Connect with us

Iowa

Iowa commission to set timeline on potential Cedar Rapids casino

Published

on

Iowa commission to set timeline on potential Cedar Rapids casino


ALTOONA, Iowa (Gray Television Iowa Capitol Bureau) – The Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission will soon start the process of reviewing an application for a casino license for a facility in Cedar Rapids.

Joint Applicants Peninsula Pacific Entertainment (P2E) and the Linn County Gaming Association say they’re planning to turn their plans in at the end of the month.

Jonathan Swain with P2E said they’re updating a few things before they turn their application in. “Our application has been ready for a couple of years. In 2021, we essentially selected the new site, the new amenities, the building, and the location,” Swain said.

Applicants are placing bets that a casino coming to Cedar Rapids would bring jobs and a boost to the local economy. In addition, they’ll contribute 8% of their revenue to nonprofits in the city. Anne Parmley with the Linn County Gaming Association said that’ll work out to $5-7 million a year. “It’s the highest gaming revenue contribution in the state,” Parmley said.

Advertisement

But not everyone has something positive to say about the proposal. Gary Thelen of West Des Moines said when Cedar Rapids voters defeated a proposed casino in 2003, people who would’ve rolled the dice and invested money in the city went elsewhere. “Now it’s too late to correct that vote. I have nothing against the people of Linn County, but they have to accept the consequences of their 2003 negative votes,” Thelen said.

Other casinos are worried about their revenues. Back in 2014 and 2017, the commission denied the city because green lighting it would take money from existing casinos and give it to Cedar Rapids. It’s something commission going to have to look at this time too.

Daryl Olsen, the Chair of the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission said, “There’s multiple things we have to look at. They all impact how we make a decision so that’s a hot topic but we’re going to look at all the aspects of it.”

The commission also voted at their meeting Monday to require a market study on the impacts of the proposed casino.

Here’s what commissioner Olsen says they’re looking for: ”What is the facility? What impact does it have? Tourism. The whole impact and part of that is as you addressed cannibalization so all of those questions are hopefully going to be reviewed and brought in on to the study,” Olsen said.

Advertisement

Olsen says those studies usually take two to three months to complete.

Monday the commission decided that this Friday they’ll lay out the official timeline to get through this process, which generally takes six to nine months so people in Cedar Rapids can get their answer about whether they’ll finally get their casino.

Conner Hendricks covers state government and politics for Gray Television-owned stations in Iowa. Email him at conner.hendricks@gray.tv; and follow him on Facebook at Conner Hendricks TV or on X/Twitter @ConnerReports.

Advertisement





Source link

Iowa

Iowa law on police appeals ‘constitutionally vacuous,’ prosecutor says

Published

on

Iowa law on police appeals ‘constitutionally vacuous,’ prosecutor says


play

  • The Iowa Supreme Court is reviewing a 2024 law that allows law enforcement officers to appeal their placement on a Brady-Giglio list.
  • A dispute between Jefferson County’s attorney and sheriff led to the sheriff being placed on the list, which identifies officers with credibility issues.
  • The county attorney argues the law is unconstitutional because it lets judges interfere with a prosecutor’s duty to disclose evidence to defendants.

A feud between two Jefferson County officials has landed before the Iowa Supreme Court, which must decide if a 2024 addition to Iowa’s Rights of Peace Officers law is unconstitutional.

Jefferson County Attorney Chauncey Moulding is asking the state’s high court to overturn what he calls the “constitutionally vacuous” law, which allows officers to petition the courts to be removed from their county’s Brady-Giglio list.

Advertisement

Named for two U.S. Supreme Court decisions, the lists compiled by prosecutors identify law enforcement officers and others whose credibility is in question, and it can provide grounds for questioning their testimony in court.

After a dispute over a case involving a sheriff’s deputy’s use of force, Moulding in 2024 notified Jefferson County Sheriff Bart Richmond he was placing him on the Brady-Giglio list. Richmond petitioned a court to reverse Moulding’s decision, and a district judge did, finding Richmond’s actions in connection with the case, while unprofessional, did not bring his honesty or credibility into question.

In his appeal, Moulding argues that’s not up to the court to decide, and that the law lets judges improperly intrude on prosecutors’ professional judgment and, ultimately, defendants’ rights.

“The practical real application of (the 2024 law) is to create a Kafkaesque scenario where a criminal defendant could face the prospect of criminal charges involving a State witness who is so lacking in credibility that the State’s attorney has qualms about even calling him to testify, but is prevented from disclosure,” Moulding wrote. “Such a situation is unconscionable, and underlines the constitutional vacuousness of the statute itself.”

Advertisement

The court has not yet scheduled arguments for the case, which could have impacts far beyond Jefferson County. Attorney Charles Gribble, representing Richmond, said this is just one of three Iowa Brady-Giglio appeals he personally is involved in.

What is a Brady-Giglio list?

Under the Fifth Amendment, criminal defendants are entitled to due process of law. In Brady v. Maryland in 1963 and in subsequent cases the U.S. Supreme Court held that due process requires a prosecutor to disclose any known exculpatory evidence to the defense. That includes anything giving rise to doubts about the credibility of the prosecution’s witnesses, including law enforcement officers.

In 2022, Iowa formalized that process by mandating prosecuting agencies maintain a Brady-Giglio list of officers whose credibility can be questioned due to past dishonesty or other misconduct. The law requires agencies to notify officers when they are being put on a list and allows them to seek reconsideration.

Advertisement

Being placed on a list can damage or destroy an officer’s career, as prosecutors generally will decline to call them as witnesses or to bring charges that would depend on their testimony.

2024 law gives courts a role in Brady-Giglio lists

Iowa’s 2024 law went beyond requiring officers be notified of their placement on a Brady-Giglio list by giving them the right to appeal to a district court if their prosecuting agency refuses to take them off a list. The law requires judges to confidentially review evidence and allows them to affirm, modify or reverse an officer’s Brady-Giglio listing “as justice may require.”

In less than two years, courts have reversed local prosecutors on several Brady-Giglio placements, including a messy Henry County dispute in which prosecutors accused a sheriff’s deputy of making misleading statements on a search warrant application.

What happened in Jefferson County?

The lawsuit before the Iowa Supreme Court involves an April 2024 traffic stop by a Jefferson County deputy. As laid out in a subsequent memo by Moulding, video recordings show the deputy handling the driver roughly and, when the man complains, telling him “I can do whatever I want” and, “You’re not going to tell me what I can and can’t do. … You’re going to learn what respect is, young man.”

After learning about the incident, Moulding wrote, he repeatedly emailed Richmond, asking if the deputy’s actions had violated any county policies. Richmond did not respond. Concerned about possible litigation against the county, Moulding then asked another county to conduct an investigation. While the details are disputed, Moulding accuses Richmond of stonewalling both his office and the outside investigators and instructing his subordinates also not to cooperate.

Advertisement

“A county sheriff ordering deputies not to cooperate with an inquiry into a deputy’s use of force represents a fundamental lapse in judgment and raised serious concerns regarding the Sheriff’s honesty, candor and ethics as a law enforcement official,” Moulding wrote.

He scheduled a meeting that Richmond did not attend and then placed him on the county’s Brady-Giglio list. In an emailed statement, Moulding called the entire matter “unfortunate.”

“Frankly, I am shocked that instead of attempting to address this matter with my office cooperatively, the Sheriff instead decided to stonewall an investigation, stonewall the Brady-Giglio investigation, and then take this matter to court instead of sitting down and addressing the matter like an adult and an elected official,” he said.

In a letter, Moulding warned Richmond that he would no longer be called as a law enforcement witness and advised him to limit his involvement with criminal investigations, as “your engagement in such activities could likely negatively impact the outcomes in court.”

Judge disagrees with sheriff’s placement on list

After Moulding denied Richmond’s request for reconsideration, Richmond filed suit. In February 2025, Judge Jeffrey Farrell ruled Richmond should be removed from the list.

Advertisement

Farrell’s order criticized both parties, finding that Moulding had failed to comply with some procedural elements of the law but that Richmond could have avoided the whole situation with “basic and professional” responses to Moulding’s emails. Nonetheless, he found Richmond’s actions did not demonstrate dishonesty or deceit that would justify placement on a Brady list.

“This is not a case in which an officer lied to a court, was convicted of a crime, manufactured or destroyed evidence, or committed some other act that would serve as the basis for impeachment in any criminal case,” Farrell wrote. “Game-playing the county attorney is not the standard of professionalism that Iowans expect of our elected county sheriffs,” he added, but does not constitute grounds for a Brady-Giglio listing.

Prosecutor appeals, argues law is unconstitutional

In his appeal, Moulding does not address Farrell’s factual findings, instead asking the court only to decide whether the law is constitutional.

“The most glaring constitutional defect in (the 2024 law) is that it impedes a criminal Defendant’s substantive and procedural due processes of law, and right to a fair trial,” the appeal says. “These fundamental rights constitute the bedrock raisons d’être for the entire body of Brady-Giglio jurisprudence in the first place.”

Iowa appears to be the only state with a law allowing officers to sue to be removed from a Brad-Giglio list, but Moulding cites a recent federal lawsuit where a judge rejected a South Dakota officer’s attempt to get removed from a list, finding the request “in essence, asks this Court to require a State’s Attorney to violate the constitution.” He further argues that the law violates the constitutional separation of powers and is “so poorly drafted as to be unenforceable and void for vagueness.”

Advertisement

Sheriff’s attorney says single lapse of judgment is not grounds for listing

Gribble, Richmond’s attorney, argued in his Supreme Court brief that the law is constitutional and that the sheriff’s actions fall well short of Brady-Giglio standards.

“Under (the 2024 law), placement on the Brady-Giglio list results not from a single lapse of judgment but rather from repeated, sustained, intentional and egregious acts over a period of time,” he wrote. “Thus, while a singular act of bad judgement may undermine a police officer’s credibility in a particular case, placement on the Brady-Giglio list places a permanent and unreviewable scarlet letter on the officer that he/she is unlikely to be able to ever overcome.”

He also suggests that a court order removing an officer from a list “does not in any way alter the prosecuting attorney’s duty to provide exculpatory evidence in all cases.” In an interview, he argued there should be a legal distinction between prosecutors disclosing concerns about an officer’s conduct in the case in which it occurred, and doing so in every future case involving them.

“To me, that’s what Brady-Giglio is for, not for occasional or first-time wrongs, even if established of a police officer, but those that have a history of that sort of thing,” he said.

The Supreme Court has not yet set a date for arguments in the case.

Advertisement

William Morris covers courts for the Des Moines Register. He can be contacted at wrmorris2@registermedia.com or 715-573-8166.



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Univ. of Iowa students practice life-saving skills through realistic medical simulations

Published

on

Univ. of Iowa students practice life-saving skills through realistic medical simulations


IOWA CITY, Iowa (KCRG) – Some students at the University of Iowa are getting hands-on medical experience before the spring semester officially begins — and they’re doing it inside a mobile simulation lab.

Wednesday, Simulation in Motion-Iowa (SIM-IA) brought its high-tech training truck to the university’s main hospital campus during what’s known as “transitions week,” just days before physician assistant students head out on clinical rotations.

Instead of practicing on classmates, students worked through simulated emergency scenarios using lifelike mannequins designed to closely mimic real patients. The mannequins can breathe, blink, sweat, and even go into cardiac arrest — giving students a realistic first taste of what they’ll soon face in hospitals and clinics.

“So they have pulses like you and I, they have lung sounds, breath tones, so they get to practice their patient assessments — their head-to-toes, what they think is wrong with that patient, determine what treatments they’re going to offer and do,” said Lisa Lenz, a Simulation in Motion-Iowa instructor.

Advertisement

Lenz controls the mannequins’ movements and symptoms behind the scenes, adjusting each scenario based on how students respond in real time.

“We can kind of assess and watch and make sure they’re doing the skills that we would expect them to do, we then get to change and flow through our scenario,” Lenz said. “So we start out with a healthy patient, maybe something like chest pains and continue through states of either progression or decline.”

Faculty members say the goal is to help students bridge the gap between classroom learning and real patient care — especially with clinical rotations beginning soon.

“This is now putting book work to the clinical practice,” said Jeremy Nelson, a clinical assistant professor in the university’s Department of PA Studies and Services. “We’re getting them ready to go out to various scenarios.”

Nelson says repetition is key, especially since some medical emergencies are rare while others are unpredictable.

Advertisement

“They may see them 10 times on rotation, they may see them once,” Nelson said. “This gives them that ‘first touch’ so when they do see it they have a better chance of learning more and being engaged and practicing.”

The spring semester at the University of Iowa officially begins January 20 for those students. Faculty say experiences like this help boost confidence and reduce anxiety before students ever step into a real emergency situation.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Iowa

To Save An Endangered Prairie Fish, Dried-up Iowa Wetlands Get New Life – Inside Climate News

Published

on

To Save An Endangered Prairie Fish, Dried-up Iowa Wetlands Get New Life – Inside Climate News


The minnow U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ecologists pulled from the shallow moat was a puny thing, with a flare of orange rimming its fins and a dark band of scales running the full length of its inch-and-a-half body. 

“Finally,” thought Kathy Law, as she peered at the little fish. In the summer sun, it glinted metallic.

Topeka shiners once thrived in small and medium streams across the Great Plains. But for several decades, the fish have been hard to find. 

For three summers, Law, a farmer and attorney, had watched expectantly as water, native plants and then wildlife returned to five restored oxbow wetlands on her family farm in Iowa’s Carroll County.

Advertisement

In 2021, the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Iowa Soybean Association excavated the U-shaped ponds on the property, former river meanders cut off from the main channel of Purgatory Creek and filled in with decades of soil erosion. 

The project cost tens of thousands of dollars, paid for by federal, state and private grants. It had all been for the silver minnow she now held.

The expansion of agriculture across the Midwest has blotted out many of the slow-moving, off-channel prairie streams that Topeka shiners favor. In their place, manually drained cropland and artificially straightened rivers have taken over.

In 1998, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed the Topeka shiner as a federally endangered species, threatened by “habitat destruction, degradation, modification, and fragmentation.” 

A Fish and Wildlife Service biologist holds a handful of endangered Topeka shiners. Credit: Kimberly Emerson/USFWS
A Fish and Wildlife Service biologist holds a handful of endangered Topeka shiners. Credit: Kimberly Emerson/USFWS

But concerted efforts to restore habitats where the endangered minnow might once again thrive have led to the restoration of hundreds of oxbow lakes across Iowa.

A network of federal, state, non-profit, and agricultural trade agencies has teamed up to excavate the former wetlands at little-to-no cost to landowners. Nearly two decades since beginning restoration efforts, they’ve learned that the abandoned river meanders don’t just create habitats for a recovering Topeka shiner population, they also effectively wash out the agricultural pollutants that plague Iowa’s waterways. 

Advertisement

“It really is a success story,” said Karen Wilke, associate director of freshwater at The Nature Conservancy in Iowa. “Now we’re not just doing it for Topeka shiner, but we’re doing it for water quality as well.” 

Over centuries, meandering rivers and streams fold in on themselves like ribbon candy. Insistent currents erode their banks, redrawing riverbeds into ever-tighter sinusoidal waves. 

Chasing the path of least resistance, the current eventually cuts off U-shaped oxbow channels, leaving curving lakes where water flows more slowly, if at all. 

Oxbows are naturally occurring features in the Iowa landscape, but they became more abundant as agriculture brought drastic, manmade transformations to the state’s hydrology, explained Clay Pierce, a former scientist in the U.S. Geological Survey’s Iowa Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit at Iowa State University. He spent the last decade of his career studying Topeka shiner habitats and recovery efforts.

Before European settlement, wetlands covered approximately 11 percent of Iowa. Their still or slow-moving waters provided habitats for a variety of fish, reptiles and amphibians, including the diminutive, silvery Topeka Shiner. Today, over 95 percent of those wetlands have been drained and converted to farmable land. 

“It’s like one of the wonders of the world, how they changed the Iowa landscape,” said Pierce.

Advertisement

Tile lines, underground drainage systems used to lower the water table in and around fields, transformed the state’s slow-moving wetlands into faster, fuller streams that intensified natural riverbank erosion and the creation of oxbow lakes, Pierce explained.

And as industrialized agriculture rerouted the state’s waters and accelerated oxbow formation, farming practices also exacerbated soil erosion, leading to the drying out of those oxbows.

Tillage, a soil management practice that reached peak popularity in the mid-20th century, left fertile topsoil exposed to the elements and readily carried off fields. Trillions of tons of U.S. topsoil are estimated to have been lost to erosion to date, settling in nearby waterways.

Erosion-mitigating farming strategies, including no-till or low-till agriculture and the planting of cover crops, have become more widely adopted, but many former oxbows in Iowa are still filled with sediment.

The former oxbows look like apostrophe-shaped scars in the earth, said Wilke, at The Nature Conservancy in Iowa. Her team has mapped out tens of thousands of oxbows across the state that are candidates for restoration. 

Advertisement

In rainy years, these patches of land are prone to flooding, as though remembering a past life. Those on farmland are largely unusable—too concave and wet to support a decent yield.

As the slow-moving and standing waters favored by the Topeka shiner all but disappeared from Iowa, so did the fish.

Once common across Minnesota, South Dakota, Iowa, Nebraska, Missouri, and Kansas, documented populations of the fish were reduced to an estimated 20 percent of their original geographic range by the turn of the 21st century, said Pierce. 

Before the onset of industrial agriculture, shiners were found in streams that flowed out of large, slow-moving wetland areas. But those wetland complexes are gone, converted to millions of acres of cropland.

Despite their endangered status, the tiny minnows are shockingly rugged, able to withstand both the broiling summers and frigid winters of the Great Plains, said Pierce. They’re also better equipped to survive in the low-oxygen conditions of shallow waters where few other fish can thrive. That resilience bodes well for their survival in restored wetland habitats.

Advertisement

“We can’t replace all the large, expansive wetland complexes that were here. It wouldn’t be economically or even politically possible to do that. But we can build more oxbows or encourage the ones that are there to function as habitats,” said Pierce.

Following the Topeka shiner’s federal endangerment listing, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) focused its efforts on preserving remnant populations in the North Raccoon River watershed, which runs through intensely cultivated cropland in western Iowa.

Though the Service initially attempted to engineer habitats within creeks, diverting currents with boulders and excavating deeper pools, they more often than not found shiners in oxbow lakes set back from the main channel and occupying private property. 

Oxbow lakes became, and remain, central to the Topeka shiner recovery plan.

In the early 2000s, USFWS worked with The Nature Conservancy of Iowa, which served as “boots on the ground,” finding funding sources, connecting with landowners, and overseeing the restorations, said Wilke. By 2008, the agencies had restored nearly twenty former oxbows in the Racoon River watershed.

Advertisement

The impact of restorations on local wildlife populations was immediately evident, said Wilke. Topeka shiners began returning to the landscape, but so did countless other species.

Research conducted by The Nature Conservancy documented 57 fish species and 81 bird species using the newly restored oxbow habitats. “Turtles, mussels, frogs, river otters, beavers, you name it,” said Wilke. “I think all the species are hungry to have this habitat come back, hungry to have more water on the landscape.”

In 2011, the Iowa Soybean Association came on board, joining forces to restore more oxbows in the Boone River watershed in north-central Iowa. With its connections to farmers across Iowa, the trade association for soybean producers brought new momentum to the project, said Wilkes.

Unlike other states with vast swaths of public land, over 97 percent of Iowa’s land is privately owned. This means that the majority of former oxbows are on private land where restoration hinges on buy-in from the owners. The Iowa Soybean Association held powerful sway with those property owners.

The organizations collaborating with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service make up the Iowa Topeka Shiner Recovery Partnership and provide both technical support and a diverse array of private funding, in addition to the suite of state and federal grants used to cover restoration costs. 

Advertisement

Though each acre of wetland costs approximately $20,000 to excavate, not a single cent comes from landowners, said Wilke.

For Kathy Law, that was a huge selling point in her decision to restore the five oxbows on her family farm. “We didn’t have to spend any money on it. And they took care of everything,” she said. “I think that’s the neat part of it. It shows we can do things that don’t cost us any money, and try to make a difference.”

This story is funded by readers like you.

Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.

Donate Now

Advertisement

To date, more than 200 oxbows have been restored in the state of Iowa. Though far from a complete comeback, Topeka shiner populations seem to be on the rise.

In 2016 and 2017, Pierce and his students at Iowa State University collected the endangered minnows in 60 percent of the Iowa watersheds they’d historically inhabited, a significant rebound from only 32 percent in 2010 and 2011.

In 2019, Pierce published an article documenting the status of Topeka shiners in Iowa.

“I think the picture is brighter, and I firmly believe that oxbows are part of that story,” said Pierce. “It’s an ‘if you build it, they will come’ sort of thing.”

Sampling by the Nature Conservancy in Iowa has also turned up Topeka shiners in the majority of restored oxbows. 

Advertisement

In fact, the minnows may not be classified as “endangered” for much longer. In the 5-year status review for the Topeka shiner, completed by USFWS in 2021, federal wildlife officials recommended that the fish be downlisted to “threatened.”

The surge in oxbow restorations hasn’t only served the Topeka shiner, participants in the recovery partnership are quick to point out.

Fish biologists from the La Crosse Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office survey for endangered Topeka shiners using a seine net in a recently restored oxbow in Iowa. Credit: Cristina Dahl/USFWSFish biologists from the La Crosse Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office survey for endangered Topeka shiners using a seine net in a recently restored oxbow in Iowa. Credit: Cristina Dahl/USFWS
Fish biologists from the La Crosse Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office survey for endangered Topeka shiners using a seine net in a recently restored oxbow in Iowa. Credit: Cristina Dahl/USFWS

The restored wetlands are also powerful water-quality tools, helping remove nitrogen runoff from tile lines that drain much of Iowa’s farmland before it can pollute major waterways.

“We’re able to intercept that tile into these wetlands before that water gets into the river, and we’re finding that it removes 62 percent, on average, of the farm chemicals, the nitrate, that comes in from that tile,” said Wilke.

Based on those findings, Iowa’s Nutrient Reduction Strategy added oxbow restorations as a nutrient-reducing practice in 2019. Introduced in 2014 to address the high volume of agricultural nutrients exiting Iowa’s waterways, the strategy promotes voluntary conservation measures for farmers looking to minimize nutrient loss from their fields and allocates state funds to those practices.

The Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship now covers 100 percent of the costs of oxbow restorations that will receive water from a tile line.

Advertisement

Unlike other nutrient-reduction practices the state funds, such as saturated buffers and bio-reactors, oxbows are both natural and long-lasting, said Wilke. “You do it, and it’s done. And then you just let nature take over and do its thing.”

The water quality benefits of oxbow restorations have brought a new group of landowners on board, said Grace Yi, habitat systems manager at Practical Farmers of Iowa, the most recent member of the Iowa Topeka Shiner Recovery Partnership.

“That’s what makes oxbows really great. They have a lot of different benefits and angles that you can approach farmers and landowners with,” said Yi.

Some of those benefits, “you can’t really put a price tag on,” like a more beautiful property or, as one farmer told Yi, time spent catching frogs with his grandson.

For Kathy Law, oxbow restorations have returned her family’s farm to a state she remembers from her early days there.

Advertisement
Kathy and David Law stand next to a restored oxbow on their farm in Carroll County, Iowa. Credit: Courtesy of Kathy LawKathy and David Law stand next to a restored oxbow on their farm in Carroll County, Iowa. Credit: Courtesy of Kathy Law
Kathy and David Law stand next to a restored oxbow on their farm in Carroll County, Iowa. Credit: Courtesy of Kathy Law

Mallards now paddle through the still waters. Off the muddy banks, fat tadpoles whip their golf-ball-sized bodies beneath fallen leaves. 

If Law encountered the Topeka shiner during childhood fishing expeditions on the farm, she doesn’t remember it. But the oxbows stir at something in her memory.

“I remember there were little creeks, little streams going through here. We hadn’t had those for forever.” 

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.

Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.

Advertisement

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

Thank you,

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending