Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis parks board and union dig in for protracted strike — and other labor news • Minnesota Reformer
Take a seat in the Break Room, our weekly roundup of labor news in Minnesota and beyond. This week: Minneapolis parks workers strike enters second week; Anti-union group targets public sectors workers with opt-out campaign; Minnesota nurses notch another victory; National teachers union locks out staff; and renowned labor organizer Jane McAlevey dies.
Minneapolis parks workers extend strike indefinitely
What was supposed to be a weeklong strike by Minneapolis parks workers entered its second week on Friday after union leaders with LIUNA Local 363 announced earlier this week the strike would go on indefinitely.
Negotiations have already dragged on for seven months and become increasingly antagonistic. Last week, park board leaders threatened to lock out striking workers until a deal was reached, prompting the union to file an unfair labor practices charge and the park board to reverse its position.
The strike has already disrupted events in the parks and could force the park board to further curtail services. The union represents roughly 300 parks workers who maintain the grounds and facilities across 185 park properties, which include 75 beaches and pools, miles of trails and seven golf courses. The park system has been ranked among the top three in the country for the past decade.
While the two sides appear close in their wage proposals, representatives for the union and the Minneapolis Parks and Recreation Board haven’t met since July 1 and have no plans to resume talks.
Minneapolis Parks Superintendent Al Bangoura said during Wednesday’s board meeting that negotiations would only resume after workers take a vote on their last offer. That prompted outcry from union members, who say managers have no power to dictate how the union conducts its business.
“A very fair offer has been proposed and (LIUNA Local) 363 leadership refuses to bring it to their members for vote. Why won’t they bring it for a vote instead of unilaterally holding their members to a strike?” Bangoura said.
Then on Friday, Bangoura released a statement saying negotiations could resume if the union provides a “substantial and meaningful counteroffer” by Monday.
Union members say the park board’s latest offer is worse than the one on the table when they voted to authorize the strike with 94% support last month.
The latest offer by the park board would cost $4.6 million over three years, while the union’s proposal would cost $6.7 million, according to the park board. The $2.1 million difference spread over three years represents less than half of one percent of the park board’s budget — $157.1 million for 2024.
The park board’s finance director said in a special board meeting on Monday that residents would see their taxes go up by 1.25% under the board’s proposal and 2.1% under the union proposal. Union members balked at the projections, pointing out the board is sitting on $25 million in reserves, has $50 million in open contracts and awarded parks Superintendent Al Bangoura a 10% raise this year.
“That’s another way for them to spin the public against us,” said Paul Holevas, a union steward who’s worked full-time for the parks for more than a decade. “I live in Minneapolis … My taxes have went up every single year, astronomically, and it’s going to happen next year and the year after regardless of whether they’re paying us or not.”
The latest offer by the park board includes 10.75% raises over three years plus small market adjustments of 50 cents per hour for certain workers annually in the final two years of the contract.
The offer would give parks workers the highest raises they’ve seen in years, but the union points out it would not make up for recent inflation. Workers have also seen other union workers make larger gains, like the city of Minneapolis’ public works employees, who won 30% raises over the next three years. And the city is considering giving police officers historic raises of nearly 22%, pushing their pay to among the highest in the nation.
Holevas says the larger sticking points remain over contract language that would weaken workers’ power, like limiting the number of union stewards and adding rules on the grievance procedure.
While the union authorized a strike with overwhelming support, many members have continued to work while their co-workers walk the picket line.
A spokeswoman for the parks system said 48% of union members are on strike by their count, while LIUNA Local 363 estimates nearly 60% are striking.
Holevas says workers are taking advantage of the opportunity to earn overtime pay, which hasn’t been offered in years, while others simply can’t afford to live on the union’s picket pay of $50 per day.
“They know most of the people that I work with live paycheck to paycheck, and aren’t going to be able to afford to strike without some help,” Holevas said. “So instead of trying to come back to the table and give us what we deserve, they would rather just wait it out, make us all broke.”
Still, Holevas says he believes more of his colleagues are joining the strike and an outpouring of public support has doubled the union’s strike fund, allowing the union to increase its picket pay to $100 per day.
“We’re united. We’re winning. We have management on their heels,” Holevas said.
Anti-union group targets Minnesota state workers
State employees and other public workers have been receiving emails from the anti-union Freedom Foundation encouraging them to cancel their union membership. Workers received emails twice from OptOutToday.com since April, promising workers “financial freedom” by halting their union dues payments, according to copies shared with the Reformer.
The emails direct workers to a website that will generate a form for workers to send to their union and employer canceling their membership. While workers say they didn’t sign up for the emails, a link provided in the email says their contact information was obtained through a public data request.
Public sector employees can’t be required to pay union dues under the 2018 Supreme Court decision in Janus v. AFSCME. Even if public workers opt out of paying dues, however, their unions will continue to represent them in negotiating wage increases and benefits.
In the private sector in Minnesota, workers who are represented by a union can opt out of membership but often must pay “fair share” dues to cover the costs of representation. That’s different than in so-called right-to-work states, where unions cannot compel workers to pay dues even if they benefit from union representation.
Labor advocates worried the Supreme Court decision would deal a deadly blow to public sector unions, which represent teachers, transit workers, public works employees, personal care attendants, state bureaucrats and others. But the vast majority of workers continue to voluntarily pay dues to fund their unions’ operations negotiating contracts and lobbying on their behalf.
In Minnesota, for example, roughly 94% of all workers covered by union contracts are also union members, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Minnesota nurses union notches another victory
Nurses at Essentia Health-Duluth Clinic 3rd Street and Patient Flow hospital voted to unionize with the Minnesota Nurses Association, marking another victory for the nurses union in its campaign to organize more workers in the north country.
Nearly 250 Essentia workers have voted to unionize with the nurses union this year, while even more are scheduled to vote on unionizing this month at St. Mary’s-Superior Wisconsin Clinic. Votes will also be tallied later this month by advanced care providers — including nurse practitioners and physician assistants — at 70 Essentia Health hospitals and clinics across northern Minnesota and parts of Wisconsin.
National teachers union locks out its staff
The National Education Association, the largest labor union in the country, deployed one of the most aggressive tactics available to employers against its own unionized employees on Sunday and locked them out amid stalled negotiations. That means the union’s nearly 300 staff members will not be allowed to work or get paid until the two sides reach a deal on a new contract, Education Week reported.
The lockout comes after the staff union, the National Education Association Staff Organization, launched a three-day strike on July 5 that halted the NEA’s annual representative assembly that brings together thousands of union delegates. The assembly couldn’t continue in person because the union would not cross its staff’s picket line. The strike also led President Biden to cancel his appearance at the assembly meeting in Philadelphia.
In a statement to Education Week, a NEA spokesperson criticized staff members for “abandoning” members and “depriving them of the opportunity to convene and deliberate the business of the union.”
The staff union, which has filed three unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board, called the lockout “a dangerous, reckless, and reactionary move that undermines the rights of every union worker in this country.”
Labor organizer and writer Jane McAlevey dies at 59
Renowned labor organizer and writer Jane McAlevey died Sunday at 59 years old from cancer. McAlevey was a charismatic figure in the labor movement who practiced — and later taught — zealous bottom-up organizing that sought to put rank-and-file workers at the helm of union campaigns and negotiations.
She authored four books that became well-worn handbooks to many union activists and trained thousands of organizers in her theory of change at the U.C. Berkeley Labor Center and the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation.
McAlevey was also a brash and polarizing figure, earning the nickname “Hurricane Jane” and a reputation for being hard to work with. She was a frequent critic of union leaders, especially after failed campaigns, and admonished those she believed were too timid, complacent or close to management.
McAlevey publicly disclosed her cancer in a profile in the New Yorker last fall after keeping her diagnosis largely private for two years. It was her second bout with cancer, which also claimed her mother, brother and sister. She entered hospice care in April, writing to her followers, “No matter how much I love the challenge of a good fight, this was never one I could win.”
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis City Council approves plan for George Floyd Square that allows transit access
The Minneapolis City Council on Thursday evening approved a redesign plan for George Floyd Square, capping off years of planning, public input and debate.
The council voted 9-4 to move forward with a plan that was backed by Mayor Jacob Frey and allows for transit access through 38th Street East and Chicago Avenue.
Under the plan, Metro Transit service will be restored along Chicago Avenue, but no vehicle traffic will cross the location where George Floyd was murdered more than five years ago. The plan allows for the intersection to be closed for public gatherings and expands space for memorials and art.
“Thousands of voices shaped this plan, and today we turned years of work into real progress,” Frey said. “Approving the flexible open option means we are finally moving forward together.”
Earlier this year the City Council voted to explore a pedestrian-focused concept for the busy south Minneapolis intersection, a decision that was vetoed by Frey. Frey argued that nearby property owners opposed a pedestrian plan and would not approve it, which is required by state law. Still, the council voted in February to override his veto 9-4.
Months later, the council ultimately decided to approve the open street design plan, though some members expressed their frustration with the decision.
“This council has been put in a position where there is no will or ability for our mayor and our administration to move on any other plan,” said Ward 12 Councilmember Aurin Chowdhury at Thursday’s meeting. “There’s no will to do pedestrian mall from them.”
Council President Elliott Payne, Vice President Aisha Chughtai, along with councilmembers Jason Chavez and Robin Wonsley voted against the plan.
The council anticipates construction to begin in 2026.
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis council’s costly encampment response plan passes, likely to be vetoed
Minneapolis City Council’s costly encampment response plan passes, likely to be vetoed
A controversial plan addressing homeless encampments, while getting enough votes for approval, may never see the light of day.
The Humane Encampment Response ordinance does and calls for many things, creating a heavy lift for the city of Minneapolis and needs a lot of public dollars — including providing portable bathrooms, hand washing station, needle disposal supplies, and more.
It also sets up a seven-day pre-closure notice and provides free storage, which city staff says alone would cost millions. The ordinance also includes ensuring people have access to services and shelter.
RELATED: Minneapolis City Council passes housing crisis policies as mayor expedites encampment closures
“We seek to address the public health and safety concerns,” Aisha Chughtai, one of the three council members, said during Thursday’s city council meeting. “It also ensures that unsheltered individuals are given the basic dignity of time to make plans before a closure.”
Her colleague, Linea Palmisano, was first to express opposition.
“I don’t know how we could suggest that we keep people in a situation where addiction, violence, trafficking — drug and sex trafficking and child trafficking — how that can be a humane response to encampments,” Palmisano said.
At the posting of this article, we did not receive a statement from council member Aurin Chughtai, who said she’s supplying one — we asked how she responds to those who feel the ordinance encourages encampments to form and why it does not include steps to address crime that unfolds in encampments.
The one who needs to sign off on the ordinance, Mayor Jacob Frey, is clear on his stance.
“I intend to veto it,” Frey told 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS, which will be effective as there was not enough support from council members to override it.
“I don’t know how anybody could argue with a straight face that that is safe, and that’s the right way to do this,” Frey said, adding, “I don’t want to turn back that progress on an ordinance that would essentially make homeless encampments much easier to start open and then much harder to close.”
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis City Council set to take stronger stance against ICE
MINNEAPOLIS (FOX 9) – The Minneapolis City Council will vote on Thursday to bolster a 22-year-old ordinance that restricts police officers from helping ICE agents or taking part in federal immigration enforcement.
Minneapolis’ separation ordinance
The backstory:
The City of Minneapolis first passed its separation ordinance in 2003, following the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and ICE under the Bush administration. Cities across the country began passing laws, including Minneapolis and St. Paul, following suggestions from Attorney General John Ashcroft in 2002 that state and local authorities should act as conduits for federal immigration enforcement.
Among other requirements, Minneapolis’ separation ordinance forbids Minneapolis police from taking part in immigration enforcement or assisting ICE agents. It also prevents city employees from investigating an individual when the only law they’ve violated is being in the United States illegally. City employees are also restricted from inquiring about immigration status except when required to do so by law.
Big picture view:
This week, the council presented a revised version of the separation ordinance with tougher language intended to combat ICE, amid a targeted immigration operation ordered by President Trump focused on the Somali community. In recent weeks, ICE agents have been spotted across the Twin Cities, especially in predominately Somali areas. Just this week, an enforcement operation in Cedar-Riverside ended in a confrontation with ICE agents pepper spraying protesters. During that operation, city leaders say an American citizen was arrested by ICE agents, forcefully handcuffed, and hauled down to a detention center in Bloomington.
The current review of the separation ordinance was sparked by a federal raid in June on a Mexican restaurant that turned out to be a criminal investigation. The raid did, however, spark an anti-ICE protest and a heavy police response.
Minneapolis council considers changes
Local perspective:
The new ordinance declares the city will “vigorously oppose” any attempt to use city resources for immigration enforcement. The revised ordinance also codifies an executive order issued last week by Mayor Jacob Frey restricting ICE from staging operations in city-owned lots, parking lots or ramps.
There are exemptions that allow police to work with ICE or federal authorities for operations like criminal investigations. In those cases, the new ordinance requires police officials to prepare a report detailing the operation and explaining why the city took part and submit it to the mayor, the council, and the public. The ordinance also opposes the government’s practice of hiding the identity of federal agents, saying that working alongside anyone who lacks clear agency identification, who is masked, or conceals their identity or badges would be contrary to the values of the city and harmful to the trust and public safety of city residents.
Dig deeper:
Along with the separation ordinance, council also approved an additional $40,000 in funding for the Immigrant Law Center of Minnesota to support legal services for immigrants in Minneapolis. The law center helps immigrants detained by ICE, those seeking citizenship, and provides advice for those at risk of immigration enforcement.
What’s next:
The Minneapolis City Council will meet at 9:30 a.m. to vote on the separation ordinance and other measures on its calendar. The separation ordinance is Item 1 under the Committee of the Whole schedule titled “Employee authority in immigration matters ordinance: Title 2.” We will stream the meeting in the live player above.
-
Alaska6 days agoHowling Mat-Su winds leave thousands without power
-
Politics1 week agoTrump rips Somali community as federal agents reportedly eye Minnesota enforcement sweep
-
Ohio1 week ago
Who do the Ohio State Buckeyes hire as the next offensive coordinator?
-
Texas6 days agoTexas Tech football vs BYU live updates, start time, TV channel for Big 12 title
-
News1 week agoTrump threatens strikes on any country he claims makes drugs for US
-
World1 week agoHonduras election council member accuses colleague of ‘intimidation’
-
Washington3 days agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa5 days agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire