Connect with us

Finance

US colleges are cutting majors and slashing programs after years of putting it off

Published

on

US colleges are cutting majors and slashing programs after years of putting it off

Christina Westman dreamed of working with Parkinson’s disease and stroke patients as a music therapist when she started studying at St. Cloud State University.

But her schooling was upended in May when administrators at the Minnesota college announced a plan to eliminate its music department as it slashes 42 degree programs and 50 minors.

It’s part of a wave of program cuts in recent months, as U.S. colleges large and small try to make ends meet. Among their budget challenges: Federal COVID relief money is now gone, operational costs are rising and fewer high school graduates are going straight to college.

The cuts mean more than just savings, or even job losses. Often, they create turmoil for students who chose a campus because of certain degree programs and then wrote checks or signed up for student loans.

“For me, it’s really been anxiety-ridden,” said Westman, 23, as she began the effort that ultimately led her to transfer to Augsburg University in Minneapolis. “It’s just the fear of the unknown.”

Advertisement

At St. Cloud State, most students will be able to finish their degrees before cuts kick in, but Westman’s music therapy major was a new one that hadn’t officially started. She has spent the past three months in a mad dash to find work in a new city and sublet her apartment in St. Cloud after she had already signed a lease. She was moving into her new apartment Friday.

For years, many colleges held off making cuts, said Larry Lee, who was acting president of St. Cloud State but left last month to lead Blackburn College in Illinois.

College enrollment declined during the pandemic, but officials hoped the figures would recover to pre-COVID levels and had used federal relief money to prop up their budgets in the meantime, he said.

“They were holding on, holding on,” Lee said, noting colleges must now face their new reality.

Higher education made up some ground last fall and in the spring semester, largely as community college enrollment began to rebound, National Student Clearinghouse Research Center data showed.

Advertisement

But the trend for four-year colleges remains worrisome. Even without growing concerns about the cost of college and the long-term burden of student debt, the pool of young adults is shrinking.

Birth rates fell during the Great Recession of 2007 to 2009 and never recovered. Now those smaller classes are preparing to graduate and head off to college.

“It’s very difficult math to overcome,” said Patrick Lane, vice president at the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, a leading authority on student demographics.

Complicating the situation: the federal government’s chaotic overhaul of its financial aid application. Millions of students entered summer break still wondering where they were going to college this fall and how they would pay for it. With jobs still plentiful, although not as much as last year, some experts fear students won’t bother to enroll at all.

Advertisement

“This year going into next fall, it’s going to be bad,” said Katharine Meyer, a fellow in the Governance Studies program for the Brown Center on Education Policy at the nonprofit Brookings Institution. “I think a lot of colleges are really concerned they’re not going to make their enrollment targets.”

Many colleges like St. Cloud State already had started plowing through their budget reserves. The university’s enrollment rose to around 18,300 students in fall 2020 before steadily falling to about 10,000 students in fall 2023.

St. Cloud State’s student population has now stabilized, Lee said, but spending was far too high for the reduced number of students. The college’s budget shortfall totaled $32 million over the past two years, forcing the sweeping cuts.

Some colleges have taken more extreme steps, closing their doors. That happened at the 1,000-student Birmingham-Southern College in Alabama, the 900-student Fontbonne University in Missouri, the 350-student Wells College in New York and the 220-student Goddard College in Vermont.

Cuts, however, appear to be more commonplace. Two of North Carolina’s public universities got the green light last month to eliminate more than a dozen degree programs ranging from ancient Mediterranean studies to physics.

Advertisement

Arkansas State University announced last fall it was phasing out nine programs. Three of the 64 colleges in the State University of New York system have cut programs amid low enrollment and budget woes.

Other schools slashing and phasing out programs include West Virginia University, Drake University in Iowa, the University of Nebraska campus in Kearney, North Dakota State University and, on the other side of the state, Dickinson State University.

Experts say it’s just the beginning. Even schools that aren’t immediately making cuts are reviewing their degree offerings. At Pennsylvania State University, officials are looking for duplicative and under-enrolled academic programs as the number of students shrinks at its branch campuses.

Particularly affected are students in smaller programs and those in the humanities, which now graduate a smaller share of students than 15 years ago.

“It’s a humanitarian disaster for all of the faculty and staff involved, not to mention the students who want to pursue this stuff,” said Bryan Alexander, a Georgetown University senior scholar who has written on higher education. “It’s an open question to what extent colleges and universities can cut their way to sustainability.”

Advertisement

For Terry Vermillion, who just retired after 34 years as a music professor at St. Cloud State, the cuts are hard to watch. The nation’s music programs took a hit during the pandemic, he said, with Zoom band nothing short of “disastrous” for many public school programs.

“We were just unable to really effectively teach music online, so there’s a gap,” he said. “And, you know, we’re just starting to come out of that gap and we’re just starting to rebound a little bit. And then the cuts are coming.”

For St. Cloud State music majors such as Lilly Rhodes, the biggest fear is what will happen as the program is phased out. New students won’t be admitted to the department and her professors will look for new jobs.

“When you suspend the whole music department, it’s awfully difficult to keep ensembles alive,” she said. “There’s no musicians coming in, so when our seniors graduate, they go on, and our ensembles just keep getting smaller and smaller.

“It’s a little difficult to keep going if it’s like this,” she said.

Advertisement

___

The Associated Press’ education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Recession? Really? Come on…: Morning Brief

Published

on

Recession? Really? Come on…: Morning Brief

This is The Takeaway from today’s Morning Brief, which you can sign up to receive in your inbox every morning along with:

And just like that, everyone is a recession expert.

Two weeks ago, most self-proclaimed finance experts hadn’t uttered the word recession since it was fashionable in late 2022/early 2023.

From late July to early August, the prevailing sentiment of those seemingly in the know was 1) Nvidia (NVDA) shares were due for another 50% move after earnings on Aug. 28; 2) a 10% year-end rally for the S&P 500; and 3) a 100% move in Nvidia’s stock price in 2025.

Yet here we are, with the pros scaring the heck out of everyone the past week on the potential for a recession after a “bad” jobs report last Friday. Two top Wall Street banks raised their recession probabilities this week, for example.

Advertisement

These pros have voiced their concerns on TV, social media, and in research reports, but they also conveyed them to global trading desks. Markets were pushed into choppy seas as crowded AI trades such as AMD (AMD) have been dumped, with no nod to their underlying fundamentals.

All this recession talk feels like BS to me, an excuse to shake out the average investor so institutional players could get back into high-flying names at cheaper prices. Everyone does know that a recession often means negative economic growth, right? Or a significant slowdown in the economy that lasts quarters or even years?

So the US economy is going to go from 2.8% second quarter GDP growth and a long period of steady expansion to slightly negative growth or worse sometime within the next six months? An economy still creating a good clip of jobs each month is going to begin producing job losses in the near future?

Where is the evidence to support this? What’s the trigger for it? Don’t hit me up on X, formerly Twitter, and say it’s interest rates because the economy has been doing just fine during this high rate period.

Lost in recession BS this week was an ISM services report, which includes data on business activity, new orders, employment, and supplier deliveries. The index clocked in at 51.4%, up from 48.8% in June.

Advertisement

Numbers over 50% are seen as positive for the economy. Most companies in the report said business was either flat or expanding gradually.

Then, initial jobless claims totaled a seasonally adjusted 233,000 for the week — a drop of 17,000. The Street was looking for a print of around 240,000.

Corporate earnings season has gone quite well too. The majority of well-known public companies are easily beating sales and profit forecasts, not shocking the masses with giant misses. Outlooks have been solid.

That’s recessionary? Come on!

Advertisement

Now, I am not going to sit here and blow smoke and say everything is peachy. Many households are struggling to make ends meet because of sticky inflation, something I was reminded of when chatting with P&G’s (PG) CEO Jon Moeller a week ago.

I think the interview by Yahoo Finance’s Brooke DiPalma at the NYSE with Dine Brands (DIN) CEO John Peyton was also eye-opening on this front.

“It’s a value war. It’s a fight for share of wallet. … At a time when our target guest is dining out less, we have to make sure that when they do choose to dine out — IHOP or Applebee’s or Fuzzy’s are their first choice,” Peyton said.

The same goes for DiPalma’s exclusive interview with Molson Coors (TAP) CEO Gavin Hattersley.

“Consumers [are] making different pack sizes choices,” Hattersley said. He said this behavior has been going on “for a while” and is “pretty consistent through through Q2.”

Advertisement

Conversations I had this past week with top leaders further shed light on these macro challenges.

Disney (DIS) CFO Hugh Johnston told me demand at its theme parks tailed off in the final few weeks of the quarter. The company sees this slowdown persisting for the next few quarters.

“We certainly see consumers behaving in a way — I wouldn’t call it recessionary necessarily — they’re watching their pennies a little bit more,” Johnston said. Lost in the sauce, though, was a strong quarter for Disney’s streaming businesses. In a recession, people usually cut unnecessary expenses.

Ralph Lauren (RL) CEO Patrice Louvet told me (video above) this when I asked him if the consumer is behaving recessionary: “I think it’s pretty clear wherever you look that the overall consumer is being pressured by the cumulative effect of inflationary pressures and interest rates. As far as our core consumer is concerned, we actually find them to be very resilient.”

The company still notched sales growth in its North American stores.

Advertisement

All in all, you don’t get the sense the economy has already jumped over a cliff and is falling to the ground. As a result, it’s hard to justify some of these severe down days we have witnessed in markets this week.

What appears to be unfolding is a gradual cooling in the economy that could prove short-lived, especially if the Fed cuts rates, as Cognizant (CTSH) CEO Ravi Kumar told me on my Opening Bid podcast this week.

Labor market developments of late “seem more consistent with post-reopening normalization and gradual rates drag than any current shock or accelerating weakness but the risk is present,” said 22V Research strategist Peter Williams in a note this week.

I think that’s a fair assessment. What’s not fair is all this recession hysteria talk.

Three times each week, I field insight-filled conversations with the biggest names in business and markets on my Opening Bid podcast. Find more episodes on our video hub. Watch on your preferred streaming service. Or listen and subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you find your favorite podcasts.

Advertisement

In the below Opening Bid episode, Trump’s former nominee to the Federal Reserve Judy Shelton shares why the Fed should be focused on 0% inflation.

This embedded content is not available in your region.

Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices

Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Private Credit Is Eyeing Bigger Margins on Loans: Credit Weekly

Published

on

Private Credit Is Eyeing Bigger Margins on Loans: Credit Weekly

(Bloomberg) — The turmoil in global markets this past week is causing private credit funds to question whether they should reconsider the ever-tighter loan margins they’re demanding.

Most Read from Bloomberg

Industry stalwarts such as Ares Management Corp. and Blackstone Inc. have been charging less for private credit for most of this year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg News, as they try to snatch business away from the syndicated loan market. But that strategy may change after recession fears have risen amid a slew of worrying economic reports.

The market turmoil that followed is causing a rethink about “some of the desirability of the spread compression that we’ve seen in the last few months,” David Golub, chief executive officer at Golub Capital BDC Inc., said in an earnings call this week. It “may take some of the steam out of some of the parties that have been most receptive to reducing spreads in the private market.”

The $1.7 trillion private credit industry has grown rapidly in the past few years, as higher rates forced buyout firms to look further afield for funding while traditional lenders pulled back. Banks have become more competitive in recent months as they try to retain leveraged loan market share. In response, credit funds started pushing their pricing down, raising concerns about a potential race to the bottom.

Advertisement

For bigger private credit loans, the interest above benchmarks that lenders demand has fallen by at least 100 basis points, or 1 percentage point, since the start of last year, according to a Bloomberg analysis.

For example, the private credit loan helping to fund Genstar Capital’s purchase of a stake of payment processor AffiniPay came in at 4.75 percentage points over the Secured Overnight Financing Rate.

In Europe, a deal for Iris Software had portions that priced at 5 percentage points over the Sterling Overnight Index Average and 4.75 percentage points over the Secured Overnight Financing Rate. Last year, margins were more typically at least 575 basis points.

“If the data starts to present a clearer hard landing expectation,” then “we are going to have the opportunity to widen credit spreads,” said Andrew Davies, head of CVC Credit in London, but “we probably need a longer period of volatility to support a significant move wider.”

Advertisement

This week’s turbulence did highlight one advantage of private credit for borrowers, however. While the debt is typically more expensive, there is no risk for borrowers that the pricing increases through syndication. A CVC-led consortium opted for private credit this week to help finance its £5.4 billion ($6.9 billion) buyout of Hargreaves Lansdown Plc, an investment platform.

By contrast, loan deals for SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment Inc., SBA Communications Corp. and Focus Financial Partners in the broadly-syndicated market were postponed as the risk premium on junk-rated corporate bonds rose to its highest level since late 2023. Prices on US leveraged loans fell to their lowest level of the year on Aug. 5.

“One of the benefits of private credit, and we’ve seen some deals pulled from the broadly syndicated market this week, just given some of that volatility, is better execution at the end of the day,” Bryan High, who leads the global private finance group at Barings, told analysts on a call this week. “We’ve definitely seen an increase in activity.”

Week in Review

  • The week began with a bang that slowly faded into more of a whimper, as spreads on US investment-grade corporate bonds surged to 111 basis points on Monday before settling back down to 103 basis points on Thursday, about 10 basis points above their level on July 29.

    • Bonds broadly gained after a weaker-than-expected jobs report on Aug. 2 raised concerns that the economy was slowing at a faster rate than previously understood, and the Federal Reserve might have to be more aggressive about cutting rates.

    • But corporate bonds had trouble keeping up early in the week, pushing credit spreads wider. Credit markets broadly shut down, with no companies selling debt on Monday in the high-grade US market. Even in the staid world of asset backed securities, T-Mobile US Inc. postponed a sale of more than $500 million in asset backed securities.

    • Later in the week, markets stabilized, helped by a Bank of Japan official signaling it wouldn’t keep hiking rates if markets are unstable. On Wednesday, companies led by Meta Platforms Inc., parent of Facebook, sold about $32 billion of US high-grade corporate bonds. In Europe, a pair of deals hit on on Thursday, effectively reopening that market.

  • For riskier borrowers, the turmoil in global markets threatened to end a summer debt boom that helped some of the riskiest US companies cut borrowing costs, push out maturities and even defer interest payments.

    • The change in tone was obvious on Monday, when SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment Inc. shelved its planned refinancing of a $1.55 billion term loan, while SBA Communications Corp. postponed the repricing of a $2.3 billion term loan. On Tuesday a $3.65 billion package for Focus Financial Partners was delayed, and market participants expect more lower rated deals will be pulled. In Europe, three days this week saw no bond sales.

    • But in a sign of how fear abated later in the week, six borrowers sold more than $4 billion of bonds in the US junk market on Thursday, the busiest day since May.

  • As fear rises of potentially slowing economic growth, creditors’ patience with Europe’s delinquent borrowers is wearing thin, with lenders now more willing to seize the assets of companies that fail to pay their debts.

    • Creditors are currently running a sales process for Hotel Bauer after seizing the Venetian landmark from the ruins of Rene Benko’s Signa empire. Elsewhere, Carlyle Group took over London Southend Airport following a dispute over an alleged breach of the terms of a pandemic-era rescue package. And Oaktree Capital Management won control of Italian football club FC Internazionale Milano after its Chinese owner defaulted on a loan.

  • China’s credit market was in some ways insulated from the tumult of the week. A series of Chinese borrowers turned to the lower cost and relatively-stable yuan bond market to get financing, including Pizhou Industrial Investment Holding Group Co., a Chinese local government financing vehicle.

    • ByteDance Ltd., the Chinese owner of TikTok, is preparing to refinance a $5 billion loan by another three years, people familiar with the matter said, in what would be one of the largest such deals for the country’s borrowers this year.

On the Move

Advertisement
  • Royal Bank of Canada’s head of US high-yield debt trading Prashant Radhakrishnan has left the firm, according to people familiar with the matter.

  • Mizuho Financial Group Inc. has hired two bankers from Barclays Plc for its leveraged finance and financial sponsors teams in the US, people with knowledge of the matter said. George Lee has joined as a managing director in Mizuho’s leveraged finance group. The firm has also hired Corey LoVerme, who will join as a managing director in its financial sponsors group in November after a leave.

  • BlueBay Asset Management’s head of European high-yield, Justin Jewell, has left the firm and will join Ninety One Asset Management, according to spokespeople at the two companies.

  • LibreMax Capital is hiring Powell Eddins, who headed US asset backed securities and collateralized loan obligation research at Barclays Plc in New York. Eddins joined Barclays in March 2023 after stints at both Credit Suisse and Wells Fargo & Co., according to his LinkedIn profile.

  • Leonard Xie has left Citigroup to join Corbin Capital Partners, where he’ll be a quantitative investment analyst focusing on collateralized loan obligation investments across the firm’s credit platform, according to a Corbin spokesperson.

  • Kohlberg & Company, a middle market private equity firm, has hired Zach Bahor from Stone Point Capital as a managing director in credit and capital markets.

  • Carlyle Group Inc. is hiring Solomon Cole from AllianceBernstein for its private credit platform, according to people with knowledge of the matter.

Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek

©2024 Bloomberg L.P.

Continue Reading

Finance

Don't make this big mistake with retirement funds when you change jobs

Published

on

Don't make this big mistake with retirement funds when you change jobs

When you switch jobs, the basic advice is to roll over your old employer-sponsored retirement account to an individual retirement account, or IRA. Sounds easy, but beware.

I know because I’ve done this a few times. And have learned to keep it simple.

My method: I divvy my rollover up between a handful of low-fee index funds. I have also carved out a portion for a target-date fund, a “set-it-and-forget-it” way to invest based on the date of retirement. (As you age, the fund shifts the account’s investments from stocks to less volatile choices, such as cash and bonds.)

But guess what?

That’s not what many people do, according to recent research from Vanguard Group. Instead, their money is transferred from a former employer’s 401(k) plan to an IRA, usually at another financial services firm, and the balance goes into a market-type cash account that generally pays a marginal rate of interest.

Advertisement

Nearly a third of those who rolled retirement savings into IRAs at Vanguard in 2015 still had the balance sitting in cash seven years later. Not cool. You lose years of potential gains from being invested in stocks, which compound and boost your wealth for your golden years.

FILE - In this Tuesday, May 20, 2008, file photo, John Bogle, founder of The Vanguard Group, talks during an interview with The Associated Press, in New York. Vanguard announced Wednesday, Jan. 16, 2019, that John C.

John Bogle: the late founder of the Vanguard Group was an index fund evangelist. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan) (ASSOCIATED PRESS)

We’re not talking about chump change here. For investors under age 55, the estimated long-term benefit of investing in a target-date fund (versus staying in cash) upon rollover is equivalent to, on average, an increase of at least $130,000 in retirement wealth at age 65, according to Vanguard.

“How many people stayed in cash and for how long far exceeded our expectations,” Andy Reed, Vanguard’s head of investor behavior research and co-author of the study, told me.

Most older investors, however — and/or those with balances exceeding $100,000 — moved out of cash within the first few months after the rollover. Compared to men, women, however, were significantly more likely to remain in cash for years after the rollover.

Read more: What is the retirement age for Social Security, 401(k), and IRA withdrawals?

Advertisement

There are several ways to handle retirement savings when leaving jobs. You can keep your 401(k) balance with your old company, roll the money into a new employer’s 401(k) plan, or move it into an IRA.

The downside to keeping retirement money at a former employer, of course, is that you can’t add any more money to it. And you’re stuck investing only in that specific menu of investments. An IRA will typically offer many more choices.

When you roll your 401(k) account into an IRA, the company that administers the plan typically liquidates your holdings, then moves the cash into your IRA. But, it doesn’t automatically invest it for you. “We often see people assume their IRA cash will be auto-invested, similar to a workplace plan such as a 401(k),” Rita Assaf, vice president of retirement products at Fidelity Investments, told Yahoo Finance.

Put it down to confusion, “not necessarily about investing, but with the mechanics of IRAs,” Reed of Vanguard said. “It’s not that people intentionally want to make this money mistake. This is not deliberate and part of a master plan. It’s out of sight, out of mind.”

Advertisement

In another survey of over 500 Vanguard IRA clients who completed a rollover in 2023 but were still in cash in June, about two-thirds had no idea how their IRA money was invested.

The remainder said they never got around to investing it, or they didn’t want to risk putting their savings into stocks, or they simply felt overwhelmed by their IRA choices. Reed said: “You can have too much of a good thing when it comes to choice.”

Given all the job changing across all generations in recent years, this mistake is pretty significant, particularly for younger workers. “If you want to have any chance of retiring and living the life you want in retirement, then you’re going to have to have a large portion of your retirement savings allocated to equities to maximize your chance of success,” Reed said.

Have a question about about retirement? Personal finances? Anything career-related? Click here to send Kerry Hannon a note. 

To improve retirement outcomes, you need to stay invested consistently.

Advertisement

One solution: Make it possible for financial services firms to invest rollovers to IRA accounts automatically into a target-date fund or something akin to how many employers now enroll workers automatically into these diversified accounts when they come on board.

Virtually all 401(k) plan sponsors and the majority of state auto-IRA programs use target-date funds when they automatically enroll workers in a retirement plan. Track record: not bad. Vanguard’s Target Retirement Fund 2050 is up 11.4% to date and 10.1% over the past five years.

Senior couple using laptop while sitting on sofa in living room at homeSenior couple using laptop while sitting on sofa in living room at home

Rolling over an IRA? Your best move is to have a plan, says T. Rowe Price. (Photo: Getty Creative) (PIKSEL via Getty Images)

This way you don’t have to know what an index fund or the other nitty-gritty of investment lingo.

Until the laws are changed, your best move is to have a plan for how you want your savings invested before you initiate a rollover, said Lindsay Theodore, a senior manager in advisory services at T. Rowe Price.

Call the firm where you’re moving your money to and get an idea of what would be an appropriate investment, she added. “Having a good understanding up front as to what that process is going to look like can help you get your money invested right away, so it doesn’t get stuck in a cash limbo.”

Advertisement

Kerry Hannon is a Senior Columnist at Yahoo Finance. She is a career and retirement strategist, and the author of 14 books, including “In Control at 50+: How to Succeed in The New World of Work” and “Never Too Old To Get Rich.” Follow her on X @kerryhannon.

Click here for the latest personal finance news to help you with investing, paying off debt, buying a home, retirement, and more

Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending