Connect with us

Iowa

DCI investigating group that recruited spoiler candidates, Zach Nunn says at fundraiser

Published

on

DCI investigating group that recruited spoiler candidates, Zach Nunn says at fundraiser


play

CLIVE — U.S. Rep. Zach Nunn said Saturday that the Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation is investigating complaints against a shadowy group of operatives that recruited candidates to run in Iowa’s highly competitive congressional districts.

As Iowa and national Republicans rallied voters at the Horizon Events Center in Clive to re-elect the first-term congressman representing Iowa’s 3rd District, Nunn again raised concerns about the Associated Press’ report on the Patriots Run Project. The AP found the group worked in at least six congressional races — two in Iowa — to recruit independent spoiler candidates to divert votes from Republicans.

Advertisement

Joe Wiederien, a fervent supporter of former President Donald Trump from Scranton, said operatives with the group worked to get him on the ballot for the 3rd District seat. He withdrew his name from the ballot.

“When you try and steal an election by taking advantage of guys like Joe or any Iowans in this room, I don’t care what your party, we fight back,” Nunn said.

Little is known about the true identities of the operatives behind the effort, prompting Americans for Public Trust, a nonprofit conservative government watchdog organization, to file a complaint with the Federal Election Commission. The complaint alleged that the Patriots Run Project violated campaign finance law by failing to register as a political committee and file disclosure reports. The nonprofit called for an investigation into the group and the people behind it.

Wiederien told the Des Moines Register at the event Saturday that DCI officials have interviewed him and he’s provided authorities with more information about his contact with the operatives.

Advertisement

“I think it’s getting down to the bottom of it,” Wiederien said.

The revelation that an investigation is underway topped off Nunn’s remarks focused on the need to keep spending down, cut taxes and secure the southern border amid a record influx of migrants.

Nunn is seeking a second term in office after he flipped the seat from Democratic control in a close 2022 race that was decided by about 2,000 votes. The 3rd District covers 21 counties in south central Iowa, including the Des Moines metro area, Winterset, Osceola and Ottumwa.

“The stakes in November could not be higher,” Nunn said. “We are but a handful of votes in Congress away from losing control of our economy, the border and our future. It’s important that we win the Senate and we have the opportunity to win the White House. We never forget about the people’s house. You are at the crossroads right now of making sure this happens.”

Advertisement

U.S. Rep. Ashley Hinson, the Marion Republican representing Iowa’s northeastern 2nd District, said “the left is so intimidated by Zach,” referring to the Patriots Run Project’s ploy.

“They will stop at nothing,” Hinson said. “They will literally stop at nothing to try to take back power. We have a shared vision, and our vision is to return power to you.”

Competition close in race for Iowa’s 3rd District congressional seat

Nunn and other speakers touted his military record at the second annual “Operation Top Nunn: Salute to the Troops” fundraiser.

Nunn last year was promoted to colonel in the U.S. Air Force, four ranks from general. He served almost two decades as an airborne intelligence officer, according to his U.S. House website. He flew recon missions off the coast of China and Russia. After 9/11, Nunn was deployed to the Middle East three times.

Advertisement

His opponent, Democrat Lanon Baccam, a former U.S. Department of Agriculture official, also has highlighted his military background on the campaign trail. Baccam was a combat engineer in the Iowa National Guard from 1998 to 2006, where he earned the rank of corporal. He was deployed to Afghanistan in 2004.

A Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa Poll conducted earlier this month found that more likely Iowa voters favor a Republican candidate over a Democrat in three of the state’s four congressional districts. Southeast Iowa’s 1st District was the only area where likely voters preferred a Democrat.

In the 3rd District, the Iowa Poll found 52% of likely voters prefer a Republican, while 44% favor a Democrat. Four percent say they are not sure.

Republicans currently hold all four congressional seats, but Democrats and Republicans are heavily targeting Iowa’s 1st and 3rd District races as the parties wrestle for control of Congress. Cook Political Report has rated the two races as “lean Republican,” but political forecasters with Inside Elections have most recently rated the contests as a “toss up.”

U.S. Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks, who is looking to stave off competition from Democrat Christina Bohannan in the 1st District, told the crowd that Nunn is “the fighter you want in Congress.”

Advertisement

“The Democrats are pouring money into Zach’s race, my race, and they’re recruiting people from anywhere to run against us,” Miller-Meeks said. “Why? Because they think they can lie and buy their way into Congress and the White House.”

The Baccam and Bohannan campaigns have said they were not involved in and had no knowledge of the Patriots Run Project’s candidate recruitment efforts.

Abortion could be major issue in Iowa’s 3rd Congressional District

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in a statement Friday said the Inside Elections ratings switch signaled Baccam is gaining momentum as women voters “are learning more about Nunn’s anti-abortion record.” Baccam is running ads criticizing Nunn’s response in a 2022 Republican primary debate when he raised his hand after being asked if he believed all abortions should be illegal, with no exceptions. 

Nunn has said this year that he does not support a federal abortion ban and believes states should decide abortion policy. 

As a state legislator in 2018, Nunn voted for a six-week abortion ban, dubbed the “fetal heartbeat” law that prohibits most abortions after cardiac activity is detectable, which can occur as early as six weeks of gestation.

Advertisement

The 2018 law is similar to the ban that took effect in July, which Iowa lawmakers passed in 2023 when Nunn was in Congress. Both versions, including the one Nunn supported, make exceptions for cases of rape, incest and when the procedure was necessary to save the pregnant person’s life.

Republicans emphasize need to secure border, slash federal spending

U.S. Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, a U.S. Air Force veteran, asked members of the crowd if they wanted to see Vice President Kamala Harris, a Democrat, elected president.

“No,” the crowd of about 350 responded.

Pfluger called on the crowd to nudge their friends and neighbors to vote for Nunn, a “battle-tested” servant who he said understands family values and put his life on the line to defend the country. With 38 days until the election, Pfluger said voters had to keep Nunn in Congress.

Advertisement

“It’s going to be less than 10,000 votes that separates us from having the majority in the House of Representatives or going back to (former House Speaker) Nancy Pelosi or (House Minority Leader) Hakeem Jeffries,” Pfluger said. “… Just 10,000 votes. You’re at the epicenter.”

Pfluger condemned “border czar Kamala Harris” for the high number of undocumented immigrants crossing the U.S-Mexico border and said border policies have “ravaged” states like Texas. Republicans have seized on Harris being asked by President Joe Biden to explore the root causes of migration from Central America. Despite the moniker, he did not task Harris with overseeing border security.

Nunn told reporters after the event that supported a Republican-backed border bill that passed the House last year but wasn’t taken up in the Senate. He has complained that the Senate didn’t vote on its own bipartisan border deal. Senate Republicans blocked the bill after Trump urged them to reject it.

Families are feeling the pinch of “Biden inflation,” raising the cost of necessities such as groceries and housing, Nunn told the crowd. He warned of what would happen if Democrats controlled tax policy as cuts enacted in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act are slated to expire.

“We’ve had the opportunity to have that American dream by making sure that your tax dollars are given back to you,” Nunn said.

Advertisement

Democrats hit Iowa’s GOP congressional delegation for campaigning without a new farm bill

Iowa Democratic Party Chair Rita Hart in a statement lambasted the state’s GOP congressional delegation for campaigning instead of focusing on negotiations for a new farm bill. The important five-year legislation expired in 2023 and was extended through this month. It’s slated to expire Monday, though funds will largely last through the end of the year.

The farm bill authorizes financial and infrastructure support for farmers and rural areas. It outlines terms for the federal government’s nutritional efforts such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and authorizes crop insurance.

Negotiations stalled as the parties disagreed over scaling back spending on nutritional programs and funding more subsidies to large commercial growers.

“Our legislators should be more concerned about supporting production agriculture, promoting soil conservation and feeding hungry kids than they are about going home to campaign,” Hart said in a statement. “This has been the most do-nothing Congress in history and it’s time to send new leaders to Congress who will harvest a bipartisan farm bill for the benefit of the Iowans they serve.”

Nunn told reporters after the event that he had asked for the farm bill to come for a vote before leaving town, but saw opportunity to advance negotiations in the lame-duck session.

Advertisement

“We all know it takes two parties to tango on this, and the reality is the Senate hasn’t even so much as drawn down on a napkin” what its plans will be, Nunn said.

Marissa Payne covers the Iowa Statehouse and politics for the Register. Reach her by email at mjpayne@registermedia.com. Follow her on X, formerly known as Twitter, at @marissajpayne. 



Source link

Iowa

Iowa women’s wrestling star Kylie Welker on competing for official NCAA championship

Published

on

Iowa women’s wrestling star Kylie Welker on competing for official NCAA championship


Wrestling-Women

March 5, 2026

Iowa women’s wrestling star Kylie Welker on competing for official NCAA championship

March 5, 2026

Advertisement

Kylie Welker chats with NCAA Digital’s Sophie Starkey about the success of Iowa women’s wrestling and the possibility of winning the inaugural NCAA sanctioned championship.



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Iowa House OKs ‘3 strikes’ bill with 20-year prison terms. What to know

Published

on

Iowa House OKs ‘3 strikes’ bill with 20-year prison terms. What to know


play

  • Iowans who commit multiple serious crimes would face a mandatory 20-year prison sentence under a “three strikes” bill passed by House lawmakers.
  • Republicans said the bill would keep Iowans safe and “prioritize victims and public safety over criminals.”
  • A nonpartisan state agency says the bill would disproportionately impact Black Iowans and could require the state to spend millions to build a new prison.

Repeat offenders convicted of multiple serious crimes would receive a mandatory 20-year prison sentence under a bill passed by House lawmakers.

House lawmakers debated for more than an hour about high costs, lack of prison space and the bill’s impact on Black Iowans before voting 68-23 to pass House File 2542, sending it to the Iowa Senate.

Advertisement

Seven Democrats, including Minority Leader Brian Meyer, D-Des Moines, joined Republicans in voting in favor of the bill.

“It will put public safety first,” said the bill’s floor manager, Rep. Steven Holt, R-Denison. “It will ensure that the debt to victims and society is paid. It will prioritize victims and public safety over criminals. It will establish real and effective deterrence that is nonexistent in our current system. It will reduce chaos and violence in our society.”

Here’s what to know about the bill.

What would the House Republican three strikes bill do?

Iowans who accumulate three strikes would face a mandatory 20-year prison sentence, with no parole, under the bill.

Advertisement

That would replace Iowa’s current law that says habitual offenders must serve a minimum three-year prison sentence before they are eligible for parole.

All felonies, as well as aggravated misdemeanors involving sexual abuse, domestic abuse, assault and organized retail theft would be considered level-one offenses that are worth one full strike.

Other aggravated misdemeanors, as well as serious misdemeanors involving assault, domestic abuse and criminal mischief would be considered level-two offenses worth half a strike each.

Lawmakers amended the bill to remove theft, harassment and possession of a controlled substance from the crimes that would count toward a person’s strikes.

Advertisement

And the amendment specifies that the bill would only apply to convictions that occur beginning July 1, 2026.

If someone is arrested and convicted of multiple offenses, only the most serious charge would count towards the defendant’s strikes.

Convictions would not count toward someone’s total if more than 20 years passes between a prior conviction and their current conviction.

Rep. Ross Wilburn, D-Ames, tried unsuccessfully to amend the bill to say that only a violent crime would qualify as someone’s third strike, but Republicans rejected the amendment.

“The bill still scores murder, felony embezzlement and felony theft the same, even though they are very different crimes,” Wilburn said. “One point is one point and three gets you 20 years with no ability for parole or judicial discretion.”

Advertisement

Holt said the legislation leaves room for judicial and prosecutorial discretion.

“There are deferred sentences, there are plea bargains,” he said. “There is plenty of opportunity for grace and judicial discretion in the legislation that we are proposing.”

Bill could cost millions, require Iowa to build a new prison, agency says

A fiscal analysis of the bill by the nonpartisan Legislative Services Agency said it could cost Iowa nearly $165 million more per year by 2031 based on the cost of housing inmates for longer prison stays.

  • FY 2027: $33 million
  • FY 2028: $66 million
  • FY 2029: $99 million
  • FY 2030: $132 million
  • FY 2031: $164.9 million

The agency said if the bill had been in effect between fiscal year 2020 and fiscal year 2025, there would have been 5,373 people who qualified for the 20-year mandatory minimum sentence.

“An increase in the prison population due to increased (length of stay) will require the DOC to build additional prison(s),” the agency states. “The size, security and other features that a future prison may require cannot be determined, but costs would be significant.”

Advertisement

The analysis noted that South Dakota appropriated $650 million last fall to build a 1,500-bed prison.

As of March 1, the Iowa Department of Corrections’ website describes the state’s prison system as being overcrowded by 25%, with 8,705 inmates compared to a capacity of 6,990.

The Office of the State Public Defender could see a projected cost increase of $1.6 million due to an increased number of trials resulting from the legislation.

But the agency’s estimates come with a caveat — the Department of Corrections did not respond to its requests for data.

“The LSA has not received a response to multiple requests for information from the DOC,” the note states. “Without additional information, the LSA cannot estimate the total fiscal impact of the bill.”

Advertisement

Holt called the fiscal note “an embarrassment to the Department of Corrections” and “an agenda masquerading as math.”

“It is clear, in my judgment, that because they did not like the legislation they went all out and extreme to create a fiscal note that cannot be taken seriously in its assumptions,” he said. “It assumes that nothing will change, that there will be no deterrent factor and that the numbers will continue as usual.”

Black Iowans would be disproportionately impacted by the law

The Legislative Services Agency analysis says the bill “may disproportionately impact Black individuals if trends remain constant.”

Of the 29,438 people convicted in fiscal year 2025 of felonies and aggravated misdemeanors that constitute a level one offense under the bill, the agency said about 70% were White, 22% were Black and 9% were other races.

Iowa’s overall population is 83% White, 4% Black and 13% other races, the agency said.

Advertisement

It’s not clear how the bill’s impact would change to account for the House amendment removing some crimes from counting towards the three strikes.

“Expanding three-strike laws will intensify disparities — and that’s what this statement shows — by mandating longer sentences, limiting judicial discretion,” Wilburn said. “We already have a habitual offender statute. We already have one in place. We have a 10-year low in recidivism in our correctional system.”

Rep. Angel Ramirez, D-Cedar Rapids, said California’s three strikes law, passed in the 1990s, worsened racial disparities, and “Iowa is about to repeat the same mistake.”

“I urge every member here, do not pass legislation that our own minority impact statement tells us will deepen inequality in our state,” Ramirez said.

Holt said minority communities in Iowa are impacted by crime and that the legislation “will make citizens of all colors safer.”

Advertisement

And he said the minority impact statement “tells only one side of the story, doesn’t it? It tells the criminal’s story. What about the victim’s story?”

“What about the mother who will continue to tuck her kids in at night and read them Bible stories because she never became the next victim of a violent career criminal?” he said. “Where is that data point in the minority impact statement?”

House lawmakers also approved separate legislation that would increase Iowa’s statewide bond schedule, Senate File 2399.

That bill passed on a vote of 74-19.

Iowans could see more information on judges’ rulings

Iowans would have access to more information about judges’ rulings ahead of the state’s judicial retention elections under a separate measure, House File 2719, which passed on a 73-19 vote.

Advertisement

The Iowa secretary of state’s office would be required to publish information including:

  • The percentage of cases in which the judge set a bond amount lower than the state’s bond schedule
  • The frequency that the judge releases someone on their own recognizance for a violent offense compared to a nonviolent offense
  • The frequency that the judge’s final sentence is lower than statutory recommendations or a prosecutor’s recommendations
  • The number of times the judge issues a deferred judgement, deferred sentence or suspended sentence
  • The number of times the judge’s rulings are reversed on appeal due to abuse of discretion or error of law
  • The average time it takes the judge to rule on a motion or case
  • The number of cases the judge has resolved compared to the number of cases on the judge’s docket

The data would have to be displayed with a five-year trend line beginning five years after the bill takes effect.

The Secretary of State’s Office would also be required to maintain a searchable database of all judicial opinions and orders for the judge’s current term and the preceding six years. The decisions would be redacted when appropriate.

And judges would have the opportunity to write a 2,000-word personal statement on their judicial philosophy or data trends present in their rulings.

Stephen Gruber-Miller covers the Iowa Statehouse and politics for the Register. He can be reached by email at sgrubermil@registermedia.com or by phone at 515-284-8169. Follow him on X at @sgrubermiller.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Iowa

Man sentenced for killing 4 people appeals his sentence to the Iowa Supreme Court

Published

on

Man sentenced for killing 4 people appeals his sentence to the Iowa Supreme Court


CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa (KCRG) – Luke Truesdell’s attorney has filed as of Sunday to appeal his sentence to the Iowa Supreme Court.

Truesdell was sentenced last week to three consecutive life sentences plus 50 years for the deaths of four people killed in rural Linn County.

A jury convicted Luke Truesdell, 36, in November on the first-degree murder of Brent Brown, 34; his girlfriend, Keonna Ryan, 26, of Cedar Rapids; and Amanda Parker, 33, of Vinton. They also found him guilty of second-degree murder in the death of Romondus Cooper, 44, of Cedar Rapids.

His attorneys previously argued multiple reasons for a retrial that could potentially be brought up again.

Advertisement

They said that one juror was overheard talking about news on the case.

They also said the prosecutors inflamed the jury, rather than focusing on the facts.

His lawyers said there is no direct evidence that Truesdell committed the murders.

Truesdell’s defense also pointed to Truesdell’s father, Larry Tuesdell, who was found covered in blood at the scene but never fully investigated. Authorities have not been able to locate Larry.

The state disagreed, citing overwhelming evidence including DNA on the murder weapon, eyewitness testimony and video of Truesdell entering the garage where the four people were found dead.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending