Connect with us

Finance

Tesla Financing: In-House And Third-Party Options | Bankrate

Published

on

Tesla Financing: In-House And Third-Party Options | Bankrate

Key takeaways

  • Tesla offers in-house financing in several states, along with the option for borrowers to secure their own loan through an outside lender.
  • The Tesla financing process requires borrowers to arrange for funds ahead of vehicle delivery.
  • The most competitive auto loan rates tend to be reserved for borrowers with strong credit history.

Tesla remains one of the most popular routes to driving electric, with the automotive brand’s share of EV sales just below 50 percent in the second quarter, according to Cox Automotive. However, with prices around $40,000 for those wanting to purchase new, securing an auto loan is the right first step for most drivers.

Consider the available options for getting behind the wheel of a Tesla and whether in-house or third-party financing is best for your needs. 

Tesla in-house financing

Tesla offers its own financing through its online platform. Buyers can finance and arrange vehicle delivery all in one place. While this option is not available in all states, it can be a good option for shoppers who prefer convenience. 

Tesla outlines a few basic steps for drivers who choose in-house financing: 

  1. Submit an application: Once you have started your online order and designed your Tesla, you can prequalify for financing. This is done under the ‘Payment Method’ section of your account. Once you choose ‘Tesla’ as your financing option and provide how much you would like to borrow, you can submit your application.  
  2. Receive confirmation: Following the application step, your credit will be reviewed and a decision will be made in the “Payment Method: section of your account. 
  3. Accept offer: You can accept the offer within your account and a Tesla Advisor will connect to arrange for vehicle delivery. If you have not received approval, an advisor will contact you within one business day. 

Tesla does not charge any prepayment penalties or fees. It also allows borrowers to choose a preferred monthly payment in the application process. It’s smart to calculate how much you can afford ahead of applying with an auto loan calculator. 

However, do not focus solely on the monthly payment. Remember that a longer loan term will result in a smaller payment but more spent over the course of the loan. More than that, every extra dollar that goes toward interest over a longer period of time is a dollar not going into an emergency fund or an investment portfolio. If you are worried about overextending your budget and having less available for your savings, consider a shorter-term or a less expensive vehicle. 

Advertisement

Third-party Tesla financing 

If you live in one of Tesla’s serviced states, in-house financing can be a strong option. However, to get the best auto loan rate, it is smart to compare auto loan rates with other lenders.

Lender APR Loan terms Loan amount
Tesla financing  Starting at 1.99% 36 to 84 months Not specified 
Tenet 6.39%-15.75% 36–84 months $15,000–$95,000
myAutoLoan Starting at 7.24% 24–84 months Starting at $8,000
Autopay Starting at 4.99% 12–84 months $8,000–$150,000

If you are opting for a third-party auto loan, applying with a lender is necessary before you can purchase through Tesla.

  1. Secure loan approval: Before your vehicle can be delivered, you must apply for and secure financing. If you have a relationship with a bank or credit union, it can be wise to start your shopping there. Otherwise, compare offers from online lenders and loan aggregators. 
  2. Share lienholder information: After you have secured approval with a lender, you must share that information with Tesla. The institution will have a lienholder address that needs to be confirmed and shared. 
  3. Arrange for payment: Lastly, you will be asked to share the payment with Tesla as soon as it is arranged to be delivered. You are responsible for submitting the amount due and the balance ahead of delivery. Also, at this point, it is important that you sign the provided Motor Vehicle Purchase Agreement.  

Benefits and risks of financing a Tesla

As with any sort of loan, there is an inherent risk that comes with financing a Tesla. But if you have crunched the numbers and feel confident in your ability to keep up with the monthly payments, it is a sound way to purchase an EV. Consider the pros and cons of financing a Tesla. 

Pros

  • Can help you afford the most advanced Tesla available.
  • Spreads out the high expense over time rather than all at once.
  • The car will be yours once the loan ends.
Red circle with an X inside

Cons

  • Puts you at risk for damaged credit in the future.
  • You will be stuck with a Tesla for longer than if you chose to lease.
  • Expensive monthly payments.

Next steps 

Buying a Tesla is an attractive option for shoppers who want to cut down on gas costs while also preserving the environment. But luxury comes at a cost. If you choose to finance a Tesla, determine which auto loan fits your needs and keep up with your payments to mitigate any future financial issues.

Advertisement

Finance

State aims to reclaim $850K from campaign finance vendor

Published

on

State aims to reclaim 0K from campaign finance vendor

OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) — The state is now looking to recoup around $850,000 from a company they said didn’t meet deadlines to create a campaign finance website.

It’s The Guardian and was supposed to be up and running in October, but that didn’t happen. The Guardian is the name of the state’s online campaign finance reporting system.

“They were unable to deliver a compliant system,” said Ethics Commission Executive Director Leeanne Bruce Boone during their meeting on Friday.

The company at the center of it all is RFD and Associates, based in Austin, Texas. They were hired in December 2024 to begin the project of creating The Guardian 2.0.

The previous company, according to the commission, was with Civix. However, problems arose between the state and that company, so they had to shift and find a new vendor.

Advertisement

The commission appropriated around $2.2 million for the endeavor.

Months went by, and according to the commission’s timeline, deadlines were missed altogether.

Dates in June were missed, and in August, the company received a warning from the Ethics Commission. The Office of Management and Enterprise Services (OMES) had to get involved in October and conduct an independent technical assessment.

The October date was proposed by the company, but it wasn’t met. In November, a formal notice of system failures and vendor non-compliance was noted.

“None of the milestones were met,” said Bruce Boone during the meeting. “Extensive corrective steps over many months. Written warnings were sent.”

Advertisement

At the Friday meeting, the commission voted to cut the contract with the company, and a contract with the previous one was then sent out.

“Terminate the contract and proceed with legal action,” said Bruce Boone.

Bruce Boone said that in total $850,000 was actually spent throughout this process on RFD. The new contract with Civix, she said, is estimated to cost over $230,000 and should last for three years. The effort is needed ahead of the 2026 election.

Now the commission has decided to bring in the Attorney General’s Office to see if they can get the money back.

“I take very seriously my role to ensure that taxpayer dollars are spent fairly and appropriately,” AG Drummond said in a statement. “My office stands ready to take legal action to recover damages, hold those responsible accountable, and work with the Ethics Commission to ensure the public has a reliable means to access campaign finance reports.”

Advertisement

News 4 attempted to get a statement out of the Chief Operating Officer of RFD and Associates, who had been in the meeting but quickly left after the commission voted.

“No comment,” said COO Scott Glover.

What would you say to taxpayers about that?

In response, he said, “I don’t agree with the ethics commission’s decision. That’s all I have to say.”

The Guardian had been delayed by several months, but the commission did respond appropriately and timely manner to requests made for documents.

Advertisement

The Guardian was back online Friday afternoon.

Continue Reading

Finance

One.funding and MV Commercial launch MV Asset Finance

Published

on

One.funding and MV Commercial launch MV Asset Finance

One.funding has partnered with UK-based MV Commercial to introduce MV Asset Finance, which offers an alternative method for MV Commercial’s customers to secure finance, according to a LinkedIn post.

In developing MV Asset Finance, representatives from One.funding worked closely with MV Commercial’s team to better understand business priorities and the requirements of their customer base.

Advertisement

Access deeper industry intelligence

Experience unmatched clarity with a single platform that combines unique data, AI, and human expertise.

Find out more


According to the post, the service aims to remove friction, ensure complete transparency, and enable a seamless process from initial engagement to completion by integrating support within MV Commercial’s operations and presenting it under their brand.

MV Commercial supplies fleet solutions for vehicles within the UK.

The company’s offerings include trucks, trailers, and light commercial vehicles that are available for sale, rental, or contract hire.

Its current rental and Ready to Go fleets consist of 2,000 specialist trucks, vans, and trailers across various depots in Airdrie, Grantham, Livingston, Oxford, Haydock, and London Luton.

Advertisement

One.funding CEO Lee Schofield said: “At One.funding, we’ve 20 years of experience in building point-of-sale finance that fits naturally into how businesses sell. MV Asset Finance shows what’s possible when that experience is embedded into the MV Commercial journey, making it easier for their customers to keep moving and keep growing.”

A recent example involved AMK Plant & Tipper Hire, which added a DAF FAD XD450 Construction eight-by-four tipper truck to its fleet, the company’s first DAF tipper purchase.

The transaction was finalised in three weeks; MV Commercial supplied the vehicle while financing was arranged through the newly launched MV Asset Finance framework.

Advertisement


Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

RFSD board approves financial assurances, reviews annual audit

Published

on

RFSD board approves financial assurances, reviews annual audit

The Roaring Fork School District Board of Education approved its annual financial accreditation assurances and reviewed the district’s 2024-25 audited financial statements during its meeting on Wednesday, according to a district news release.

The audit, presented by McMahan and Associates, found the district’s overall financial position to be stable and identified areas for continued improvement in internal controls and financial processes. The district’s General Fund balance remains above minimum levels required by board policy.

Chief Financial Officer Christy Chicoine said the audit reflects progress following prior concerns identified in earlier reviews.



“We have made significant improvements compared to the prior year’s audit as a Finance Department, and I am grateful for the finance team’s commitment towards those improvements as demonstrated in this audit,” Chicoine said. “While we still have work to do to continue to sustain and enhance the district’s fiscal management, the audit report indicates we are clearly headed in the right direction.”

Superintendent Anna Cole said the findings validate work undertaken over the past two years to rebuild internal systems and improve transparency.

Advertisement



“Over the past two years, our teams have worked diligently and transparently to rebuild internal financial systems that left the district at risk,” Cole said. “The outcomes of this audit are evidence that we are on track.”

Cole said the timing of the audit is significant as the district begins developing its budget for the 2026-27 school year and faces mounting external pressures.

“We couldn’t have stabilized internal systems at a better time,” she said. “As we begin the budgeting process for the 26/27 school year, we face external challenges like declining enrollment, instability of state and federal funding, and a rising cost of living that is outpacing staff and teacher salaries. This audit is an important confirmation that our finances are in order as we prepare to navigate oncoming challenges.”

Board President Lindsay DeFrates said the board is better positioned to plan ahead following the audit’s conclusions.

Advertisement

“We are grateful for the leadership of Chief Chicoine and the hard work of the district finance and human resources teams,” DeFrates said. “We are now in a much better place financially and will move forward with clarity, transparency and accountability, able to better navigate the challenges to come.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending