Connect with us

Kansas

Kansas City and Brian Platt sued for discrimination by ousted civil rights director

Published

on

Kansas City and Brian Platt sued for discrimination by ousted civil rights director


Andrea Dorch, former head of Kansas City’s civil rights department, is suing City Manager Brian Platt and the city for race and age-based discrimination.

Dorch’s lawsuit was filed nearly a year after she alleges she was forced to resign from her position as head of the Civil Rights and Equal Opportunity Department because she warned city officials that a multi-million dollar Northland data center campus being built by Facebook’s parent company was reportedly skirting city rules.

The lawsuit comes as the city council and Mayor Quinton Lucas are beginning to renegotiate Platt’s city manager contract, which is up for renewal at the end of this year.

A spokesperson for the mayor’s office issued the following statement on behalf of the city:

Advertisement

“Per standard practice, the City will not comment on pending lawsuits. On the merits of the Meta project itself—one of the largest infrastructure projects in recent Kansas City history—more than $186 million in construction and other support work has already been committed to registered minority- and women-owned businesses, and growing.

“Kansas City government continues its work with Meta to ensure the more than $1 billion project meets all goals set by the City Council throughout all phases of construction. We expect Meta’s contract utilization plan to be finalized with the City this spring.

“We are proud of our City staff and all efforts to ensure equitable inclusion both inside of City Hall and in the workforce on all public projects.”

The lawsuit states that beginning in 2022, Platt created obstacles that made it difficult for Dorch to carry out her job duties as head of the civil rights office. Toward the end of 2022, the lawsuit alleges that Platt singled Dorch out in a meeting of department directors and then barred her from attending city council meetings. It’s normal for department heads to attend city council meetings to give testimony on relevant ordinances.

KCUR reported last spring on Dorch’s departure from the civil rights office. In an interview with KCUR following her resignation, and a report she had published prior to her leaving city hall, Dorch alleged that city officials, including Platt, interfered with her job duties, particularly when she voiced concern that the Northland development was not hiring the proper number of city-mandated minority and women-owned contractors.

Advertisement

Dorch’s lawsuit states that Mayor Quinton Lucas and councilmember Eric Bunch “publicly derided and denigrated” her for challenging Meta’s failure to include minority and women-owned businesses in the project, which violated the city’s own rules.

When Dorch continued asking questions about the Meta project, and advocating that the developer comply with the city’s rules, the lawsuit says Platt sent “an official letter of reprimand” via email, called her communication “unprofessional” and prohibited her from discussing any of those issues with the mayor or city council. Those duties made up the foundation of Dorch’s job, the lawsuit states.

In May 2023, the city council approved changes to its contract with Meta that require the developer to follow city requirements to hire minority and women-owned businesses.

City officials maintain that Dorch, then the highest-ranking Black woman in city hall, was asked to resign because she violated a rule requiring city hall employees to live in Kansas City. They cite a Lee’s Summit home that Dorch purchased as evidence she broke the residency requirement.

But in Dorch’s lawsuit and in previous interviews with KCUR, she maintains her primary residence has always been in Kansas City. Jackson County property records show Dorch owns homes in both Kansas City and Lee’s Summit. A car registered in Dorch’s name lists the same Kansas City address.

Advertisement

The lawsuit says firing her over the residency requirement was “pretextual.”

Dorch’s lawsuit cites KCUR’s reporting from last spring that revealed the city hired private investigators to follow her, and that the surveillance began soon after Dorch received the letter of reprimand from Platt.

Dorch first learned of the surveillance from KCUR and The Kansas City Star, and “up to this point, was still worried that she was being followed and/or surveilled,” according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit says Dorch “was in fear for her safety and the safety of her children as Mr. Platt never informed Plaintiff that he hired a private investigator to follow and surveil her.”

Dorch’s departure from City Hall angered Civil Rights leaders in Kansas City, many of whom called on Platt to resign and accused Platt and Mayor Lucas of overseeing a “culture of racism” at City Hall.

Advertisement

Dorch alleges in the lawsuit that the city applies its residency requirement selectively, and says several department heads own residential property outside city limits but have not been asked to resign from their position. The lawsuit says the city has used its residency requirement to terminate female, minority employees.





Source link

Kansas

New downtown stadium will mean less parking for Royals fans

Published

on

New downtown stadium will mean less parking for Royals fans


KANSAS CITY, Mo. — From 25,000 parking spots to 19,000 within a 10-minute walk to the stadium, that’s how many Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas says will be available near the new Royals ballpark in Crown Center, with 9,000 of those spots on the actual campus.

While there will be less parking, Royals fan Roger Nickell says he believes this move is good for Kansas City.

“I think anything that makes Kansas City an exciting place to come to, and a good destination, the parking itself is not going to be the issue,” Nickell said “We’d rather have good things in our city, and if you go to other cities, Kansas City is actually really, really easy right now.”

While it might not be ideal for some, downtown stadiums and parking is the normal for a number of teams and cities throughout Major League Baseball. Upwards of 20 teams have a stadium in the downtown area, including the Twins, Cardinals and Tigers.

Advertisement

“I think every new stadium in the MLB is being built downtown, so I kind of expected it,” Royals fan Jackson Fort said. “I think parking will be kind of, they’ll have to figure out something because there’s going to be a big building and not a lot of space to put it. I think you’ll see a lot more Ubers and less of that tailgating scene that the chiefs and the royals are so known for.”

While tailgating as we know it will look different, walking to the stadium won’t actually look that bad if you use the streetcar. From the stop at the World War I Museum, you’re looking at a nine-minute walk to Crown Center, and four-minute walk if you get off at Union Station.

“I think it would be a good thing for the city, for the baseball park and for everybody,” avid streetcar user Gary Henderson said. “Especially for the people who use the trolley would get a chance to see how comfortable it is and maybe it’ll increase their business too.”

With hopes of the new stadium to be ready for opening day in 2030, the Royals, Kansas City, and fans have time to figure out any potential obstacles.

“I think we’ll get to figure it out,” Royals fan Caden Tucker said. “I think that they have plenty of time to be able to figure everything out and make sure everything’s not going to be packed in here and just kind of slowed down in the process.”

Advertisement

While a lot of parking will be taken away in the near future, if one thing is for certain, the Royals will not. The current lease for Kauffman stadium is set to expire in 2031.



Source link

Continue Reading

Kansas

PBS Kansas remembers employee killed in Wichita shooting; estranged husband charged

Published

on

PBS Kansas remembers employee killed in Wichita shooting; estranged husband charged

























PBS Kansas remembers employee killed in Wichita shooting; estranged husband charged | Trusted News Source for Wichita & Kansas | kake.com

We recognize you are attempting to access this website from a country belonging to the European Economic Area (EEA) including the EU which
enforces the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and therefore access cannot be granted at this time.

For any issues, contact news@kake.com or call 316-943-4221.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Kansas

Final 7-Round Kansas City Chiefs 2026 NFL Mock Draft: Putting my skills to the test against an AI trained to think like Brett Veach

Published

on

Final 7-Round Kansas City Chiefs 2026 NFL Mock Draft: Putting my skills to the test against an AI trained to think like Brett Veach


I trained my AI to think and draft like Kansas City Chiefs GM Brett Veach. Then I challenged it to a duel for my final 2026 NFL Mock Draft.

Chiefs GM Brett Veach speaks to the media during his pre-draft introductory press conference.
YouTube/Chiefs

You’re going to see a lot of final mock drafts for the Kansas City Chiefs this week, but I decided to make mine a little bit differently this year.

Advertisement

I wanted to give Chiefs fans an idea of what I would do while also adding a predictive element. What I settled on was a dueling mock draft against an AI trained to think like Chiefs GM Brett Veach.

How did I train my AI? First, I uploaded Veach’s draft history since he took over as general manager following the 2017 NFL Draft. Then, I fed it pre-draft and post-draft press conference transcripts to give the AI context on how Veach views the NFL Draft. I weighted the more recent press conferences more heavily. From there, I uploaded historical data on key thresholds at specific position groups. It had access to confirmed combine formals and pre-draft meetings with 2026 NFL Draft prospects, along with historical context on their importance.

I also uploaded the Chiefs’ stats from last season so the AI could quantify areas that needed improvement relative to NFL averages. The final piece of the puzzle was to upload the Chiefs’ 90-man offseason roster and team needs.

To execute the mock draft, I used the A to Z Sports NFL Mock Draft Simulator. I provided the AI with the list of the 10 best available players at a given pick. I made my picks before the AI, but I didn’t tell it who I had chosen. The AI was prompted to use all available data to make a decision for each draft pick. With all that in mind, here’s a look at how the mock draft competition turned out.

Final Kansas City 2026 NFL Mock Draft

Pick No. 9

Top available: Mansoor Delane, Caleb Downs, Jordyn Tyson, Spencer Fano, Makai Lemon, Monroe Freeling, Jermod McCoy, Kenyon Sadiq, Ola Ioane, and Keldric Faulk.

Advertisement

My pick: Arizona State WR Jordyn Tyson

Solving for the Chiefs’ need for “the guy” on offense in the future just feels like the right move for this draft class. Travis Kelce can’t play forever. Add Tyson and get back to scoring 30+ per game.

What AI Brett Veach did: Auburn DE Keldric Faulk

Edge rusher was the No. 1 need that I provided to the AI. At 6-foot-6 and 275 pounds with 34-inch arms, Faulk meets virtually every Chiefs threshold from a physical standpoint. It’s not an exciting pick for fans, but even a robot can see the upside here.


Pick No. 29

Top available: Kadyn Proctor, Akheem Mesidor, Caleb Banks, Cash Howell, T.J. Parker, CJ Allen, Denzel Boston, Chris Johnson, R Mason Thomas, and Colton Hood.

Advertisement

My pick: Tennessee CB Colton Hood

I’m becoming increasingly comfortable with the idea of taking a cornerback early. The old NFL adage goes that you can never have too many cornerbacks, and the Chiefs need bodies there. Not just for 2026, but also for the long term. Hood gives you a physical man coverage corner who can play outside, but probably crosstrains inside, too.

What AI Brett Veach did: Alabama OT Kadyn Proctor

Offensive tackle wasn’t rated as highly on the AI’s needs list. However, the Chiefs did have a top-30 visit with Proctor. I think it probably took note of Brett Veach’s comments about offensive tackle drying up by pick No. 35. He also hits some athleticism thresholds, despite missing on one key measurable (arm length).


Pick No. 40

Top available: Caleb Banks, Chris Johnson, R Mason Thomas, Denzel Boston, Chris Bell, Zion Young, Christen Miller, Chris Brazzell, D’Angelo Ponds, and Gabe Jacas.

Advertisement

My pick: Florida DT Caleb Banks

There are obviously some questions regarding the nagging foot injury. Plus, there’s still some development and pad-level issues to work out. I just think the 6-foot-6, 310-pound defender would really thrive by learning from Chris Jones.

What AI Brett Veach did: Florida DT Caleb Banks

What a copycat. Based on the information I gave the AI, this doesn’t surprise me. Banks had the medical top-30 visit with Kansas City. Veach, of course, mentioned needing two more defensive linemen in this class during his pre-draft presser. This just makes me feel even more strongly that this is a no-brainer pick if he’s available at pick No. 40.


Pick No. 74

Top available: Ted Hurst, Davison Igbinosun, Dom Orange, Antonio Williams, Jonah Coleman, Genesis Smith, Caleb Tiernan, Dani Dennis-Sutton, Will Lee III, and Keionte Scott.

Advertisement

My pick: Penn State DE Dani Dennis-Sutton

A member of the 2026 All-Juice Team, Dennis-Sutton feels like he was built in a lab solely for Steve Spagnuolo. He hits all of the physical thresholds, but also is quietly one of the more productive players at the position.

What AI Brett Veach did: Georgia State WR Ted Hurst

I think this might have been a “best player available” pick for the AI. Hurst took a pre-draft visit with the Chiefs, and wide receiver is pretty high on the needs list. It makes sense why the AI Brett Veach would value him here.


Pick No. 109

Top available: Brian Parker, Nick Singleton, Isaiah World, Oscar Delp, Dontay Corleone, Bud Clark, Kaleb Proctor, Harold Perkins, Emmett Johnson, and Charles Demmings.

Advertisement

My pick: TCU S Bud Clark

A versatile safety prospect for the Chiefs. Clark has ball skills for days, with four consecutive college football seasons with 3 or more interceptions. At 6-foot-1 and 188 pounds, he’s also a physical presence in run support. He fits the Spags mold.

What AI Brett Veach did: Stephen F. Austin CB Charles Demmings

Cornerback also ranked highly on the needs list, so I can see how the AI prioritized this position group at this pick. Veach also has a history of drafting FCS talent, including Fayetteville State CB Joshua Williams and Western Illinois DT Khalen Saunders. Demmings fits the mold for what K.C. likes at the cornerback spot in terms of physicality and athleticism.


Pick No. 148

Top available: Sam Roush, Kevin Coleman, Jalon Kilgore, Billy Schrauth, Kaleb Elarms-Orr, Ephesians Prysock, Justin Jefferson, Zane Durant, Logan Taylor, and Jeff Caldwell.

Advertisement

My pick: Stanford TE Sam Roush

I’m a big Roush fan. He’s already one of the better blocking tight ends in the class, but I also think there’s big upside as a pass-catcher. He has a 6-foot-6 and 267-pound frame. Plus, he’s a legacy player in Kansas City.

What AI Brett Veach did: South Carolina DB Jalon Kilgore

Nickel/safety versatility probably appealed to the AI here. There’s also really good ball production with eight career interceptions and 21 passes broken up. I think he’s rather role-limited in the NFL, but the AI could’ve done a whole lot worse at pick No. 148.


Pick No. 169

Top available: Landon Robinson, Josh Cameron, Caden Curry, Taureen York, Demon Claiborne, Domani Jackson, Eli Raridon, Cade Klubnik, J.C. Davis, and Keagen Trost.

Advertisement

My pick: Illinois OT J.C. Davis

I hadn’t taken an offensive tackle yet, so this felt right. This one is a bit of a homer pick as Davis played for my UNM Lobos before transferring to play for my Fighting Illini. If the Chiefs wait on offensive tackle, he’s the one I’d want them to target.

What AI Brett Veach did: Navy DT Landon Robinson

Doubling up on the pass-rushing interior defensive linemen. I see you, Brett Veach AI. Robinson is undersized, but his athleticism and production are absolutely worth taking a chance on. Being the top-ranked player on the list I gave to the AI probably played a part in this decision.


Pick No. 176

Top available: Jeremiah Wright, Ar’Maj Reed-Adams, Mikail Kamara, Marlin Klein, Adam Randall, Trey Moore, Jakobe Thomas, Nick Barrett, Kaelon Black, and Febechi Nwaiwu.

Advertisement

My pick: Michigan LB Jimmy Rolder

Call it a reach on my part, as Rolder is 201 on the A to Z Sports big board. Only a one-year starter. Instinctive with impressive closing speed at 6-foot-2 and 238 pounds. He’s someone who could slot in as a SAM linebacker in 2026, but potentially develop into the green-dot-wearer down the line.

What AI Brett Veach did: Indiana RB Kaelon Black

I noted three things the Chiefs still needed at running back in team needs for the AI: Pass protection, short-yardage, and return specialists. Black (5-foot-10, 210 pounds) can handle the first two, at the very least. The one thing I found interesting here is that running back was very low on my AI’s needs list.


Pick No. 210

Top available: Tyren Montgomery, John Michael Gyllenborg, Robert Spears-Jennings, Skyler Gill-Howard, Diego Pounds, Carver Willis, Caleb Douglas, Eli Heidenreich, Red Murdock, and George Gumbs Jr.

Advertisement

My pick: Florida EDGE George Gumbs Jr.

Gumbs felt like that developmental speed-rusher prototype that the Chiefs want, but haven’t really hit on. He’s long (6-foot-6 with 34-inch arms), springy, super-athletic, and the flash plays look really good. It’s just all about further development and consistency.

What AI Brett Veach did: Buffalo LB Khalil “Red” Murdock

The AI got a little sassy with me and spat out Red’s government name. I feel like Brett Veach’s recent comments about the linebacker position stuck with the AI here. I also feel like it valued Murdock’s production (364 tackles and 17 forced fumbles in his career).


Final verdict

Charles Goldman’s Final 2026 NFL Mock Draft:

Advertisement
  • 9: Arizona State WR Jordyn Tyson
  • 29: Tennessee CB Colton Hood
  • 40: Florida DT Caleb Banks
  • 74: Penn State EDGE Dani Dennis-Sutton
  • 109: TCU S Bud Clark
  • 148: Stanford TE Sam Roush
  • 169: Illinois OT J.C. Davis
  • 176: Michigan LB Jimmy Rolder
  • 210: Florida EDGE George Gumbs Jr.

AI Brett Veach’s Final 2026 NFL Mock Draft:

  • 9: Auburn DE Keldric Faulk
  • 29: Alabama OT Kadyn Proctor
  • 40: Florida DT Caleb Banks
  • 74: Georgia State WR George Hurst
  • 109: SFA CB Charles Demmings
  • 148: South Carolina DB Jalon Kilgore
  • 169: Navy DT Landon Robinson
  • 176: Indiana RB Kaelon Black
  • 210: Buffalo LB Red Murdock

Overall, I was surprised by how well the AI drafted. My draft feels a bit more top-heavy with the instant-impact contributors, but I think the AI might’ve actually done a better job on Day 3. That felt especially Brett Veach-like, given his history and penchant for finding late-round steals.

If I do this again next year, I think I’ll feed the AI some of our draft rankings at A to Z Sports to give it better context. It had access to prospect data, but not any specific set of rankings. That’s probably the one area this experiment failed. The only context it had for “best” was the order of the 10 players I gave it to choose from at each pick. If I had the ability to “reach” as I did at 176, the AI should be able to.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending