Connect with us

Finance

Legislature’s Joint Finance Committee approves 4 reading curriculums under Act 20

Published

on

Legislature’s Joint Finance Committee approves 4 reading curriculums under Act 20

Editor’s note: With low reading proficiency scores across the state, USA TODAY NETWORK-Wisconsin is exploring the causes and consequences of low literacy. This article is part of the By the Book series, which examines reading curriculum, instructional methods and solutions in K-12 education to answer the questions: Why do so many Wisconsin kids struggle to read, and what can be done about it? 

To read other stories in the series, click here.

Wisconsin’s Joint Committee on Finance approved Monday a list of four reading curricula schools can adopt to be in compliance with the state’s new reading law, Act 20. The curricula approved are those recommended by the state’s Early Literacy Curriculum Council, a nine-member council created to specifically evaluate K-3 reading curriculums for their compliance with Act 20.

The four curricula approved are:

  • Core Knowledge Language Arts K-3
  • Our EL Education Language Arts
  • Wit and Wisdom with Pk-3 Reading Curriculum
  • Bookworms Reading and Writing K-3

Act 20, signed into law last summer, requires curriculum to be backed by the “science of reading”: a decades-old body of research that explains how the brain learns to read. It includes an emphasis on phonics, which teaches students the sounds letters make and how those sounds combine in predictable patterns to form words.

The law’s changes are aimed at improving reading proficiency in the state, which has been low for years. Fewer than half of students at the state’s five largest school districts are considered proficient in reading, according to state exam scores since 2018.

Advertisement

Part of the law’s revamping of reading instruction requires schools to use specific instructional methods that are systemic and explicit by next school year. This instruction must include fluency, phonological awareness, phonemic awareness, phonics, oral language development, vocabulary, writing, comprehension and building background knowledge.

The list of approved curricula is significant because school districts that adopt one of them can receive reimbursement for up to half the cost, which can be millions of dollars. Many districts will be turning to this list as they redefine how they teach reading.

Committee Democrats, DPI worry list will open state up to litigation

This list was approved 10-4 along party lines with all Republicans on the committee voting in favor and no Democratic support. While Republicans were in favor of the four curricula recommended by the Early Literacy Curriculum Council, Democrats wanted to approve the Department of Public Instruction’s broader list.

In February, the Early Literacy Curriculum Council released its list of four recommended curricula. About 30 curriculum vendors submitted materials for evaluation by the council, and by February, it had reviewed about half, according to a memo from the Legislative Fiscal Bureau.

Advertisement

Given how much time curriculum review requires and the swift deadlines in Act 20, the council didn’t have enough time to review all the submitted curricula, the bureau’s memo said.

DPI, the state’s education agency, did its own evaluation of all the curricula, recommending 11. It rejected one of the council’s recommendations (Bookworms Reading & Writing for K-3) and added others that the council hadn’t rated. 

More on Act 20: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction asks lawmakers to change deadline for implementing part of Wisconsin’s new literacy law

In a letter to the Joint Committee on Finance, the DPI said the council’s process for evaluating curricula had exposed the state to “an unacceptable level of risk.”

Because not all vendors who submitted curriculum materials were evaluated by the council, one that wasn’t evaluated could sue, according to the Legislative Fiscal Bureau.

Advertisement

Democrats on the Joint Committee on Finance said that was reason enough to go with DPI’s recommendations. However, Republicans saw that as weak argument, opting for the four curricula from the Early Literacy Curriculum Council.

“This council, they’re experts. This is what they do,” said. Sen. Duey Stroebel during the committee meeting. “And I’m sorry I’m not going to look to DPI as, my god, the only people in the world who can pick the correct curriculum.”

He said the committee shouldn’t “water down, not give our kids the best quality curriculum” because of a “far-fetched legal theory.”

More on Act 20: Wisconsin passed a landmark literacy law 3 months ago. So what happens next?

The committee’s move is a “missed opportunity,” said state Superintendent Jill Underly in a media release.

Advertisement

“The DPI’s list of high-quality materials is robust, offers more support and flexibility, meets the definition of science-based early literacy detailed in Act 20 and mirrors materials recommended by other states undergoing similar changes,” Underly said.

The Early Literacy Curriculum Council is required to annually recommend science-based K-3 reading curricula, so Monday’s list is subject to expansion next year.

Why does the list of curricula matter?

Districts aren’t required to adopt the approved curricula, but those will be the only ones eligible for partial reimbursement — a large incentive for districts, given the cost of curriculum adoption.

Many districts will likely make the switch to new reading curriculum, if not the four approved Monday. In the past, DPI has recommended that districts use curricula positively rated by a third-party curriculum evaluation organization called EdReports.

Advertisement

At least 79% of school districts surveyed by the Department of Public Instruction in 2021 said they use a curriculum that is either not rated or is negatively rated by EdReports. About 80% of school districts participated in the survey.

Districts have been waiting for the release of curricula so they can adopt new practices, train their staff and be in compliance with Act 20 by the 2024-25 school year. The Green Bay School District, for example, has been waiting for the literacy council and DPI to release its curriculum list before it buys new reading curriculum. It plans to select something for grades kindergarten through eight in March.

Danielle DuClos is a Report for America corps member who covers K-12 education for the Green Bay Press-Gazette. Contact her at dduclos@gannett.com. Follow on Twitter @danielle_duclos. You can directly support her work with a tax-deductible donation at GreenBayPressGazette.com/RFA or by check made out to The GroundTruth Project with subject line Report for America Green Bay Press Gazette Campaign. Address: The GroundTruth Project, Lockbox Services, 9450 SW Gemini Drive, PMB 46837, Beaverton, Oregon 97008-7105.

Advertisement

Finance

Ray Dalio reveals the surprising ‘single most important reason’ he’s succeeded in investing—and it has nothing to do with finance | Fortune

Published

on

Ray Dalio reveals the surprising ‘single most important reason’ he’s succeeded in investing—and it has nothing to do with finance | Fortune

Ray Dalio built the world’s largest hedge fund on cold market logic and macro trendspotting. But when asked what really powered his rise to the top of global finance, he didn’t cite any model or macro insight at all. Instead, he credited meditation. 

“[It’s] maybe the single most important reason for whatever success I’ve had,” he told the renowned Odd Lots podcast this week. “Meaning, it has given me an equanimity to step back, to see the arc, to accept there’s a life cycle.”

Dalio often describes major crises and events in terms of cycles, and he referenced meditation as the thing that lets him step outside himself long enough to see reality clearly, rather than get caught up in headlines. But in the Odd Lots interview, he also made clear what he does with that clarity: He uses it to map out cause-and-effect relationships. 

For Dalio, meditation creates the mental distance he needs to see events—markets, politics, human conflict—as linked chains rather than emotional shocks. That lens is so central to his worldview that he referenced it over and over:

“If you understand the cause-effect relationships … you can be ahead of the game. The causes happen before the effects.”

Advertisement

He talks about politics this way, too. Instead of seeing polarization as chaos, he thinks about the “mechanics” that produce it: incentives, cycles, interest groups, constraints. He isn’t judging them morally; he’s trying to understand how each variable begets the others.

Meditation, he says, is what lets him make that shift away from the instinct to react. 

“You align the subliminal and the intellectual mind … while still feeling the emotions, but being able to look down on them and ask: How does reality work?”

Dalio’s perspective echoes core Buddhist ideas far more than the conventional Wall Street training. In much of Buddhist thought, the world is a web of causes and conditions: pratītyasamutpāda, or dependent origination. Everything arises from something else, and clinging to how we wish things were is what creates suffering, rather than the event itself. Dalio doesn’t use Buddhist language, but he describes almost the same process: Don’t impose your preferences, don’t treat incidents as isolated, and don’t get trapped in your immediate emotional reaction.

On investors who meditate

Advertisement

Dalio isn’t the only investor who sees meditation as part of the job. Ivan Feinseth, another longtime research analyst, has practiced Transcendental Meditation since 1978, when Maharishi Mahesh Yogi—the leader of the movement—visited his New Jersey high school.

The routine Feinseth describes is simple: You sit, breathe, and repeat a mantra until your thoughts stop becoming intrusions and instead flow naturally, to the extent that you can observe them. The effect he describes is almost identical to Dalio’s. 

“It does center you and relax you and calm you,” Feinseth told Fortune. “I get answers to questions … Many times I’m thinking about something and, after I meditate, I’ve found a solution.” 

Sometimes it’s trivial, like realizing his neighbor could fix a garage door with a side-mounted motor that he remembered seeing years ago (“We do have an incredibly accurate memory”). Other times, it’s the structure of a major research report or the right way into a thorny market call.

“Once you start to relax, things become clearer,” he said. “Sometimes the best way to think about something is not thinking about something.”

Advertisement

Few professions blur emotion and logic like investing, Feinseth argued.

“People act emotionally and then use logic to justify an emotional reaction,” he said. Meditation doesn’t remove that dynamic, but it can help keep you from participating in it, especially during selloffs that are obviously out of step with fundamentals.

Research on mindfulness has shown mixed but meaningful effects on investor decision-making. A 2020 thesis on mindfulness and trading found no reduction in overconfidence and even higher anchoring among more mindful traders. However, a research brief from investment firm Addepar argues that mindfulness can interrupt biased, stress-driven reactions by shifting cognition from the amygdala to the prefrontal cortex, creating a pause before acting. 

In practice, mindfulness means noticing a fear response during a selloff without immediately selling; recognizing when a familiar narrative is shaping an investment thesis; or stepping back from recency-driven overconfidence. Meditation doesn’t eliminate biases, but it provides a structure for identifying and disrupting them, the authors argue. 

Dalio, it appears, would agree.

Advertisement

“Whatever success in life I’ve had,” Dalio said, “is more because I know how to deal with what I don’t know, than anything.”

Continue Reading

Finance

Business continuity & disaster recovery in finance: Endpoint resiliency in a high-stakes world

Published

on

Business continuity & disaster recovery in finance: Endpoint resiliency in a high-stakes world

In financial services, “time is money” is more than a saying — it’s an unforgiving law. A few hours of downtime can mean millions lost, confidence shaken, and regulators knocking. 

As firms invest heavily in data protection, disaster recovery, and infrastructure redundancy, one critical layer often remains underinvested: endpoint resilience. The devices that connect analysts, traders, portfolio managers, risk teams, and back‑office staff to core systems are often the weakest link, and when they fail, the rest of the architecture can’t save you fast enough.

Why endpoints are the last mile of risk

Regulators are already raising the bar. The FFIEC’s modern guidance for U.S. financial institutions reframes the standard from simple business continuity and disaster recovery (BC&DR) plans to operational resilience, demanding full continuity even under cyber disruption. In 2025, global regulatory regimes are similarly shifting, like DORA in the EU, for example, mandating rigorous ICT risk management, continuity, and incident response rules across financial institutions. It isn’t enough to recover your back-end systems; your users must be able to reconnect securely and fast.

Here’s the hard truth: More than half of attacks in financial services begin at endpoints. In 2024, 65% of financial institutions reported ransomware attacks. Of those, 49% experienced full encryption of datathough many also mitigated before full encryption. The average recovery cost (excluding ransom) in finance hit $2.58M in 2024, and ransom demands routinely range into the millions. 

Advertisement

When systems grind to a halt in finance, the effect isn’t just measured in spreadsheets — it’s seen on the trading floor, in anxious client calls, and across frozen payment screens. Downtime isn’t just a technical hiccup; it erodes trust and sends shockwaves across the business. A few minutes offline can mean missed trades, unsettled deals, and regulatory headaches that persist long after recovery.

Today, most downtime is tied to security incidents and not just IT failures. That means the pressure is higher, and expectations from regulators and clients are relentless. Traditional fixes like hardware swaps or reimaging can’t keep up. In finance, recovery needs to be instant, seamless, and leave no room for doubt because every moment counts.

The real costs of traditional endpoint recovery in finance

Let’s examine a few real-world barriers:

  • Scale & complexity: Financial institutions often manage tens of thousands of endpoints across trading floors, branch networks, remote staff, and data centers.
  • Critical prioritization: Some devices, such as those running trading desks or risk models, must come back online before others.
  • Forensic & compliance integrity: Overwriting or wiping devices can destroy audit trails needed for post-incident investigations and regulatory reviews.
  • Latency to value: Shipping replacement devices or reimaging at scale introduces unacceptable delays.
  • Dependency on VDI/remote desktop: But what if the endpoint itself is compromised or can’t initiate the remote session? That fallback collapses under attack.

Even in the most mature BC/DR strategies, endpoint recovery is typically an overlooked blind spot.

IGEL: Embedding continuity into every endpoint

Advertisement

IGEL’s approach to BC&DR closes this gap with endpoint‑level resilience that matches the expectations in finance. Instead of treating endpoints as passive dependencies, IGEL turns them into active recovery enablers.

  • IGEL Dual Boot & USB fallback: Each device boots into an immutable IGEL environment separate from the main system, so users can regain secure access instantly, without wiping or losing the original partition.
  • Scale with control: IGEL Universal Management Suite (UMS) orchestrates recovery across thousands of endpoints from one console while enforcing policy and priority.
  • Preserve forensic integrity: The compromised partition remains untouched, preserving logs and evidence for regulators and investigations.
  • Regulator-ready workflow: IGEL’s architecture aligns with operational resilience frameworks (e.g. DORA, FFIEC, local mandates), enabling auditable and rapid recovery steps.
  • Minimized disruption: No hardware swaps, no freight delays, no extended downtime. Users reboot and resume work in minutes — not hours, not days.

For finance, this is more than a technical improvement, it’s a structural advantage. Imagine a trading desk seamlessly rebooting into a clean environment while IT investigates. 

Making endpoint recovery the next pillar of resilience

To adopt endpoint resilience, financial leaders should:

  1. Reframe endpoint risk: View endpoints as active assets in recovery, not passive liabilities.
  2. Simulate real attacks: Test a full-scale endpoint compromise in tabletop and live drills.
  3. Tier your devices: Assign priority levels (trading, risk modeling, client-facing) and map recovery SLAs accordingly.
  4. Integrate IGEL BC&DR: Deploy the IGEL Dual Boot failover plan across endpoints layered into your continuity playbooks.
  5. Audit & certify: Use IGEL’s immutable architecture and audit trails to satisfy regulators demanding proof of quick, reliable recovery.

Conclusion: Not just resilience — Continuity without compromise

In finance, downtime bleeds value faster than any other domain. The best business continuity and disaster recovery strategies already protect data, applications, and infrastructure. But true resilience demands one more layer at the endpoints.

IGEL BC&DR empowers financial services firms to convert their most vulnerable assets into recovery enablers, shrinking downtime from days to minutes, safeguarding compliance, preserving forensic visibility, and keeping clients, stakeholders, and regulators confident through disruption.

Advertisement

If you’re ready to elevate your continuity approach and embed resilience where it really matters, see IGEL in action today.

Continue Reading

Finance

Asian stocks rise as US rate hopes soothe nerves after torrid week

Published

on

Asian stocks rise as US rate hopes soothe nerves after torrid week
Investors are awaiting the latest US inflation data this week that could guide the Federal Reserve’s decision-making on interest rates (RONALDO SCHEMIDT)

Asian markets mostly rose Monday as fresh hopes for a US interest rate cut provided some calm after last week’s rollercoaster ride fuelled by worries of a tech bubble.

The scramble to snap up all things AI has helped propel equities skywards this year, pushing several companies to records — with chip titan Nvidia last month becoming the first to top $5 trillion.

But investors have grown increasingly fearful that the vast sums pumped into the sector may have been overdone and could take some time to see profits realised, leading to warnings of a possible market correction.

That has been compounded in recent weeks by falling expectations the Federal Reserve will cut rates for a third successive time next month as stubbornly high inflation overshadows weakness in the labour market.

However, risk appetite was given a much-needed shot in the arm Friday when New York Fed boss John Williams said he still sees “room for a further adjustment” at the bank’s December 9-10 policy meeting.

Advertisement

The remarks saw the chances of a cut shoot up to about 70 percent, from 35 percent earlier.

Focus is now on the release this week of the producer price index, which will be one of the last major data points before officials gather, with other key reports postponed or missed because of the government shutdown.

“The reading carries heightened importance following the postponement of October’s personal consumption expenditures report, originally scheduled for 26 November, which removes a key datapoint from policymakers’ assessment framework,” wrote IG market analyst Fabien Yip.

“A substantially stronger-than-expected PPI outcome could reinforce concerns that inflationary pressures remain entrenched, potentially constraining the Fed’s capacity to reduce rates in December despite recent labour market softening.”

After Wall Street’s rally Friday capped a torrid week for markets, Asia mostly started on the front foot.

Advertisement

Hong Kong and Seoul jumped more than one percent, while Sydney, Singapore, Wellington and Taipei were also well up, though Shanghai and Manila retreated. US futures advanced.

Tokyo was closed for a holiday.

But while the mood is a little less fractious than last week, uncertainty continues to weigh on riskier assets, with bitcoin hovering around $87,000.

While that is up from its seven-month low of $80,553, it is still sharply down from its record $126,200 hit last month.

– Key figures at around 0230 GMT –

Advertisement

Hong Kong – Hang Seng Index: UP 1.4 percent at 25,568.08

Shanghai – Composite: DOWN 0.1 percent at 3,829.71

Tokyo – Nikkei 225: Closed for a holiday

Dollar/yen: UP at 156.70 yen from 156.39 yen on Friday

Advertisement

Euro/dollar: DOWN at $1.1515 from $1.1519

Pound/dollar: DOWN at $1.3096 from $1.3107

Euro/pound: UP at 87.92 pence from 87.88 pence

West Texas Intermediate: DOWN 0.2 percent at $57.93 per barrel

Brent North Sea Crude: DOWN 0.2 percent at $62.44 per barrel

Advertisement

New York – Dow: UP 1.1 percent at 46,245.41 (close)

London – FTSE 100: UP 0.1 percent at 9,539.71 (close)

dan/rsc

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending