Connect with us

Finance

‘I find it impossible to catch my bearings’: Yahoo Finance community reacts to Trump tariff stock market plunge

Published

on

‘I find it impossible to catch my bearings’: Yahoo Finance community reacts to Trump tariff stock market plunge

Shocked investors are searching for a light at the end of the tunnel after being hit by Trump tariffs.

Indeed a glimmer of any kind is hard to find at the moment.

Markets have shed an astounding $5.4 trillion in value in the two days since President Trump revealed big-time tariffs on major countries last Wednesday. The S&P 500 (^GSPC) is now at its lowest level in 11 months, with pros saying the carnage may not yet be over.

Futures on the S&P 500 (ES=F), Nadaq 100 (NQ=F), and Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F) are down 2.8%, 3%, and 2.5%, respectively.

Wall Street has been slashing its S&P 500 price targets for 2025, dialing up recession odds, and pontificating worst-case scenarios for the bottom lines of household name companies, from Apple (AAPL) to Amazon (AMZN) to Walmart (WMT).

Advertisement

“What I’ve been saying in my meetings lately, even before the Rose Garden [ceremony last week on tariffs], is that it’s not clear to me where [for sectors and industries] new value has been unlocked,” RBC Capital Markets strategist Lori Calvasina told Yahoo Finance. “If you are looking at individual stocks that have any of these [tariff] issues, I suspect it’s very hard to make assumptions about earnings that you can have confidence in.”

Read more: The latest news and updates on Trump’s tariffs

So with this as a backdrop, I put a straightforward question to the Yahoo Finance retail investor community in my Sunday Morning Brief newsletter: What stocks are you buying amid one of the biggest routs in recent memory, if any?

“You’re right, it’s messy right now and difficult to decide what to do,” one investor remarked.

Below are several of the best responses I received.

Advertisement

I would still love to hear from you as you navigate the markers this week. Drop me a line @BrianSozzi on X or directly via email brian.sozzi@yahoofinance.com.

“So what am I buying what am I selling? Buying, not much. Like you I find it is impossible to get my bearings on individual shares since tech began to waver last August.

“You’re right it’s messy right now and difficult to decide what to do. I have taken lumps and sold positions that I was keeping to see if they went up over time, but time ran out Thursday … they went down too much, so my marginal investments went kaput and I sold for losses ranging from 8% to 25%. Gulp.

“I have retained my IT investments which earlier this year I had moved to ETFs due to individual position volatility, but I’am facing a huge loss with Dell, (DELL) my chosen darling and only remaining tech stock, in what now looks like a horrid decison. It is a loss that I have yet to materialize but it rankles me. I may average down.

“I sold most everything where I was losing big or medium. I bought no new positions but added to two dividend payment positions as defensive measures Mercedes Benz Group (MBG.DE) and Banco BPM (BAMI.MI)

“I have kept all my (5) European defense stocks, Hensoldt (HAG.DE), Leonardo (LDO.MI), Rheinmetall (RHM.DE), losing Renk (RENK.VI) and Indra (ISMAY) due to stop losses that in the midst of battle, I inadvertently forgot to remove. (they all had big profit cushions, not crying about those sales). I kept 2 of my 3 my ETF’s related to defense … selling a US dollar denominated ETF only.

“My utility investments have done well in this sinkhole market.

“I am steeling myself for additional loss-making sales next week, as, despite a potential bounce back, I don’t expect this to be a two day calamity.

“I have kept most banks due to dividends, takeover situations and large profit cushion. I added to a German mid cap ETF as I expect there will be orders going their way. I am also keeping Mercedes Benz and Porsche (PAH3.DE) auto shares because of their potential to segue into defense related production to save themselves.

“I have also retained two engineering construction companies that are involved in oil exploration or refinery building or similar un-ecological energy activities, despite also having some green energy projects.

“I’m a 61-year-old barely-retired self-managed investor living in Michigan, heart of the US auto industry. Under Trump 1.0 I underperformed broad market indices. The president’s continuous tweets and flip-flops made rational investing challenging. I sold into negative comments, missed out on snapback rallies, and watched long-term passive investors who paid no attention to daily gyrations make sizable gains.

“This time I would learn from prior mistakes — so I thought.

“I checked charts to recall China trade war rhetoric and saw a two-week 8% drawdown in March 2018 precede a strong rally. As the Rose Garden tariff chart flashed across the internet on Wednesday, I saw my opportunity. Not knowing what to purchase with my cash hoard I went broad with QQQ (QQQ) and SPY (SPY), picking them up “on the cheap” thinking this would be capitulation of the March correction similar to 2018. I finished the day down 2%. The next day down another 5%.

“Now, with sentiment reaching extreme lows, I wait. I bite my nails for fear of further drops yet can’t chance being out of the market should a positive announcement occur (tariff “deal”, end of military conflict, or some out of the blue statement from the president).

“I ask, how a nation can offer “concessions” when its only transgression is supplying the US appetite for goods. How does a company restructure, overnight, global supply chains and manufacturing that took decades to establish? How should an investor respond when this entire “tariff” correction is resultant of one man’s simplistic US trade deficit calculations? What if this all vanishes with a single post on social media?”

Read more: How to protect your money during economic turmoil, stock market volatility

“Brian, I lived through the financial crisis as well, and in my view, this situation is very different. Unlike back then, this crisis could potentially be resolved with the stroke of a pen. While I understand that some damage has already been done, the sell-off so far feels largely indiscriminate.

“Right now, I’m investing in management teams rather than just companies. No one can say for sure when or how this ends, but I believe that backing leaders who have successfully navigated multiple crises will pay off in the long run.”

“Just read this. Although I agree with the premise, I don’t think it is as doom and gloom as the article paints. Example would be if as an analyst if your clients bought Apple back then, where would they be now or 10 years ago? As to what stocks I’m buying: tech, healthcare.”

Brian Sozzi is Yahoo Finance’s Executive Editor. Follow Sozzi on X @BrianSozzi, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Tips on stories? Email brian.sozzi@yahoofinance.com.

Click here for the latest stock market news and in-depth analysis, including events that move stocks

Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance

Advertisement

Finance

Bank of Korea needs to remain wary of financial stability risks, board member says

Published

on

Bank of Korea needs to remain wary of financial stability risks, board member says

SEOUL, Dec 23 (Reuters) – South Korea’s central bank needs to remain wary of financial stability risks, such as heightened volatility in the won currency and upward pressure on house prices, a board member said on Tuesday.

“Volatility is increasing in financial and foreign exchange markets with sharp fluctuations in stock prices and comparative weakness in the won,” said Chang Yong-sung, a member of the Bank of Korea’s seven-seat monetary policy board.

Sign up here.

The won hit on Tuesday its weakest level since early April at 1,483.5 per dollar. It has fallen more than 8% in the second half of 2025.

Chang also warned of high credit risks for some vulnerable sectors and continuously rising house prices in his comments released with the central bank’s semiannual financial stability report.

Advertisement

In the report, the BOK said it would monitor risk factors within the financial system and proactively seek market stabilising measures if needed, though it noted most indicators of foreign exchange conditions remained stable.

Monetary policy would continue to be coordinated with macroprudential policies, it added.

The BOK held rates steady for the fourth straight monetary policy meeting last month and signalled it could be nearing the end of the current rate cut cycle, as currency weakness reduced scope for further easing.
Following the November meeting, it has rolled out various currency stabilisation measures.

The BOK’s next monetary policy meeting is in January.

Reporting by Jihoon Lee; Editing by Jamie Freed

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Mike Burkhold: A Blueprint for South Carolina’s Financial Future – FITSNews

Published

on

Mike Burkhold: A Blueprint for South Carolina’s Financial Future – FITSNews

“I am running because the system needs to be fixed and I have the skills and mindset to do it…”


by MIKE BURKHOLD

***

Earlier this month, at the invitation of Virginia Secretary of Finance Steve Cummings, I spent a full day in Richmond meeting with leaders from across that state’s financial infrastructure. These were not ceremonial handshakes. These were working meetings — substantive, focused and highly instructive.

I met with teams overseeing budgeting, taxation, regulatory oversight, accounting and administration. What I found was a modern, integrated and disciplined approach to managing public money. And it made me even more certain of one thing: South Carolina is ready for change.

Advertisement

***

TEAMWORK AND TALENT MATTER

What stood out most in Virginia was the cohesion. From top to bottom, everyone I met shared the same mission — being responsible stewards of the taxpayers’ money. No silos. No blame games. Just a united focus on efficiency, transparency and performance.

That mindset doesn’t happen by accident. It is baked into the culture. The Secretary of Finance meets quarterly with department heads to review budgets, resolve audit findings and keep teams on track. There is accountability at every level. And it works.

That is what I want to bring to South Carolina. As Comptroller General, my job is to revitalize and modernize a critical finance function and to do it in close partnership with the legislature, the governor and the treasurer. I want to build an office that operates with precision, earns trust and gives lawmakers the clarity they need to govern wisely.

***

THIS IS BIGGER THAN ONE SEAT

I am not running for this office because I want a long political career. I am running because the system needs to be fixed and I have the skills and mindset to do it.

If part of that fix means rethinking whether this seat should remain an elected position then I welcome that conversation. In other states like Florida, voters elect a Chief Financial Officer with broad oversight. In Virginia, the Secretary of Finance is appointed by the governor and oversees all fiscal functions. Either model can work – but both reflect a commitment to modern coordinated financial management.

Advertisement

What matters most is that we have a structure that delivers results and earns the public’s trust. That structure needs to be part of a bigger conversation focused on delivering value to citizens – not maintaining fiefdoms or political turf.

***

RELATED | S.C. ‘REPUBLICANS’ REBUFF TRUMP ON REDISTRICTING

***

PUBLIC SERVICE STARTS WITH LEADERSHIP

One of the most inspiring parts of my trip was seeing the caliber of leaders who had left high-paying private sector roles to serve the people of Virginia. They brought with them a culture of excellence and a belief that good government is possible when the right people step forward.

We have that kind of talent in South Carolina. We just need to encourage more of it. I am stepping up because I believe in servant leadership. I see a seat that has not been led this way in a long time and there is a lot to fix. Not just the systems and operations but also the teamwork and coordination across agencies.

My goal is not what is best for Mike. It is what is best for South Carolina. I want to rebuild the Comptroller General’s office into a trusted partner, a respected institution and a model for modern financial leadership. Then I want to help figure out what structure will best serve the next generation.

***

A MOMENT OF OPPORTUNITY

The recent $3.5 billion error exposed just how outdated and fragile our current systems are. But we are not starting from scratch. We are starting from a place of strength. We have smart people, a strong economy and the will to do better.

Advertisement

Now we need to modernize our expectations. We need to align talent. We need to redesign the systems that manage $40 billion of taxpayer money. And we need leadership that sees the big picture, listens well and gets the details right.

South Carolina’s future is full of promise. But to get there, we need to treat government finance with the same rigor, discipline and urgency as any top-performing business.

That is why I am running. Not to keep a seat – but to serve the mission.

***

ABOUT THE AUTHOR…

Mike Burkhold is a Republican candidate for comptroller general of South Carolina.

***

WANNA SOUND OFF?

Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our articles? Or an issue you’d like to address proactively? We have an open microphone policy! Submit your letter to the editor (or guest column) via email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Why investing in a Trump Account could complicate your taxes

Published

on

Why investing in a Trump Account could complicate your taxes

Parents who put money into their children’s “Trump Accounts” might face a headache come tax time: Even the smallest contributions may require them to fill out a little-used gift tax form that can take hours to complete.

Several tax experts have raised concerns about the new savings vehicles, which were created in Republicans’ massive tax and spending bill this summer, and have urged Congress to pass a new law so that families who use it won’t have to file gift tax returns.

“It’s going to create a compliance nightmare,” said Amber Waldman, senior director for estate and gift tax for RSM US, a tax and consulting firm.

Under the terms of the One Big Beautiful Bill law that created it, the federal government will seed each Trump Account with $1,000 for every U.S. citizen born from 2025 through 2028. Much like an individual retirement account, the money will be invested in funds that track the stock market. The idea is that children’s growing pot of money will eventually help them pay for education or a home purchase when they become adults.

Advertisement

Parents, relatives, employers and nonprofits also can contribute to the accounts. Businessman Michael Dell and his wife Susan have pledged to put $250 in each of the accounts of 25 million children who are younger than 10 today.

But some tax experts think lawmakers overlooked a tax requirement that could make the accounts too burdensome for most parents.

A contribution to a child’s Trump Account is a taxable gift, which requires the giver to fill out one of the IRS’s more complicated tax forms, Form 709. The 10-page document takes the average filer or their accountant more than six hours to complete, and the government has only accepted mailed submissions; that changes this coming tax season, when e-filing will become available.

It’s used by fewer than 225,000 households a year, federal data show, and is so obscure that commercial tax software like TurboTax doesn’t include it.

“If you want to apply for the $1,000 because your kid was born within the time period, fine. If your employer wants to make a contribution or you qualify for a contribution from a charitable organization … fine. But don’t put your own money in until this is clarified,” said Susan Bart, a lawyer who specializes in estate and gift tax.

Advertisement

Most gifts aren’t nearly this complicated. Under long-standing law, most people can give cash gifts to one another tax-free. But if it’s a sizable amount – more than $19,000 – the IRS requires the donor to file Form 709. Over time, if those gifts add up to more than $15 million in the giver’s lifetime, they need to pay certain taxes. The whole system is meant to prevent very wealthy people from doling out large cash gifts during their lifetimes so their heirs can avoid estate taxes later.

But because there’s no provision for contributions to Trump Accounts to count as exempt gifts under current tax law, donors would have to declare every contribution, several tax experts say. This applies whether the donation is $25 or as much as the $5,000 annual cap. That’s because to be considered a tax-exempt gift, the recipient has to be able to access the money right away. Trump Account beneficiaries cannot withdraw the money until they turn 18.

Asked whether Trump Account contributions are required to be reported, an IRS spokesman referred questions to the Treasury Department, where several officials did not answer questions from The Washington Post.

The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel, a lawyers group, sent a letter raising the issue to the congressional tax-writing committees last month. The group’s Washington affairs chair Kevin Matz said his group received no answer beyond acknowledgment that the letter was received.

Congress has dealt with a problem like this before. Lawmakers approved a clause exempting 529 accounts – the tax-advantaged savings accounts for a child’s education – from the requirement that the recipient have present use of the gift. That means parents, grandparents and others can put money in 529 accounts without filing gift tax returns.

Advertisement

The experts who raised the issue are calling on Congress to make the same legislative fix for Trump Accounts.

“It seems like legislators accidentally left that out,” Waldman said.

The 10-page tax form asks a series of questions that are nearly indecipherable to the uninitiated. It distinguishes gifts that are “generation-skipping” – such as a grandparent giving money to a grandchild. When a married couple makes a gift, it probes whether the amount can legally be considered split between them, or attributable to just one.

Even experts scratch their heads. “Not all accountants necessarily have the experience and background to be able to complete it without extensive study,” Matz said.

Bart agreed: “It’s not a DIY form by any means.”

Advertisement

She said she’s seen lawyers befuddled by Form 709 before. “Sometimes my partners in other practice areas who are very, very smart people, they think: I can do this for my own kid or grandchild. They come running back after they look at the form a while. You need to be a specialized attorney with a lot of experience in the area.”

Many people might contribute to Trump Accounts without knowing that they are supposed to file Form 709, and aren’t likely to file it. But experts believe that skipping the form could create problems for the parents if they’re ever audited. Or if tax software like TurboTax starts including Trump Account questions, the taxpayer might not be able to submit their returns through the software if they indicate that they gave to the accounts.

Parents can still create Trump Accounts for their children to receive money from the government and charities like Dell’s without triggering the tax form problem.

“Of course if the government’s giving you a free $1,000, go ahead and take it. That’s not going to hurt you,” Waldman said. “If you’re thinking about personally contributing, consider your other options.”

Even without the tax-filing complications, Trump Accounts might not be the best way for most parents to save money for their children, experts say. The 529 plans offer much better tax benefits – unlike Trump Accounts, parents can often take some state tax deductions when they put money into the account, and if the child uses the money to pay for education, the earnings inside the account are never taxed.

Advertisement

If parents want a multipurpose savings vehicle for their kids that is not just limited to education spending, an ordinary taxable brokerage account might also be a better choice, tax professionals say. Trump Accounts are untaxed during the beneficiary’s childhood, when the money is growing in the account, unlike a brokerage account that could require paying taxes on any dividends. But the tax treatment when the child does withdraw the money could be much more favorable on the brokerage account – that money gets the lower capital gains tax rate, while Trump Account withdrawals are taxed at the same rate as ordinary income, and even come with a 10 percent tax penalty if the child doesn’t use the money for a qualified purpose. And the brokerage account offers a much wider range of investment options.

“As a tax-advantaged account, it’s a terrible tax-advantaged account,” said Greg Leierson, senior fellow at New York University’s Tax Law Center.

Continue Reading

Trending