Connect with us

Illinois

Book bans: Illinois poised to be first state to punish libraries that remove titles

Published

on

Book bans: Illinois poised to be first state to punish libraries that remove titles


Illinois Governor JB Pritzker is about sign a bill that would block the state’s community and public school libraries from receiving funding if they ban books — the first state in the nation to take such a stance against a wave of book banning in the U.S.

It’s the first time a monetary penalty would be imparted on institutions who go along with the book bans now on the rise in several pockets of the U.S., including in Florida under the leadership of presidential contender, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis.

DeSantis, on the 2024 White House campaign stump last week, said he would look to make the book bans that took hold in Florida under his leadership, easier to pass in other states with social conservatives in power.

With some exceptions, calls for bans of titles ranging from African-American history to LGBTQ+ memoirs have typically been sought by just a few parents or other community members, yet these minorities often get libraries to respond.

Advertisement

“In Illinois, we don’t hide from the truth,” Pritzker, a Democrat, said in a statement when the legislation, House Bill 2789, was introduced earlier this year. “We embrace it and lead with it. Banning books is a devastating attempt to erase our history and the authentic history of many.”

Once enacted, the Illinois law takes effect on Jan. 1, 2024.

Book bans in U.S. public-sector schools increased by 28% in the first half of the 2022-23 academic year over the same period a year earlier, PEN America, a writers’ organization has reported, as it tracks such actions nationwide.

The American Library Association’s Chicago chapter said there were 67 attempts to ban books in Illinois in 2022, increasing from 41 the previous year. The public at large objected to more than 2,500 books last year across the country, according to the ALA, but objections don’t automatically lead to bans.

The Illinois penalty initiative was started by its Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias, also a Democrat, whose office oversees the Illinois State Library and administers several grant programs for public and school libraries.

Advertisement

The bill requires that as a condition of qualifying for those grants, libraries adopt either a written policy prohibiting the practice of banning books or follows the American Library Association’s Library Bill of Rights, which includes a statement that “(m)aterials should not be proscribed or removed because of partisan or doctrinal disapproval.”

“This right-to-read legislation will help remove the pressure that librarians have had to endure from extremist groups like the Proud Boys who have targeted some of our libraries and their staff,” Giannoulias said during a news conference after the Senate vote. “This first-of-its-kind legislation is important because the concept of banning books contradicts the very essence of what our country stands for.”

Read: DeSantis promises to make America Florida. But Florida isn’t Florida anymore, critics say.

In June 2022, the Illinois Community High School District 99 school board came under pressure to remove the young-adult memoir “Gender Queer,” written as an illustrative graphic novel, from its library shelves. According to a Chicago Sun-Times article, pressure for removal came from a group of conservative parents as well as members of the far-right Proud Boys.

According to the American Library Association, “Gender Queer” was the most frequently challenged book in 2022, drawing 151 requests for its removal because of its focus on LGBTQ+ issues and what critics said was explicit sexual content.

Advertisement

Demonstrators who support banning books gathered during a protest outside of the Henry Ford Centennial Library in Dearborn, Mich., in 2022. Protests on both sides of the issue emerged after Dearborn Public Schools temporarily restricted access to seven books following a parent’s complaint about their content.


AFP via Getty Images

Earlier this month, a poem written for President Joe Biden’s inauguration was been placed on a restricted list at a South Florida elementary school after one parent’s complaint. In a Facebook post, poet Amanda Gorman vowed to fight back. Her poem, “The Hill We Climb,” was challenged by the parent of two students at Bob Graham Education Center in Miami Lakes, along with several books.

Read: Florida school library limits access to Amanda Gorman’s poem for Biden inauguration after parent complaint

Advertisement

Back in Illinois, Senate Republicans argued that the bill would put too much power in the hands of the ALA and that enshrining the group’s Library Bill of Rights into law would force local libraries to enact extreme policies, even beyond book bans.

Related: Montana bans people in drag from reading to kids at libraries, public schools

One member of the state’s lawmaking body, Republican Sen. Steve McClure, said that prohibiting libraries from banning books for any reason would mean they could not reject the donation of books from the public, including books that are purely hate speech or books offering directions on how to build a bomb, according to coverage of state politics on the Capitol News Illinois site.

Don’t miss: ‘Woke’ is being used to describe everything and nothing. What does it actually mean?

At his news conference, Giannoulias described those arguments as “ludicrous” and said the legislation does not deal with drag shows or dictate to librarians what materials they have to maintain. Separate of, but not completely exclusive from book bans, drag storytelling hours have come under greater scrutiny in some states.

Advertisement

Read: Drag queens fear Republican bills to restrict performances will hurt their livelihoods: ‘There’s nothing inherently sexual about drag’

“We’re not telling you what books to buy or not buy,” Giannoulias said. “What we’re saying is, if a book is in circulation as determined by the libraries and the librarians, that book cannot be banned because a group of individuals don’t like or want that book in their library. That’s what the legislation is all about.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Illinois

Rep. Eric Sorensen faces GOP challenger Joe McGraw in Illinois’ 17th Congressional District

Published

on

Rep. Eric Sorensen faces GOP challenger Joe McGraw in Illinois’ 17th Congressional District


CHICAGO (CBS) – Voters in Illinois’ 17th Congressional District will decide Tuesday whether Democratic Rep. Eric Sorensen will keep his seat, or challenger Joe McGraw will return the seat to Republicans for the first time since 2012.

The 17th District does not include any part of the Chicago area, but does snake around to include Rockford, the Quad Cities, Galesburg, Peoria, and Bloomington-Normal. Sorensen is in his first term representing the district, which has been in Democratic hands since 2013.

Sorensen, a meteorologist for more than 20 years before he was elected to the 17th District in 2022, is facing a challenge from McGraw, a retired judge who spent 15 years on the bench in the 17th Judicial Circuit, which includes Winnebago and Boone counties before he retired in 2017.

Sorensen has touted his limited experience as an elected official as an advantage in seeking bipartisan solutions in Congress.

Advertisement

“I’m one of the very few people that doesn’t have a background in politics,” Sorensen said recently. “So I can work with Republicans and Democrats to get the job done.”

McGraw, meantime, has touted his experience as a judge, as well as a trained mediator and arbitrator.

“I’ve used those skills to do reality testing with parties that are very adverse to try to figure out, what are the facts?” McGraw said recently.

This race, which could help tilt the balance of power in Congress, is focused on the same issues as numerous others. They include the issues of abortion, the economy, and immigration.

Where do Sorensen and McGraw stand on abortion?

Sorensen supports codifying Roe v. Wade into federal law, and permanently restoring a woman’s right to choose. Meantime, he also wants to protect women’s right to travel across state lines to seek safe reproductive care in Illinois.

Advertisement

McGraw has said he supported the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, arguing abortion is an issue that states should decide, not the federal government. He has said he would oppose a national abortion ban if it were to come up for a vote in Congress.

Where do Sorensen and McGraw stand on the economy?

Sorensen supports legislation to increase Social Security benefits for seniors, and wants to expand Medicare’s power to negotiate prescription drug prices to lower medication costs for working families and seniors. He also supports creating more “green jobs” to help address climate change, such as through increased electric vehicle production at the Rivian plant in Normal, Illinois.

McGraw has said he wants to cut taxes on American factories to create more jobs, and eliminate the federal estate tax. He also wants to reduce federal spending by restricting immigration, arguing migrants have become a drain on social services, health care, and schools.

Where do Sorensen and McGraw stand on immigration?

Sorensen has proposed legislation to add 500 new U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers at entry points on the southern border, as well as a bill to provide increased funding, technology and staffing for U.S. Customs and Border Protection to stop the spread of fentanyl.

Likewise, McGraw also wants to expand the border patrol and crack down on fentanyl, but also supports expanding the border wall between the U.S. and Mexico. He also backs a return to the “Remain in Mexico” policy, which would require asylum seekers arriving at the southern border to stay in Mexico until an immigration court rules on their asylum claims.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Illinois

Election workers punched in Orland Park, Illinois

Published

on

Election workers punched in Orland Park, Illinois


Election workers punched in Orland Park, Illinois – CBS Chicago

Watch CBS News


A 74-year-old longtime election judge said in his nearly 40 years volunteering at the polls, there have been a few arguments—but nothing like the violence he faced Sunday. Charlie De Mar reports.

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Illinois

Illinois man arrested after punching election judge at polling location

Published

on

Illinois man arrested after punching election judge at polling location


A man in Illinois punched an election judge at a polling location and was arrested on Sunday, two days before the climax of the US presidential race, according to authorities.

The man, identified as 24-year-old Daniel Schmidt, was charged with two counts of aggravated battery to a victim over 60, two counts of aggravated battery in a public place, and five misdemeanor counts of resisting arrest and one count of disorderly conduct.

His case follows numerous attacks on the voting process and threats of violence, the purpose of which often is to create fear and distrust around voting, according to extremist experts.

Election officials across the US say voting is safe, and voters should not be deterred from casting their ballots in Tuesday’s presidential race.

Advertisement

In Schmidt’s case, police say they responded to reports of a man causing a disturbance in the voting line at the township office of Orland Park, Illinois.

Officers arrested Schmidt after learning that he had allegedly entered the building and attempted to cut in front of other voters in line for early voting.

An election judge at the entrance instructed Schmidt to go to the back of the line and wait his turn. But authorities say that Schmidt refused.

At that point, another election judge was called to assist, police said – and Schmidt was again instructed to go to the back of the line.

According to the police, Schmidt then attempted to push past that election judge who stopped him from entering alongside several other staff members.

Advertisement

Schmidt then reportedly began yelling profanities and punched the election judge in the face, knocking the official’s glasses off. At that point, several other patrons jumped in and restrained Schmidt until the officers arrived.

Authorities added that, while being arrested, Schmidt also resisted Orland Park officers.

Schmidt was held overnight on Sunday and transported to Bridgeview courthouse for a detention hearing on Monday morning.

Ahead of this year’s election, election offices around the country have strengthened their security measures in anticipation of potential violence at the polls, in part in response to a rise in threats and harassment directed at election workers after the 2020 election that Donald Trump lost to Joe Biden.

Trump is running in Tuesday’s election against Kamala Harris.

Advertisement

Many offices have also trained their workers on de-escalation techniques and conducted drills for active shooters as well as other kinds of attacks.

In the last week alone, the US has already experienced multiple attacks on the voting process, threats of violence and extremism, including bomb threats, ballots being burned and more.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending