Published March 25, 2026 12:36PM
Fitness
Measuring bioactive nitric oxide during exercise could help improve fitness, and this new device provides real-time data
The heart is the master dispatcher for our lifeblood. It has the crucial burden of balancing physiological economics during rest, during a ride, and while recovering. If the heart can’t pump enough blood to equal demand for nutrients and oxygen, fatigue sets in, you bonk, and sometimes, you have to quit. Rest and replenishment are the only salvation.
It is well understood that the body’s managerial mechanisms run much deeper, especially during exercise. Governing a cyclist’s overall ability to continue putting out power during any type of effort are the cellular and molecular constituents produced and delivered alongside every contraction of the restless courier in our chest. Oxygen, glucose, fatty acids, lactate, hemoglobin, bicarbonate, nitric oxide — all are important, each playing a role in how well we are able to respond to the stresses of exercise. They also dictate how well the body can adapt and repair between exercise sessions.
We make an intentional point to try and measure and understand the importance of biomarkers and vitals in athletic training and performance, with the current boom in wearable technologies making it possible to deliver insights never previously fathomed. Though no lack of data exists, is there a best measure to understanding an athlete’s exercise capacity and fitness?
Being able to measure blood flow has been a decades-long quest in sports medicine. Exercise physiologists often focus on the mitochondria, bioenergetics, and oxygen consumption (VO2) as a pathway to understanding someone’s performance capacity and upper limits. Coaches use biological outputs such as lactate and heart rate layered atop metrics like power to guide training strategy. The integration of all of these somatic informatics is rightfully based on what we know as best practice today.
But what are the true regulators and rate limiters of performance? We know that the ability to do work (ride a bike) is based on a few basic orderly factors:
- Muscles need oxygen
- and fuel (glucose, fatty acids)
- to synthesize ATP
- which is used to output mechanical energy
- so that they can contract
- and work (exercise) can be done.
But a crucial step is missing: the regulation of delivering oxygen and fuel. The body was divinely designed to compensate and adapt to changing conditions, and at the level of muscle oxygenation and work output, here is how that concept is applied. At the onset of exercise, a shift in blood flow must occur to ensure oxygen and nutrients are delivered where they are needed most — your working skeletal muscles, the heart, and brain, primarily. The ability to measure and understand how this happens is crucial. As it turns out, one molecule is inadvertently responsible, and without it, everything else is impossible.
Hello, SNO.
Performance regulation: There’s a new kid in town.
Nitric oxide (NO) has been hailed as one of the most important regulators of cardiovascular health, impacting blood pressure, inflammation, and overall vascular function. It is a potent vasodilator, responsible for directing and improving blood flow to areas of the body where blood flow is needed most. This happens during periods of oxygen demand and supply mismatch, like exercise, and it happens almost immediately. The supplement market is booming with products that help athletes improve NO production, such as L-arginine, to help maximize blood flow to muscles during a workout.
All of this stated, the classic understanding of how NO is produced and directs blood flow is beginning to change, which inevitably impacts how we think of performance regulation. Let’s break it down. We know that:
- Muscles need oxygen,
- and oxygen is carried by hemoglobin in red blood cells.
- Oxygen must be transferred from red blood cells to muscles
- so work (exercise) can be done.
Further:
- When exercise starts,
- muscles begin consuming oxygen at a higher rate.
- A dip in available oxygen happens.
- Oxygen is increasingly offloaded from red blood cells to try and match the new demand.
Remember: supply must match demand.
Now what? An economic dance ensues between red blood cells (where oxygen is carried), and the oxygen tension in the muscle itself. A newer discovery has explained how this interplay impacts overall dispersion of blood during a workout so muscles can be adequately fueled and exercise can continue, and it is meticulously regulated.
During conditions where oxygen tension in muscles (and therefore red blood cells) decreases, a nitric oxide derivative called S-nitrosohemoglobin (SNO-Hb) is also produced and offloaded by hemoglobin alongside oxygen. SNO-Hb, part of a group of compounds called S-nitrosothiols, or SNOs, dilates the tiny blood vessels in the muscle tissue itself (capillaries, arterioles). Blood flow increases, and oxygen delivery can now meet the heightened demand. This goes for nutrient delivery too, like increased need for fatty acids and glucose.
Why is measuring SNO helpful?
It could be hypothesized that many of the foundational benefits of exercise are due to these well-controlled increases in blood flow. There is a system-wide effect on the heart and brain, too. Further, there are adaptations to the cardiovascular system and blood profile in response to training. More exercise leads to more hemoglobin, a larger blood volume, and a greater and faster NO response. The latter specifically leads to a better blood flow response, and therefore improved oxygen and nutrient delivery. Theoretically, the same goes for bioactive NO derivative, SNO, at the tissue level. In this perspective, SNO is sitting in the driver’s seat and orchestrating it all.
Devices exist on the market today that measure oxygen saturation in muscles and other tissues (SmO2 or tissue oximeters), but that only paints a partial picture of the impact certain types and intensities of exercise have on an individual. Being able to measure someone’s SNO response to exercise would offer the first look into the gatekeeper of muscle oxygenation. Why do we care? All of this impacts the ability for mitochondria to output adenosine triphosphate (ATP). It is also an indicator of muscular damage during injury and nourishment during rehabilitation. These processes all require oxygen.
Measuring SNO is specific, and it may indicate the readiness and effectiveness of exercise on a personalized level. It can be associative to overall VO2, and oxygen consumption specific to the muscle (called mVO2) as well. It may be an indicator of power output and capacity, and could also correlate to lactate efflux. Further, and most importantly, it can stand alone as its own measurement. As with anything truly new and disruptive, a lot of research needs to be conducted, but there is evidence indicating the usefulness of SNO as a novel biomarker to gauge fitness and performance.
How can we measure SNO? NNOXX has a device
There is a device available today that non-invasively measures SNO, plus muscle oxygenation (SmO2) and muscle oxygen consumption (mVO2) from a company called NNOXX. (Full disclosure: I have consulted with NNOXX on clinical and regulatory affairs.) It’s the only device of its kind, delivering continuously streaming data that can be accessed at any point during a ride or workout. NNOXX helps athletes understand the efficiency and effectiveness of an exercise by measuring these performance indicators directly in exercising muscle, in real time.
One differentiating thing about these biomarkers is that they are exercise “blind,” meaning you can ride or you can lift, and you will still produce SNO and use oxygen, just not in the same way (a topic for a different article). The $299 NNOXX device can be used to make individualized assessments during many types of exercise — biking, lifting, and running, as examples — and only needs to be placed on the exercising muscle during your workout.
So how can riders use NNOXX to help improve their cycling performance?

NNOXX provides a Performance Readiness Score
Muscle recovery can be impacted by insufficient calories, poor sleep, dehydration, overreaching, or even the onset of illness. NNOXX is differentiated because the biological assessments are measured and delivered in real-time based on rates of oxygenation and deoxygenation, plus the bioactive nitric oxide response while you’re exercising. All you have to do is a guided four-minute cycling protocol and the app will give you both a Muscle Readiness and Aerobic Readiness percentage tailored to your physiological status. You’ll be given a recommendation of how to proceed based on your score. You can also see a seven-day trend.
NNOXX can help you understand how well you performed compared to other rides or exercise sessions.
The app provides individualized performance indicators, including a Power Index, Endurance Index, and Economy. These indicators are based on your personal rates of muscle deoxygenation, reoxygenation and other factors, measured in real-time during your workout. After your workout is finished, you’ll receive your score for the day, your average range, and 60-day comparative trend.
This feature is really useful if riders have regular routes or workouts, and they’re interested in seeing if they’re improving, especially when making changes to their routine (e.g. more sleep, additional interval sessions, changes in recovery or dietary habits, or longer rides).
Further, users can potentially infer if a specific type of riding is best for them. For example, if the data shows you’re more efficient at climbing than previously thought, it may be something worth capitalizing on or integrating more often into your routine. The opposite can be a takeaway, too. If the app indicates you perform better doing power activities than long rides, you can use this to create a goal around improving your endurance.
What if I am new to mountain biking or cross-training and to improve my performance without hiring a coach or personal trainer?
The NNOXX app provides an AI-guided coach to customize your ride or other workout to be the most effective and efficient. The output is based on the effects of your real-time SNO production. As data is aggregated, workouts can be compared and personalized to your individual physical performance to help maximize gains.
For a new-to-market device and a new biomarker, the metrics provided by the device do seem to be physiologically reliable and accurate. Because the data is provided continuously with relatively no lag, the information can easily be compared to other performance indicators. Users can see how their body is compensating for increases in cadence or terrain grade, as examples.
NNOXX recently released a feature that allows users to import their Strava and Peloton data into the High Performance Platform on their website. Comparisons between SNO and SmO2 can be made alongside work, power, heart rate, and others on a single platform.
Again, the SNO biomarker and associated performance indicators are new. Like most things in science and medicine, it takes time to build up a bank of clinical evidence that is trustworthy, and the data on SNO as a performance biometric promises to evolve as discoveries are made and information is added. The digital technology boom is allowing researchers and developers to change the landscape at an unmatched speed, and NNOXX is a great example of what I believe is a positive outcome of the race.
Sources
Premont, R. T., Reynolds, J. D., Zhang, R., & Stamler, J. S. (2020). Role of nitric oxide carried by hemoglobin in cardiovascular physiology: developments on a three-gas respiratory cycle. Circulation research, 126(1), 129-158.
Reynolds, J. D., Posina, K., Zhu, L., Jenkins, T., Matto, F., Hausladen, A., … & Stamler, J. S. (2023). Control of tissue oxygenation by S-nitrosohemoglobin in human subjects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(9), e2220769120.
Fitness
What Happens to Your Body When You Take Ozempic Without Exercising
Losing weight doesn’t necessarily make you fitter, a new study finds.
(Photo: Oleg Breslavtsev / Getty)
Is exercise obsolete in the age of Ozempic? Now that the initial hype has settled down, nobody makes that claim with a straight face. In fact, one of the big fears among people taking GLP-1 agonists (the class of drug to which Ozempic belongs) is that they’ll lose too much muscle along with all the fat, leaving them weaker and less healthy. But at this point, there’s very little data on what happens when you combine these drugs with an exercise routine (or lack thereof).
A newly published study in the journal Sports Medicine steps into this gap. It’s a secondary analysis of data from a previously published study by researchers at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark, funded in part by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (Novo Nordisk is the company that makes Ozempic). The study follows volunteers taking another Novo Nordisk GLP-1 agonist called liraglutide (sold under the brand names Victoza and Saxenda) for an entire year, with or without the addition of a regular exercise program. The results show that without exercise, both health and physical function suffer—and it’s not just about muscle.
What the GLP-1 Study Found
The study involved 193 adults between the ages of 18 and 65. It’s a little unusual in that they started by following an eight-week very-low-calorie diet before starting either exercise or the GLP-1 drug. That’s because the original study was designed to look at ways of maintaining weight loss. Everyone included in the study lost at least 5 percent of their starting weight, which resulted in an average weight loss of 29 pounds. Then, for the following year, they either exercised, took the GLP-1 drug, did both, or did neither. (Those who didn’t get the drug got a placebo.)
The exercise program involved two group exercise classes per week, including 30 minutes of intervals on an exercise bike, then 15 minutes of circuit training (step-ups, boxing, squats, kettlebells, and so on). The subjects were also asked to do two additional workouts on their own; the details were up to them, but most chose running, cycling, brisk walking, or circuits. Adherence was decent: they averaged 2.65 workouts a week and met standard public health guidelines for physical activity.
The first outcome of interest (as reported in the original analysis) is weight. Here’s the trajectory of the four groups:
Doing nothing was the worst option. Exercising and taking a GLP-1 drug was the best option. If you had to choose one or the other, the drug looks marginally better, though the difference wasn’t statistically significant.
Does Fitness or Fatness Matter More?
There’s a longstanding debate about the relative health effects of being overweight versus being aerobically unfit. The two often go together, so they get conflated—but they’re not the same thing. The general trend of evidence, according to the Danish research team, is that it’s better for health and longevity to be fit and overweight than unfit and normal weight. This distinction is important in the context of GLP-1 drugs, because if they help you lose weight without gaining fitness, then the health benefits may be less than you’d expect.
Figuring out how to measure fitness in this context isn’t straightforward. When you lose weight, you’ll generally lose some muscle mass in addition to fat loss. Both strength and aerobic fitness (as measured by VO2 max) are roughly proportional to muscle mass, so your absolute fitness might appear to decline when you lose a lot of weight. But if you lose less strength or fitness in proportion to your overall weight loss, you’ll still end up with greater functional fitness: you’ll have an easier time getting up from a chair, be able to walk for longer, and so on.
One of the simple functional tests the Danish study included was a stair-climb test: climb up and down an 11-step stairway twice, as fast as possible. Here’s what those results looked like:
It’s clear here that the exercise program helped people speed up and down the stairs more quickly, whether or not they were taking the GLP-1 drug. Just taking the drug without exercising didn’t have any benefit.
There are a whole bunch of other fitness measures in the paper: VO2 max tests, leg strength tests, body composition tests to measure muscle mass in the arms and legs. The fitness outcomes can be expressed in absolute terms, or relative to total body weight, or relative to muscle mass. No matter how you express it, the overall pattern, with a few minor exceptions, is the same as the graph above: exercise makes you fitter, simply taking the drug doesn’t.
(An example of a minor exception: the drug alone was enough to improve relative leg strength, i.e. leg strength divided by total body weight, because weight decreased more than strength. But adding exercise worked even better.)
This conclusion—that the best way to get fitter is to exercise—is not exactly surprising. But I think it has been overlooked in discussions about GLP-1 drugs. I’ve certainly seen lots of chatter about the dangers of muscle loss with Ozempic, and the need to pound protein and lift weights. That’s a legitimate concern, but aerobic fitness is an even better predictor of longevity and marker of general health. GLP-1 drugs have remarkable properties, but they haven’t made exercise obsolete.
For more Sweat Science, sign up for the email newsletter and check out my new book The Explorer’s Gene: Why We Seek Big Challenges, New Flavors, and the Blank Spots on the Map.
Fitness
Stay on Top of Your Workouts and Health With the Best Fitness Trackers of 2026
Format: Would you prefer wearing a ring or a wrist-based device? If you want something understated that you can wear all the time and don’t mind not having a screen to glance at, then a ring would be ideal. If having a watch on your wrist is comfortable, then a smartwatch or wrist-based tracker may be the right choice.
Compatibility: If you’re an Apple user, ensure your fitness tracker is compatible with iOS. The same goes if you’re an Android user.
Storage capacity: For those who don’t want their fitness tracker to be dependent on their phone, look at a device with its own storage capacity.
Special features: Before purchasing a fitness tracker, consider the health metrics that are important to you for your favorite workouts. If you’d like your tracker to do more than monitor your fitness, you’ll be better off with a smartwatch like the Pixel Watch 4 or Apple Watch SE 3.
Wi-Fi or Bluetooth: If you’re the type of person who likes to leave their phone behind when working out but still needs internet access, ensure your fitness tracker has Wi-Fi.
GPS? For those who run, hike or walk and want to keep track of metrics like distance and pace without their phone, choose a fitness tracker that has built-in GPS.
Screen size: Once you decide you want a fitness tracker with a screen, make sure it fits your personal preferences. A smaller screen may be better if you prefer for it to be less obvious that you’re wearing a fitness tracker on your wrist.
Battery life: How often do you want to be charging your fitness tracker? If frequently charging your devices is a pet peeve, ensure your fitness tracker of choice has a long battery life, especially for your preferred workouts.
Water resistance: Individuals who work out by swimming or those who enjoy taking a dip in the pool after exercising will want a fitness tracker that is water-resistant. Confirm your device is rated for the depth you plan to swim at.
Subscription cost: It’s common for fitness trackers to come with the added cost of a subscription, particularly if you want to access all available features or require extra features for your workout or fitness goals. To guarantee that a fitness tracker is in your budget, check not only the price of the device, but also how much your subscription of choice will run you over the course of a year.
Fitness
Exercise First Thing in the Morning for Better Heart Health, Study Suggests
“This study suggests that when you exercise may matter, not just how much you exercise,” says senior study author Prashant Rao, MBBS, a sports cardiologist and physician-scientist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, both in Boston.
The research, which will be presented at the American College of Cardiology’s Annual Scientific Session later this month, relied on minute-level heart rate data from nearly 15,000 adults. Dr. Rao says this allowed his team to capture long-term, real-world exercise data with much more detail and accuracy.
Early Morning Workouts Are Linked to Better Cardiometabolic Health
The study analyzed health records and Fitbit heart rate data collected over a year. Researchers identified periods when participants had an elevated heart rate for 15 minutes or more to track physical activity. Then they grouped participants into categories based on the time of day exercise occurred.
Researchers compared these timing groups with health data including rates of high blood pressure, obesity, high cholesterol, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, and other cardiovascular health problems. They adjusted the findings to account for differences in age, sex, income level, total activity level, sleep, alcohol use, and smoking status.
The results showed that compared with adults who exercised later in the day, those who worked out in the morning were:
These risk reductions were independent of how much exercise people actually got. Adults who exercised between 7 and 8 a.m. had the lowest odds of coronary artery disease.
Aubrey Grant, MD, a sports cardiologist at MedStar Health in Washington, D.C., who wasn’t involved with the research, says the results suggest that “timing may be a previously underappreciated lever in cardiometabolic risk reduction.”
He adds that wearable technology is giving scientists more granular exercise data, which “opens a more nuanced conversation about how physical activity interacts with the body’s daily rhythms.”
Exercise Timing Is a ‘New Frontier’
A main limitation of the research is that it’s an observational study, “so we can’t establish causality,” Rao says. Because participants weren’t randomized to exercise at different times, the results only show a link, not that earlier exercise directly leads to the observed health benefits.
“While we did our best to adjust for confounders [factors that could muddy the results], timing may still reflect differences in work schedules, socioeconomic factors, or lifestyle patterns that aren’t potentially fully captured in our analyses,” he says.
The link between exercise timing and health is a “new frontier in exercise science,” says Dr. Grant. For decades, research has focused on “how much and how hard” people worked out — variables that still matter, he says.
Why Exercise Timing May Lower Cardiometabolic Risk
“The honest answer is that we do not fully know yet” why this link is appearing, Grant says.
“Morning exercise may align better with circadian physiology,” or how bodily functions naturally correspond to the time of day, he says. “Cortisol peaks early in the day and can prime the body for physical exertion, potentially enhancing metabolic efficiency,” Grant adds.
Exercise is also a natural stimulant. When you work out early, it revs up your bodily systems and energizes you for the day, says Andrew Freeman, MD, director of cardiovascular prevention and wellness at National Jewish Health in Denver. Dr. Freeman was not involved with the new study.
People who work out earlier may also have healthier lifestyle habits, overall, says Alex Rothstein, EdD, an assistant professor of exercise science at the New York Institute of Technology in Old Westbury.
“If you work out earlier in the day, you tend to have fewer excuses to not work out,” and you may exercise more consistently, says Dr. Rothstein, who was not involved with the new research.
Should You Start Exercising in the Morning?
Freeman recommends getting 30 minutes a day of “breathless physical activity,” including a combination of cardio and strength training. But if you prefer to work out in the afternoons or have responsibilities preventing you from exercising in the morning, don’t worry.
“It does not mean people should feel guilty about evening workouts,” Grant says. “It means that when we counsel patients on optimizing their health, exercise timing is now a legitimate part of that conversation, alongside sleep, nutrition, and stress management.”
If you have flexibility, though, Rothstein suggests exercising in the morning, as it’s less likely that something will interfere with your workout later on, and it may offer extra heart health benefits.
“The most important message is still: Exercise consistently, regardless of timing,” Rao says. However, “Timing may represent a simple, low-cost way to potentially optimize health.”
-
Detroit, MI1 week agoDrummer Brian Pastoria, longtime Detroit music advocate, dies at 68
-
Georgia1 week agoHow ICE plans for a detention warehouse pushed a Georgia town to fight back | CNN Politics
-
Movie Reviews7 days ago‘Youth’ Twitter review: Ken Karunaas impresses audiences; Suraj Venjaramoodu adds charm; music wins praise | – The Times of India
-
Science1 week agoIndustrial chemicals have reached the middle of the oceans, new study shows
-
Science1 week agoHow a Melting Glacier in Antarctica Could Affect Tens of Millions Around the Globe
-
Culture1 week agoTest Your Memory of Great Lines From Classic Irish Poems
-
Sports5 days agoIOC addresses execution of 19-year-old Iranian wrestler Saleh Mohammadi
-
New Mexico3 days agoClovis shooting leaves one dead, four injured



