Connect with us

Finance

Football: Vitesse docked 18 points amid Russia finance probe – DW – 04/20/2024

Published

on

Football: Vitesse docked 18 points amid Russia finance probe – DW – 04/20/2024

The Netherlands’ KNVB football association handed Vitesse Arnhem an 18-point deduction on Friday, making the struggling side’s relegation a mathematical certainty. 

It’s the largest penalty of its kind in the history of Dutch football. However, the club said it did not plan to appeal, and it welcomed the lifeline offered by the KNVB that means it might at least be able to retain its license and continue to exist as a club.

The club’s been in turmoil for some time now, as it tries and fails to extricate itself from Russian ownership following the invasion of Ukraine and EU sanctions against its current owner. 

Vitesse were already bottom of the league on 17 points with just a few matches left to save themselves. Now they have a nominal total of -1 points and relegation is inevitable. 

Vitesse players walk off after a 6-0 defeat to PSC on April 13
The club faced a crushing 6-0 defeat away to PSV Eindhoven last weekendImage: Toin Damen/PRO SHOTS/picture alliance

Why is the club in trouble? 

A mainstay in the Dutch Eredivisie top division for more than 30 years and in either Russian or Georgian ownership for the last decade, Vitesse is facing allegations of financial irregularities and licensing breaches as it tries and fails to convince authorities to approve a takeover by a US investment group. 

The team is still owned by Russian oligarch Valerij Oyf, and it used to be nicknamed “Chelsea B” because of the close ties it had to the London club when that was owned by Roman Abramovich. Several high-profile Chelsea players, including Nemanja Matic and Mason Mount, spent periods on loan in Arnhem. 

Advertisement
Vitesse owner Valeriy Oyf during the Dutch Eredivisie match between Vitesse Arnhem and Feyenoord Rotterdam at Gelredome on December 08, 2019 in Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Vitesse owner Valeriy Oyf bought in in 2018, and has been trying to get out since Russia’s invasion of his native Ukraine in 2022Image: Maurice van Steen/VI Images/imago images

Oyf, like Abramovich at Chelsea, made it clear soon after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine that he was looking to sell the club. He would soon face EU sanctions, again like Abramovich. However, he has not been able to sell so far. 

Dutch authorities are not convinced by the financial viability of the takeover proposal, and accuse Vitesse of submitting false information while trying to secure approval for the change of ownership. 

An investigative report by British newspaper The Guardian and The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, alleging a secret network of loans linking the club to Abramovich, and suggesting Abramovich ultimately funded the 2014 purchase of Vitesse by a Georgian investor, helped prompt the investigations. 

KNVB says penalty reflects ‘extent of the violations’

“The size of the sanction is based on the exceptional seriousness and the extent of the violations of the licensing system,” the KNVB said in a statement on Friday

It said the withheld information might even have hidden potential violations of sanctions against Russia.

Advertisement

“This includes providing incorrect information that was important for the forensic investigation into possible violations of sanctions legislation and withholding information important for the assessment of Vitesse’s continuity,” it said. 

The KNVB warned it continued to investigate other potential violations by Vitesse and said it would comment further should further penalties follow. 

It said it had responded to the club’s latest bid to win approval for new ownership, requesting an amended plan. It said it would update on this issue, too, as soon as a decision was reached. 

How football and ‘sportswashing’ helped Putin start a war

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

Vitesse plans not to appeal, welcomes ray of hope for broader survival

Vitesse, meanwhile, said that it “will not appeal against the punishment and will seize the chance of retaining its license with both hands.” 

Advertisement

It conceded in a statement that some such sanction had long seemed “unavoidable” given that the club had been unable to meet certain requirements.

“For example, Vitesse did not submit the half-yearly figures correctly, acted incorrectly with regard to ING Bank and the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate, and the Vladimirov report was unable to demonstrate whether or not there are connections between Vitesse and Roman Abramovich,” the club said. 

Interim general manager Edwin Reijntjes was quoted as saying that although it was a “dark day” for everyone who cares about Vitesse, facing relegation for the first time this century, “this is the harsh reality.”

“On the other hand — and I really want to make this clear to everyone — we are extremely happy with the opportunity that is being offered to us to retain our license. This too was hanging by a thread,” Reijntjes said. 

A revocation of the club’s license would effectively mark its dissolution, at least temporarily, with it unable to compete in any KNVB-organized competitions. 

Advertisement

Friday’s penalty, at least as it stands, foresees the club fighting in the Dutch second divsion next year.

msh/wd (AP, dpa, Reuters)

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Proximo Congress 2026: US Energy & Infrastructure Finance | Insights | Mayer Brown

Published

on

Proximo Congress 2026: US Energy & Infrastructure Finance | Insights | Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a proud sponsor of Proximo Congress 2026. This senior meeting of the US energy, infrastructure, and digital infrastructure finance community is shaped around the questions credit and investment committees are actually asking in 2026: how asset classes are converging, how risk is being priced in a recalibrated policy and geopolitical environment, and how public and private capital are being structured together to deliver projects at scale.

Mayer Brown has also been recognized for three separate awards which will be presented during the event. These awards include:

  • Proximo North America Transport Deal of the Year 2025 – SR 400 Peach Partners
  • Proximo North America Rail Deal of the Year 2025 – Brightline West
  • Proximo North America LNG Deal of the Year 2025 – Port Arthur LNG 2

For more information, visit the event website. 

Continue Reading

Finance

What are nonconforming mortgages and what are the risks?

Published

on

What are nonconforming mortgages and what are the risks?

If you have ever taken out a mortgage, you’ll know there are a lot of requirements to meet. You may need to put down a certain amount and have a debt-to-income ratio below a certain threshold. You may also run into limits on how much you can borrow or what sources of income the lender will count.

These rules do not apply to all mortgages — just to conforming mortgages, which is what the majority of borrowers take out. However, mortgage lenders are increasingly offering what are known as nonconforming loans, or mortgages that do not “comply with every one of the strict standards put in place after the housing crisis,” said The Wall Street Journal. While “still a small portion,” the “share of mortgages using alternative lending practices” has “doubled in size over the past three years.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Financial Stress Is Changing What Consumers Value in Credit Cards | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

Financial Stress Is Changing What Consumers Value in Credit Cards | PYMNTS.com

What U.S. consumers ask of their credit cards has changed. For financially stressed households, it has little to do with rewards.

As more households turn to credit cards to manage liquidity and cover everyday expenses, a new set of practical concerns is driving card behavior: Can the card help avoid a missed payment? Can it make balances easier to track? Can it provide enough visibility into available credit and upcoming obligations to help manage an uncertain month?

Those concerns are beginning to reorder what consumers value most in their credit card relationships.

That evidence is clear in “Winning Top of Wallet: How Credit Card Apps Shape Choice,” a PYMNTS Intelligence and Elan Credit Card report examining how consumers use mobile apps to manage spending, payments and engagement across their credit card portfolios. The report found 30% of consumers primarily use credit cards to build credit or extend purchasing power, while another 22% primarily use cards for cash flow management, together outweighing rewards-based usage.

The divide is more pronounced among financially stressed households. Among consumers living paycheck to paycheck and struggling to pay bills, 40% cited credit dependence as their primary reason for using credit cards. Just 11% pointed to rewards.

Advertisement

For a growing share of consumers, credit cards are functioning less like discretionary spending products and more like liquidity management tools.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

What Matters Most

That evolution is also changing which app features matter most.

Among cash flow-focused consumers, 31% said scheduling payments or autopay encouraged them to spend more on a card, while 27% cited alerts and reminders. Credit-motivated consumers showed similarly high engagement with tools tied to available credit visibility and payment timing.

Rewards still influence spending behavior, particularly among financially stable households. Half of consumers who prioritize rewards said tracking or redeeming rewards through a mobile app encouraged them to spend more on the card.

Advertisement

But the report suggests that financial stress changes the hierarchy of engagement. As household budgets tighten, rewards become less central than predictability, visibility and control.

That shift helps explain why mobile apps increasingly influence which cards become top of wallet.

Among credit-dependent consumers, 77% said the quality of a credit card app influences which card they use most often. Credit-dependent consumers also reported the highest app adoption levels, with 77% using their primary card’s app regularly or occasionally.

The competition, in other words, is no longer simply about card acquisition. It is about becoming the card consumers rely on to navigate everyday financial management.

Digital Experience Becomes a Financial Retention Tool

The report also suggests that digital experience increasingly shapes retention risk.

Advertisement

Nearly 1 in 4 cardholders said a poor app or digital experience contributed to reduced card use. Among Gen Z consumers, that figure climbed to 45%.

At the same time, 7 in 10 cardholders said app quality influences which card becomes their primary card, underscoring how mobile interfaces are becoming embedded directly into consumer payment behavior.

For issuers, the implications extend beyond app design.

Consumers living paycheck to paycheck hold nearly as many credit cards as financially stable households, meaning financially stressed consumers are not disengaging from credit entirely. Instead, they are becoming more selective about which cards feel easiest to manage and most useful during periods of financial pressure.

Rewards and promotional offers still matter, particularly among affluent and financially stable consumers. But for a growing segment of households, the most valuable card may be the one that reduces uncertainty around balances, payment timing and available liquidity.

Advertisement

In a crowded multi-card market, financial visibility itself is becoming part of the product.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending