Connect with us

Culture

Man City 1 Man Utd 2 – Amad’s genius, Nunes’ errors and Amorim’s set-piece problem

Published

on

Man City 1 Man Utd 2 – Amad’s genius, Nunes’ errors and Amorim’s set-piece problem

Amad scored a brilliant late winner in the Manchester derby shortly after earning the penalty that had put Ruben Amorim’s team level as Manchester City crumbled in the closing stages at the Etihad Stadium.

The main story before the game was Marcus Rashford and Alejandro Garnacho being left out of the United squad, with United head coach Amorim saying he made the decision after evaluating “everything”.

In their absence, United fell behind when Josko Gvardiol headed in from a short corner in the 36th minute, worsening United’s awful record for set-piece goals conceded this season.

Bruno Fernandes had a good chance to equalise in the second half when he clipped a shot wide, but it was Amad who intercepted a poor Matheus Nunes backpass and drew a foul from the same player, with Fernandes scoring the penalty.

And 54 seconds after the restart, Amad collected a through ball, lobbed it over Ederson and then steered it into the goal from a tight angle to win it. According to Opta, it was the latest into a game that the reigning Premier League champions had led and lost. City have now won just one of their last 11 games.

Advertisement

Here Carl Anka, Mark Critchley and Mark Carey analyse the key talking points.


How did Amad do that?

“I just want to improve the team so I cannot treat it like a normal derby,” said Amorim on Thursday evening. It was a pre-match press conference that saw the head coach try to downplay the traditional emotional narratives that go into a game. Neither City or United are on an upward ascent at the moment, so bragging rights fell behind “earning three points” in the hierarchy of needs.

Still, Sunday’s trip to the Eithad will have made clear many things that Amorim has already made good assessments on. His team will likely have to “suffer” in the immediacy, with some players better suited to the “idea” he is trying to communicate to this squad, compared to others. Amad once again looked to be United’s most dangerous attacker but ran offside three times in the first half.

His eagerness to fashion chances in a team lacking creators saw him set off a fraction too early in crucial moments. Yet the 22-year-old’s bravery where many others were timid eventually paid off. His driving runs are illustrated in his player dashboard below.

Advertisement

It was Amad who sensed Kyle Walker’s backpass to Ederson was slack and wouldn’t make its intended target. It was Amad who rounded the City goalkeeper to open up a goalscoring opportunity. It was Amad who opted to pause, and wait for Matheus Nunes to foul him. And Amad who won the penalty.

Fernandes converted and it looked to end 1-1.

But there was Amad again. Latching onto a hopeful pass from Lisandro Martinez in the 90th minute before tipping it over Ederson and into the far post.


Amad lobs the ball over Ederson

Amorim’s first derby will have taught him — again — that his team’s physicality needs to be worked on. He will have understood — again — that there is much to improve on with set pieces.

Advertisement

And finishes from a tight angle

But he will have also learned that, in a derby, some of these players can find another level. Amad’s genius yes, but also Harry Maguire battling as the middle centre-back. Manuel Ugarte breaking up play, and more.

The road is long, but many United players are willing to walk and run it.

Carl Anka


Where did Nunes go wrong?

With a long line outside the treatment room and those fit enough to play fatigued, City find themselves in a position where they have to do things differently. See: Matheus Nunes at left-back.

Pep Guardiola did not have much other option — unless he fancied a switch of system or dropping youngster Jahmai Simpson-Pusey into a Manchester derby.

Advertisement

And in fairness, Nunes initially acquitted himself adequately enough, as he has when playing further up the left flank in recent weeks.

But lapses have pockmarked the 26-year-old’s Etihad career to date and that career may well be defined by the two errors that led to United’s equaliser from the penalty spot.

The backpass to play Amad through on goal could be considered an unfortunate error — but to charge back and slice through the United winger and concede a spot kick was simply reckless in the extreme.


Nunes and the foul that changed the game (Carl Recine/Getty Images)

Nunes collapsed to the turf, barely being able to lift his head from the ground, and City subsequently collapsed to defeat.

Mark Critchley

Advertisement

What’s Man United’s set-piece problem?

Two goals conceded against Arsenal. One against Nottingham Forest, and another conceded to Manchester City. Manchester United have picked up a concerning weakness on corners this season.

United have the second-worst defensive record on set pieces in this season’s Premier League. Eight of United’s 19 goals conceded have been from set-piece situations — at 42 per cent, that is the highest in the league. Conceding 6.8 goals per 100 corners is the second-highest rate behind Wolves, who are 19th and sacked head coach Gary O’Neil today.

Amorim’s side appear to have tweaked their coaching approach to dead balls, with new assistant Carlos Fernandes taking over set-piece duties from Andreas Georgson but the frailties remain. The team appear to be defending in a hybrid style, where the majority of players mark zonally, and a handful are tasked with man-marking duties.

So long as a United player gets first contact on the initial cross, they can defend the set piece well enough. But if they are faced with a team that opts for a layered approach to their attacking play, things can get complicated.

City’s opening goal came from a short corner-kick routine where Ilkay Gundogan ventured over from the edge of the box to take a touch and tee it up for Kevin De Bruyne.

Advertisement

The Belgian’s cross might have taken a touch from oncoming United defenders, but it still managed to loop towards the back post where it was headed in by Josko Gvardiol.

It was a straightforward goal to concede. United were too slow to close down City when the corner was taken short, and not aggressive enough to stop Gvardiol in the air. It was a goal that spoke to something Amorim brought up earlier in the week, before facing FC Viktoria Plzen.

“We have to be very good in second phases,” said the United head coach on Wednesday. “Such as after crosses, the next cross we have to improve on. We have to improve on these details. We have to be so much better in set pieces and we have to win it.”

The saying says the devil is in the details. United haven’t quite mastered their new routines yet.

Carl Anka and Mark Carey

Advertisement

How important are Gvardiol’s goals?

In the season before Erling Haaland’s arrival, seven City players hit double figures in all competitions. Since then, only two have scored 10 or more goals in a campaign: Phil Foden twice, Julian Alvarez once.

Repurposing a team of false nines to serve the best centre-forward of his generation has had its benefits and its side-effects, making Guardiola’s side look blunt in those occasional spells when Haaland struggles for goals.

Step forward Josko Gvardiol. This derby’s breakthrough was his fourth of the season, moving him clear behind Haaland as City’s top-scorer. No defender has scored more Premier League goals (eight) in 2024.

Gvardiol has become a semi-reliable goal source, not only aerially like today or at Bournemouth, but also with deft finishes and screamers like at Newcastle and Wolves respectively.

OK, so four goals is hardly a glut and City need others to start chipping in too, but at times when City look bereft of ideas to break down opponents, Gvardiol is increasingly becoming the plan B.

Advertisement

Mark Critchley


It is a sight that no football fan likes to see, no matter your allegiance.

Manchester United’s Mason Mount fell to Etihad turf after just 12 minutes in what was only his ninth league start since the beginning of last season.

It was clear that he was unable to carry on minutes before his substitution, after signalling to Amorim that he needed to come off. It is yet another blow for the 25-year-old after calf and hamstring injuries have plagued him since his move from Chelsea.

Mount was consoled by team-mates Fernandes, Martinez and Amad — even engaging in a short exchange with international team-mate Phil Foden — before rallying those around him as he trudged off.

Advertisement

It is a cruel outcome for Mount, especially given his return to fitness under new manager Amorim and an impressive 30-minute display in the Europa League against Viktoria Plzen on Thursday night.

Prior to Sunday’s game, Mount had not managed to play more than 20 per cent of the available domestic minutes in a Manchester United shirt. You have to go back to the 2020-21 season when he last played more than 75 per cent of the possible games in the Premier League.

A fully fit Mount offers so much to his team in and out of possession. His intelligent positioning and relentless running are infectious to team-mates, with Mount often viewed as a manager’s dream in his ability to execute the tactical instructions laid out to him.

Starting as the left-sided No 10 on Sunday afternoon, Mount would have hoped to have punished Manchester City with neat interplay alongside left wing-back Diogo Dalot, making underlapping runs that appeared to be a key part of Amorim’s early training session as Mount was nearing full fitness.

go-deeper

It is too early for a prognosis, but Mount could do with a dollop of luck in hoping that his injury is not too serious.

Mark Carey

Advertisement

How ‘embarrassing’ was Hojlund vs Walker?

Shortly after Manchester City took the lead, Kyle Walker was lying on the ground and there was a scrum of players around him. Walker was holding his face and as the officials waited on a VAR check, there was a sense Rasmus Hojlund could be in trouble after squaring up to the City defender.


A melee ensues after Walker falls to the ground (Michael Regan/Getty Images)

What the replays showed though was that both players put their foreheads together, and while Hojlund leaned forward slightly it did not constitute violent conduct and certainly did not appear to have generated enough force to send Walker to the floor.

“Walker must be embarrassed,” former United captain Roy Keane said on Sky Sports.


Hojlund and Walker butt heads (Dave Howarth – CameraSport via Getty Images)

Referee Taylor’s decision was to book both players.

In the second half, it was Hojlund who went down, this time under a challenge from Ruben Dias, with Taylor not awarding a penalty and the VAR deciding it was “normal contact”.

Advertisement

The United striker was determined to have the last laugh, posting a photo of his clash with Walker on Instagram (second image below) after the game.


What did Pep Guardiola say?

“I’m the boss, I’m the manager and I’m not good enough. it’s as simple as that. I need to talk to them about the way we have to play and press and build up and I’m not good enough. It’s always the same problem you can fix, but it’s not. Matheus made an incredible effort playing left back really good with and without the ball but it’s happened, it’s football and we move forward.”


What did Ruben Amorim say?

“I think we deserved it. It was a very tough match but we believe until the end. We managed to score, we needed that win, it was important for us and for our fans. We were in the game for 90 minutes and that is very good. We talk about the Arsenal game, we played well in the first half, but they were not believing that we could win.

“Today was so much more different. I also believe. Then we have Fergie time and we put the things together and something magic happened. It was a good day for us.”

On leaving Rashford and Garnacho out of the squad: “For me it’s important; the performance in training, the performance in games, the way you dress, the way you eat, the way you engage with your team-mates, the way you push your team-mates.

“Everything is important. In our context, in the beginning of something, when we want to change a lot of things, when people in our clubs are losing their jobs, we have to make the standards really high.

Advertisement

“Today the team proved we can leave anyone out of the squad and manage to win if you play together.”


What next for City?

Saturday, December 21: Aston Villa (A), Premier League, 12.30pm GMT, 7.30am ET

What next for United?

Thursday, December 19: Tottenham (A), Carabao Cup quarter-final, 8pm GMT, 3pm ET


Recommended reading

(Top image: by Alex Livesey – Danehouse/Getty Images)

Advertisement

Culture

Finding Wisdom in a Poem by Wendy Cope

Published

on

Finding Wisdom in a Poem by Wendy Cope

Advertisement

Where do you turn when you need advice? A chatbot? A life coach? A wise and trusted friend?

How about a poet? Poets may not be famous for making the best life choices, but because they subject the mess of human existence to the discipline of language, they can be as helpful as any therapist or mentor.

Good poets know the rules and when to break them, which is something they can teach the rest of us.

Advertisement

To wit:

Giving advice is a peculiar literary undertaking. It flourishes in certain popular genres — graduation speeches, newspaper columns, country and western songs and poems like this one — but what, in these contexts, is it really for?

Advertisement

I’m thinking of situations when you don’t urgently need help but nonetheless enjoy reading answers to questions you may not have thought to ask. What interests you isn’t the content of the advice — you could get all the life hacks you want from A.I. — so much as the voice of the person dispensing it.

Wendy Cope is an English poet, born in 1945, who has been a fixture of her country’s literary scene since the 1980s. More recently, her short, buoyant poem “The Orange” has been widely memed online, bringing her to the attention of new readers beyond Britain.

Advertisement

Cope favors rhyme, meter, brisk jokes and tart aperçus. She addresses romance, friendship and the petty absurdities of modern life with disarming good humor. The last line of “The Orange” is “I love you. I’m glad I exist.” Somehow she makes it the opposite of cringe.

This isn’t the kind of poetry you would describe as “confessional.” And yet …

Want to learn this poem by heart? We’ll help.

Advertisement

Fill in the missing words below. You can always refer to the reading by A.O. Scott and full
text above.

Question 1/7

Let’s start with the first stanza.

Advertisement

Stop, if the car is going clunk 

Or if the sun has made you blind. 

Dont answer emails when youre drunk. 

Advertisement

Tap a word above to fill in the highlighted blank.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Culture

Can You Match the Places These Authors Lived With Settings in Their Books?

Published

on

Can You Match the Places These Authors Lived With Settings in Their Books?

A strong sense of place can deeply influence a story, and in some cases, the setting can even feel like a character itself. This week’s literary geography quiz highlights places where authors were born (or lived) that later became locations in their books. To play, just make your selection in the multiple-choice list and the correct answer will be revealed. At the end of the quiz, you’ll find links to the works if you’d like to do further reading.

Continue Reading

Culture

Book Review: ‘America, U.S.A.,’ by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.

Published

on

Book Review: ‘America, U.S.A.,’ by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.

AMERICA, U.S.A.: How Race Shadows the Nation’s Anniversaries, by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.


For those of us in the national memory-keeping business, anniversaries hold near-totemic power. Satisfyingly round units of time, ideally bearing fancy, Latin-derived names, serve as the overburdened pegs on which to hang think pieces and museum exhibits, revisionist documentaries and maudlin public ceremonies. The arbitrary nature of such occasions is precisely what gives them their charge, inviting us to set aside complacency and submit to a comprehensive check-in.

In his new book, “America, U.S.A.,” Eddie S. Glaude Jr. presents an intriguing variation on the genre, seeing the country’s 250th birthday as an anniversary of anniversaries: 50 years since the malaise-ridden, schlock-heavy Bicentennial. A century since the subdued Prohibition-era Sesquicentennial. A century and a half since telegraphed reports of George Armstrong Custer’s defeat by the Lakota and Cheyenne at Little Bighorn rudely interrupted the Gilded Age Republic’s 100th birthday party.

If an anniversary offers a snapshot of a moment, the core of Glaude’s book is an old-timey photo album, a collection of notable episodes from earlier national reckonings, long-ago glances in the mirror. An estimable scholar of Black history, politics and religion at Princeton — best known for “Begin Again,” his 2020 meditation on James Baldwin’s relevance for our times — Glaude focuses, as his subtitle puts it, on “how race shadows the nation’s anniversaries.”

Such celebrations, he contends, have never really been the moments for honest self-reflection they are often advertised to be. Instead, the nation usually shatters the mirror, refusing to accept what it prefers not to see. “American anniversaries are often moments to turn a blind eye to the evils of the past and the present,” Glaude writes, “to suppress the fact of America’s divided soul.”

Advertisement

It’s a clever concept, and, needless to say, perfectly timed. Last year, Glaude notes, the Trump administration executed a hostile takeover of the government’s studiously bipartisan 250th anniversary planning. It is now preparing a program that is certain to conceal more than it reveals about the country ostensibly being celebrated.

Glaude, in no mood for celebration, argues that such omissions and evasions also defined commemorations in the past. In 1875, Frederick Douglass predicted “one grand Centennial hosannah of peace and good will to all the white race of this country.” He was right: The nation reached 100 years old at a crucial moment in the post-Civil War fight over racial equality, with white Northerners ready to give up on Southern Reconstruction. The occasion would help the once-warring sections to reunite around a shared commitment to white supremacy. On May 10, 1876, at the opening of the Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia, the police tried to bar Douglass from the grandstand, until a white politician vouched for him.

The 150th anniversary came soon after a resurgent Ku Klux Klan successfully pushed for a restrictive immigration law aimed at keeping America a “Nordic” nation. At the lavishly funded, lightly attended celebrations in Philadelphia, Black veterans of World War I were excluded from marching in the opening parade. A writer with The Associated Negro Press wondered “what was in the breast of those black men who fought to make America safe for Democracy and on Monday stood on the sidelines, forgotten, as the Nordic strode by in all his vain pride.”

By 1976, when the nation marked its Bicentennial, the violence of the ’60s had destroyed any semblance of consensus. Vietnam and Watergate had eroded trust in the government. The commission initially tasked with organizing the anniversary was disbanded amid reports of corruption. Corporations filled the vacuum, Glaude explains, with “star-spangled whoopee cushions; patriotic toilet seats; Liberty hamburgers; red, white and blue beer cans.” The author, around 8 years old at the time, dimly remembers donning a pair of tricolor trousers.

A half-century later, Glaude is refreshingly honest about the depths of his despair. “I do not love America, and never have, especially now,” he writes in one of the more startling opening sentences I’ve read in some time. He dismisses this year’s Semiquincentennial as reaching back “to a storybook America that requires either the banishment of Black people from view or the reduction of our role in the country’s history, so as to affirm America’s ongoing quest to be a more perfect union.”

Advertisement

Undoubtedly true. But Trump doesn’t own the country, at least not yet, nor the 250th anniversary of one of the most radically liberatory and confusingly contradictory events in world history — an inspiration, as Glaude shows, even to critical observers of the American experiment, like Douglass. Far from the revanchist MAGA-palooza in Washington, I suspect this summer’s unasked-for invitation to national soul-searching may surprise us yet.

Despite his despair, Glaude concludes that “the past still offers resources for us to freedom-dream.” So, too, does this book.


AMERICA, U.S.A.: How Race Shadows the Nation’s Anniversaries | By Eddie S. Glaude Jr. | Crown | 270 pp. | $31

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending