Connect with us

Entertainment

Review: 'Look Into My Eyes' is a compassionate profile of psychics, not out to scam but connect

Published

on

Review: 'Look Into My Eyes' is a compassionate profile of psychics, not out to scam but connect

As Lana Wilson’s documentary about psychics “Look Into My Eyes” opens, a gray New York sky hovers above a nondescript building. A modest yellow glow comes from one high-storied window. Inside, a woman begins telling someone off-camera about a girl’s tragic death, something she’s held onto tightly for 20 years. There’s a question she still needs answered. How is she?

Wilson returns to that exterior building shot at the end of the film, after we’ve witnessed several more interactions and gotten to know a handful of these psychics, many of whom carry around their own unresolved aches. But at the end, the image somehow feels different: That lit window against the big, hard, anxious city conveys a hopeful warmth. It looks comforting.

Coming to “Look Into My Eyes” as a skeptic is only natural, because you’re human. The world of clairvoyants is bizarre and suspicious, and we love docs that pull back the curtain. What’s also universal, however, in these years of global trauma, is the need to address what ails us, and it’s this perspective that informs Wilson’s approach — the same one that imbued grace to her previous documentaries “After Tiller,” about abortion doctors, and “The Departure,” about a turmoil-ridden monk.

Something diverting and affecting emerges from Wilson’s close, considerate and not unskeptical hang with a diverse handful of New York psychics plying their wares and living their lives. You end up believing — not in paranormal powers or some mystical gift, but in the modest building blocks of reaching out. These tucked-away transactions of faith and performance offer, in their own way, a kind of solace.

Wilson’s observational mode is respectful, the multi-camera set-up fixed on hushed, awkward-at-first exchanges as if capturing an important interview where subject and questioner have equal standing. The faces of the clients have nervous smiles as they ask a question or await one, or receive a declaration of a spiritual presence. The psychics, too, betray their own apprehension as things come to them. Will it spark an emotion, bring them nearer to the source of the pain? Or will it go wrong? It comes off as a first dance, where both parties want to avoid stepping on toes or actively leading, yet find a rhythm that matches the music and, most importantly, feels good.

Advertisement

The exchanges often seem like bids for being heard, where all that’s being sought is a kind, sensible word from the friendly face in front of you. An adoptee wants details about the Chinese birth parents who gave her up. (They were greedy; being adopted can be hard.) A tightly wound woman fears her defiant dog doesn’t like her. (He senses that worry; be calmer.) A young Black man fixates on having learned about his ancestor’s slave price. (Focus on defining your own freedom.)

That assuaging goes both ways, though. The psychics’ own backstories of anguish and loneliness — unsurprisingly, they’re almost all former or still-striving actors — invariably tinge the kind of healing messages given: that a person is unique, that someone can’t change the past, that a lost loved one accepts them, that recognition is just around the corner. Some of the psychics’ lives seem, frankly, precarious, and by a certain point, we glean, quite movingly, that in these sessions, they’re soothing themselves as much as their clients.

In interviews, Wilson can be heard off-camera, gently probing: Is this essentially improv? Their replies aren’t defensive — the psychics rely on an affable confidence in not knowing exactly what is going on, but that something is. As one of them adds, “If it resonates, it doesn’t really matter.”

Human connections are gifts, imagination is powerful and empathy isn’t a trick. These are the things “Look Into My Eyes” patiently communicates to us from its watchful perch. What these freelance healers do may not be professional therapy. But the sensitive, intimate outlet shown in Wilson’s compassionate documentary — one of the year’s best — lets us put our mistrust aside to consider what can be deeply felt from a pretense accepted between willing, receptive souls.

‘Look Into My Eyes’

Advertisement

Rating: R, for language

Running time: 1 hour, 44 minutes

Playing: In limited release Friday, Sept. 13

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Eden’ Review: Jude Law Leads a Starry Cast Marooned in Ron Howard’s Odd and Off-Putting Survival Tale

Published

on

‘Eden’ Review: Jude Law Leads a Starry Cast Marooned in Ron Howard’s Odd and Off-Putting Survival Tale

It would be completely understandable that Ron Howard, having directed more than two dozen genre-tripping films spanning six decades, would want to shake things up a bit by jumping into something outside his proven comfort zone.

And it would be equally logical that the vehicle to take him there would be a certifiably bizarre but true account of a 1920s German philosopher who sets up an experimental society with his lover/disciple on a remote island in the Galápagos, only to have it all implode when opportunists come and crash the party.

Eden

The Bottom Line

Mighty far from paradise.

Advertisement

Venue: Toronto International Film Festival (Gala Presentations)
Cast: Jude Law, Ana de Armas, Vanessa Kirby, Daniel Brühl, Sydney Sweeney
Director: Ron Howard
Screenwriter: Noah Pink

2 hours 9 minutes

But despite all the intriguing possibilities of the concept and a game, international cast including Jude Law, Ana de Armas, Vanessa Kirby, Daniel Brühl and Sydney Sweeney, Eden, handed its world premiere at Toronto, never finds its happy place. The prevailing overwrought tone lands more cartoonish than satirical, while a protracted running time accentuates the film’s deficiencies.

The movie certainly starts promisingly enough, efficiently setting up the life and times of Dr. Friedrich Ritter (Law). In 1929, he flees German society and its bourgeois values to create a new home on the remote island of Floreana, living off of limited natural resources with his survivalist partner, Dore Strauch (Kirby).

Advertisement

But the couple’s solitary existence is interrupted by the arrival of Heinz Wittmer (Brühl), a World War I vet with a younger new wife, Margaret (Sweeney), and a son, Harry (Jonathan Tittel). They have been following Ritter’s dispatches and hope the land’s virgin air might cure Harry’s tuberculosis, just as it appears to have kept Strauch’s multiple sclerosis under control.

Feeling less than hospitable, Ritter and Strauch glare at the newbies with their safari shorts and butterfly nets, figuring they won’t make it until the first rains.

But while the family prove surprisingly resilient, building a home for themselves and their soon-to-be newborn, their co-existence is freshly threatened by the entrance of the Baroness Eloise Bosquet de Wagner Wehrhorn (de Armas), accompanied by a pocket harem of young men, who intends to build the world’s most exclusive resort on the rocky terrain.

It soon becomes clear that the Baroness, with her long strand of pearls and a hard-to-place accent that sounds much like Anna Delvey’s, is a scheming instigator. She proceeds to pit the inhabitants against each other, leading to an inevitable descent into madness.

Despite an inspired setup that might suggest Werner Herzog’s Gilligan’s Island, Howard and screenwriter Noah Pink (Tetris) shipwreck the Queensland-shot vehicle in a mishmash of styles. Neither quite satire nor thriller nor murder mystery, the film cries out for a sharper attack.

Advertisement

It’s the kind of tale that would have been a natural fit for the likes of Mike White, whose acutely devious White Lotus sensibility would have been right at home here. But although Howard delivers some effective set pieces, notably a harrowing sequence in which Margaret must deliver her own baby, little about Eden feels consistent.

As a result, the performances are likewise hit and miss. De Armas does the best she can with her femme fatale role, even though she ultimately lacks the satirical chops of a more seasoned character actress to really hit it home.

Meanwhile, Law (so commanding in another TIFF offering, The Order) grows so tiresome as the smug, pontificating Dr. Ritter that by the time he eventually loses his mind, you can’t blame it for wanting to get away.

Only Sweeney manages to retain the viewer’s sympathy and her character’s sanity as the decent pillar of stability that is Margaret — who, as the end credits and archival footage reveal, would remain on the island until her death in 2000, and where her descendants host tourists at Wittmer Lodge to this day.

Now that premise sounds more like something in Howard’s wheelhouse.

Advertisement

Full credits

Venue: Toronto International Film Festival (Gala Presentations)
Production companies: Imagine Entertainment, AGC Studios
Cast: Jude Law, Ana de Armas, Vanessa Kirby, Daniel Brühl, Sydney Sweeney
Director: Ron Howard
Screenwriter: Noah Pink
Producers: Ron Howard, Brian Grazer, Karen Lunder, Stuart Ford, William M. Connor, Patrick Newall
Executive producers: Miguel A. Pelos Jr., Zach Garrett, Noah Pink, Mathias Herndl, Namit Malhotra, David Taghioff, Masha Maganova, Matt Murphie, Craig McMahon
Director of photography: Mathias Herndl
Production designer: Michelle McGahey
Costume designer: Kerry Thompson
Music: Hans Zimmer
Editor: Matt Villa
Sales agents: CAA, AGC Studios

2 hours 9 minutes

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Girls Will Be Girls Sneaks Up on You

Published

on

Girls Will Be Girls Sneaks Up on You

Preeti Panigrahi in Girls Will Be Girls.
Photo: Juno Films/Everett Collection

Early in Shuchi Talati’s Girls Will Be Girls, the film’s protagonist, a precocious high-school senior named Mira (Preeti Panigrahi), stands in front of a mirror, combing her hair and rubbing lotion, when a soft, sensuous pop song comes on the radio. Slowly, she begins to dance to the music. As Mira gets carried away by her moves, her mother Anila (Kani Kusruti) enters the room, and the girl stops — one of those quiet “gotcha” moments that many of us might remember from our youths. But then, Mom herself starts to sway to the music, beckoning her daughter into a parent-child communion. Mira makes a half-hearted attempt to join in before stepping away; it’s too awkward, too weird. She’s a teenager, after all, and which teenager would be caught dead dancing with their own mother? Anila’s face drops, as the euphoria of bonding dissipates. The loveliness of the moment is enhanced by its mystery. Did mother and daughter dance together when the girl was younger? Is Anila’s gray look a winsome recognition that her child is growing up — or is it a more self-centered one, reflecting a fear that she herself isn’t so young anymore?

This is the kind of vibrant ambiguity that sometimes seems to come effortlessly to Girls Will Be Girls, a subtly powerful Indian drama that was probably the best picture I saw at the Sundance Film Festival earlier this year. (It opens in New York today and will expand nationally in the weeks to come.) The movie tells what could be a simple coming-of-age story, but it’s been written and directed and acted with such feeling, such observation, that every moment pulses with life. Mira is the top student at her elite school near the Himalayas, and she’s been named head prefect for the year, which is sort of like a student-council president with a lot more power and responsibilities (not to mention more spite directed at her from the other kids). She’s charmed by the new boy at school, a cheerful and handsome lad named Srinivas (Kesav Binoy Kiron) who just moved from Hong Kong. Their first real exchange occurs when he asks her to put up a flyer for his astronomy club, as their fingers dance around each other while tacking a piece of paper on the school bulletin board. Among other things, Girls Will Be Girls captures the ways that young love can turn the most mundane interaction into something intimate and indelible.

Advertisement

Yes, it might be puppy love, but like many a teenager before her, Mira suspects this might be “big-dog love.” Pleasant and courteous, Sri says and does all the right things. He stays in a dormitory, while Mira lives nearby, so he starts coming over with Mom’s gleefully conspiratorial help. Anila, who graduated from this school years earlier and still imagines herself as not too far removed from girlhood, is also charmed by this young man. First, she sees in the boy a chance to bond further with her daughter: With Sri around, mom and daughter even dance together, finally. But Mira also begins to suspect that her mother is showing more interest in Sri than appropriate. It’s the kind of plot turn that could make for sleazy melodrama — perhaps something from the paperback romances Anila likes to read — but Talati lets the uncertainty over these people’s intentions hang in the air, maybe because they themselves probably aren’t sure what they’re doing.

Mira is new to this girlfriend-boyfriend stuff, and Sri pretends to be, too — though we can tell early on that he has more experience than he lets on, especially when he talks about a relationship he had for over a year in Hong Kong. Mira has for so long been such a good and proper student; she clearly relishes how their relationship allows her to feel like she’s quietly rebelling against the school’s strict ways. But her occasional haughtiness as a student extends to her personal life as well. Sri’s well-spoken respectfulness lets Mira imagine that their love is different than the other kids’ — certainly a step above the burgeoning romance between her best friend Priya (Kajol Chugh) and one of her boorish classmates, Vikrant (Aman Desai).

Talati makes her feature-directing debut here, and she ably juggles all this dicey subject matter, avoiding both common coming-of-age clichés and the pitfalls of cheap melodrama. There’s a delectable, pitch-perfect hesitation to the performances. Everybody seems to be treading on eggshells, because they’re all navigating feelings they’re unsure of in a setting that doesn’t allow for uncertainty, fantasy, pleasure — or even really pain. Girls Will Be Girls is a modest work, but like some of the greatest films, it comes to vivid life before our eyes.

See All

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

How to watch the 2024 Emmys (and everything else you need to know)

Published

on

How to watch the 2024 Emmys (and everything else you need to know)

The second Primetime Emmy Awards of 2024 are upon us.

The 76th Emmy Awards, celebrating the best of the 2023-24 television season, arrives just eight months after the ceremony for the 75th edition was held in January. Nominees from hit shows such as “Shōgun,” “The Bear,” “Hacks,” “The Crown” and “Baby Reindeer” will assemble at the Peacock Theater at L.A. Live in Los Angeles on Sunday for the actual 2024 Emmy Awards.

“Shōgun” and “The Bear” are among the shows that have already notched a few early wins at the Creative Arts Emmy Awards held earlier this month. Jamie Lee Curtis and Jon Bernthal won comedy guest acting awards for their roles on “The Bear,” while Néstor Carbonell of “Shōgun” and Michaela Coel of “Mr. & Mrs. Smith” were awarded the guest actor prizes in drama.

Here’s everything you need to know about the 2024 Emmy Awards.

When are the Emmys? Didn’t we just have them?

The 76th Emmy Awards will be held on Sunday at the Peacock Theater at L.A. Live. The three-hour live telecast begins at 5 p.m. PT on ABC (and will be available the next day on Hulu).

Advertisement

This is a return to form for the Emmys, which are traditionally held in September. The 75th Emmys were postponed from their original date in 2023 to January because of the dual Hollywood strikes by the Writers Guild of America and SAG-AFTRA.

The Creative Arts Emmy Awards, which were held earlier this month, will air on FXX on Saturday at 8 p.m. (and will be available on Hulu the next day).

How can I watch them?

The live telecast will be broadcast on ABC, so you will need access to cable, a television equipped with a digital antenna or an over-the-top service that is not currently fighting with Disney (sorry DirecTV subscribers). Cord-cutters will need to be subscribed to streaming services with live TV tiers like Hulu+ Live TV or Fubo.

Those not concerned about seeing the event live can stream it on Hulu starting Monday.

Who is hosting?

Eugene and Dan Levy will host the 76th Emmy Awards.

Advertisement

(Kirk McKoy / Los Angeles Times)

Father-son team Eugene Levy and Dan Levy, who co-created and starred in the beloved sitcom “Schitt’s Creek,” have been tapped to host this year’s ceremony. As Times television critic Robert Lloyd noted in his interview with the Canadian duo, it’s almost like a belated victory lap for them: “Schitt’s Creek” swept all seven of the major comedy categories at the 72nd Emmys, which were held in 2020, during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Levys said that their aim for the show is for it “to feel celebratory” with “a bit of an edge.”

“People … are kind of excited that we’re not hard-edged comics, that there will be a kind of warmth to the room,” said Dan Levy. Added Eugene Levy: “You want it to be funny, but it’s maybe a kinder, gentler approach.”

Advertisement

Read Lloyd’s conversation with the Levys here.

When does the red carpet start and how can I watch it?

Preshow coverage of the event will begin at 2 p.m. PT on E! with a programming block that kicks off with “Live From E! Countdown to the Emmys.” The red carpet coverage portion of the evening will being at 3 p.m. with “Live From E!: Emmys,” hosted by Laverne Cox, who will be joined this year by Heather McMahan and Keltie Knight.

Over on ABC, Robin Roberts and Will Reeve will be hosting “On the Red Carpet: Live at the Emmys” beginning at 4 p.m. PT. For L.A. locals, KTLA’s live red carpet coverage will begin at 3 p.m. PT.

What shows and actors are nominated?

FX’s Japan-set historical drama “Shōgun” was one of the top nominees when Emmy nominations were announced in July and it is vying for the drama series award along with “The Crown,” “Fallout,” “The Gilded Age,” “The Morning Show,” “Mr. & Mrs. Smith,” “Slow Horses” and “3 Body Problem.” (The series has already nabbed 14 wins at the Creative Arts Emmys.)

Jennifer Aniston (“The Morning Show”), Carrie Coon (“The Gilded Age”), Maya Erskine (“Mr. & Mrs. Smith”), Anna Sawai (“Shōgun”), Imelda Staunton (“The Crown”) and Reese Witherspoon (“The Morning Show”) are nominated for lead actress in a drama series. The drama lead actor nominees are Donald Glover (“Mr. & Mrs. Smith”), Walton Goggins (“Fallout”), Gary Oldman (“Slow Horses”), Hiroyuki Sanada (“Shōgun”), Dominic West (“The Crown”) and Idris Elba (“Hijack”).

Advertisement

On the comedy side, last year’s winner “The Bear” is once again up for series, along with “Abbott Elementary,” “Curb Your Enthusiasm,” “Hacks,” “Only Murders in the Building,” “Palm Royale,” “Reservation Dogs” and “What We Do in the Shadows.”

The lead comedy actress field includes Quinta Brunson (“Abbott Elementary”), Ayo Edebiri (“The Bear”) and Jean Smart (“Hacks”), who have all previously won Emmys for their roles, as well as Selena Gomez (“Only Murders in the Building”), Kristen Wiig (“Palm Royale”) and Maya Rudolph (“Loot”). The lead comedy actor field features first-time nominees Matt Berry (“What We Do in the Shadows”) and D’Pharaoh Woon-A-Tai (“Reservation Dogs”) as well as Television Academy favorites Larry David (“Curb Your Enthusiasm”), Steve Martin (“Only Murders in the Building”), Martin Short (“Only Murders in the Building”) and the most recent winner of the category, Jeremy Allen White (“The Bear”).

See the full list of nominees here.

Who will win an Emmy award?

a woman and man in Japanese period attire riding horses

Anna Sawai and Hiroyuki Sanada in “Shōgun.”

(Katie Yu / FX)

Advertisement

According to awards prognosticators, including Times columnist Glenn Whipp, “Shōgun,” “The Bear” and “Baby Reindeer” are expected to have big nights.

“The Bear,” which dominated the comedy field at the 75th Emmy Awards earlier this year, is expected to win the comedy series, comedy lead actor (Jeremy White) and comedy supporting actor (Ebon Moss-Bachrach) races once again. Also likely: another round of questions about whether “The Bear” is really a comedy.

Fellow FX series “Shōgun” has long been considered the front runner in the drama categories. The historical drama has already notched 14 wins at the Creative Arts Emmys and will likely add the awards for drama series, lead drama actress (Anna Sawai) and lead drama actor (Hiroyuki Sanada) to its haul on Sunday.

The full list of Whipp’s predictions is available here.

Who are the presenters?

As usual, a number of nominees have been tapped to also hit the stage as presenters at this year’s ceremony, including Christine Baranski (“The Gilded Age”), Matt Bomer (“Fellow Travelers”), Lily Gladstone (“Under the Bridge”), Selena Gomez (“Only Murders in the Building”), Greta Lee (“The Morning Show”), Steve Martin (“Only Murders in the Building”), Nava Mau (“Baby Reindeer”), Ebon Moss-Bachrach (“The Bear”), Martin Short (“Only Murders in the Building”), Jean Smart (“Hacks”) and Kristen Wiig (“Palm Royale”).

Advertisement

Kathy Bates, Candice Bergen, Billy Crystal, Viola Davis, Allison Janney, Jane Lynch, Niecy Nash-Betts, Sam Richardson, Maya Rudolph, Dick Van Dyke and Steven Yeun are among the past Emmy winners who have also been announced as presenters in this year’s telecast.

The Television Academy has also teased an Olympics crossover with appearances by swimmer Caeleb Dressel and rugby player Ilona Maher, who both won medals at the Paris Games.

Continue Reading

Trending