committee and now helps American Stewards with its marketing campaign, in contrast 30×30 to Nazi Germany.

And in its information on how states, counties and native landowners can struggle 30×30, American Stewards claims that “there isn’t a credible scientific reasoning or details that help the necessity to protect any certain amount of land to ‘treatment’ local weather change.”

Advertisement

Ricketts parroted that declare in a June interview with conservative radio host Dana Loesch, saying 30×30 is “not based mostly on any science or information.”

The world’s premier local weather analysis physique disagrees. In a sweeping report on local weather impacts and vulnerability earlier this 12 months, the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Local weather Change concluded that “sustaining the resilience of biodiversity and ecosystem companies at a world scale depends upon efficient and equitable conservation of roughly 30% to 50% of Earth’s land, freshwater and ocean areas.”

In some ways, American Stewards’ opposition push has already been an enormous success. The group stoked worry in rural communities throughout the West and Midwest, elevating its personal model within the course of. It satisfied dozens of native authorities our bodies to move its prefabricated resolutions opposing 30×30: So far, greater than 130 counties and different localities throughout 13 states have adopted the mannequin resolutions, based on a tally on American Stewards’ web site.

And a rising variety of Republican lawmakers and allied right-wing organizations are peddling the group’s speaking factors and dealing to drum up opposition.

However few have confirmed themself a much bigger champion of the trigger than Ricketts. Heart for Western Priorities dubbed him “the political hub of 30×30 disinformation.”

Advertisement

A Direct Line To Ricketts

In early April, a few month after Byfield briefed Ricketts on the state Capitol, she checked in with Gage, her contact within the governor’s workplace, to see how the letter he was spearheading towards 30×30 was coming alongside. In an e-mail to Gage, Byfield famous that she was going to be holding anti-30×30 occasions in Oklahoma, Montana and South Dakota within the coming weeks and provided to assist if Gage wanted to safe signatures from the governors of these states.

Whereas the emails don’t point out that Gage took her up on that provide or that Byfield was concerned in crafting the opposition letter, they do present that Byfield had advance data of Ricketts’ actions.

“Governors have been responding positively,” Gage wrote. “I count on the ultimate letter by April sixteenth.”

A few weeks later, on April 21, Gage despatched Byfield the finalized letter that Ricketts and 14 different Republican governors, together with these from Oklahoma, Montana and South Dakota, had despatched to Biden. In it, the group outlined their considerations and speculated that 30×30 would violate non-public property rights and harm native economies.

Byfield praised the letter and thanked Ricketts for his management. She additionally knowledgeable Gage that she’d spoken earlier that day with a Fox Information reporter who was pitching a narrative on 30×30 and provided to ship the journalist the governors’ letter and Gage’s contact info.

Advertisement

“Go for it!” Gage replied. “We’d be blissful to go on Fox Information to debate.”

Later that day, Byfield emailed the Fox reporter to attach him with Gage, who she described as “very properly versed on 30×30.” When the reporter hadn’t reached out to Ricketts’ workers per week later, Byfield contemplated “if it could be worthwhile to have some op-eds able to go whatever the route of the story.”

“Considering we must always attempt to benefit from the nationwide highlight,” she instructed Gage.

“I agree – we’d be blissful to crew up on an op-ed,” Gage replied.

The 2 brainstormed which retailers to focus on, together with Fox Information and The Wall Avenue Journal, however HuffPost may discover no document of Ricketts publishing an opinion in both publication. He did, nonetheless, publish not less than 5 columns about 30×30. The columns are circulated to all Nebraska papers and infrequently get revealed.

Advertisement

It wasn’t the one time that Byfield and Gage brainstormed media technique. When a reporter from the Omaha World-Herald reached out to Byfield in early June to ask about her group’s view of the Sagebrush Riot and the Bundy household’s authorities resistance, Byfield pinged Gage to ask if the reporter was “sincere” and value speaking to.

“I might simply present him written remark at this level,” Gage suggested. “If he follows up once more, we will go to additional.”

It was round that very same time in June {that a} reporter on the Day by day Beast contacted the governor’s crew to inquire about its relationship with American Stewards. Ricketts’ workplace pretended it had little if any data of the right-wing group. “Reached for remark, Ricketts’ workplace requested extra info on American Stewards,” the Day by day Beast reported.

By then, Gage had been consulting with American Stewards’ government director about 30×30 for almost 4 months. He’d already invited Byfield to talk on a panel about 30×30 at a 2-day agricultural summit the governor would host the next month — an invite that Byfield promptly accepted. And Byfield was already pulling strings within the governor’s workplace to advance her personal agenda.

This affect is especially clear in Ricketts’ government order on 30×30 — the primary of its variety in any state.

Advertisement

In an e-mail on Might 27, Byfield flagged language in an order from Inside Secretary Deb Haaland that directed members of a newly created local weather process pressure to collaborate and coordinate with states and native authorities. Byfield confused that the availability could possibly be a “highly effective instrument” for Nebraska to struggle 30×30 and steered a coordination provision be included in Ricketts’ upcoming government order.

When Gage circulated a “confidential one pager” in early June, Byfield drew consideration to a Nebraska statute that requires all conservation and preservation easements to obtain approval from the native county board or different acceptable authorities physique. And he or she steered the governor process the director of the Nebraska Division of Agriculture with ensuring the U.S. Division of Agriculture was conscious of necessities beneath state regulation.

“We could even take into account offering some advisable language for this,” she wrote.

Ricketts’ government order on 30×30, signed on June 24, has Byfield’s fingerprints throughout it. The directive instructs the Nebraska Division of Income to “advise counties of their rights in reviewing conservation easements” pursuant to the statute Byfield underscored in her e-mail. It designates Nebraska’s agricultural director because the state coordinator for the federal local weather process pressure that Haaland established in her secretarial order. And it directs the state agriculture director to “coordinate with the U.S. Division of Agriculture (USDA) to make sure that the USDA is searching for correct native approvals for conservation easements” associated to federal packages.

Byfield was current on the signing ceremony.

Advertisement

After months of backroom collaboration, the governor’s relationship with American Stewards turned more and more public. In September, Ricketts interviewed Byfield for a full hour on his podcast. Amongst different issues, the 2 argued that an Inside Division reality sheet on 30×30 had lifted statistics — together with that 1 million species at the moment are vulnerable to extinction and that the U.S. is shedding a soccer field-sized space of nature to growth each 30 seconds — from a 2019 Heart for American Progress report. (The extinction statistic is from a United Nations report. The lack of nature estimate is from a report that the Heart for American Progress commissioned however that was carried out by Conservation Science Companions, a California-based science nonprofit.)

“In the event that they had been writing a highschool paper, they’d have gotten a D for plagiarism,” chuckled Ricketts, whose public feedback and writings have repeatedly mirrored these of American Stewards.

Byfield and Gage remained in shut contact by means of November. Then, all of the sudden, communication between the governor’s workplace and American Stewards stopped, based on data offered to HuffPost. When pressed about whether or not the governor’s workplace had complied with HuffPost’s requested date vary, an adviser to the governor responded, “I presume the break in communication was doubtless due the resignation of Taylor Gage, Strategic Communications Specialist, on Dec. 3, 2021.”

Gage was undoubtedly Byfield’s main contact in Ricketts’ workplace. Nonetheless, internal emails point out that Byfield and the governor’s workplace had began strategizing off-email lengthy earlier than Gage’s departure out of concern that their discussions could possibly be made public through a data request.

Byfield warned Gage a few watchdog group, Accountable.US, that had been submitting data requests for American Stewards’ communications with counties in quite a few states — “Your workplace could obtain an analogous request,” she wrote — and scrutinizing the group’s tax standing. Accountable.US filed a grievance with the Inside Income Service in Might accusing the group of violating its 501(c)(3) tax-exempt standing by lobbying towards 30×30 on the federal, state and native ranges.

Advertisement

In one other back-and-forth in September, Gage flagged a USDA announcement about $75 million in investments for climate-smart agriculture and forestry initiatives on non-public lands, together with one in Nebraska.

“We have to reply…,” Byfield wrote. “Have a number of ideas of what wants to enter this, however they’re strategic and shouldn’t be topic to a [Freedom of Information Act] request. We may both go to by cellphone, or, loop in an lawyer for the state so we set off the lawyer consumer privilege. Ideas?”

“Would you’ve time for a Zoom subsequent week?” Gage requested.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Nebraska

Nebraska baseball boots Boilermakers from Big Ten tournament

Published

on

Nebraska baseball boots Boilermakers from Big Ten tournament


LINCOLN, Neb. (KLKN) — Nebraska baseball defeated Purdue on Wednesday night to stay alive in the Big Ten tournament.

The Huskers won 6-2 at Charles Schwab Field in Omaha, a different story from their bruising loss to Ohio State the night before.

The Boilermakers scored first, on a Luke Gaffney home run.

But Nebraska’s offense got going in the second inning, racking up four runs.

Advertisement

Gabe Swansen homered in the third inning, and Josh Caron hit another homer in the ninth to ice the game.

SEE ALSO: Husker baseball’s Brett Sears named Big Ten Pitcher of the Year

Husker pitcher Brett Sears struck out nine batters in his six innings on the mound. He recorded the win and is now 9-0.

The tournament is a double-elimination playoff.

Wednesday’s loss eliminates Purdue from the tourney.

The Huskers will play the loser of the Indiana vs. Ohio State game on Friday at 2 p.m.

Advertisement
Categories: Husker Sports, Sports





Source link

Continue Reading

Nebraska

Nebraska sues TikTok, alleging teens are deceptively targeted • Nebraska Examiner

Published

on

Nebraska sues TikTok, alleging teens are deceptively targeted • Nebraska Examiner


LINCOLN — Teen TikTok users and parents who signed them up for the social media app were misled by the company about the safeguards in place to protect younger users, Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers said Wednesday.

The County-City Building in Lincoln serves as the home to Lancaster County courtrooms. (Paul Hammel/Nebraska Examiner)

Instead, Hilgers said, young people on the app are bombarded by addictive videos the algorithm recommends, including some that Hilgers said put young people’s mental health at risk, ranging from content encouraging body image issues to discussions about suicide.

The Attorney General’s Office filed a lawsuit Wednesday in Lancaster County District Court alleging that the popular social media app built its business on hooking teens and children on the feedback loop of social media engagement.

Hilgers on Wednesday said it’s no accident that what social media companies have been doing in recent years to grow and keep their audiences sounds similar to what tobacco companies did in trying to lure young smokers into becoming lifelong users. 

Advertisement

Hilgers says TikTok knew

A key driver of the lawsuit, Hilgers explained, is that TikTok knows it is distributing questionable videos to young people and knows that its business model relies on growing and holding its “golden audience.”

He said his investigators created accounts pretending to be 13-17 years old. The lawsuit alleges these investigators saw videos show up on their “For You” feeds that authorities deemed inappropriate. The app offered them without investigators searching for related topics.

TikTok Inc., the U.S. company that operates the popular social media service, and ByteDance, its parent company, filed suit Tuesday, May 7, 2024, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit over a law requiring ByteDance to sell its subsidiary or face a ban from U.S. app stores. (Kevin Frayer/Getty Images)

“TikTok holds itself out as a safe platform,” Hilgers said. “It tells people that it is a family friendly platform. It tells people that it’s been appropriate for people over the age of 12. It tells people that its restricted mode is effective.

“It has all sorts of claims that it makes to the public, and none of those claims are true.”

Hilgers said the lawsuit stemmed from a two-year investigation started by his predecessor, Doug Peterson, whose office began looking into social media content. The investigation has thus far resulted in Nebraska suing TikTok and Facebook’s parent company, Meta.

TikTok says it has safety tools

California-based TikTok and its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, said Wednesday that the app has “industry-leading safeguards to support teens’ well-being.” Its statement pointed to age restrictions, parental controls, time limits and more. 

Advertisement

“We will continue working to address these industry-wide challenges,” the company spokesman said.

Hilgers said those promised protections are ineffective and confusing for teens and parents to use. He also said they don’t curb access to questionable material by teens and younger kids. He said his office also saw inappropriate sexual content.

The Nebraska consumer protection lawsuit is the latest risk facing TikTok. It also faces a new federal law seeking to force the separation of the company from its Chinese ownership by 2025 over data privacy and U.S. national security concerns.

Nebraska is one of more than 25 states that have banned the use of TikTok on phones, tablets and computers used by state government employees, citing security concerns. The federal government also restricts the use of the app on its devices.

Some states have discussed passing broader bans on the app, which is among one of the more popular ways young people get their news and information. Montana recently banned it, but a federal judge paused the ban, citing constitutional concerns.

Advertisement

Civil fines possible

In Nebraska, TikTok and ByteDance face potential civil fines of up to $2,000 for each alleged violation of the state’s Consumer Protection Act and another $2,000 for each alleged violation of the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

State Sen. Carolyn Bosn of Lincoln is shown on Feb. 2, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

Hilgers, much like he did when suing Meta, said he hopes the company will change course and “tell the truth by saying exactly what their platform does.” He said they could change the material they show teens and younger users.

“At the end of the day, we want them to be honest,” he said.

The AG said he would have brought the lawsuit against TikTok with or without the passage last session of State Sen. Carolyn Bosn’s Legislative Bill 934, which demands jury trials in similar lawsuits.

But he said he was encouraged at the prospect of a Nebraska jury weighing allegations against TikTok and ByteDance. Bosn, a former prosecutor, has argued that requiring jury trials could encourage settlement talks with the companies involved.

Internal documents could be key 

Hilgers said his office is asking a judge to publicly release or unseal internal documents obtained from TikTok during the investigation. He said they will help show what sort of content was shown to teens.

Advertisement

Some glorified drug use. Others talked about sex. Still others focused on weight loss and were steered to young women already at risk of eating disorders.

Hilgers expressed skepticism that TikTok’s system of removing videos that are reported as in violation of its rules is the most effective way to police the site. He said TikTok’s algorithm is sophisticated enough to limit what it shares.

One of the biggest challenges for parents of children with TikTok accounts is knowing what they are named and how to access them. Many kids don’t tell parents they have access, so many parents don’t know their kids’ passwords and can’t check on them.

Hilgers said tens of thousands, if not more than a hundred thousand Nebraskans, have TikTok accounts. About 150 million Americans use the app daily. Half of its youngest users spend hours a day on the app. This hurts school performance, behaviors and mental health, he said.

The AG said he thinks he has all the tools he needs to enforce consumer protection law on TikTok. But he said he would address any shortcomings with state lawmakers. He said his office isn’t done investigating social media companies.

Advertisement

“This is truly digital poison,” Hilgers said. 

Court Filing

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nebraska

The Little River Band replacing The Guess Who at Nebraska State Fair

Published

on

The Little River Band replacing The Guess Who at Nebraska State Fair


GRAND ISLAND, Neb. (KSNB) – The Nebraska State Fair and 1868 Foundation announced Wednesday that The Little River Band would be coming to the State Fair instead of the previously announced act, “The Guess Who.”

“Concert organizers weren’t sure the previously announced act, The Guess Who, could fulfill their engagement,” a press release from the State Fair stated. “As a result, The Little River Band has been booked to perform on Tuesday night, August 27 in the air-conditioned comfort of the Heartland Events Center.”

The Little River Band started in Australia, and has been around for almost 50 years.

Tickets to see The Little River Band will remain the same amount, and previous ticketholders tickets are still valid for the same seat.

Advertisement

Reserved seats range from $25 to $50 for Tom Dinsdale Automotive VIP seats, plus fees.

If you would prefer a ticket refund, you can contact the Nebraska State Fair Box Office by calling (308) 382-1620 or stopping by the Nebraska Building on or before June 21.

Click here to subscribe to our KSNB Local4 daily digest and breaking news alerts delivered straight to your email inbox.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending