Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Stream It Or Skip It: ‘A Man Called Otto’ on VOD, Starring Tom Hanks as a Stereotypical Grumpy Old Man

Published

on

Stream It Or Skip It: ‘A Man Called Otto’ on VOD, Starring Tom Hanks as a Stereotypical Grumpy Old Man

A Man Referred to as Otto (now streaming on VOD providers like Amazon Prime Video) continues the present run of Minor Tom Hanks performances, which started just a few years again with throwback maritime conflict thriller Greyhound and continued via the Western Information of the World, the disarmingly Chappie-esque Finch, his annoying OTT flip in Elvis and that damned Pinocchio “stay motion” remake. Otto – which grossed north of $100 million on the worldwide field workplace – finds him enjoying a personality you non-subtitle-averse folks could also be conversant in, for the reason that movie is an Americanized remake of 2015 Swedish darkish comedy A Man Referred to as Ove, a couple of persnickety grump of a lonely previous man whose repeated makes an attempt to off himself routinely fail. What Hanks, a real treasure of the cinema, does with the function is… effectively, extra disappointing than anything.

The Gist: Otto (Hanks) can’t BELIEVE he has to pay for 2 yards of rope to hold himself with when he solely wants 5 ft. And don’t get him STARTED on the shoddy craftsmanship of the attention hook he drills into his ceiling – it received’t even bear the burden of an grownup human lengthy sufficient for one to correctly asphyxiate one’s self with a noose. Oh effectively. Since Otto’s not useless, he could as effectively go on along with his regular routine of nitpicking each little rule and ordinance of his apartment complicated, you recognize, your bike goes right here and never right here, who the hell retains placing metallic within the recycling bin for plastic, who retains leaving the gate open and, whereas we’re at it, let’s not be good to the affectionate stray cat that wanders the neighborhood. “Idiots” is a factor he grumbles below his breath consistently. He’s simply been unwillingly “retired” from the job he’s had for a zillion years – his co-workers appear to relish driving a knife into the picture of his face rendered as frosting atop his goodbye cake – and he lays in mattress subsequent to a conspicuous empty spot that tells us HEY THE POOR A-HOLE’S WIFE IS DEAD SO MAYBE CUT HIM A LITTLE SLACK. Although reducing anybody slack has apparently by no means crossed his thoughts. When he goes low, we go excessive, proper? 

There’s no slack in that noose rope, although. He’s about to do himself in when there arises such a clatter from throughout the highway. It’s his new neighbors transferring in, they usually can’t park the rattling U-Haul trailer: Idiots. He parks it for them as a result of if you need something achieved proper you must do it your self and everyone seems to be silly however Otto and he doesn’t undergo fools, which is the remainder of the inhabitants, as a result of he’s the one one on the entire dadgum planet who’s not a idiot. The brand new neighbors are led by Marisol (Mariana Treviño), a happy-go-lucky mother of two women with one other child on the best way and a dope of a husband (Manuel Garcia-Rulfo) who can’t do something with out breaking one thing, together with his personal bones. These folks might actually use a good friend who is aware of easy methods to do issues, however jeez, Otto’s degree of pragmatism is a bit, shall we embrace, pointless.

Otto visits his spouse’s grave and flashes again to when he met Sonya (Rachel Keller), an angel of a human being who was totally flawless, or maybe not, as a result of one wonders if her potential to nurture the kind of bellyaching grousemonkey that Otto turns into was, certainly, a flaw. (Notably, Hanks’ son Truman Hanks performs younger Otto.) Marisol offers Otto some scrumptious meals, and begins chipping away at his crusty veneer. She wants driving classes, and if anybody who isn’t a grade-A moron goes to show her, the one possibility is Otto, who may even have a sense or two below there that he’ll truly nearly share. In the meantime, he babysits her women, begins getting on a bit of higher along with his different wacky neighbors – even a few of the less-wacky ones – and perhaps that ol’ cat ain’t so dangerous in any case. Additionally in the meantime, we get a subplot about an evil actual property firm that feels fully extraneous, however hey, not less than Otto has one thing else to gripe about.

'A Man Called Otto'
Photograph: Everett Assortment

What Motion pictures Will It Remind You Of?: Otto is Carl Fredricksen from Up crossed with Napoleon Dynamite (“Idiots!”) crossed with Ebenezer Scrooge, and Marisol is much like Sally Hawkins’ Poppy character from Completely happy-Go-Fortunate, as a result of she’s just about unflappable, and in addition doesn’t know easy methods to drive. 

Efficiency Value Watching: We walked away from Otto pondering we most likely don’t must see Hanks play one other softball character like this (he’s sort of the anti-Mr. Rogers), and in addition pondering we have to see Treviño – who lights up the display screen together with her presence – in lots of extra issues.  

Advertisement

Memorable Dialogue: Otto finds it someplace in himself to say this to Marisol: “You may have given delivery to 2 kids. Quickly it’ll be three. You may have come right here from a rustic very far-off. You discovered a brand new language, you bought your self an schooling and a nitwit husband and you might be holding that household collectively. You’ll have no drawback studying easy methods to drive. My god, the world is filled with full idiots who’ve managed to determine it out, and you aren’t a whole fool.”

Intercourse and Pores and skin: None.

Our Take: A Man Referred to as Otto is mechanically engineered for optimum lachrymosal extraction. The grouch meets the pollyanna, and one thing has to provide, and that is the kind of film that you recognize which manner it’s going to swing, most likely even earlier than you watch it. The explanation Otto is the best way he’s? Nicely, no spoilers, nevertheless it’s pat and predictable, and results in an aggravating, ballpeen-to-the-noggin ironic twist, and a washy, noncommittal decision. Extra troublesome is how the film treats suicide as a plot gadget, both to evoke a dark-comic chuckle from us or to make us really feel sorry for Otto; it’s simplistic, bordering on distasteful. It didn’t sit effectively with me, despite director Marc Forster’s try to gauge the tone so it’s bland and straightforward to eat.

Treviño works laborious to be the movie’s saving grace, however I’m unsure it’s value saving. As for the Otto character, it appears tailor-made to plug into the Hanks algorithm so he could execute the instructions of a schmaltz-ridden screenplay that’s overburdened with subplots and characters, and reasonably jejune in its strategy to delicate emotional content material. Which isn’t to say Hanks is dangerous; seeing him inhabit a cartoon like Otto might be entertaining, and he enjoys the occasional alternate with Treviño that strikes a chord of reality. However when the writing is that this flimsy, it forces even a stalwart famous person actor into enjoying little greater than a caricature.

Our Name: SKIP IT. A Man Referred to as Otto is watchable at greatest, tone deaf at worst. 

Advertisement

John Serba is a contract author and movie critic based mostly in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: “Mufasa,” everything we didn’t need to know about “The Lion King”

Published

on

Movie Review: “Mufasa,” everything we didn’t need to know about “The Lion King”

The CGI animated savannahs, rivers and rock formations of Africa are photo-real, and the animals populating it have never been more realistically rendered than they are in “Mufasa: The Lion King.”

Disney felt the need to have the lions, warthog and meercat’s lips move when they sing, which is saying something.

But let’s keep this review short and not-exactly-sweet, unlike this boardroom-ordered prequel to one of Disney’s most popular intellectual properties. “Mufasa: The Lion King” never makes the case that it’s a story that needed to be told or a movie that needed to be made.

It’s about how Mufasa got separated from his birth-parents’ pride of lions, and joined another, becoming “brothers” with the lion cub who “saved” him, but who will come to be called “Scar.”

So the object of this prequel is to show how Mufasa became Lion King and how Scar got his scar and became the bitter rival in their pride.

The “story” is framed as a “story” Rafiki the ape (John Sani) tells Simba’s cub, and that cub’s protectors/babysitters, Timon (Billy Eichner) and Pumbaa (Seth Rogen).

Advertisement

The tale is of another coming-of-age quest, with two young-lions on their own this time, paired-up, depending on each other, on the run from a pride of albino lions led by the killer Kiros (Mads Mikkelsen).

There are new songs of a far more forgettable nature than those from the animated classic “The Lion King.”

“The circle is broken,” he growls, and we believe him.

There are harrowing moments of drama in their quest, but there’s precious little humor to the movie, all of it provided by the same duo who have always been the comic relief, Timon and Pumbaa.

“We’ve been singing ‘Hakuna Matata’ since forever!”

Advertisement

“Who hasn’t?

The messaging, about taking in “strays,” and that “To be lost is to learn the way,” is weak tea.

Story failings aside, it’s not a bad movie. But “Mufasa” never lets us forget the limited-entertainment-value of the entire undertaking. Oscar winner Barry Jenkins (“Moonlight”) was hired to direct, but aside from a few voice casting decisions (Keith David, Anika Noni Rose, with Aaron Pierre and Kelvin Harrison, Jr. as Mufasa and Taka/Scar), he brings nothing to this that makes a difference.

Disney’s tech/animators telling their bosses that “Yes, we can make it look like a movie with real singing lions and bathing hippos on the veldt without using real animals or shooting on location” is no justification for showcasing that technology.

Story matters, and this one didn’t need to be told.

Advertisement

Rating: PG, some violence

Cast: The voices of Aaron Pierre, Kelvin Harrison, Jr., Tiffany Boone, John Kani, Mads Mikkelsen, Thandiwe Newton, Keith David, Billy Eichner and Seth Rogen.

Credits: Directed by Barry Jenkins, scripted by Jeff Nathanson, based on characters from Disney’s “The Lion King.” A Walt Disney release.

Running time: 1:58

About Roger Moore

Movie Critic, formerly with McClatchy-Tribune News Service, Orlando Sentinel, published in Spin Magazine, The World and now published here, Orlando Magazine, Autoweek Magazine

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Better Man (2024) – Movie Review

Published

on

Better Man (2024) – Movie Review

Better Man, 2024.

Directed by Michael Gracey.
Starring Robbie Williams, Jonno Davies, Steve Pemberton, Damon Herriman, Raechelle Banno, Alison Steadman, Kate Mulvany, Frazer Hadfield, Tom Budge, Anthony Hayes, Jake Simmance, Jesse Hyde, Liam Head, Chase Vollenweider, Rose Flanagan, Jack Sherran, Karina Banno, Asmara Feik, Leo Harvey-Elledge, Elyssia Koulouris, Frazer Hadfield, Chris Gun, Ben Hall, Kaela Daffara, and Chase Vollenweider.

SYNOPSIS:

Follow Robbie Williams’ journey from childhood, to being the youngest member of chart-topping boyband Take That, through to his unparalleled achievements as a record-breaking solo artist – all the while confronting the challenges that stratospheric fame and success can bring.

Advertisement

During a conversation exploring the possibility of a biopic, British popstar Robbie Williams told well-regarded musical director Michael Gracey that he saw himself as a monkey performing for others. That became the window into telling the story of this singer/songwriter with Better Man, a film that, as the title implies, also shows that Robbie Williams is self-aware of his flaws, mistakes, and shortcomings without being afraid to put them front and center. Yes, rather than go through the arduous casting process, Michael Gracey ran with that comment literally, making the creative choice to have the pop star played by a CGI monkey (voiced by Jonno Davies, with Robbie Williams lending his vocals.)

It’s a smart move to roll a short clip of subject and filmmaker conversing before the film starts proper, not just because other parts of the world might not be familiar with Robbie Williamss music (consistently accidentally reading it as a biopic about musician Robin Williams if you’re anything like me), but also since this is such a bold concept for a biopic that it’s helpful to get an idea of what this man looks like and the personality he puts out there before it’s all monkey business.

Going one step further, this turns out to not fall into the trappings of a flailing gimmick but ties into themes of pressures of the music industry, fame causing stunted behavior, family drama, and an unflinching portrayal of self that doesn’t smooth over any rough edges. Better Man is an invigorating biopic; a shot of adrenaline to the most overplayed, clichéd genre. After this, no one should be allowed to make biopics (at least ones about musicians) unless they have an equally creative angle or some compelling X factor behind it. Simply put, this film puts most recent offerings from the genre to shame, especially the ones that get trotted out at the end of every year as familiar awards bait.

Even though the life trajectory and story beats aren’t anything new to anyone who has ever seen a biopic about a musician before, it gets to be told with boundless imagination, typically coming from several dazzling musical sequences. Not only are they dynamic in presentation (whether it be jubilantly unfolding across the streets of London or something more melancholy regarding fatherly abandonment), but they are sometimes highwire concepts themselves; Better Man has one of the most thrilling, fantastically clever, visually stunning, and exciting takes on battling one’s demons.

The characters (including Robbie’s family, friends, lover, hell, and even Oasis) don’t interact or react to Robbie Williams as a monkey. It’s a visual treat for us (this film would fall apart without the astonishingly expressive technical wizardry from Weta, who already have proven themselves as outstanding in this field when it comes to the recent Planet of the Apes movies) but another personal, self-deprecating, honest interpretation of how Robbie saw himself during these life stages. Initially, this feels like it will end up as a missed opportunity for further creativity or humor. One of the more surprising elements here is that the filmmakers (with Michael Gracey co-writing alongside Oliver Cole and Simon Gleeson) are playing this material straight and not going for laughs. That confidence pays off, allowing a maximalist, melodramatic side to come out with sincere, absorbing emotional heft.

Advertisement

That story follows a standard rise and fall structure, with Robbie Williams finding inspiration from his initially supportive singing father (Steve Pemberton), exhibiting a relatable drive to make his grandmother (Alison Steadman proud, getting his start in boy band Take That before his insecurities and worsening substance abuse and egocentric behavior gets him kicked out, stumbling into a rocky relationship with Nicole Appleton (Raechelle Banno), and then not only finding the courage to put some meaningful lyrics out into the world through a successful solo career but managing the anxieties that come with performing in front of humongous crowds while constantly struggling with drug addiction. 

Some of those aspects feel glossed over and aren’t as explored as they possibly could have been (the film is already 135 minutes, but some of it is given a broad strokes treatment), but it’s affecting anyway due to the creativity, artistry, musical numbers, and blunt honesty enhancing those character dynamics. Better Man is a biopic that starts with a confessional about being a narcissist and having a punchable face and ends up somewhere beautifully moving that perfectly captures the essence of that title. There is also a healthy dose of Frank Sinatra here, given that he was a major source of inspiration for Robbie Williams, so let’s say he and Michael Gracey did this biopic their way, and the result is something no one should want any other way.

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★ ★

Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association and the Critics Choice Association. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews, follow my Twitter or Letterboxd, or email me at MetalGearSolid719@gmail.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

Advertisement

 

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review | 'Nosferatu'

Published

on

Movie Review | 'Nosferatu'

Robert Eggers’s take on the 1922 F.W. Murnau film “Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror” has long been a passion project for the director, in various stages of development since he broke out with 2015’s “The Witch.” Now that the film has finally made its way to screens, Eggers has the opportunity to shine. And like any of his films, “Nosferatu” has mood and style to spare.

Eggers’s movies always have great attention to detail, but sometimes the style can outweigh the story and “Nosferatu” is no different. “The Witch” was about setting a moody atmosphere and “The Northman” was about showing off the muscularity in his filmmaking and in between he made arguably his best movie, “The Lighthouse,” which is a bizarre, fever dream kind of experience.

In the first frames of “Nosferatu,” Ellen (Lily-Rose Depp) emerges from the shadows with tears running down her face. She is calling out to something, but nothing is there. What is making her body move in such unpleasant ways? Who is the mysterious voice calling out to her? From the shadows emerges a silhouette of Count Orlok (Bill Skarsgård), who is haunting Ellen.



Years later, Ellen is in a relationship with Thomas (Nicholas Hoult, who is having a busy year between “Nosferatu,” “Juror #2” and “The Order”). Thomas is heading to Transylvania to meet with Count Orlock, foreshadowing a great deal of dread in the movie. Back home,  Ellen is not doing well, constantly haunted by the looming presence of Count Orlock, who will not let her know peace.

Not only does Count Orlock hang over Ellen’s life, but his existence hangs over the entire movie. Eggers effectively uses the character sparingly, shooting him in shadows and only revealing his face every so often. It’s best to go into the movie surprised by the design, because Eggers certainly doesn’t settle for recreating the well-established imagery from the original film. Skarsgård, who is becoming a horror film regular, is nowhere to be found in his performance, completely disappearing behind the character.

Advertisement

Depp delivers the strongest performance of her young career, as she is required to run the gauntlet of emotional and physical pain. Her suffering helps bring some emotion to the movie, which can occasionally feel cold and distant in service of emphasizing the film’s craft. Individual moments of dread feel palpable, but the movie goes through plodding stretches (including with superfluous characters played by Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Emma Corrin; Eggers regular Willem Dafoe also plays a role), where the emotionality of Depp’s performance and the grim appearance of Skarsgård become sorely missed.

Even when the movie is choppy, it’s hard to not get lost in the impeccability of the craft. Egger and cinematographer Jarin Blaschke partially use natural lighting to establish the mood, while production designer Craig Lathrop transports viewers to 1838 Germany. Getting lost in the world of “Nosferatu” isn’t hard — though sometimes being moved by it as a whole is a tough task.

“Nosferatu” is currently playing in theaters.

Matt Passantino is a contributor to CITY.






Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending