Connect with us

Minnesota

4 things we learned from the Giants’ 16-13 loss to the Vikings

Published

on

4 things we learned from the Giants’ 16-13 loss to the Vikings


At this point in the 2025 NFL season, there really isn’t much left to learn about this New York Giants team. They’re bad. As a former scientist, I do appreciate that ownership has tried to apply the scientific method to understand why.

Two hypotheses were offered by fans and the Giants beat writers in mid-season. The Giants are bad because (a) the coaches are bad, or (b) the players (and hence the general manager) are bad. They couldn’t realistically fire the entire coaching staff in mid-season, but they did fire the two most frequent targets of fans’ and writers’ wrath, head coach Brian Daboll and defensive coordinator Shane Bowen. They’ve now run the experiment for five weeks, taken the Petri dish out, and the results are in: The Giants still stink. So we now know it wasn’t (just) the coaches, although it’s possible that Mike Kafka and Charlie Bullen are as bad as Daboll and Bowen.

No scientific experiment is perfect, but today we got another data point. What did we learn from the Giants’ 16-13 loss to the Minnesota Vikings?

Is Mike Kafka the second coming of Joe Judge?

Advertisement

When Brian Daboll was still head coach, the Giants had some of their most successful offensive games this season after Jaxson Dart took over as starter. That more or less continued until Dart’s concussion in Chicago, during another blown fourth quarter lead, precipitated Daboll’s dismissal. Kafka, who supposedly had been given back the play calling this year, now had complete charge of the offense, and it looked good, even great at times, in his first two games as head coach with Jameis Winston at the helm.

Since Dart returned, though, things haven’t been the same…except for the losing. Dart has played some of his worst ball since returning to the lineup against New England. Today was clearly the worst game of his Giants career, with only 33 yards passing on the day. Maybe the absence of designed runs has taken something important from his arsenal.

Or maybe Kafka is coaching scared. Last week I was upset at how often he called running plays on 2nd and 10 after incomplete passes. Today Kafka just bypassed first down passes completely for a while. Kafka called runs on the Giants’ first four offensive plays. The first two worked for big gains, but the next two didn’t. Kafka finally called passes on two consecutive plays, neither of which worked, but both of which were canceled by Minnesota penalties. Given new life at the Vikings’ 16 yard line, Kafka called three consecutive runs that only got them to 4th and goal at the 5 yard line. THEN, rather than kick the field goal to get back to a 3-3 tie, he decided to have Dart pass…which resulted in a sack and change of possession.

This is terrible play calling. You’re telling your QB that you have no faith in him. It brought back memories of the final two games of the Joe Judge Experience, when he refused to let Mike Glennon pass at all after the first quarter in Chicago, and then had Jake Fromm not even attempt to get first downs deep in his own territory. I get it – Brian Flores runs a difficult defense to diagnose, and you’re risking disastrous turnovers if he’s confusing your rookie QB. But Flores was blitzing Dart about 70% of the time, and play callers are supposed to have hot reads for the QB to throw to in order to blunt the effect of the pressure. If you don’t let your QB experience that, you’re stifling his development. If you’re using 12 personnel and then almost always running out of it rather than passing, you’re tying your QB’s hands.

You’re not in good hands with the Giants’ receiving corps

Advertisement

The counter to my point above is that minus Malik Nabers, the Giants’ receivers are a really unreliable group. On the rare occasions that Dart did try to pass, he was undercut by his receivers’ inability to corral the ball. Darius Slayton bobbled and lost another pass that would have been a first down. Wan’DaleRobinson, among the more sure-handed of the Giants’ receivers, let a pass hit him in the face mask and be bobbled before he got hit and it fell incomplete. Admittedly it was a pass that Dart floated rather than putting velocity on so Robinson could gather it in well before contact, but it was still a drop. Finally, Theo Johnson once again could not bring in a pass that he should have been able to go get, letting it bounce off his hands for an interception.

The pass rush is looking up

Granted, the Vikings’ OL is not the best, but the Giants got good pressure on J.J. McCarthy and Max Brosmer today. The beneath-the-surface story of today’s game was that the QB the Giants chose not to draft last year faced the QB they chose to trade up for this year. McCarthy, after a rough start to his career, had played great the previous two games, making the Viking offense suddenly look like a juggernaut. Today, The Giants sacked McCarthy three times and Brosmer once and held the two of them together to 160 yards passing. Brian Burns had two more sacks, continuing his excellent season, and Abdul Carter was active again, with another sack on a beautiful inside spin, his signature move, plus several other pressures. In addition, Chauncey Golston, who has been injured for much of his first Giants season and invisible when he’s been out there, got his first sack and was generally active when he was in the game.

Maybe it was the pass rush, maybe it was the inexperienced QBs, but today was the first day that I thought the Giants’ secondary played well this season. Paulson Adebo had his first interception as a Giant. Jevon Holland had what should have been a pick-6, but it was called back because Abdul Carter lined up in the neutral zone. Oof. Tyler Nubin finally made a positive play this season, recovering McCarthy’s fumble and returning it 27 yards for a TD.

I also thought the Giants’ linebackers had one of their best games of the season, especially Bobby Okereke, who has been MIA since Wink Martindale stormed out the door. Okereke even broke up a pass to Justin Jefferson.

Advertisement

After a 3-year odyssey, the Giants today looked like they actually have a kicker who can make field goals in Ben Sauls. Granted, they were only 27 and 39 yards, but we’ll take what we can get as Giants fans. Besides,he was kicking in what looked like a decent wind today and it looked like he placed them perfectly to compensate for the wind. He also made his only extra point, which would not be a big deal on any other team, but as Giants fans we count our blessings, however small.

Speaking of blessings, the dream of the No. 1 pick remains alive, with unexpected help from the Titans, who handily defeated the cratering Chiefs.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Minnesota

Minnesota Senate Democrats advance assault weapons ban; path to final passage remains rocky

Published

on

Minnesota Senate Democrats advance assault weapons ban; path to final passage remains rocky


ST. PAUL — Asked how he felt after testifying in the Minnesota Senate Judiciary Committee, Mike Moyski said, “At least in this committee hearing, the opposing group was able to make eye contact with us.”

Moyski’s daughter, 10-year-old Harper Moyski, was killed in the

Annunciation Catholic Church shooting on Aug. 27.

Another child, 8-year-old Fletcher Merkel, was also killed, and 28 others were injured in the Minneapolis shooting.

Advertisement

Mike Moyski testified Friday, March 13, in support of an assault weapons and high-capacity magazines ban. He and Harper’s mother, Jackie Flavin, also

testified two weeks ago

in a House committee, where the bill stalled.

“I do know at the heart of it, nobody in those rooms wants kids to die, so it’s just landing on what makes the most sense and what will get us there the fastest,” Moyski said Friday.

Despite no movement from Republicans on an assault weapons ban Friday, Moyski said he’s feeling “very much still hopeful,” and intends to keep showing up at the Capitol.

Advertisement

“This is the long game, and we’re here for it,” he said.

Mike Moyski and Jackie Flavin testify in favor of an assault weapons ban at the Capitol in St. Paul on Friday, March 13, 2026.

Mary Murphy / Forum News Service

The Minnesota Senate Judiciary and Public Safety Committee heard a slate of 17 gun violence prevention bills on Friday. With a DFL majority, several advanced out of committee, including the assault weapons ban.

Sen. Michael Holmstrom, R-Buffalo, said he brought the assault weapons ban bill into a sporting goods store on Thursday, and wasn’t able to find any hunting rifle that wouldn’t be banned under the bill. But he said that’s not why he’s against it.

Advertisement

“Over the last 100 years, we’ve seen 250-plus million people killed by their own nations,” Holmstrom said. “And the Second Amendment is created specifically to defend our right against a tyrannical government that looks to strip away our freedom. That is the reason that I defend these bills — it is not because I like hunting. That is just an ancillary benefit.”

Sen. Michael Holmstrom
Sen. Michael Holmstrom, R-Buffalo, discusses opposition to gun control bills at the Capitol in St. Paul on Friday, March 13, 2026.

Mary Murphy / Forum News Service

Sen. Zaynab Mohamed, DFL-Minneapolis, who authors the ban and represents the district that covers Annunciation, responded to Holmstrom’s argument with, “Looking forward to you speaking about the occupation in our state.”

Sen. Judy Seeberger, DFL-Afton, who has previously been opposed to an assault weapons ban, was a “yes” vote on Friday, though she shared Holmstrom’s concerns about the scope of the bill.

Advertisement

“I am also concerned that this issue — which is at its heart a public safety issue — is being turned into a partisan issue by both parties,” Seeberger said.

While the Senate DFL can advance gun control bills with their one-seat majority, the bills’ prospects in the tied House aren’t promising.

Asked Thursday night if he sees any movement from his House Republican colleagues, House DFL Leader Zack Stephenson, of Coon Rapids, said he doesn’t believe anything has changed.

“I wish I could tell you that it was leading towards Republican support,” he said. “Leader [Harry] Niska said in a press conference many months ago that there wasn’t a single Republican vote for meaningful gun violence prevention measures, and that he wouldn’t allow a bill come to the floor, and I don’t believe that has changed.”

ZackStephenson
House DFL Leaders Zack Stephenson of Coon Rapids and Jamie Long of Minneapolis answer questions from reporters at the Capitol in St. Paul on Thursday, March 12, 2026.

Mary Murphy / Forum News Service

Advertisement

One Republican gun bill that passed Friday was

SF3825,

from Sen. Warren Limmer, R-Maple Grove, amending existing safe storage negligence law.

Current law prohibits someone from failing to properly store a loaded firearm away from a child; Limmer’s bill would also require safe storage from a “person prohibited from possessing firearms,” not just a child. Limmer listed some examples of who the change could apply to: felons, domestic violence offenders or individuals deemed mentally unstable.

Advertisement

The committee also passed several bipartisan gun violence prevention bills not related to gun control — such as funding studies or mental health services.

One of those,

SF3648

from Rich Draheim, R-Madison Lake, regarding school safety specialists funding, passed unanimously. The school safety initiative has seen bipartisan support in the Senate and House — though lawmakers are

working with a tight budget this session.

Advertisement
JackieFlavin
Jackie Flavin (third from left), mother of Harper Moyski, listens to debate on gun control at the Capitol in St. Paul on Friday,

Mary Murphy / Forum News Service

Mary Murphy

Mary Murphy joined Forum Communications in October 2024 as the Minnesota State Correspondent. She can be reached by email at mmurphy@forumcomm.com.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Minnesota

Drone sightings drove surveillance fears as ICE surged in Minnesota

Published

on

Drone sightings drove surveillance fears as ICE surged in Minnesota


Some Minneapolis residents who took to the streets to document U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids believe federal authorities used drones to record and intimidate them. Despite laws governing drone use, finding a definitive answer is unlikely.



Source link

Continue Reading

Minnesota

Pushing for

Published

on

Pushing for



Advertisement

This session, a bill to end surveillance pricing is moving forward at the Minnesota Capitol.

Surveillance pricing is when companies use data collected on you to set individualized pricing for consumers. 

“Companies are using our personal data to find our pain points, how much we will pay for something,” said DFL Rep. Erin Koegel, the co-chair of the Minnesota House Commerce Finance and Policy committee.

The committee performed an experiment with a rideshare company — ordering the same ride from the same house to the Mall of America.

“The prices were always different. And so my committee administrator consistently saw a higher price of his twin brother,” said Koegel.

Advertisement

Companies accused of surveillance pricing often deny it. One example is Instacart. On its website it says it does not use “personal, demographic, or user-level behavioral information about individuals to set online item prices.”. 

“The bill that we’re working through right now would basically just outlaw the use of personal data for prices. So companies would not be able to use all of your personal data to determine what you would pay,” said Koegel.

The Minnesota Chamber of Commerce has voiced its concerns about the proposed ban, arguing it would eliminate discounts, increase costs and restrict marketing tools and that a ban would impede what is the inevitable evolution of marketing. 

Koegel says it’s not clear if the bill will clear the Legislature.  

“We’re trying do here in Minnesota is make it clear that we want a fair and transparent market. We want to know what these companies are doing, ” said Koegel.

Advertisement

In the meantime she shared some advice.

I think searching for flights in incognito mode. Kind of like you basically have to hide your identity online now to get fair prices,” said Koegel.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending