Connect with us

Michigan

Michigan voters to choose party candidates for crucial Senate race in battleground state

Published

on

Michigan voters to choose party candidates for crucial Senate race in battleground state


LANSING, Mich. (AP) — Michigan voters could play a major role in choosing who the next president will be — and they could also determine which major party controls Congress in 2025. Next week’s party primaries over an open U.S. Senate seat and two congressional races in the battleground state will set the stage for November.

Democratic U.S. Rep. Elissa Slotkin has the inside track for her party’s nomination to the Senate against a challenge from a television actor. Former U.S. Rep. Mike Rogers has the endorsement of former President Donald Trump and the financial backing of national Republicans in the race for his party’s nomination.

Slotkin and Rogers are looking to fill the seat long held by Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow, who announced in early 2023 she would not seek reelection. Democrats currently maintain a narrow margin in the Senate but are defending far more seats in this year’s elections.

The political drama in Michigan extends further down the ballot as well. Slotkin’s Senate bid puts a House seat up for grabs, one of two in Michigan that are expected to be competitive in November. With Republicans defending a narrow majority in the U.S. House of Representatives, the outcomes of the Michigan contests could have national implications. And Michigan Republicans themselves are looking to regain control of the state House of Representatives lost in 2022.

Advertisement

Slotkin, a third-term U.S. representative from Holly, has positioned herself as the party’s front-runner with her fundraising prowess and endorsements. She last reported about $8.7 million in cash on hand in mid-July and announced earlier this year she plans to spend $8 million in advertising in the weeks leading up to the general election.

Her sole primary competitor, actor Hill Harper, best known for his role in the television show “The Good Doctor,” has raised considerably less than her more than $24 million.

Rogers, a former U.S. representative lured out of retirement, has Trump’s endorsement to stave off competitors, as well as the endorsement of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.

Other Republican competitors include former U.S. Rep. Justin Amash and physician Dr. Sherry O’Donnell. Businessman Sandy Pensler, who dropped his candidacy and endorsed Rogers at a July 20 rally with Trump, will also be on the ballot because he withdrew too late.

Michigan Republicans haven’t secured a Senate victory in Michigan since 1994.

Advertisement

Rogers is far behind Slotkin in fundraising, raising more than $5.3 million and sitting on about $2.5 million of cash, according to the latest campaign finance report. But national party groups have reserved millions in ad buys after the primary, ahead of the general election.

The race has mirrored many aspects of the U.S. presidential election. Slotkin has campaigned on protecting and expanding reproductive rights while Rogers has slammed the Biden administration for its handling of border security.

Slotkin, who is Jewish and has extensive foreign policy experience as a former CIA analyst and Defense Department official, has at times faced criticism for not being harder on Israel. Michigan has the largest concentration of Arab Americans in the nation, and support from the community is critical in the state where nearly 100,000 people cast “uncommitted” ballots in February to protest President Joe Biden‘s handling of the Israel-Hamas war.

Meanwhile, Vice President Kamala Harris’ team is attempting to change the White House narrative inherited from Biden and regain support from Arab American leaders in the Detroit area, especially in Dearborn, one of America’s only majority-Muslim cities. Slotkin has thrown her support behind Harris.

National attention will turn to Michigan as some of the most competitive congressional races in November could determine the makeup of the U.S. House as well as the Senate.

Advertisement

Slotkin’s foray into the Senate race opened her congressional seat in central Michigan. Both party candidates are unchallenged in their primaries for the swing district.

In Michigan’s 8th congressional district encompassing Flint and Saginaw, U.S. Rep. Dan Kildee’s retirement leaves the competitive seat open. The Democrat who has represented the area since 2013 has endorsed first-term state Sen. Kristen McDonald Rivet for the position. Also in the running are Pamela Pugh, state board of education president, and Matt Collier, the former mayor of Flint.

Paul Junge, a former TV anchor who lost by more than 10 percentage points to Kildee last year, is running on the GOP side. Also running are Mary Draves, a former chemical manufacturing executive at Dow Inc., and Anthony Hudson.

Detroit is likely to be without Black representation in Congress for a second consecutive term after a court ruled that a former state senator and popular candidate did not submit enough valid signatures in the 13th congressional district.

Detroit, which is nearly 80% Black, had maintained some Black representation in Congress for almost 70 years until 2023. Incumbent U.S. Rep. Shri Thanedar faces two remaining primary challengers but holds a major cash advantage over Mary Waters, a former state lawmaker who has served on the Detroit City Council since 2021, and attorney Shakira Lynn Hawkins.

Advertisement

Michigan Republicans are looking to regain control of the state House of Representatives in November, with all 110 seats up for election. Democrats became the majority party in both chambers of the Legislature in 2022, spurred by redistricting and an abortion referendum on the ballot that same year. The Legislature passed numerous laws on Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s agenda in the year following.

Early voting, new this year for Michigan thanks to a 2022 referendum, started for the August primary election on Saturday, July 27.

__

Associated Press writer Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement

Michigan

Northwestern or Illinois? Ohio State or Michigan? The CFB Week 14 picks — including one huge upset — are in

Published

on

Northwestern or Illinois? Ohio State or Michigan? The CFB Week 14 picks — including one huge upset — are in


All “Hat,” no battle?

Heading into the season, Northwestern (+7) at Illinois (6:30 p.m. Saturday, Fox 32, 720-AM, 890-AM) didn’t project as a difficult matchup to size up. The Wildcats were scrapping toward being competitive again, while the Illini were coming off a 10-win season and widely viewed as a College Football Playoff hopeful.

But the visitors are 6-5 and trending up, and the hosts are 7-4 and needing to hold on to the Land of Lincoln trophy — “the Hat,” as it’s known — just to feel OK about where they’re at.

“Nothing better than the last opportunity together,” Illini coach Bret Bielema said about the regular-season finale at Memorial Stadium.

Advertisement

Home field should matter. Quarterback Luke Altmyer should give the Illini an edge. But the weather — cold, with snow in the forecast — is a factor not to be overlooked, and it’s the Wildcats who run the football far more reliably, averaging 174 rushing yards per game. Their QB, Preston Stone, also happens to be the Big Ten’s reigning offensive player of the week, and terrific wide receiver Griffin Wilde is coming off an 11-catch game.

“We’re treating this as postseason play,” Northwestern coach David Braun said. “I know it’s the regular season, but we’re playing for a trophy.”

A battle, it shall be, but I’ve got the Illini eking it out 27-24.

And now, let’s get to what Week 14 is really about: the games — including “The Game” — that will shape the playoff picture heading into conference championship weekend. (All games Saturday unless otherwise noted.)

No. 7 Ole Miss (-7) at Mississippi State (11 a.m. Friday, ABC 7): The Rebels have won four of the last five Egg Bowl games, none by fewer than seven points. Dak Prescott isn’t running through that tunnel for the Bulldogs. Rebs by 10 and on to the CFP.

Advertisement

No. 4 Georgia (-14½) vs. No. 23 Georgia Tech (2:30 p.m. Friday, ABC 7): It’ll be a great scene at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta. They don’t call it Clean, Old-Fashioned Hate for nothing. Georgia wins but doesn’t cover.

No. 2 Indiana (-28½) at Purdue (6:30 p.m. Friday, NBC 5, Peacock): Boiler Up? Oh, stop. Hoosiers, 38-14.

No. 1 Ohio State (-10) at No. 15 Michigan (11 a.m., Fox 32): OSU has become a stand-alone superpower, better than everybody else, no ifs, ands or Bucknuts. Also true, insanely: Michigan, which has a real shot at joining the Buckeyes in the playoff if it springs a stop-the-presses upset, has won the last four games over its bitter rival. The edge between the ears is real — until it isn’t. Buckeyes by 14.

No. 12 Miami (-7) at No. 22 Pittsburgh (11 a.m., ABC 7): It’s win or forget the playoff for the Hurricanes. The Panthers still have a path if they take down the U and either SMU or Virginia loses, putting them in the ACC title game with a shot at an automatic bid. Upset? Almost. ’Canes by a kick.

No. 6 Oregon (-7) at Washington (2:30 p.m., CBS 2): The Huskies have won three of the last four, and five of the last nine, in this underrated series. The Ducks are more likely than not to be in the playoff even with a loss, but the pressure on them against a dangerous three-loss team in a supercharged environment will be extreme. Upset? Yep, I’m calling it, 31-30.

Advertisement

LSU (+10) at No. 8 Oklahoma (2:30 p.m., ABC 7): Tigers quarterback Michael Van Buren Jr., in for injured starter Garrett Nussmeier, has done just enough the last two games to squeak past Arkansas and Western Kentucky. If that prepared him for the Sooners’ monstrous defensive front, I can’t imagine how. The Sooners — their offense puzzlingly stuck in low gear, too — are cooked on the playoff front, though, if they go down here. OU, 24-13.

No. 14 Vanderbilt (+2½) at No. 19 Tennessee (2:30 p.m., ESPN): Vandy still has a fair-to-middling shot to be the last at-large in — the Volunteers have no shot — but the dream has to die at some point, doesn’t it? Take Rocky Top.

No. 10 Alabama (-6) at Auburn (6:30 p.m., ABC 7): Weird things happen in the Iron Bowl, and weird things are expected by many in this one. I dig weird — who doesn’t? — but I’m rolling with the Tide, 27-14.

No. 9 Notre Dame (-32½) at Stanford (9:30 p.m., ESPN): The playoff committee can’t get away with ranking the two-loss Irish any higher, but eyeballs know there aren’t eight better teams out there. Blowout, 38-7.

Last week: 6-1 straight-up, 4-3 against the spread.

Advertisement

Season to date: 65-26, 45-46.



Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

Michigan State football’s last chance at ending miserable season on high note

Published

on

Michigan State football’s last chance at ending miserable season on high note


EAST LANSING – Quindarius Dunnigan is lunging for the tape in a marathon college career.

To mark the finale of the Michigan State defensive lineman’s seven years in college, 15 family members were hitting the pavement for Thanksgiving and his last game – one van for the passengers and another for the luggage.

Following practice on Tuesday, Dunnigan was about 24 hours out from their arrival and preparing to host a group through the weekend. Despite all his growth split between Middle Tennessee State and the last two years at Michigan State, making holiday plans isn’t a strength.

“I have no idea,” Dunnigan, a Chattanooga native, said with a laugh before anticipating some competitive board games. “With it being cold, they ain’t going to want to go outside anyway so it will probably just be a whole lot of fireplace action, movies and stuff.”

Advertisement

The Spartans (3-8, 0-8 Big Ten) are heading into the end of a miserable season by facing Maryland (4-7, 1-7) at Ford Field in Detroit on Saturday (7 p.m., FS1). They’ve lost eight straight – the program’s longest losing streak in more than four decades – and are one defeat away from finishing winless in the Big Ten for the first time.

“All these games we’re playing, it’s bigger than the program, it’s bigger than us,” defensive lineman and Detroit native Jalen Thompson said, “so we’re just playing for the guys next to us, playing for our seniors.”

Michigan State’s last appearance at Ford Field ended in a 42-0 loss against Penn State to close the chaotic 2023 season a day before coach Jonathan Smith was hired. The Spartans return to Detroit amid more uncertainty about the direction of the program with athletic director J Batt still silent about Smith’s job status.

“I have no other way to look at it besides the way they’ve gone, call it the last month,” Smith said Monday of his team approaching the finale. “I totally anticipate that they’re going to bow up again, back to work tomorrow morning and come out flying around excited to play and finishing things right this Saturday.”

Although the brutal losing streak continues, the effort remains. Michigan State’s defense has upped its fight and a 20-17 loss at Iowa last week marked the second straight road defeat when leading with less than two minutes to play. Another game the Spartans were only a play or two from winning but couldn’t get it done.

Advertisement

Maryland is riding a seven-game losing streak but, unlike Smith, coach Mike Locksley received public support from Maryland athletic director Jim Smith for a ninth year with additional financial resources to build a roster. Smith and has staff remain in limbo.

“I think both programs are really hungry for a win,” offensive coordinator Brian Lindgren said, “to take some momentum into the offseason.”

Defensive coordinator Joe Rossi, whose midseason move from the booth to the sideline helped spark that side of the ball, quickly dismissed a mention of Saturday’s game as a matchup between two teams with 15 combined losses.

“I get to coach Wayne Matthews one last time – that’s a big deal to me,” Rossi said. of one of the seniors. “Grady Kelly, Malik (Spencer), Sam Edwards, Quindarius Dunnigan, Malcolm Bell, Joshua Eaton – I get to coach those guys one more time. That’s what I’m excited about.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Michigan

7,000 Michigan families could lose housing assistance if federal funds are cut, AG says

Published

on

7,000 Michigan families could lose housing assistance if federal funds are cut, AG says


LANSING, MI – Around 7,000 Michigan families could lose access to housing assistance programs if a federal policy change announced this month is made permanent, according to Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel.

That includes approximately 2,000 families with children, Nessel’s office said in a press release sent out with the Michigan Coalition Against Homelessness (MCAH), made up of more than 92 homeless service providers.

Sarah Rennie, MCAH senior director of advocacy, said in the coalition’s 35 plus years of operation, it’s “never encountered a threat as devastating and extreme to persons in poverty.”

“Lives will be lost,” Rennie said.

Advertisement

The policy change is to a federal Continuum of Care (CoC) program, created by Congress to provide nonprofits and state and local governments with funds to help end homelessness.

It’s offered through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), which Nessel and a coalition of 20 other states are now suing for “illegally upending support for tens of thousands of Americans experiencing homelessness or housing insecurity.”

The lawsuit filed Nov. 25 alleges that the changes will limit access to long-term housing and other services by restricting funding and imposing illegal conditions on grants.

“If permitted to take effect, these changes will displace thousands of Michigan families,” Nessel said.

On Thursday, Nov. 13, HUD released the policy changes, described as “monumental reforms” to the CoC program, including with a $3.9 billion funding announcement.

Advertisement

The federal changes, first reported by POLITICO, also significantly cut funding for permanent housing programs.

Instead, more than half of 2026 funding would be shifted to transitional housing assistance programs with some work or service requirements.

According to an advocacy guide shared by the National Alliance to End Homelessness, permanent housing now accounts for around 87% of CoC funded programs. That would be brought down to 30%.

About 170,000 people nationwide could be at risk of experiencing homelessness because of this change, many with disabilities and complex health needs, according to the guide.

The new policy may also create gaps in funding that could leave participating landlords and staff unpaid, deter future private sector investment, stall construction and shift costs to local and state governments, the alliance wrote.

Advertisement

Last year, Michigan received more than $100 million through the CoC grant program, according to Nessel’s office.

Rennie said the federal order “completely misunderstands the root causes of homelessness.”

“Homeless rates in Michigan continue to rise, not because of a failure in the current homeless service delivery system, but because Michigan faces an affordable housing crisis,” she said. “Recent estimates show the state is short by over 290,000 affordable housing units. Additionally, real wages remain stagnant while inflation rises, putting many hard-working families on the brink of financial disaster.”

She said a shift in services, funding cuts and a lack of time for agencies to plan “will turn the state’s housing crisis into a housing catastrophe.”

HUD Secretary Scott Turner wrote that the change would align with a Trump administration executive order.

Advertisement

He said it would restore “accountability to homelessness programs and promote … self-sufficiency among vulnerable Americans.”

HUD had not responded to a request for comment as of the time of publishing.

Nessel’s lawsuit contends that the changes to the CoC program dramatically reduces the amount of grant funds that can be spent on permanent housing without Congressional authority.

The changes aren’t incremental, she said, and will disrupt providers’ ability to both provide housing and budget for their programs.

The funding announcement also includes a requirement that 70% of projects be “competed,” meaning applicants must submit proposals for evaluation.

Advertisement

Turner wrote that the change would end “the status quo that automatically renewed funding without measuring success.”

Historically, around 90% of funding year to year is protected, Nessel’s office said, meaning a renewal of projects is guaranteed to ensure that individuals and families relying on them have stable housing.

But this figure has also been cut down – to around 30% – meaning 70% of projects will again compete for funds.

“These new policies virtually guarantee that tens of thousands of formerly homeless people in permanent housing nationwide will eventually be evicted through no fault of their own when the funds aren’t renewed,” Nessel said.

Her office added that the change also puts “new unlawful conditions” on accessing funding.

Advertisement

HUD’s longstanding policy is encouraging a “housing first” model, Nessel said, that provides stable housing without preconditions for access – like sobriety or a minimum personal income.

She said the change would make requirements more stringent for both providers and those seeking services.

The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in the federal District of Rhode Island, was also signed onto by attorneys general in Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin, along with the governors of Kentucky and Pennsylvania.

In addition to the lawsuit, groups like the National Alliance to End Homelessness have begun advocating against the change to Congress, requesting a one-year extension of existing CoC contracts.

On Nov. 13, over 40 Senate Democrats sent a letter to Turner criticising the change. U.S. Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Holly, was among those who signed on.

Advertisement

On Oct. 28, before the change was formally announced, 22 House Republicans also sent a letter requesting the grants be renewed so programs would not be destabilized. Rep. Jack Bergman, R-Watersmeet, was among those who signed.

Neither Slotkin nor Bergman could be reached for comment as of the time of publishing.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending