Connect with us

Iowa

Iowa businesses and lawmakers ignore warnings on child labor and reap consequences

Published

on

Iowa businesses and lawmakers ignore warnings on child labor and reap consequences



Lawmakers and trade group leaders, and managers who kept teenagers on the clock late, all colossally misjudged how this would play out, from proposal through implementation.

Iowa businesses have been openly disregarding federal rules about when and how much children can work, and the federal government has taken notice. Who are the victims?

  1. The exploited children.
  2. The owners and managers who scheduled the exploited children.

If you picked 2, congratulations! You’ve mastered the increasingly popular art of transforming guilt into grievance.

There is more to the story than this quiz reveals: Policymakers and a trade group gave the businesses a big push to start thumbing their nose at regulations on teenagers’ work hours. But even the more nuanced version can be accurately reduced to any of several memes. “Well, well, well, if it isn’t the consequences of my own actions” comes to mind.

Advertisement

The violations can’t be undone, so the path forward involves making the best of the situation. State government, which helped set the confrontation in motion, needs to take the lead on negotiating with the U.S. Department of Labor to reach broad settlements on the penalties for the child labor. With business owners saying fines could put them out of business, it could be appropriate for the state to take responsibility to keep that from happening. Everyone involved needs to follow federal rules. And Iowa’s law will need an update in 2025 so that businesses can’t receive inconsistent directions.

More: Businesses are caught in the middle of conflicting child labor laws. How do they vary?

How Iowa’s child labor law became a catastrophe

The idea of loosening Iowa’s child labor laws came up at work group meetings in 2022 that involved Iowa Restaurant Association President and CEO Jessica Dunker, other industry lobbyists, and Iowa Workforce Development Director Beth Townsend, according to public documents obtained and posted by progressive activist David Goodner.

A few months later, bills with wide-reaching provisions removing protections were introduced in the Iowa Legislature. A few extra-terrible ideas, such as making employers immune from liability when kids get hurt, were tossed overboard in the succeeding months. But the bill Gov. Kim Reynolds signed in May 2023 still fixed things that weren’t broken, creating new problems.

Advertisement

Both before and after the bill passed, Statehouse Democrats and the Biden administration’s Labor Department said loudly that Iowa was risking trouble by saying teenagers could work later and more often than federal rules allow. In such conflicts, the stricter version controls. Iowa said 14- and 15-year-olds could work until 9 p.m. during the school year and until 11 p.m. in the summer; the real standards are 7 p.m. and 9 p.m.

Enforcement should not have been a surprise. Iowa needs to clean up its mess.

As the Register’s Kevin Baskins reported, Dunker’s Iowa Restaurant Association encouraged members to take advantage of the state law. The Labor Department said it would “continue to monitor Iowa’s implementation of the law to assess potential obstruction of federal child labor protections.” The Labor Department was not kidding.

The Restaurant Association in a June 7 email said regulators were “out in full force across the state. They are taking massive punitive action against Iowa restaurants who are following the new state youth employment hours instead of the federal regulation on hours.” A Subway franchise owner who had not been fined yet told Baskins, “I followed the state law to the letter because that’s what I thought I was supposed to do.”

Dunker, Statehouse Republicans and others have expressed outrage, saying that the Labor Department should have either let Iowa scofflaws slide or taken a softer approach of warnings to businesses instead of fines. None of the objections is availing in the slightest.

Federal officials denied allegations that enforcement has been selective or inconsistent. But even if it was, rule breaking is still rule breaking; this argument didn’t fly when Connecticut’s Aaliyah Edwards illegally blocked Iowa’s Gabbie Marshall in the Final Four in April, and it doesn’t fly now. Also, are any of the people who are aghast that President Joe Biden is enforcing labor laws the same people who have been red in the face for months over Biden allegedly not enforcing immigration laws?

Advertisement

The state needs to clean up the mess it set in motion. Cases involving far more egregious violations of child labor laws frequently conclude in settlements with less onerous penalties than those looming now. Iowa workforce officials and the attorney general’s office should take the lead in helping negotiate with the Labor Department to ensure that Iowans who followed terrible advice aren’t further hung out to dry. If the fines really do threaten to put anybody out of business, especially those without any history of labor-law problems, a bailout would be in order.

Sadly, it appears Iowa will dig in its heels instead. Reynolds on Friday announced a news conference for Monday in North Liberty about “excessive penalties against Iowa businesses that employ teens.”

Besides being illegal, Iowa’s law for teenagers doesn’t adequately protect childhood and education

There is room for well-meaning disagreement about whether the federal protections are, in fact, too strict. Advocates of Iowa’s law make a fair point that school-sponsored extracurricular activities keep students out much later than 7 or even 9 p.m. But the reasons for keeping some brakes on younger teens’ work are more compelling. Research frequently ties sleep deprivation with teenagers’ academic, social and mental health struggles. In the cases of families that are in such a precarious state that a child’s earning potential is vital to their well-being, Iowa would be better off supporting those families more directly. Children should have childhoods.

It should have gone without saying, of course, that the policy debate has nothing to do with whether businesses are required to observe the federal protections for 14- and 15-year-olds. Lawmakers and trade group leaders, and managers who kept teenagers on the clock late all colossally misjudged how this would play out, from proposal through implementation. They have only themselves to blame.

Lucas Grundmeier, on behalf of the Register’s editorial board

Advertisement

FURTHER READING: Iowa restaurant lobby plays stupid games, wins stupid prizes

FURTHER READING: From 1946, “Why child labor laws?”

This editorial is the opinion of the Des Moines Register’s editorial board: Carol Hunter, executive editor; Lucas Grundmeier, opinion editor; and Richard Doak and Rox Laird, editorial board members.

Want more opinions? Read other perspectives with our free newsletter, follow us on Facebook or visit us at DesMoinesRegister.com/opinion. Respond to any opinion by submitting a Letter to the Editor at DesMoinesRegister.com/letters.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Iowa

Possible East Coast port strike will increase costs in Iowa

Published

on

Possible East Coast port strike will increase costs in Iowa


CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa (KCRG) – An East Coast port strike could be just days away, and that could mean spending even more at the grocery store and for other goods here in Iowa.

Workers at the ports along the East Coast are set to strike October 1st.

Around 45,000 dock workers on the East Coast are likely to go on strike for the first time since 1977.

But according to supply chain experts here in Iowa, even if the strike doesn’t end up happening, the damage is already done.

Advertisement

“Apple watch, they’d usually use a port maybe in New England to serve that market, they’ve already diverted their shipments,” said Dr. Andy Anderson, UNI supply chain management professor.

In anticipation of a possible strike, ships on the sea right now are going to the West Coast instead of the East coast.

That means a lot of ships need to take a long detour, which could pose a big risk for any perishables being shipped.

“So what we saw in 2015 with the [West Coast] port strikes is that we saw a lot of things just rotting in their containers because there were so many delays,” Anderson said.

Another factor is that ports on the west coast will be handling ships that normally go to the east coast, which could lead to a big traffic jam for ships on the East Coast.

Advertisement

“West Coast cannot handle the entirety of all these five major East Coast ports, the volume,” said Jade Chu, UNI supply chain management professor.

Delays for perishable products mean trips to the grocery store will be more expensive.

Plus, with the holidays coming up, lots of goods that would be shipped in time for holiday shopping are now potentially being delayed.

“So something that’s small and high in value like an iPhone probably isn’t going to be impacted that much, but if you have something that is much larger and lower value, then you’re going to see a big impact,” Anderson said.

While he still expects shelves to be stocked here in Iowa, delays and some scarcity mean higher costs.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Obituary for Anthony M. Puccio at Farley

Published

on

Obituary for Anthony M. Puccio at Farley


Anthony M. Puccio, 76, of Farley, Iowa, passed away peacefully surrounded by his family on Wednesday, September 25, 2024, at his home in Farley. Visitation for Tony will be held from 1 to 5 p.m. on Sunday, September 29, 2024, at the Reiff Funeral Home in Farley, Iowa where the



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Iowa sues company accused of dumping disused wind-turbine blades at sites across state

Published

on

Iowa sues company accused of dumping disused wind-turbine blades at sites across state


The state of Iowa is suing a Washington state company and its executives for allegedly dumping tons of old wind-turbine blades around Iowa, in violation of the state’s solid-waste laws.

The lawsuit alleges that over the past seven years, Global Fiberglass Solutions has failed to properly dispose of decommissioned wind-turbine blades and stockpiled them at multiple locations across Iowa.

The lawsuit, filed in Iowa District Court for Jasper County, seeks payment of civil penalties and a court injunction to prevent any additional violations of the state’s solid-waste laws.

Advertisement

More: MidAmerican has removed tornado-collapsed turbines, but repair, replacement work ongoing

Global Fiberglass Solutions and its CEO, Donald Lilly, are named as defendants in the case, as is Ronald Albrecht, one of Global’s corporate officers. The defendants could not be reached for comment.

The lawsuit claims that General Electric, which provides parts and equipment for wind turbines, and MidAmerican Energy, which owns wind turbines in Iowa, each hired Global in 2017 to recycle their decommissioned wind-turbine blades.

MidAmerican and General Electric paid Global “millions of dollars,” the lawsuit alleges, to cut up, transport, and recycle the blades. Typically, such blades are about 170 feet long and weigh roughly 16 tons.

Advertisement

Rather than recycle the blades, the lawsuit claims, Global instead dumped roughly 1,300 of them at four locations around the state: Newton, Atlantic and a site in Ellsworth that was used to store blades that were originally dumped in Fort Dodge.

At one time, the lawsuit alleges, there were about 868 blades stored at the Newton site, which was a parking lot for the former Maytag factory. In Ellsworth, Global allegedly dumped 400 blades in a field, directly on the ground. In Atlantic, 22 blades were dumped in a field, directly on the ground, according to the lawsuit.

State says company never posted bond ensuring blades would be recycled

In 2018, according to the lawsuit, the Iowa Department of Natural Resources began fielding complaints about the Newton site. In 2020, the department sent Global a notice of violation related to the sites in Fort Dodge and Newton, indicating the blades were not being recycled as claimed and had simply been discarded. Later that year, a similar notice was issued regarding the Ellsworth site.

In December 2020, the lawsuit alleges, Global agreed to a consent order obligating the company to “take a number of concrete steps to purchase, install, and commence using recycling equipment” to process a certain percentage of the blades according to a series of deadlines.

The company also was required to post a $2 million surety bond to defray state expenses should the DNR be forced to remove and dispose of the blades because of Global’s lack of compliance with the consent order.

Advertisement

The DNR then agreed to extend the deadline for posting the bond until April 1, 2021.

Global never posted the bond, according to the lawsuit, and so the DNR ordered Global to stop accumulating wind-turbine blades in Iowa and to remove all of the blades scattered at the disposal sites. Global didn’t comply with that order and in July 2021 the matter was referred to the Iowa attorney general’s office for legal action.

The state’s lawsuit against Global was filed thie week of Sept. 22, three years after that referral. It seeks a civil penalty of up to $5,000 for each day the company was out of compliance with Iowa’s solid-waste laws.

State records indicate MidAmerican has removed and properly disposed of the blades once located at the Ellsworth site, while General Electric has removed the blades from Atlantic and Newton — a task that was completed in June this year.

Global and its executives “dumped and abandoned 1,300 decommissioned wind-turbine blades in stockpiles across the state,” Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird said in a news release.  “We are taking action to hold them accountable.”

Advertisement

Find this story at Iowa Capital Dispatch, which is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions: kobradovich@iowacapitaldispatch.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending