Indiana
Indiana governor candidate Q&A: Jamie Reitenour on the issues
Who is Jamie Reitenour: 2024 gubernatorial candidate?
Jamie Reitenour, a 2024 gubernatorial candidate is interviewed on Dec. 8, 2023, at the Indianapolis Star.
Jamie Reitenour admits that for most of her life, she was a conservative voter who felt like she was merely checking boxes.
But the 2016 election piqued her interest in politics. Not long after, the Indianapolis mother of five said, she felt a calling from God to become governor of Indiana. Last year, she said, she felt the calling resurge and decided to act on it.
She has significant ground to cover in terms of name recognition compared to her opponents in the Republican primary, which include Fort Wayne businessman Eric Doden, U.S. Sen. Mike Braun, Lt. Gov. Suzanne Crouch, former Attorney General Curtis Hill and former Commerce Secretary Brad Chambers. Donald Rainwater is running as a Libertarian and former schools Superintendent Jennifer McCormick as a Democrat.
IndyStar asked Reitenour, as well as the seven other candidates, a set of questions about issues relevant to the 2024 race, some of which were submitted by readers. This interview is edited for length and clarity.
Q: What do you think sets you apart from your competition in the Republican primary?
A: I haven’t been in politics. That’s why people should want me in politics. Because America needs normal people. Not perfect people ― true people. Because the country is in need. And the people are hurting. It’s real. So that’s the biggest difference.
Q: What would be your first priority as governor?
A: I’ve traveled over 13,000 miles in the last two years ― I got started January 2022. And so as I went around, I looked for, where is the most vulnerable place in our state? And what I saw was that education is the area where it is most vulnerable. Our children are vulnerable. Our scores are low. Kids are losing their identity. They’re losing their desire. That’s a big deal ― their vision for life. When you leave, and you have no reason to continue to get a job, when you’ve got half a society that’s just dropping off and saying, who cares? That’s a big deal.
So my head of education, her name is Paige Miller. And she’s a Mom for Liberty. I love that group; they are a wonderful group of people. We bring to the table, desiring that every senior would graduate having completed an apprenticeship. Senior year is a year where they’re not doing a whole lot anyway. We want Indiana to be the training capital of the United States. So we start there, and we very rapidly go around the state. We’ve got great plans for our small towns. We’ve got our eyes on Gary, Indiana.
Q: In many ways today’s Republican Party has factions defined by one’s posture toward Donald Trump. What’s yours?
A: Whether it’s President Trump or Tim Scott or Nikki Haley or Ron DeSantis ― if any of those people were in the position that President Trump has been put in, I’d have a problem with it. I don’t believe that what’s happening in our country is fair justice. I think it’s easy to not like a person or blame something on a person’s personality, but I love the law. And there’s a lot to be wanting, in the situation that he finds himself in. In the Bible, in Micah, it says, “What is required of you but to do justly, and to love mercy and to walk humbly before thy God.” I would just say to anyone in that position, I would want everyone to do justly. And I think that is wanting, so I would direct my comment less to the person and more to the situation.
Q: Do you believe the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump?
A: I believe the 2020 election had an incredible amount of irregularity, and it should have been questioned.
Q: Where do you stand on Indiana’s new abortion law, and what changes to it would you support?
A: I definitely am a person that believes in life at conception, and I’m not an exception person. I’m just, life at conception. I know a lot of babies that people would have said “no” to that are just so beautiful. And our society needs their beauty.
Q: Gun violence is an epidemic in today’s American society. How should Indiana respond?
A: Fatherless homes is an epidemic in our society, and that’s what we need to be addressing. Kids model their examples. They want to be wanted. They want leadership. They want to belong.
The issue is not the item they’re picking up to do violence; the issue is their homes and the brokenness of their homes. There needs to be a wake-up call for the families that have been constantly going to the same well, but the water has run dry, and the solutions are not working. So they need to be looking for something different. My solution to gun violence is education. It’s walking in those streets, looking at those children, going to those high schools.
I’m willing to consider very outside-of-the-box things for schools that are struggling in education. If you’ve got a 10% graduation rate, everything is on the table. We will talk apprenticeships, we will talk early training in freshman year. We will talk all solutions so that kids can get out of this cycle of poverty and violence and broken family and really experience what they were made for.
Q: The 2023 legislative session dealt with culture war topics such as LGBTQ issues and school library books. Where do you stand on those issues?
A: Some of the books they’ve read, the way that they speak in these books are things that I would never let my children hear. So, there was a need for discretion. So I’m happy with the laws that have promoted that discretion and given the boundaries. But it was done for just up to third or fourth grade. It’ll be interesting to see if they stop at third grade or if they continue it for all the grades. I think if it’s good for a third grader, I don’t understand how it cuts off at fourth grade. I think it’ll be an interesting conversation.
Q: Should citizens have a right to collect signatures to put questions on the ballot without legislative approval?
A: Yeah, I think Hoosiers should.
Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Kayla Dwyer at kdwyer@indystar.com or follow her on Twitter @kayla_dwyer17.
Indiana
Mari Evans: Indianapolis icon of Black Arts Movement remembered
INDIANAPOLIS (WISH) — Throughout the month of February, WISH-TV is celebrating Black History by sharing stories of remarkable African Americans who made great contributions to the Indianapolis community.
Mari Evans was an African American poet, writer, television host and professor who championed the Black Arts Movement in the Circle City.
Her face may be recognizable because her likeness appears on a larger than life mural painted on the side of a building at the corner of Mass Avenue and Michigan Street, signifying her dedication to Black culture in the city.
Her mission was always to depict African American life in Indianapolis, with themes of love, loss, liberation and faith.
Born in 1919 in Toledo, Ohio, Evans moved to Indianapolis in 1947 and made her home here. She became a prolific poet and writer, a musician and professor at Purdue and Indiana University. In later years, Evans produced, wrote and directed a show called “The Black Experience” on Indianapolis Public Television.
Evans died in Indianapolis on March 10, 2017, at the age of 97.
She was a champion of African-American culture in Indianapolis and beyond.
Indiana
Lawmakers could scrap child labor reporting in Indiana
Indiana lawmakers discuss bill allowing data centers without public input
The House narrowly passed the bill after its author promised to improve it in the Senate.
Indiana lawmakers are once again moving to weaken state child labor laws.
Recent changes to House Bill 1302 would do away with the Indiana Department of Labor’s Youth Employment System, a database where employers are required to register and track minors 17 years old and younger on their payroll.
Doing away with the system could make it more difficult to estimate just how many Hoosier youth are working across the state at any given time.
According to the most recent legislative fiscal note on the bill, “the change will likely reduce the efficiency of on-site employer inspections for compliance with child labor laws since employers will no longer have to indicate that they employ workers younger than 18.”
State Rep. Jake Teshka, R-New Liberty, the bill’s author, confirmed that the amendments go a lot further than the version of the bill passed by the House with a 92-0 vote on Jan. 28. That version made only a minor adjustment to the mandated reporting timeline for employers.
But amendments made in the Senate’s Pensions and Labor Committee strike all of the provisions about the database from state law. The changes repeal the mandate for the labor department to maintain the database, employer reporting requirements and penalties for failing to report and track teen workers.
Teshka said he was still gathering details about the new changes. The newer version of the bill, sponsored by Sen. Linda Rogers, R-Granger, will go to the full Senate on Feb. 16. It could get a straight up and down vote as early as Feb. 17. Rogers did not respond to a request for comment.
In 2024, Rogers, who owns a golf course that is registered to employ minors, cosponsored legislation that increased work hours for teens. She also put forth legislation to reduce the age at which teens can sell and serve alcohol in hotels and restaurants from 19 to 18. Both bills were signed into law.
Teshka said he’ll have an opportunity to concur or dissent to the changes if it passes the Senate. For now, he intends to have more conversations with people in the Department of Labor, industry and education to identify the best way forward.
Department of Labor attorney Brent Cullers told a House committee last month there were 40 violations for reporting requirements in 2025. Employers appealed half of them because of confusion over the timeline to report the employment status of their under 18 workers.
“We’ve heard from some employers of youth that they would maybe hire more, but the [reporting] program has actually become something that’s burdensome to them,” Teshka said Jan. 13.
The Youth Employment System launched in 2021. Prior to the database, schools certified a teen worker’s age and academic standing.
Current Indiana law requires employers to register in the database if they have at least five teens on payroll. The database contains the names, ages and hire dates of youth as well as the email addresses, number of minor employees, and the names of each registered employer. Employers who do not comply with the reporting requirement can face penalties up to $400 per infraction, per minor employee.
If the reporting system is eliminated, “it would not change any of the laws around youth employment and the way youth in our state can be employed,” Teshka said, “and that goes to the number of hours they can work and when they can work and the types of jobs they can work.”
Like other red states, Indiana has eased child labor laws since 2019. In recent years, lawmakers have eliminated teen work permits, expanded work hours for older teens, shifted oversight of the teenage workforce from the Indiana Department of Education to the Labor Department, eliminated mandatory rest breaks and exempted businesses employing fewer than five teens from registering them with the state.
Last year, an IndyStar analysis of Indiana child labor violations found a steady increase in the number of teens under 18 working hazardous jobs. Labor law violations involving teens hit a nine-year high in 2023.
Teshka said he understood concerns that attempts to do away with the database are another means to weaken labor laws protecting minors. He said there needs to be balance because teens do learn soft skills by working.
“We don’t want to make it so restrictive that we are icing out youth from certain businesses and those sorts of things,” said Teshka. “But, we also want to make sure that we’re doing it in a responsible way.”
This story may be updated.
Contact IndyStar investigative reporter Alexandria Burris at aburris@gannett.com. Follow her on X, formerly Twitter, at @allyburris and on Bluesky at@allymburris.bsky.social.
Indiana
IU basketball: Indiana at Illinois — The report card
Indiana was reminded it’s a notch below the nation’s best on the road.
The Hoosiers kept the margin within single digits throughout the entirety of the first half, and were down just five on multiple occasions in the final four minutes before the break. But an 11-0 second half Illinois run gave the Illini a 54-36 lead with 12:33 left. And that was all she wrote.
Let’s take a deeper look at how Indiana lost 71-51 in Champaign with our latest edition of The Report Card.
The Hoosiers (17-9, 8-7) will travel to Purdue on Friday.
—————————————-
OFFENSE (D)
At 51 points, Indiana was held to its lowest scoring output of the season. At .90 points per possession, the Hoosiers were held to their second least efficient game of the season.
This was a game where troubles on one end bled into the other. Indiana felt its best chance to score in this game would be broken floor opportunities in transition off Illinois misses and turnovers. But Illinois’ ability to get offensive rebounds and limit turnovers meant more often than not the Hoosiers were taking the ball out of the basket and forced to run half court offense.
IU coach Darian DeVries liked his team’s shot selection from 3-point range, but the results left much to be desired. The Hoosiers made their fourth-fewest threes in a game on the season, tied for their second-fewest attempts, and shot their fourth-worst percentage.
Not making shots was fatal, because IU wasn’t scrambling in other ways to accumulate scoring opportunities.
Indiana didn’t get to the free throw line. At 12.2%, their free throw rate (FTA/FGA) was the second-lowest of the year. They took just six free throws for the game. At with just four offensive rebounds, their 14.8% offensive rebounding rate was their third-lowest of the year.
DEFENSE (C+)
Indiana probably would have taken the deal if you offered them 43.9% shooting overall from Illinois, including just 22.6% from three. IU actually held Illinois to its second-lowest point total of the season.
Like IU, the Illini missed plenty of good looks from long range. But the plus side of their 24 misses from beyond the arc was long rebounds they were able to track down.
“They come off long and they’ve got 6-10, 7-foot everywhere where they can just grab it over the top of you,” IU coach Darian DeVries said.
Illinois grabbed 15 offensive rebounds and scored 17 second chance points. That in large part explains why the Illini scored 1.26 points per possession, the third-most allowed by IU all season, despite their relatively poor shooting percentages.
That, and IU only forced two Illinois turnovers, for a season-low turnover percentage of 3.5%. So Illinois got a shot on the rim on virtually every possession, and they got offensive rebounds on 41.7% of their misses. Indiana never went to a bigger lineup to attempt to combat Illinois’ size, and the staff never attempted to increase the defensive pressure in order to create more takeaways. Eventually, it was just too much to overcome.
SEE ALSO:
THE PLAYERS (*starters)
*Tucker DeVries (C+) DeVries shot the ball reasonably well but wasn’t as much of a factor on the glass as he’d been recently, and he wasn’t able to facilitate the offense like he has on several occasions. And early foul trouble helped Illinois grow its first half margin.
*Lamar Wilkerson (B) Indiana was only able to get Wilkerson five shots in the second half. And he wasn’t able to connect on the limited open looks. He was solid in the first half, making of 6 of 9 from the field. He only scored two points in the final 16 minutes of the game and didn’t make a three in the final 28, but that was probably more on the staff than Wilkerson.
*Sam Alexis (B-) Alexis once again provided an inside scoring option for IU, and he competed on the glass. The effort is there, but he wasn’t going to be able to contain Illinois on the glass on his own.
*Conor Enright (C) This just wasn’t a game where you felt Enright’s fingerprints all over it. He was still a solid facilitator with six assists against two turnovers. And he probably lost a bunch of assists as IU missed open looks. But like most of his teammates, Enright struggled to contain dribble drives.
*Nick Dorn (D) Dorn’s shooting struggles are a concern. He went 0 of 4 from three, and he’s 4 of 26 from deep over his last four games. But just as concerning, Dorn had just two rebounds in 32 minutes. It’s hard to point to a significant pattern of positive contributions.
Jasai Miles (C-) Miles made a three and competed on the glass, but was otherwise mistake and foul prone. It’s interesting how he has taken minutes from Trent Sisley, because the results haven’t always seemed to justify that move.
Reed Bailey (C) Bailey had a nice drive for a score and had some moments as a facilitator. He did grab some rebounds in his limited minutes. But not at the rate of Alexis. This was probably a game to try him and Alexis together to see if they could slow Illinois on the glass.
Trent Sisley, Tayton Conerway and Aleksa Ristic saw limited action.
————————
Andrej Acimovic did not play — coaches decision.
Jason Drake and Josh Harris were out with injuries.
For complete coverage of IU basketball, GO HERE.
The Daily Hoosier –“Where Indiana fans assemble when they’re not at Assembly”
Related
-
Alabama1 week agoGeneva’s Kiera Howell, 16, auditions for ‘American Idol’ season 24
-
Illinois1 week ago2026 IHSA Illinois Wrestling State Finals Schedule And Brackets – FloWrestling
-
Culture1 week agoTry This Quiz on Passionate Lines From Popular Literature
-
Science1 week agoTorrance residents call for the ban of ‘flesh-eating’ chemical used at refinery
-
Politics1 week agoWest Virginia worked with ICE — 650 arrests later, officials say Minnesota-style ‘chaos’ is a choice
-
Science1 week agoTrumpRx is launched: How it works and what Democrats say about it
-
Fitness1 week ago13 best fitness watches for 2026, tried and tested
-
Health6 days agoJames Van Der Beek shared colorectal cancer warning sign months before his death