Connect with us

Finance

New report suggests long-term worries for Vatican finances

Published

on

New report suggests long-term worries for Vatican finances

ROME – A new analysis of the Vatican’s financial situation by an Italian news outlet contains both good and bad news for papal finances, pointing to relative success in efforts to contain ballooning deficits but also seemingly irreversible long-term declines.

According to an overview of the most recent financial data published July 26 by La Repubblica, Italy’s most widely read daily newspaper, the Vatican’s annual operating deficit grew by roughly $5.4 million in 2023, a lower figure than in past years. The report suggested the result was due to the impact of both spending cuts and also efforts to generate more realistic appraisals of the value of Vatican properties.

Among the cost-cutting measures adopted in recent years include new limits on hiring and contracting, as well as efforts to increase the rents collected on some Vatican properties which are leased commercially and to put others up for sale.

The report cited a recently completed financial statement approved by the Vatican’s Council for the Economy, led by German Cardinal Reinhard Marx. According to the report, the deficit for 20234 amounted to over $90 million, with income of $1.25 billion and expenses of $1.34 billion.

Income in 2023 actually grew by $30 million, according to the financial statement, but expenses also went up by $36 million due to the impact of inflation.

The statement also indicated that the size of the 2023 deficit could still shrink somewhat depending on what the actual performance of the Vatican’s investment portfolios match projections.

The Repubblica analysis also found that income from the annual Peter’s Pence collection, which supports the works of the pope, amounted to $52.5 million in 2023, an increase over the $47.2 million collected in 2022.

Advertisement

Nonetheless, the net gain from the collection was offset by the fact that the fund’s reserves were once again draw upon in 2023 to support the Roman Curia, the Vatican’s chief administrative bureaucracy, to the tune of almost $98 million.

Moreover, the long-term trend in income from the fund is clearly downwards. According to the Repubblica analysis, collections dropped 23 percent overall from 2015 to 2019, and are poised for further reductions.

To some extent, those declines may be related to financial scandals, such as the aborted $400 million purchase of a former Harrods warehouse in London that resulted in the criminal convictions of nine figures for fraud, including Italian Cardinal Angelo Becciu. Given that Peter’s Pence also is sometimes viewed as a referendum on the popularity of the current pope, various controversies surrounding Franci may also have had an impact.

More basically, however, most observers believe the core factor is that much of the Peter’s Pence income derives from wealthier nations, where Catholic populations, and therefore Catholic giving, have been in decline for decades.

Declines in income are especially worrying for Vatican accountants today, given concerns about an aging workforce and unfunded pension obligations down the line. There’s also alarm that rising costs and declining income could eventually compel the Vatican to either trim its payroll or cut salaries, or both, at time when both the volume and the complexity of the workload from around the world is increasing rapidly.

The financial statement reportedly approved by the Council for the Economy concerns the Holy See, and mostly excludes both the Government of the Vatican City State, which is responsible for administration of the physical territory – including income, for example, from the Vatican Museums – and also excludes the Institute for the Works of Religion, the so-called “Vatican bank,” which for 2023 showed $33.2 million in income and a total of $5.9 billion in client assets.

Advertisement

However, it’s considered improbable that income from either the city state or the IOR will be sufficient in coming years to offset the Vatican’s broad deficits, leaving it unclear for the moment how the losses will be sustained.

Finance

Tennessee election finance board to subpoena members of Constitutional Republicans | Chattanooga Times Free Press

Published

on

Tennessee election finance board to subpoena members of Constitutional Republicans | Chattanooga Times Free Press

Dissatisfied with a Tennessee attorney general’s investigation, the Registry of Election Finance is set to subpoena members of two Constitutional Republican groups to have them explain how they operate without registering as a political action committee.

The registry board voted Tuesday to order members of the Tennessee and Sumner County Constitutional Republicans to answer questions about their political activity at an upcoming “show cause” hearing. A sworn complaint filed by Goodlettsville businessman Wes Duenkel in November accuses the groups of acting like a PAC by making expenditures for candidates or issues but refusing to register with the state.

Five people spoke to the state investigator, but three others declined.

Registry board Chair Hank Fincher said Tuesday, “If they’re not going to talk to us, they’re going to have to assert the Fifth Amendment,” the right to avoid self-incrimination.

Registry board members requested the attorney general’s office investigate the matter in February and in late June received the results. The report amounted to short interviews in which four members denied raising or spending money for candidates. The investigation did show the group’s Facebook page at one point offered a link to donate money. The group also vetted and supported candidates for local and state elections, in addition to holding breakfasts and other political gatherings.

Advertisement

(READ MORE: Tennessee Senate incumbents face opponents calling them not conservative enough)

Co-founder Chris Spencer, who is challenging Republican Sen. Ferrell Haile, of Gallatin, in the Aug. 1 primary, caught the ire of some board members because he told the AG’s office investigator, after being asked about monthly meetings and refreshments, “I am done with questions. This is such a waste of time.”

Spencer declined to comment after Tuesday’s meeting.

Kurt Riley, another co-founder, claimed in his interview that breakfasts were free and that the sale of Tennessee Constitutional Republicans merchandise did not benefit candidates or the group’s platform. He also said the group was formed to pay for his travel and expertise.

The attorney general office’s investigation was accompanied by a letter from the deputy attorney general saying the office is not an “investigative agency” and doesn’t have the resources to conduct full-scale probes for the registry. The letter also said the registry, based on a new state law, could use other options for investigations if it is unsatisfied with the AG’s Office.

Advertisement

(READ MORE: Sumner County, Tennessee, poised to scrap human resources department)

Fincher, a Democrat, said Tuesday he was “surprised” at Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti’s “abdication” of statutory duties to investigate campaign finance issues. He noted the registry board opted to investigate matters itself and added that the board will be seeking more funding from the legislature to hire investigators.

Registry member Tom Lawless, who previously questioned the length of time it took the AG’s office to produce the report, challenged the quality of the investigation and called the AG’s action “repugnant” and “reprehensible.”

If subpoenaed members of the Constitutional Republicans decline to testify before the board, it could take “corrective actions,” Lawless said.

“Nobody is above the law, and they’re required to do certain things. And if they don’t do it, we’ll assist them with the maximum ability that we can,” Lawless added.

Advertisement

The attorney general’s office has declined to respond to questions about the letter it sent to the registry with its investigation.

Read more at TennesseeLookout.com.

    “If they’re not going to talk to us, they’re going to have to assert the Fifth Amendment,” said Registry of Election Finance member Hank Fincher. (John Partipilo/Tennessee Lookout)
 
 
Continue Reading

Finance

Prioritising climate finance

Published

on

Prioritising climate finance

To tackle these challenges head-on, climate finance must be prioritised. This involves mobilising resources to fund projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions, promote renewable energy, and enhance resilience to climate impacts. Such investments are crucial for job sustenance, creation, and economic diversification.

India’s ambitious goal of achieving Viksit Bharat, or a developed India, must be aligned with its climate action financing needs, which are estimated to require $10–12 trillion. This substantial investment is essential not only for mitigating and adapting to the impacts of climate change but also for ensuring sustainable economic growth and development. Integrating climate finance into the broader Viksit Bharat agenda is crucial, as it will enable India to build resilient infrastructure, foster innovation in green technologies, and create a robust framework for sustainable development. 

Banks and financial institutions play a pivotal role in mobilising climate finance. They are instrumental in developing innovative financial products, such as green credit, green deposits, green bonds, and climate-focused credit and investment funds, which attract both domestic and international investors. As Indian sectors transition to cleaner energy sources, there will be significant implications for financial institutions’ portfolio exposures and future investment mixes. This shift will necessitate adjustments in how financial portfolios are structured, as investments in traditional high-carbon sectors may diminish while those in sustainable and green technologies increase. 

Continue Reading

Finance

UK is 'broke and broken,' new government says amid shortfall in public finances

Published

on

UK is 'broke and broken,' new government says amid shortfall in public finances

LONDON — Britain’s new left-leaning government said Sunday that the nation is “broke and broken,” blaming the situation on its predecessors ahead of a major speech on the state of the public finances that is widely expected to lay the groundwork for higher taxes.

In a sweeping assessment three weeks after taking power, Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s office professed shock at the situation they inherited after 14 years of Conservative Party rule, while releasing a department-by-department analysis of the perceived failures of the previous government.

The critique comes a day before Treasury chief Rachel Reeves is expected to outline a 20-billion-pound ($26 billion) shortfall in public finances during a speech to the House of Commons.

“We will not shy away from being honest with the public about the reality of what we have inherited,’’ Pat McFadden, a senior member of the new Cabinet, said in a statement. “We are calling time on the false promises that British people have had to put up with and we will do what it takes to fix Britain.”

Starmer’s Labour Party won a landslide election victory earlier this month following a campaign in which critics accused both major parties of a “conspiracy of silence” over the scale of the financial challenges facing the next government.

Advertisement

Labour pledged during the campaign that it wouldn’t raise taxes on “working people,” saying its policies would deliver faster economic growth and generate the additional revenue needed by the government. The Conservatives, meanwhile, promised further tax cuts in the autumn if they were returned to office.

As proof that the previous government wasn’t honest about the challenges facing the country, Starmer’s office pointed to recent comments from former Treasury chief Jeremy Hunt confirming that he wouldn’t have been able to cut taxes this year if the Conservatives had been returned to power.

Those comments came in an interview with the BBC in which Hunt also accused Labour of exaggerating the situation to justify raising taxes now that they’ve won the election.

“The reason we’re getting all this spin about this terrible economic inheritance is because Labour wants to raise taxes,” Hunt said on July 21. “If they wanted to raise taxes, all the numbers were crystal clear before the election. … They should have levelled with the British public.”

The government on Sunday released an overview of the spending assessment Reeves commissioned shortly after taking office. She will deliver the complete report to Parliament on Monday.

Advertisement

Those findings led the new government to accuse the Conservatives of making significant funding commitments for this financial year “without knowing where the money would come from.’’

It argued that the military had been “hollowed out’’ at a time of increasing global threats and the National Health Service was “broken,’’ with some 7.6 million people waiting for care.

And despite billions spent to house migrants and combat the criminal gangs ferrying migrants across the English Channel on dangerous inflatable boats, the number of people making the crossing is still rising, Starmer’s office said. Some 15,832 people have crossed the Channel on small boats already this year, 9% more than during the same period in 2023.

“The assessment will show that Britain is broke and broken — revealing the mess that populist politics has made of the economy and public services,” Downing Street said in a statement.

The quandary the government finds itself in should be no surprise, said Paul Johnson, the director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, an independent think tank focused on Britain’s economic policies.

Advertisement

At the start of the election campaign, the institute said that the U.K. was in a “parlous fiscal position” and the new government would have to either raise taxes, cut spending or relax the rules on public borrowing.

“For a party to enter office and then declare that things are ‘worse than expected’ would be fundamentally dishonest,” the IFS said on May 25. “The next government does not need to enter office to ‘open the books.’ Those books are transparently published and available for all to inspect.”

Continue Reading

Trending