Connect with us

Entertainment

Review: What is Pan-American music? Gustavo Dudamel and pianist Gabriela Martinez have some ideas

Published

on

Review: What is Pan-American music? Gustavo Dudamel and pianist Gabriela Martinez have some ideas

Pete Seeger’s legendary “We Shall Overcome” live performance at Carnegie Corridor in 1963, the occasion that signaled the indispensable method music might encourage ’60s-era political reform, ended on an exceptionally excessive level. The eloquent, certainly definitive, efficiency of the patriotic Cuban music “Guantanamera” made each syllable in José Martí’s poems consequential. Seeger, nevertheless, launched the music by saying “individuals” had put one in every of Martí’s final poems to a preferred tune. It wasn’t “individuals,” it was Julián Orbón.

Orbón is duly credited on the jacket of the live performance’s stay recording. Possibly Seeger had a thoughts slip. Possibly he had an issue with Orbón. Possibly there may be simply an Orbón downside, which might clarify why Julián Orbón de Soto, who was born within the Asturias area of Spain in 1925, moved together with his household to Havana in 1938 and rose to be thought-about by many to be the nation’s most promising younger composer, has been unjustly uncared for.

That injustice was addressed by the Los Angeles Philharmonic at Walt Disney Live performance Corridor Thursday evening, the primary live performance in Gustavo Dudamel’s new Pan-American Music Initiative. This system ended with a stirring efficiency of Orbón’s “Tres Versiones Sinfónicas.” Orbón was simply 28 when he wrote the rating and gave it its sadly uninspiring title describing it as merely three diverse symphonic items.

Even within the Pan-American Initiative — which isn’t a pageant however a broad, ongoing effort at inclusivity — Orbón appeared an afterthought. The night, which started the L.A. Phil’s fall season, was to have been devoted completely to Venezuelan, Mexican and Brazilian composers. But in a late change of path, Dudamel as an alternative led John Adams’ “I Nonetheless Dance,” Mozart’s Flute and Harp Concerto in addition to his “Serenata Notturna” and the Orbón.

Advertisement

As luck would have it, Saturday evening on the Eli and Edythe Broad Stage, the Venezuelan pianist Gabriela Martinez performed an intriguingly unique Pan-American program that mixed works by Venezuelan and Brazilian composers with current ones from the U.S.

Dudamel and Martinez increase the query of what it means to be Pan-American. Virgil Thomson outlined American music as music written by an American.

Is Reynaldo Hahn’s “Portraits de Peintres,” which Martinez performed, Venezuelan? The composer was born in Caracas and emigrated to Paris in his youth. These piano miniatures are musical impressions of 4 early poems by Proust about painters (for a short time, Hahn and Proust had been lovers). On the floor, they sound as French as Ravel, who was a classmate of Hahn’s. However they don’t sound like Ravel. It’s exhausting to say whether or not there’s a trace of Venezuelan affect in Hahn’s effervescent melodies and vibrating accompaniments, or whether or not it simply appears that method realizing Hahn’s origins.

“Tres Versiones” provides an enchanting rabbit gap of musical influences and identities through which to get misplaced. The primary motion, “Pavana,” begins with melody by the Spanish Renaissance composer Luis de Milán magisterially belted out by French horns and accented off the beat in its final notes, ending on a punctuated Coplandesque chord by piano and harp. The 12 months was 1953, the 12 months of Castro’s “Historical past Will Absolve Me” speech.

The Orbóns had fled Spanish Civil Conflict, and Julián grew to become an keen preliminary supporter of the Cuban Revolution. The Milán tune is steadily given the complete Copland remedy, virtually changing into a fanfare for the frequent Cuban.

Advertisement

Probably the most astonishing motion, the second, is titled “Organum-Conductus.” It begins, mystically, with a chant melody by the novel twelfth century composer Pérotin, who would turn out to be a seminal affect on Steve Reich and the event of American Minimalism a dozen years later. In Orbón’s arms, Pérotin takes on symphonic rapture, rising ever extra euphoric and extra boldly coloured. The final motion, “Xylophone,” is an Afro-Cuban dance made distinctive by a big contingent of percussion.

Having grown disillusioned by the Cuban Revolution, Orbón left in 1960 for Mexico Metropolis. He moved to New York the 12 months of Seeger’s Carnegie live performance and taught at Columbia College till his dying in 1991. In New York, he was considered a Spanish Neoclassicist. Dudamel made it thrillingly evident that Orbón must be reconsidered as one thing like a pan-Spanish-Cuban-American and neo-Medieval-Renaissance Modernist.

Mozart’s Concerto for Flute and Harp may on first blush appear an applicable Neoclassical Pan-American match, since flute and harp are widespread devices in Latin, folks, pop, jazz and classical musics. Besides Mozart hated each devices. That nevertheless, didn’t cease principal flutist Denis Bouriakov and principal harpist Emmanuel Ceysson from delivering a vibrant efficiency. Plus, Ceysson’s Artwork Deco purple harp seems like it could have properly slot in at a Nineteen Fifties Havana evening membership.

Adams’ “I Nonetheless Dance” was written in 2018 to have fun Michael Tilson Thomas and his husband, Joshua Robison. A curtain-raiser, it helped launch MTT’s final season because the transformative music director of the San Francisco Symphony. The influences should not Latin (though there may be loads of that in Adams’ beloved oratorio, “El Niño”), however is extra within the spirit of Duke Ellington, with African and Japanese percussion, together with an electrical bass guitar, thrown right into a blazing orchestral combine that doesn’t cease for near eight minutes.

Tilson Thomas performed it as a type of fantasy, a luminous imaginative and prescient of the ballroom. Every thing goes by very quick. The rhythms are mind-bending. It takes virtuoso listening to simply to comply with the rating. However for Dudamel, this was no fantasy. “I Nonetheless Dance” grew to become “I Dance.”

Advertisement

The unique L.A. Phil program would have ended with a Villa-Lobos’ Chôros No. 10. As a substitute, Tilson Thomas, who remarkably nonetheless conducts regardless of grappling with mind most cancers, will conduct it with the L.A. Phil in January. However Martinez crammed the void for now by ending her Broad program with Villa-Lobos’ “Bachianas Brasileiras” No. 4 in its unique piano model.

She is a outstanding pianist who has had a great deal of publicity however stays for some mysterious motive on the sideline. Saturday was a return to the Broad. She’s carried out on the Soraya and as soloist with the Pasadena Symphony and the Pacific Symphony. She’s not exhausting to seek out on YouTube. However regardless of having been a soloist for Dudamel in Venezuela, she has but to look with the L.A. Phil or in Disney Corridor.

Primarily based in New York, Martinez is attuned to its new music scene, and she or he included brief items by Missy Mazzoli (“Heartbreaker”), Caroline Shaw (“Gustave Le Grey”) and Sarah Kirkland Snider (“The Currents”). All three ladies are very a lot in demand and really a lot performed. However they couldn’t have a greater champion.

With a cool willpower, a tone filled with glowing coloration and a seemingly easy method, Martinez received Mazzoli’s miniature to glow darkly. A Chopin mazurka floated on air out of shimmering chords in Shaw’s rating, whereas Snider’s quiet tolling of bells was so majestic that it virtually appeared like digital music. Melody in all three of those items must be assembled a observe at a time. Martinez did so by offering such substance to every particular person observe that she gave the look of capturing it from the air, like a flying insect, and attaching it the piano in order that it might be part of the subsequent one.

The stunner was “Veil” by Viet Cuong, a Vietnamese American composer from L.A. who’s receiving appreciable consideration of late (the Pacific Symphony simply opened its new season together with his percussion concerto, “Re(new)al”). “Veil” is about only one observe, a G sharp that tolls all through and retains altering primarily based on how it’s hit, how the strings are damped (Martinez performed contained in the piano and out) and the harmonic context it’s put in.

Advertisement

“Veil” wasn’t written for Martinez, however it sounded prefer it should have been, on some degree. Her contact is magical. She lifts the veil and divulges, in G sharp, a world in sound, pure to the purpose of getting no nationalities and all nationalities. It opened the ears to all.

An impressive efficiency of Villa-Lobos’ seductive “Bachianas Brasileiras” adopted. This twentieth century Brazilian channeling of Bach flowed naturally from Cuong’s G sharps, leaving that impression that, whereas the surroundings differs, the Amazon, Rhine and Mekong Delta are all rivers, and water all over the place is nourishing.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Entertainment

Nicki Minaj apparently arrested in Netherlands on suspicion of drug possession

Published

on

Nicki Minaj apparently arrested in Netherlands on suspicion of drug possession

Nicki Minaj was apparently arrested at an airport by Amsterdam police upon her arrival in the Netherlands on Saturday on suspicion of carrying drugs in her luggage. The rapper filmed herself being questioned by police who detained her before she could leave the airport for her show in Manchester at the Co-op Live arena for the next stop on her Pink Friday 2 Tour.

In the video, which she posted to Instagram Live, the 41-year-old rapper whose real name is Onika Tanya Maraj-Petty tells the authorities she was not carrying any drugs. Despite her denial, she was told she needed to go to the police station in video captured on her live recording.

Minaj was “arrested … at Schiphol Airport because of possession of soft drugs,” a spokesperson for the police in the Netherlands told NBC.

According to Minaj’s recording, a man in a police uniform explained to her that she “would get a lawyer at the office” and they would go “as fast as possible.” She was then told “to get into this [police] van and go into the precinct with no lawyer present.”

During the verbal exchange, Minaj alleged that airport security asked that she make a “statement with no lawyer present” after “pre-rolls” (ready-to-smoke joints filled with marijuana) were allegedly discovered in her luggage.

Advertisement

Before the supposed arrest, the “Anaconda” hit-maker made a series of posts on X (formerly known as Twitter) about her bags getting searched at the airport.

Nicki Minaj attends the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Costume Institute benefit gala celebrating the opening of the “Camp: Notes on Fashion” exhibition in 2019 in New York.

(Charles Sykes/Invision/AP)

“They’ve been trying everything they possibly can to TRY to stop this tour,” she wrote in one tweet. She also accused authorities of trying to “plant things” in her luggage.

Advertisement

Minaj also shared a recording on her Instagram of her verbal exchange with a man who told her that police were going to be searching her bags.

Minaj then asked: “But wasn’t that what you planned on doing from the get-go? Why didn’t you guys search it before it went on the plane?”

The man responded: “They did just a random quick check, but now they want to open it” and said Minaj choosing to film the authorities resulted in them wanting to search her bags.

The rapper replied: “ ‘Do I have any more in those purses’ and I said, ‘No,’ and I asked him where are my bags.” “They took my bags and put them on the plane before I could know what bags are on the plane.”

The airline crew member simply said he was “so sorry for that.”

Advertisement

Minaj replied “OK, of course,” before the video ended.

Minaj also tweeted: “they said they found weed…they took my bags without consent,” seemingly admitting that there was marijuana in her luggage that may have belonged to her security staff.

In Minaj’s caption on Instagram, the rapper wrote “they took my bags before I could see them” then “put it on the plane…This is what it looks like when ppl are paid big money to try to sabotage a tour after all else failed. Everything they’ve done is illegal.”

In her final post on X, Minaj tweeted that she was being told she had to “go 5 mins away to make a statement about my security to the police precinct.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Love Me Telugu Movie Review, Ashish, Vaishnavi Chaitanya

Published

on

Love Me Telugu Movie Review, Ashish, Vaishnavi Chaitanya

Movie Name : Love Me

Release Date : May 25, 2024

123telugu.com Rating : 2.25/5

Starring : Ashish, Vaishnavi Chaitanya, Ravi Krishna, Simran Chowdhary, and others

Director: Arun Bhimavarapu

Producers: Harshith Reddy, Hanshitha Reddy, Naga Mallidi

Advertisement

Music Director: M.M. Keeravani

Cinematographer: P.C. Sreeram

Editor: Santosh Kamireddy

Related Links : Trailer

Love Me, starring Ashish and Vaishnavi Chaitanya, has hit the screens today. This romantic thriller is directed by debutant Arun Bhimavarapu. Let’s see how the movie is.
 

Advertisement

Story:

Arjun (Ashish) is a YouTuber. He always tries to find answers to unsolved questions and does things that others ask him not to do. Arjun finds out there is a ghost named Divyavathi, and whoever tried to go near her lost their lives. Arjun falls in love with the ghost and in the process of learning what happened to Divyavathi, he comes across many surprises. Who is this Divyavathi? What happened to her? How did Prathap (Ravi Krishna) and Priya (Vaishnavi Chaitanya) assist Arjun in unraveling the mystery surrounding Divyavathi? This is what the movie is about.
 

Plus Points:

Ashish has improved a lot compared to his debut film. He has shown more maturity in his performance in a role that requires him to behave in a subtle manner. Ashish looks charming in every frame, and his dialogue delivery is also neat.

The screenplay in the first half isn’t perfect, but the core idea of the movie, which is the hero falling for a ghost, makes us sit through. The movie begins on an interesting note with the backstory of the ghost. Though the film remains flat thereafter, the solid visuals and the central theme engage us to an extent. Ravi Krishna is alright in his role.
 

Advertisement

Minus Points:

Not all interesting ideas look good on the screen. The hero falling in love with a ghost is an idea that isn’t explored much, but the presentation isn’t convincing. The interest factor created in the first half dies down by the end after the big revelation. Once the final twist is disclosed, everything looks silly and illogical. The character development of an artist upon whom the entire film revolves isn’t done well.

One would expect a thrilling ride in the second half, but what we get to see is a confusing narrative that tries to pack in a lot. When the hero and Vaishnavi Chaitanya start unraveling the mystery, we come across many characters, and it is too much to absorb. A lot of information is presented that goes over our heads. The second half makes us wonder what actually is happening.

Advertisement

Vaishnavi Chaitanya doesn’t get much scope to shine, and this is due to the way her character is written. The complex narration is not the only drawback. The film scores low in terms of emotions, too. They don’t look natural, and not enough time is taken to showcase the emotional connection between the key characters.
 

Technical Aspects:

Keeravani’s background score is decent. The songs are just about okay. The writing isn’t good, so we can’t expect much from the music department. The art work is superb, and the visuals by P.C. Sreeram are top-notch. The movie is splendid visually, and credit should go to the legendary cinematographer for the fantastic visuals. The CG works are satisfactory.

The editing is below par and creates too much confusion. Director Arun Bhimavarapu has come up with some interesting ideas, but he isn’t successful in translating them effectively onto the screen. The first half is somewhat watchable, but the proceedings in the second half go for a toss with the complicated screenplay.
 

Advertisement

Verdict:

On the whole, Love Me tries to be a unique horror thriller but ends up being a silly and unconvincing flick. The fascinating ideas are not told in an effective manner, and the movie looks illogical in many places. Ashish is good in his role, and the first half is somewhat watchable. But the whole second half is confusing with too much information, and the key twist disappoints big time. You can skip this film.
123telugu.com Rating: 2.25/5

Reviewed by 123telugu Team

Click Here For Telugu Review

Advertisement

Articles that might interest you:


Advertisement



Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

New Mexico judge denies Alec Baldwin's motion to dismiss criminal case in 'Rust' shooting

Published

on

New Mexico judge denies Alec Baldwin's motion to dismiss criminal case in 'Rust' shooting

A New Mexico judge denied a motion to dismiss the involuntary manslaughter case against Alec Baldwin, clearing the way for the high-profile actor to stand trial for his alleged role in the deadly “Rust” movie shooting.

New Mexico First Judicial District Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer’s decision late Friday was a setback to Baldwin and his legal team, who had argued that prosecutors were bent on winning a conviction of the 66-year-old actor-producer at all costs following the October 2021 accidental shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the low-budget western movie set near Santa Fe.

Baldwin’s trial on the felony charge is expected to begin in July. If convicted, he would face a prison sentence of up to 18 months. He has pleaded not guilty.

In January, grand jurors in Santa Fe County indicted Baldwin on an involuntary manslaughter charge, determining there was sufficient evidence that he acted negligently by pointing a loaded gun at Hutchins without first checking the weapon.

After the indictment, Baldwin’s lawyers pored over transcripts of the grand jury proceedings to try to build a case that Special Prosecutor Kari T. Morrissey had at times shut down testimony that could have been beneficial to their client.

Advertisement

“The state has sought to convict and imprison Baldwin for an accident caused by the mistakes of others,” Baldwin’s attorney Luke Nikas wrote in a motion to dismiss the indictment.

On Friday, Nikas and his law partner Alex Spiro said in an email: “We look forward to our day in court.”

In a hearing last week, Baldwin’s attorneys argued that Morrissey failed in her duty to provide testimony in a “fair and impartial manner.”

Marlowe Sommer on Friday wrote in her 19-page ruling that defense attorneys failed to provide evidence of “prosecutorial bad faith.”

To meet that definition, defense attorneys must show that the prosecutor deliberately misled the grand jury or engaged in “intentional misconduct,” the judge wrote, adding that was not the case in the Baldwin matter.

Advertisement

“The court does not find that defendant has established prosecutorial bad faith,” Marlowe Sommer wrote.

At issue was whether grand jurors were fully informed that they could call witnesses from a list provided by Baldwin’s attorneys. The judge wrote that the special prosecutor read a letter from Baldwin’s side during the proceedings, and that jurors also were allowed to question witnesses.

“Although the State deferred certain questions, in many other instances, the grand jurors asked probative questions, and received complete answers from witnesses, without State interference,” Marlowe Sommer wrote.

Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer, center, talks with prosecutor Kari T. Morrissey, left, and Hannah Gutierrez’s defense attorney Jason Bowles during Gutierrez’s February 2024 trial in Santa Fe, N.M.

(Eddie Moore / Albuquerque Journal)

Advertisement

On the afternoon of Oct. 21, 2021, Hutchins, Baldwin, Souza and about a dozen other crew members were gathered in a rustic church at Bonanza Creek Ranch, south of Santa Fe, to prepare for an upcoming scene. Assistant director David Halls, who was the on-set safety coordinator, handed the gun to Baldwin, declaring that it was “cold,” meaning there was no ammunition inside, according to numerous witnesses.

The actor was sitting in a pew, facing the door of the church. Hutchins and Baldwin had discussed a close-up camera angle of the gun’s muzzle — a view that Hutchins, the director of photography, wanted as a way to heighten the drama in advance of a gunfight scene. Baldwin has said Hutchins told him to slowly pull his Colt .45 revolver from his holster and point it at the camera.

He did, and that’s when the gun went off.

Hutchins died from her wounds. The film’s director, Joel Souza, was injured by the same bullet but has since recovered.

Advertisement

Baldwin’s case has featured numerous twists and turns, including when the actor known for NBC’s “30 Rock” and parodying former President Trump in skits on “Saturday Night Live,” participated in an ABC News interview, broadcast in December 2021, less than six weeks after the tragedy. Baldwin described for news anchor George Stephanopoulos how he pointed the gun at Hutchins and cocked the hammer.

“I didn’t pull the trigger,” Baldwin said, blaming others for the tragedy.

Since then, investigators and FBI analysts have performed tests to demonstrate that Baldwin must have pulled the trigger.

However, during the FBI tests in 2022 at the agency’s lab in Quantico, Va., forensic analysts used a rawhide mallet to strike the gun so hard that components of the gun fractured. Baldwin’s attorney’s have cited the broken parts as evidence that the weapon was compromised before Baldwin handled it.

The first set of prosecutors had to step down after a string of missteps, including an attempt to charge Baldwin on a penalty enhancement that called for a mandatory five-year prison sentence. That penalty wasn’t in effect at the time of the tragedy. The initial prosecutors also made statements about holding Baldwin responsible for his actions, prompting criticism from defense attorneys that such commentary was prejudicial against the actor.

Advertisement

Shortly after Morrissey and her law partner Jason J. Lewis joined the case last spring, they dropped the charges against Baldwin, saying they needed time to review evidence and address legal issues raised by Baldwin’s team.

Last week, Morrissey bristled at suggestions that it was problematic for her to seek an indictment after dropping the charges against Baldwin last year. She said it was Baldwin’s lead attorney, Luke Nikas, who asked for the charges to be dropped, and she agreed.

At the time, the prosecutors said they needed time to investigate whether the gun had been modified prior to its arrival on the film set, as Baldwin’s team has suggested.

Prosecutors have won two convictions for negligence leading to Hutchins’ death.

In March, a Santa Fe jury convicted armorer Hannah Gutierrez of involuntary manslaughter. Morrissey had argued that Gutierrez, whose job was handling the guns, was the most responsible for the tragedy. The jury deliberated only about two hours after hearing evidence during a two-week trial. Last month, Marlowe Sommer sentenced Gutierrez, 26, to the maximum sentence of 18 months in a New Mexico women’s prison.

Advertisement

Last year, Halls pleaded no contest to negligent use of a deadly weapon and received a suspended six-month sentence.

Continue Reading

Trending