Connect with us

Entertainment

Review: Manic and emotional, animated 'Dog Man' hides parental anxiety under its fur

Published

on

Review: Manic and emotional, animated 'Dog Man' hides parental anxiety under its fur

Never fear, “Dog Man” is here — to save your families from the doldrums of January moviegoing. The popular children’s books by Dav Pilkey (a spinoff of the “Captain Underpants” series) are adapted with a silly, self-referential charm by writer-director Peter Hastings, resulting in a cutely frenetic but narratively somewhat flimsy animated feature.

Hastings and team maintain the childlike illustration style of the books, with crayon lines and shading on the simply designed characters, as well as the colloquial, slangy writing (law enforcement officers are “supa cops”; various important buildings are “ova there”).

“Dog Man” feels like a bedtime story made up by a dad, then rendered in a sweetly kiddie aesthetic. The character’s origin story is told in a quick introduction: Ohkay City police officer Knight and his trusty dog, Greg, make a great team (Greg’s the brains of the operation). But when they’re injured in a terrible explosion, doctors have to attach Greg’s head to Officer Knight’s body, resulting in Dog Man, Supa Cop. Dog Man succeeds, to the chagrin of his boss, Chief (Li’l Rel Howery), and delights local TV reporter Sarah Hatoff (Isla Fisher).

Dog Man’s nemesis is an evil orange tabby named Petey (Pete Davidson) who loves nothing more than to dream up wilder and wilder robots to take down his rival. Dog Man, for his part, is continually throwing Petey in Cat Jail, from which he keeps escaping. But everything changes when Petey, fed up with his assistant Butler (Poppy Liu), clones himself and out pops an adorable orange kitten, Li’l Petey (Lucas Hopkins Calderon).

It’s the entrance of Li’l Petey that grounds and focuses the affably chaotic “Dog Man,” which often teeters on the edge of completely out of control. The film is so visually dense, so rapidly wordy, so referential to its own form, that details fly by in a blur. But the emotional beats are solid, especially when it comes to the themes of found family and the fears and challenges of raising a little version of yourself.

Advertisement

“Dog Man” is a very obvious and emotionally naked tale about the anxiety of parenting, specifically from a young dad’s perspective (references to films like “Die Hard” and “RoboCop” also underline the millennial/Gen X dad POV). Petey wails, “What have I done with my life?” as Li’l Petey cries, and then wonders, “If I made you, why aren’t you like me?” as he realizes that his mini-me isn’t as interested in evil as he is. When Petey abandons his son, in a repeat of his own childhood trauma, Dog Man rescues the young kitten and teaches him how to be actively compassionate, which leads to Li’l Petey later imparting the wise nugget, “Love isn’t just a feeling, it’s also something you do.”

These touching themes underpin the otherwise goofy and juvenile story about a reanimated evil fish, Flippy, programmed by Petey to destroy all Do-Gooders, who somehow manages to turn all the buildings in Ohkay City into kaiju-style monsters. That storyline blurs into a messily amusing cacophony, only serving as a springboard for Petey’s redemption.

Davidson lends his irascible appeal to Petey in an excellent vocal turn. The writing and performances of Petey and Li’l Petey’s characters emerge as the bright spots of the film, their surprisingly satisfying character arcs eclipsing the wordless heroics of Dog Man.

Still, the whole film barely stretches to its 89-minute running time and there’s not enough to the conceit to pad out more of the story and lore. However, the lessons of compassion and empathy are profound, and remind us that tales of good triumphing over evil are evergreen, even when it doesn’t seem to be reflected in the world around us.

‘Dog Man’

Advertisement

Rated: PG, for some action and rude humor

Running time: 1 hour, 29 minutes

Playing: In wide release Friday, Jan. 31

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Film Reviews: My Dead Friend Zoe and Ex-Husbands

Published

on

Film Reviews: My Dead Friend Zoe and Ex-Husbands

‘My Dead Friend Zoe’

An Army vet is haunted by a fallen comrade.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Jennifer Hudson gets nailed in the face sitting courtside with Common at a Knicks game

Published

on

Jennifer Hudson gets nailed in the face sitting courtside with Common at a Knicks game

Jennifer Hudson very nearly got a basketball to the face — and did get a basketball player to the face — sitting courtside with Common at the Knicks-Warriors game Tuesday.

And somewhere in the middle of it all, her boyfriend pretty much hit her in the face, but only because he was trying to protect her.

(These are things that do not happen to people who sit in the cheap seats, which for this famous couple might be, like, Row 3.)

Miles McBride of the New York Knicks was going for a steal against the visiting Golden State Warriors at Madison Square Garden when things went all sorts of wrong in the game’s second period.

The action unfolded in an instant: McBride jumped into the path of a Warrior-to-Warrior pass. He tipped the ball. He did not take control of the ball. And he did not stop. At the receiving end of that 6-foot-1 momentum? It was JHud.

Advertisement

Fortunately it wasn’t, say, 7-foot Knicks center Karl-Anthony Towns who went for the ball, or the world might have found itself missing one name on the EGOT list. Towns skipped the game for personal reasons, according to the New York Post.

Common tried to protect his lady, but in executing a volleyball-style move to knock the basketball away from her face, he appeared to whack her right in what NBA on TNT announcer Greg Anthony guessed were her “real expensive” eyeglasses. Hudson, who said a distinct “wow” in the immediate aftermath, did not look even one bit happy.

McBride politely checked in with both of them before he turned back to the game. In a flash, the collision was over.

“Protect Jennifer Hudson. Protect Jennifer Hudson,” announcer Ian Eagle intoned afterward. Then came the instant replay, during which they assessed whether Common had indeed protected the talk-show host.

“Common is making sure everybody’s OK,” Eagle said.

Advertisement

“Let me see what Common did — did he, did he protect her?” Anthony wondered.

“He tried. He actually banged the glasses,” Eagle said.

“No. No he didn’t [protect her],” Anthony said. “He doesn’t get points for that.”

In other celebrity courtside news, later in the game die-hard fan Spike Lee had a few things to tell Golden State’s Steph Curry right to his face after Curry got around McBride’s defense to sink a three-pointer for the lead.

Golden State beat New York, 114-102.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Mickey 17 movie review & film summary (2025) | Roger Ebert

Published

on

Mickey 17 movie review & film summary (2025) | Roger Ebert

Mickey Barnes dies, then he dies again, then he dies again, over and over in ways that are both grotesque and banal. And that’s one of the more entertaining parts of “Mickey 17,” Bong Joon Ho’s frustratingly uneven follow-up to his Oscar-winning thriller “Parasite.” 

With his third English-language feature, the South Korean auteur explores some of the same themes of the previous two, “Okja” and “Snowpiercer”: gaping economic disparities, humanity’s destruction of the planet and the dangers of authoritarianism. These topics are sadly more relevant than ever given the right-wing ideology that’s swept across the globe in recent years, and he depicts them with his signature high style and brash satire. 

Still, for fans of 2019’s “Parasite,” “Mickey 17” may feel like a disappointment. Perhaps anything would be. Long gone is the exquisite mastery of tone and tension he displayed in his historic Best Picture winner. Writer-director Bong’s latest is more of a free-wheeling affair: heavy-handed in the points he’s making yet scattered in his narrative. At one point during a climactic swirl of visual effects, I wondered to myself: What exactly is happening, and how did we get here?  

And yet Robert Pattinson’s performance is so gonzo, so gleefully deranged, that he keeps you hanging on and hoping he’ll succeed in a variety of incarnations. Starring in a Bong Joon Ho film is another example of the inspired choices Pattinson has made post-”Twilight,” whether he’s working with indie greats like Claire Denis, Robert Eggers and David Cronenberg or bringing his angular emo presence to Matt Reeves’ darkly artful “The Batman.” You can see why he’d be drawn to this role: It allows him to get a little goofy while showing a ton of range. 

Based on the 2022 sci-fi novel Mickey7 by Edward Ashton, “Mickey 17” follows the masochistic misadventures of Pattinson’s titular character. He is an “Expendable” on a faraway ice planet 30 years in the future. The hapless Mickey has signed up (without actually reading the fine print) to die repeatedly, only to be reprinted in his own body with his own memories. His job is to run interference for the colonizers of this brave new world, whether it’s breathing potentially toxic air or testing experimental vaccines. Whatever violent end he meets, he figures it’s better than the threats that were in store for him from gangsters back on Earth. The montage of him dying and being reborn represents the sweet spot for Bong with its mix of dark humor and brisk pacing. 

Advertisement

During one particularly perilous mission, he collapses through a cave and is left for dead in the snow–by the friend who got him into this situation four years earlier, of all people. Steven Yeun, who also appeared in “Okja,” is always a welcome presence, but there isn’t much to his character besides selfishness and opportunism. The techs back at the lab figure this version of Mickey (#17) has died, so they print out a new version of him, Mickey 18. But when Mickey 17 returns intact, it’s a violation of the government’s rule against multiples, so the two must figure out how, or even whether, to coexist. 

While Mickey 17 is a good-natured people pleaser, Mickey 18 is arrogant and aggressive. The idea that there would be deviations in their personalities is a clever one, and it gives Pattinson room to play with his voice, delivery and demeanor. The special effects are seamless as they perform opposite each other in a variety of maximalist scenarios. Having two Mickeys is also an exciting prospect for his sexually voracious girlfriend, Nasha (a spirited Naomi Ackie), a brave and loyal security officer. Meanwhile, another co-worker, Kai (“Happening” star Anamaria Vartolomei), is attracted to the kinder version of him.  

But they all live in fear of the smooth tyrant who runs the whole operation, Kenneth Marshall, played by a preening, puffy-haired Mark Ruffalo. His buffoonery can be amusing, but his self-aggrandizement is unmistakable, as is the pursuit of genetic supremacy that drives his mission. Marshall even has a catchphrase and a cadre of hangers-on in red baseball caps. Ruffalo and Toni Collette as his scheming wife, Ylfa, lean hard on the loathsome nature of their characters, which is good for a few laughs but quickly grows tiresome. 

“Mickey 17” gets a little too complicated around the arrival of Mickey 18, despite the frequent narration from Pattinson explaining the way this world works. Much of it speaks vividly for itself, thanks to the beautifully dystopian cinematography from Darius Khondji and the imposing industrial gloom of Fiona Crombie’s production design. Subplots spin out of control and drag on interminably, involving a coup and the indigenous critters known as “creepers,” which resemble gray suede armadillos and are simultaneously hideous and adorable. As in “Okja,” this animal element is not the slightest bit subtle, as it bludgeons us with ideas about immigration and colonization. 

What’s frustrating is that I totally agree with everything Bong is saying, I just wish he were saying it with a touch more finesse. Maybe they can do some fine-tuning in the lab for next time. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending