Connect with us

Health

Trump’s V.A. Squeezes Mental Health Care in Crowded Offices, Raising Privacy Concerns

Published

on

Trump’s V.A. Squeezes Mental Health Care in Crowded Offices, Raising Privacy Concerns

In a Boston V.A. hospital, six social workers are conducting phone and telehealth visits with veterans from a single, crowded room, clinicians say. In Kansas City, providers are planning patient care while facing each other across narrow, cafeteria-style tables in a large, open space, according to staff members.

And in South Florida, psychiatric nurses have been treating veterans with mental health conditions in a hallway near a bathroom, sitting down with them in a makeshift medical bay jury-rigged out of filing cabinets and a translucent screen.

“People walking by can hear everything that’s going on,” said Bill Frogameni, an acute care psychiatric nurse at the Miami V.A. hospital and director of the local chapter of the National Nurses United union, referring to the patient intake setup in a V.A. outpatient facility in Homestead, Fla., outside Miami.

“The nurses are triaging these patients asking standard questions: ‘Do you feel like harming yourself or others? How long have you been feeling suicidal? Do you have a plan to harm yourself?’” Mr. Frogameni said. “It’s very personal stuff.”

The cramped conditions are the result of President Trump’s decision to rescind remote work arrangements for federal employees, reversing a policy that at the V.A. long predated the pandemic. Since Mr. Trump’s order, the Department of Veterans Affairs has been scrambling to find adequate office space for tens of thousands of health care employees, even those who see most or all of their patients virtually, while maintaining the legal requirement of confidentiality.

Advertisement

V.A. officials say the agency is handling its return to office responsibly, with the goal of improving care for veterans. While nearly 60,000 employees are being shifted into federal office space, another 45,000 have been allowed exemptions or extensions and can continue working from home for now. That includes a six- to eight-month pause for select clinicians categorized as “telemental health” providers, according to V.A. documents.

Staff members concerned about patient privacy can notify supervisors, who will give them what they need, said Peter Kasperowicz, a V.A. spokesman. If any staff members lack appropriate work space, he added, “that in itself is a violation of V.A.’s return-to-in-office-work policy.”

But interviews with three dozen V.A. employees, internal agency documents and photographs provided to The New York Times from six V.A. facilities depict crowded or stopgap office spaces where clinicians say they are being asked to administer mental health treatment or discuss sensitive information in open settings where conversations can be overheard.

Veterans have noticed the lack of privacy, clinicians say. They described patients newly hesitant to discuss issues like legal problems, substance abuse and intimate partner violence, limiting the effectiveness of their treatment. Some clinicians said they had trouble hearing patients over the phone or during video calls in their new, telemarketing-style work spaces.

Providers have been instructed to use headphones, computer privacy screens and even convex mirrors to block veterans’ view of other people in the room, documents and interviews show. In an internal memo, V.A. workers were told to prepare to work in crowded environments by avoiding strong perfumes or “heating or consuming pungent foods” while at their desks.

Advertisement

Some providers told The Times that they are quitting or retiring early rather than work in conditions that jeopardize patient privacy or undertake long commutes just to talk to patients on video. The V.A. is already suffering from “severe” shortages of psychologists and psychiatrists, according to an agency report.

“They were going to put us around conference tables with headsets and laptops,” said Dr. Nicole Stromberg, 61, an addiction psychiatrist who retired on Thursday after 11 years at the V.A., much of it spent in leadership positions.

For the past five years, Dr. Stromberg has been working remotely, seeing around 500 veterans spread out across 35 counties in Michigan. She said terminating treatment with her patients has been so painful that she often leaves the sessions crying.

“It’s really exhausting and really hard and not even what I want to do,” she said. “And I feel guilty, because I feel like doctors should be sticking it out until the end. That’s the commitment we made.”

The V.A. pioneered telehealth two decades ago to help reach its geographically dispersed patient population, hiring mental health providers for fully remote jobs to treat veterans in other counties or even states. During the first Trump administration, the V.A. aggressively expanded its use of virtual mental health care, which it considered a successful innovation.

Advertisement

But mandating that federal employees work from the office has been a priority for Elon Musk and his so-called Department of Government Efficiency — in part, the billionaire explained in a Wall Street Journal opinion essay he cowrote shortly after the election, because it “would result in a wave of voluntary terminations that we welcome.”

Mr. Kasperowicz characterized the current pushback as coming from “a small but vocal minority” of V.A. employees who were “telling tall tales in a desperate attempt to avoid returning to the office at all costs.”

Referring to the photographs provided to The Times, he disputed that patient confidentiality was being violated and said that in each location, clinicians could get access to private offices when needed.

“The central — and false — premise of your hit piece is that V.A. employees are improperly discussing sensitive info in crowded spaces,” he said. “These photos show the opposite of that. They actually undermine the false narrative The New York Times is trying to push.”

Mr. Kasperowicz said no sensitive information was discussed in the medical bay in the Florida facility, which he described as “appropriately private.” He acknowledged issues at two V.A. facilities highlighted by The Times but said officials had worked to resolve them.

Advertisement

In Michigan, for instance, Mr. Kasperowicz confirmed that officials at a clinic outside Grand Rapids had learned on April 16 of a “small group of telehealth providers performing virtual visits in a converted conference room.” But he said that, 12 days after the situation came to light, the providers had been given access to smaller private spaces for sensitive exchanges.

The agency was “no longer a job where the status quo is to phone it in from home,” he added.

A White House spokeswoman said that the return-to-office mandate would mean “better services for our veterans.”

“Many private companies are ending remote work because numerous studies show that employees are more productive and collaborative in-person,” Anna Kelly, the spokeswoman, wrote in a statement.

Deadlines for returning to office were set for April and May. At the time of the executive order, more than 20 percent of the V.A.’s staff had been working remotely.

Advertisement

The anticipated impact of the return-to-office mandate on V.A. mental health prompted protests from medical and professional organizations after an initial Times report in March.

In an April 11 letter, the chief executive of the National Association of Social Workers warned V.A. Secretary Doug Collins that providers working in such spaces were “at serious risk of violating HIPAA regulations and other federal privacy laws.”

“These conditions create profound ethical concerns and could endanger the professional licensure of V.A. social workers,” Anthony Estreet wrote.

Leaders of the American Psychiatric Association and American Psychological Association also appealed to Mr. Collins, asking that mental health providers be exempted from the return-to-work order lest they quit, leaving their patients stranded without care.

Jennifer Mensik Kennedy, the president of the American Nurses Association, said many nurses have approached her to report overcrowded conditions that risked violating patient privacy laws.

Advertisement

“There’s not enough office space,” she said. “People are doubled up. People are working in hallways.”

The V.A.’s expansion of telehealth in Mr. Trump’s first term has helped veterans, said Dr. Harold Kudler, who served as the agency’s chief consultant for mental health services from 2014 to 2018.

By 2023, virtual care made up 54 percent of mental health visits. Studies showed that teletherapy had lowered the cost of care and reduced wait times by an average of 25 days. A study of rural veterans found a 22 percent reduction in the likelihood of suicidal behavior among those provided care over video tablets.

Dr. Kudler, who is now in private practice, said in his conversations with current V.A. personnel that many had expressed “despair” about “abrupt and unreasoning change.”

“Once you break that system that way, it’s going to be a very long time coming back,” he said.

Advertisement

Alarms have sounded from within the agency about return-to-office mandates. Kevin Galpin, a top V.A. official who oversees teletherapy, wrote in a memo last month that clinicians require “private, secure and therapeutic office spaces” to deliver care, and that open-plan work stations “are inconsistent with this guidance,” according to a copy reviewed by The Times. (Mr. Galpin declined to comment.)

In interviews, V.A. clinicians described a chaotic spring, as two large waves of employees were given deadlines to report to a federal office space. Some described having to work out of hallways or split offices the size of closets. Many spoke on the condition of anonymity out of fear of retribution.

A social worker who treats homeless veterans in California said she was placed with a dozen other staff members in a windowless mailroom that was so crowded with undelivered packages that she had to move boxes to reach her cubicle.

In Ohio, the V.A. asked more than 70 telehealth providers to start working out of a suburban office park, but many were unable to log into the V.A.’s computer system, according to an employee. Mr. Kasperowicz said that internet equipment there had failed and that workers have been allowed to work from home while repairs are made.

Many clinicians said the changes had prompted them to start looking for jobs outside the agency, which often pay significantly higher salaries.

Advertisement

Dr. Anil Kulangara and Dr. Catherine Shim, married psychiatrists who had been treating patients remotely at the American Lake clinic in Tacoma, Wash., said they were deeply discouraged on April 14, when they reported to the office spaces they had been assigned.

“It seemed a little unreal, almost laughable,” Dr. Kulangara said. They weren’t given keys for the building or the office, which still contained the belongings of previous occupants. When they were able to get in, they discovered that the I.T. setup would not allow them to see patients, so they raced home, they said.

“At no point in this did anyone explain why this was important to do, other than to comply” with an executive order, Dr. Kulangara said. “We tried. It’s not worth it, and it doesn’t make any sense. It was such an obvious harm to us and to our patients and no one seemed willing to push back.”

Both doctors officially resigned last week, citing the discontinuation of remote work as the reason. Though both have received offers for new jobs, Dr. Kulangara said, “we have been literally sick to our stomachs thinking of what is going to happen to our patients,” a combined case load of more than 500 veterans suffering from PTSD, sexual trauma and severe mental illness.

In total, 10 clinicians told The Times that they had left their jobs, or were in the process of leaving, because of the changes.

Advertisement

One psychiatrist said she decided to quit as soon as she learned she would have to see patients over a video link from an open-plan office. Finding a new job was easy: Within weeks, she said, she had three offers, including one that paid 20 percent more than the V.A.

Another psychiatrist practicing in Virginia, who was hired for a fully remote position, said she has accepted a new job in the private sector rather than commute to a V.A. building to conduct virtual treatment, which would restrict the time she spends with her young children.

The psychiatrist said it took less than two weeks to find a new job. But she is torn about the decision, because it means terminating treatment with 600 veterans who need care.

“I’m angry,” she said. “I have one patient on hospice — he is recounting trauma, he only has a few months left to live, and I don’t think he will be rescheduled before he passes.”

The Trump administration has said it plans to eliminate 80,000 V.A. jobs, or roughly one-sixth of the total work force, but officials say the layoffs will target administrative and support staff and will have no affect on patient care.

Advertisement

Dr. Stromberg, the psychiatrist from Michigan, said her anxiety began mounting when V.A. clinicians were told to remove Pride flags and stop using pronoun identifiers. As an administrator, she had supported D.E.I. programs, so she feared she would be targeted in the layoffs.

The return-to-office order, she said, left her little choice but to retire early.

Six weeks ago, she began telling patients that she was terminating their treatment. They are mostly veterans who returned from war with undiagnosed PTSD and struggle with addiction, she said; by her estimate, a quarter of them have already made suicide attempts. And it is unlikely that her position will be filled after her departure, she said.

“Termination is difficult anyway,” she said. “A psychiatrist and a patient, it’s an oddly intimate relationship.”

Nearly all of them have responded with hurt and confusion, Dr. Stromberg said: Their sessions were virtual, so why did it matter where she was? She reminds them of the executive order that Mr. Trump signed on Jan. 20, phasing out remote work for federal employees, one of his first official acts.

Advertisement

“This was not an easy decision,” she said. “It’s not the right one for my patients. And it’s one I’m really feeling forced to make.”

Kitty Bennett, Susan C. Beachy and Kirsten Noyes contributed research.

Health

GLP-1 Drugs Linked to Osteoporosis and Gout: Here’s How To Stay Safe

Published

on

GLP-1 Drugs Linked to Osteoporosis and Gout: Here’s How To Stay Safe


Advertisement




GLP-1 Drugs Linked To Increased Risk of Osteoporosis and Gout | Woman’s World




















Advertisement





Advertisement


Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.


Use escape to exit the menu.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Health

Ozempic-style drugs could slash complication risks after heart attacks, research suggests

Published

on

Ozempic-style drugs could slash complication risks after heart attacks, research suggests

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A popular class of weight-loss drugs may prevent life-threatening cardiac complications by opening microscopic blood vessels that often remain blocked after a heart attack, according to a study published this week in Nature Communications.

The research, led by the University of Bristol and University College London, identified a biological brain-gut-heart signaling pathway. 

This discovery appears to explain how GLP-1 drugs — which mimic glucagon-like peptide-1, a hormone that helps regulate blood sugar and appetite — protect heart tissue from a condition known as “no-reflow.”

“In nearly half of all heart attack patients, tiny blood vessels within the heart muscle remain narrowed, even after the main artery is cleared during emergency medical treatment,” Dr. Svetlana Mastitskaya, the study’s lead author and a senior lecturer at Bristol Medical School, said in a press release.

Advertisement

“This results in a complication known as ‘no-reflow,’ where blood is unable to reach certain parts of the heart tissue.”

In nearly half of all heart attack patients, tiny capillaries (blood vessels) remain narrowed even after the main blocked artery is cleared. (iStock)

This lack of blood flow increases the risk of heart failure and death within a year. GLP-1 medications could prevent this, according to the researchers.

How it works

When the GLP-1 hormone is released in the gut or administered as a drug, it sends a signal to the brain, which then sends a signal to the heart that switches on special potassium channels in tiny cells called pericytes.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

When these channels open, the pericytes relax, which allows the small blood vessels (capillaries) to widen and improve blood flow to the heart muscle, the researchers noted.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

The new study used animal models and cellular imaging to track how GLP-1 interacts with heart tissue. When the researchers removed the potassium channels, the drugs no longer protected the heart — confirming they play a key role.

The findings suggest that existing GLP-1 medications, already used for type 2 diabetes and obesity, could be repurposed as emergency treatments. (iStock)

The findings suggest that existing GLP-1 medications, already used for type 2 diabetes and obesity, could be repurposed as emergency treatments during or immediately after a heart attack to reduce tissue damage.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

The researchers noted several limitations, including that the study relied on animal models.

Clinical trials are necessary to determine whether the brain-gut-heart pathway operates with the same timing and efficacy in humans.

While the study highlights the drug’s immediate benefits during a heart attack, it des not establish whether long-term use of these drugs provides a pre-existing level of protection. (iStock)

Additionally, while the study highlights the drug’s immediate benefits during a heart attack, it does not establish whether long-term use of the medication provides a pre-existing level of protection.

Advertisement

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

The research was primarily funded by the British Heart Foundation.

Related Article

Eating oatmeal for two days has unexpected impact on heart health, study suggests
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Health

Do collagen supplements really improve skin? Major review reveals the truth

Published

on

Do collagen supplements really improve skin? Major review reveals the truth

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Collagen supplements have exploded in popularity, touted as everything from an anti-aging miracle to a muscle recovery booster.

But a sweeping new review conducted by U.K. researchers suggests that while collagen may help improve skin elasticity and ease arthritis pain, it does little for athletic performance or wrinkle reduction.

Researchers from Anglia Ruskin University analyzed 16 systematic reviews and 113 randomized controlled trials involving nearly 8,000 participants worldwide, which they say is the most extensive evaluation of collagen’s health effects to date. 

The review found consistent evidence that collagen supplementation improves skin elasticity and hydration over time and provides significant relief from osteoarthritis-related joint pain and stiffness, according to findings published in Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum. 

Advertisement

A large U.K. review found that collagen supplements may improve skin elasticity and hydration over time. (iStock)

The researchers, however, did not find meaningful improvements in post-exercise muscle recovery, soreness or tendon mechanical properties (strength, springiness and stretch resistance).

“Collagen is not a cure-all, but it does have credible benefits when used consistently over time, particularly for skin and osteoarthritis,” co-author Lee Smith, professor of public health at Anglia Ruskin University, said in a statement.

EXPERIMENTAL SERUM SHOWS PROMISE IN REVERSING BALDNESS WITHIN 20 DAYS

“Our findings show clear benefits in key areas of healthy aging, while also dispelling some of the myths surrounding its use,” Smith added.

Advertisement

Collagen, the most abundant protein in the body, supports skin, bones, tendons, cartilage and connective tissue, according to experts. Natural collagen production begins to drop in early adulthood and declines more sharply with age.

The study found that collagen supplements may help reduce joint pain and stiffness in people with osteoarthritis. (iStock)

The review found that long-term collagen supplementation was linked to improved skin firmness and hydration, but did not help skin roughness — a proxy for visible wrinkles. 

Benefits appear to accumulate gradually, suggesting that collagen should not be viewed as an “anti-wrinkle ‘quick fix,’ but as a foundational dermal support for individuals seeking holistic skin maintenance,” the researchers said.

Advertisement

“If we define anti-aging as a product or technique designed to prevent the appearance of getting older, then I believe our findings do support this claim for some parameters,” Smith told the BBC. “For example, an improvement in skin tone and moisture is associated with a more youthful-looking appearance.”

Collagen supplementation was linked to reduced pain and stiffness in people with osteoarthritis, with stronger benefits seen over longer periods of use, and showed modest improvements in muscle mass and tendon structure that may support healthy aging. 

Collagen did not significantly improve skin roughness, a marker of visible wrinkles. (iStock)

However, it did not show meaningful results when used as a fast-acting sports performance supplement, and evidence for benefits related to cholesterol, blood sugar, blood pressure and oral health was mixed or inconclusive.

Dr. Daniel Ghiyam, a California-based physician and longevity specialist, said the findings align with what he sees in clinical practice.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE FOR MORE LIFESTYLE STORIES

“Collagen is a targeted support tool, not a foundation of health or performance,” Ghiyam, who was not involved in the study, told Fox News Digital. “When marketed that way, it makes sense. When marketed as a cure-all, it doesn’t hold up to the data.”

The authors noted that while many previous collagen studies have received financial support from the supplement industry, the current review did not receive industry funding.

Experts say collagen supplements may offer modest benefits for skin hydration and joint comfort, but they are not a cure-all. (iStock)

The team called for more high-quality clinical trials examining long-term outcomes, optimal dosages and differences between collagen sources, such as marine, bovine and plant-based alternatives. 

Advertisement

Among its limitations, the review could not determine whether certain forms of collagen work better than others or what the optimal regimen should be. 

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

While the review included randomized controlled trials, the quality of the studies varied, with newer research generally showing stronger results.

Experts say more data and studies are needed to build on the findings. They also noted that diet plays a crucial role in skin health.

Collagen supplements, often sold as powders or pills, may improve skin elasticity and ease joint pain, experts say. (iStock)

Advertisement

Dr. Erum Ilyas, a Pennsylvania-based dermatologist and chair of dermatology at Drexel University College of Medicine, noted that the review analyzed previously published meta-analyses rather than generating new primary data.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“At this time, I have not seen sufficiently strong independent evidence to routinely recommend collagen supplements to my patients,” Ilyas, who was not involved in the review, told Fox News Digital.

“Although some studies show modest improvements in markers such as hydration and elasticity, there remains limited independent, biopsy-confirmed evidence demonstrating sustained increases in dermal collagen content,” she added.

Fox News Digital has reached out to the researchers for comment.

Advertisement

Related Article

Cosmetic fillers can cause deadly complication, experts warn — but new tech exposes it
Continue Reading

Trending