Connect with us

Finance

Letters on campaign finance, Minneapolis deaths, Oregon’s wildlife tax

Published

on

Letters on campaign finance, Minneapolis deaths, Oregon’s wildlife tax

Setting limits on campaign spending

Fifty years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Buckley v. Valeo, legitimizing the idea that spending money in elections is a form of free speech. Thirty-four years later, Citizens United v. FEC went even further, granting corporations and unions, not just individuals, the right to spend unlimited sums to influence American elections.

These rulings, and the distorted view of the First Amendment behind them, have had serious consequences. Nearly $15 billion was spent in the 2024 election cycle alone, even as large majorities of Americans agree that money in politics is a threat to our elections. Here in Oregon, where we value civic participation and close-to-the-voter elections, it’s increasingly difficult for ordinary voters to compete with massive outside spending.

Even at the state and local level, Oregonians have limited authority over how money operates in our elections. That power has been centralized in the hands of unelected judges who were never meant to write election policy for the entire nation. It’s part of why everything feels so broken: a system where citizens cannot govern the rules of their own elections is not sustainable.

There is hope. A constitutional amendment would restore the ability of Congress and the states, including Oregon, to set reasonable limits on money in politics. Our nation is at a turning point, and we need to take action now. I encourage my fellow Oregonians to learn more about this vital issue, and urge our elected officials to support a constitutional amendment that will allow us to create common sense limits on the power of money in our elections.

Maud McCole, Eugene

Advertisement

Other things to consider about Good, Pretti deaths

While we all can agree that the deaths of the two protesters in Minneapolis were regrettable, it should be noted that those deaths were entirely preventable.

First and foremost, the incompetent and corrupt Biden administration allowed millions of illegal aliens into the United States without any sort of vetting or other means of identification.

Second, the sanctuary city policy of Minneapolis makes it very difficult for law enforcement to do their job. This, coupled with a fawning media and cowardly politicians cheering on and encouraging lawlessness, contributed largely to the deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti.

Raymond Moreno, Eugene

Advertisement

Support lodging tax increase for wildlife

The most important bill (to these readers) in the 2026 legislative session is HB 4134: “1% for Wildlife.” It adds 1.25% — less than the cost of a cup of coffee a day — to the statewide Tourism Lodging Tax (TLT). This legislation had bipartisan support in the 2025 legislature, but failed to get a floor vote in the Senate before adjournment. Funds raised with this fee go directly to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife for wildlife and habitat conservation. They assure a sustainable funding stream in the face of uncertain federal funds. This year’s bill adds .25% for wildlife stewardship and rehabilitation programs, including wolf depredation compensation.

Biological diversity — both floral and faunal — knows no geopolitical bounds nor ecological/economic bounds. Wildlife species, and their habitats, abound in Oregon. They transcend whatever artificial bounds we attempt to place upon them. Local, national, and international tourists visit throughout every year to enjoy our oceans, forests, valleys, mountains, watersheds, meadows, and deserts. Thus, in addition to the intrinsic ecological value of biodiversity, the economic value of our wildlife exceeds the investment to sustain it. From whale watchers to bird watchers, hunters to fishers, wildlife opportunities abound. Let’s make sure they stay that way.

Please urge your state representative and senator to vote YES on HB 4134.

David and Judy Berg, Eugene

Former Minneapolis residents horrified

As former residents of South Minneapolis, we are observing the horrifying, sad andgratifying events unfolding in real time; the horrifying killing of Renee Nicole Good, and Alex Pretti, then the sad adolescent, cruel and destructive response of the Trump administration and his sycophants.

Advertisement

What’s gratifying is to see the same savvy and united uprising of the activist neighborhood, many public officials, and the Twin Cities, and now in Eugene, Springfield, and the many other Oregon towns. Stay strong until ICE stands down and is held accountable.

“I’m not mad at you,” she said, and then Renee Nicole Good was dead …then Alex Pretti…???

Jan Nelson, Edward Winter and Rebecca La Mothe, all Eugene, et al.

Not all protesters are vandals

The First Amendment gives us the right to peacefully assemble and to petition the government for a redress of our grievances. To me, this is more than a right. It is my responsibility. If the citizens had not risen up in 1776 in the American Revolution, we would be an English territory under a king. That would have served the king well, but not the rest of us.

So I peacefully assemble and protest against anything that infringes on my freedom or the freedom of others; against anything that goes against the protections of the Constitution’s due process of law. I protest ICE and the many laws they break to meet quota.

Advertisement

I stand on the corner with my sign and I glory in the endless stream of cars honking in agreement and the occasional middle finger. It is invigorating to see the American spirit is alive and well.

Last Friday, during this peaceful gathering on Seventh and Pearl, a second, smaller gathering took place with a different approach at a slightly different location. They made loud noises and banged on the federal building office windows to the point of breaking the glass. The message was clear and the response was predictable.

I do not favor violence to any degree, from protesters or ICE agents. It draws attention away from the message we had congregated to express. But, I caution myself and others to not use disruption, broken windows or spray paint as an excuse to lump together the entire protesting world, imposing the identity of the minority with the entire movement.

Some people are horribly disturbed at the breaking of windows and spray paint. I’m against it, too. But I am more horrified at what is happening to citizens and guests in the U.S. by the violent and illegal grabbing of people off the streets — like they did in WWII Germany to the Jewish population. So if we are outraged at a broken window more than we are outraged at cruel and atrocious illegal arrests without warrant or due process, we need to rethink our stance and our purpose.

Candy Neville, Eugene

Advertisement

Not handouts, hands up

What if we could end homelessness — not with handouts, but with high school diplomas?

Research consistently shows that lacking a diploma is the single greatest risk factor for homelessness. Yet traditional education fails millions who learn differently. Global Sovereign University exists to change that.

GSU is a 501(c)(3) educational foundation built on one principle: teach a man to fish. Our free online platform meets learners where they are — whether they’re visual thinkers failed by rigid classrooms, adults seeking trade skills, or anyone overlooked by conventional systems.

What makes us different? Gamified learning that rewards progress. AI tutoring available 24/7. And “Civilization Builders” — retired professionals volunteering as mentors to share real-world wisdom with the next generation.

We don’t measure success by grades. We measure it by changed lives: someone landing their first job, a parent helping their child with homework, a veteran transitioning to civilian employment.

Advertisement

Education shouldn’t create dependency. It should build capability. GSU provides the tools; learners build their own futures.

Visit GlobalSovereignUniversity.org to learn more, volunteer as a mentor, or support our mission. Together, we can build a bridge to freedom—one learner at a time.

Dr. Gene A Constant, Eugene

Finance

By the Numbers: Financial report reveals scale of financial costs, growth

Published

on

By the Numbers: Financial report reveals scale of financial costs, growth

Following a year marked by financial turbulence, Northwestern’s financial report for fiscal year 2025 revealed the University’s struggles and growth as they navigated a tumultuous landscape in higher education.

The latest report detailed fiscal year 2025, which began Sept. 1, 2024 and ended Aug. 31, 2025. It did not include the University’s stipulated $75 million payment to the federal government, which was part of the agreement struck in November 2025.

According to the University’s 2025 financial report, net assets sit at $16.2 billion, up from 2024’s $15.6 billion. However, the University spent almost $148 million more than it brought in during fiscal year 2025. 


In the last five fiscal years, the University has increased steadily in operating costs for assets without donor restrictions.

Advertisement

Year-to-year increases in operating costs hovered around 10% in the past five fiscal years. Simultaneously, revenue growth has decreased year to year, from 12.8% between 2021 to 2022 to only 3.9% between 2024 to 2025.

Amanda Distel, NU’s chief financial officer, identified “rising benefits expenses, litigation, new labor contracts, and rapidly unfolding federal actions” as key challenges in fiscal year 2025 in the report.

Before the deal, NU invested between $30 to $40 million each month to sustain research impacted by the federal freeze, interim President Henry Bienen confirmed in an Oct. 24 interview with The Daily.

In an attempt to reduce costs, the University announced a switch in July to UnitedHealthcare from Blue Cross Blue Shield as the University’s employee health care administrator, effective Jan. 1. However, faculty and staff have reported increased out-of-pocket costs for certain services like mental health care.

Advertisement

Financial aid increased from $618.3 million in fiscal 2024 to $638.3 million in fiscal year 2025. Among undergraduate students in the 2024-25 school year, 15% are first-generation college students and 22% receive federal Pell Grants. According to the report, most families earning less than $70,000 per year attend at no cost, and most families earning less than $150,000 per year attend tuition-free.

Tuition is the second largest source of revenue behind grants and contracts. By the end of the fiscal year, the University held $778 million in outstanding conditional awards, an increase from fiscal 2024’s $713.5 million, according to the report. 

Distel wrote that the number of gift commitments above $100,000 reached its highest in University history, calling it a “strong year of philanthropic support.”

Donor funds are categorized by whether or not restrictions were imposed on the time, use or nature of the donation. In fiscal 2025, University net assets without donor restrictions totaled $9.59 billion, or 59.1%, while net assets with donor restrictions totaled $6.65 billion, or 40.9%, of total net assets.

Advertisement

The University’s investment in construction efforts saw an immense uptick from $275.2 million in fiscal 2024 to $750.5 million in fiscal 2025.

This cost is spread across multiple projects, such as Ryan Field, which started construction in 2024 and is slated to open October 2026. The project operates with a $862 million budget, including a $480 million contribution from the Ryan family.

The Ann McIlrath Drake Executive Center, Cohen Lawn and Jacobs Center renovations also continued during the fiscal year.

Email: [email protected] 

Related Stories:

Advertisement

The Daily Explains: How does Northwestern spend its money? 

Northwestern NIH, NSF grant cessations total more than $1 billion 

Northwestern announces 3.3% tuition increase ahead of 2025-26 academic year 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

When should kids start learning about money? Advice from local financial advisor

Published

on

When should kids start learning about money? Advice from local financial advisor

When should kids start learning about money, and preparing for adult expenses like rent, car payments, and insurance?

It’s a question asked recently by an ARC Seattle viewer.

We took the question to Adam Powell, Financial Advisor at Private Advisory Group in Redmond. Powell talked with ARC Seattle co-anchor Steve McCarron to share insights on the right age to form money habits, common financial mistakes parents unknowingly pass down to their children, and practical tips to set kids up for long-term financial success.

Find more ARC Seattle stories on our YouTube page.

Comment with Bubbles
Advertisement

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

Watch ARC Seattle weekdays from 7 to 10 a.m. and 10 to 11 p.m. on KUNS, The CW Network.

Continue Reading

Finance

Soft-saving era? Gen-Z embraces new financial trend that puts experiences over long-term planning

Published

on

Soft-saving era? Gen-Z embraces new financial trend that puts experiences over long-term planning

LOS ANGELES (KABC) — Many Gen-Zers are adopting a financial approach that prioritizes quality of life in the present, a trend that’s being called “soft saving.”

Bob Wheeler, a CPA, described the mindset as a shift in how young adults balance their current lifestyle with longterm planning.

“It’s really a financial approach of ‘I want to make sure I have a good quality of life, and I’m thinking about the future,’ but not as much as the present,” Wheeler said.

For many Gen Z consumers, that can mean spending more on experiences – like vacations or concerts – rather than saving for major purchases like a car or home.

Wheeler said the approach can offer emotional benefits.

Advertisement

“I think there are definitely benefits, I mean, less anxiety, feeling like life is what you want it to be, fulfillment, versus saving for later on,” he said.

Still, financial experts caution against ignoring longterm stability. Wheeler encouraged young workers to take advantage of employer-sponsored retirement plans.

“They’re not going to do the max. They’re going to do enough to make sure they’re getting the match from your employer, so maybe they’re doing 3% or 5%. Maybe they’re not maxing out their IRAs. Maybe they’re doing $2,500,” he said.

He also stressed the importance of building an emergency fund, typically enough to cover six months of expenses.

“I want people to enjoy their life now because tomorrow is not promised,” Wheeler said. “I also just really reiterate to them ‘and you need to have some money set aside because we don’t know.’”

Advertisement

But saving for a home may not be practical for everyone. In some places, renting can be cheaper, and tenants avoid maintenance costs.

Copyright © 2026 KABC Television, LLC. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Trending