Movie Reviews
‘My Name Is Alfred Hitchcock’ Review: Mark Cousins’ Doc Is a Sly and Engaging Celebration of the Filmmaker
Along with his latest deep-dive film about motion pictures, prolific documentarian Mark Cousins switches up his strategy by including a heaping dollop of mischief. My Identify Is Alfred Hitchcock, his love letter to one among cinema’s towering greats, flaunts a title that might be an impostor’s declaration on To Inform the Fact. The opening credit announce that the movie was “written and voiced by Alfred Hitchcock.” Say what? The primary sound of that voice on the soundtrack, nevertheless acquainted its adenoidal depths and Cockney slants, sparks affordable doubt — suspicions confirmed when the maestro’s preliminary feedback concern an enormous bust of him in London, erected 20 years after his dying.
The grasp of suspense is voiced by English impressionist Alistair McGowan, and finally, when you’ve gotten previous the movie’s ventriloquist conceit — that Hitchcock, addressing Cousins and us, is revisiting his physique of labor from the angle of the smartphone-tethered twenty first century — you’ll marvel on the breathy element of the efficiency. By then the movie could have drawn you in with Cousins’ sometimes sharp connections as he delves into the visible language of Hitchcock’s creations, the narrative motifs and creative methods — wizardly methods in “a trickster medium.”
My Identify Is Alfred Hitchcock
The Backside Line Brimming with insights and film love, when you get previous the ventriloquism.
Whether or not the “Hitchcock speaks” gambit enriches the doc is debatable, as is the query of whether or not he’d deign to splain all of it to us as patiently as he does, his historic conversations with Truffaut however. However the artifice provides a becoming layer of playfulness, as does Hitchcock’s promise that he’ll deceive us as soon as throughout his commentary — which he does, in spectacular trend.
Cousins’ documentary, premiering in Telluride, arrives on the centenary of Hitchcock’s first directorial effort, Quantity 13. Set amongst tenants of an affordable-housing constructing, it was pulled from manufacturing due to funds issues, its accomplished scenes subsequently misplaced. There’s no point out of it in My Identify, a movie that consists virtually solely of clips from the 54-year filmography. Cousins’ picks are hanging for his or her breadth and depth, and so they’re interwoven with an natural propulsion, the gathering by no means feeling rushed or pedantic or listy (the elegant enhancing is by frequent Cousins collaborator Timo Langer).
Aside from one among his trademark cameos, in Marnie, there are not any transferring photographs of Hitchcock himself; as a substitute, the doc places a number of stills of the auteur in rotation. Any suggestion of TV newsmagazine-style repetition is quickly dispelled by Cousins’ inquisitive digital camera, pulling in tighter, and by the eager liveliness of the deceased filmmaker’s voiceover.
Carried alongside by Hitchcock’s narration, we peer into his photographic portrait, and into his movies: the “most severe” (The Unsuitable Man), the lesser-known silents (“You in all probability didn’t see it,” Hitchcock/McGowan says of 1927’s Downhill, aka When Boys Go away House), the shimmering black-and-white nail-biters of the ’40s, ’50s and ’60s (Shadow of a Doubt, Strangers on a Prepare, Psycho) and the immortal Technicolor dreamscapes (Rear Window, Vertigo, North by Northwest, The Birds).
As “Hitchcock” notes, his motion pictures have been analyzed each which approach and again once more. Cousins’ contemporary strategy divides the work into six sections, a sublime capsule melding existential questions with the sensible challenges and alternatives of big-screen storytelling. The primary chapter, Escape, is the longest, and from there the movie strikes by means of Need, Loneliness, Time and Achievement, culminating with Peak — as in an elevated sense of perspective. It’s a rattling good define for a life, not to mention a compelling blueprint for exploring the oeuvre.
Cousins’ approach of motion pictures is as embedded within the narration as his analysis on Hitchcock’s productions. Biographical parts flicker by means of the dynamic cross-section of film moments, primarily as a complement to the tales they inform. He doesn’t second-guess or dismantle the films; he zeros in on what makes them tick. With one notable exception, this model of Hitchcock, our narrator, embraces the alternatives he made. Born on the tail finish of the nineteenth century, he upended Victorian literary concepts with a vigorous modernity. Till Truffaut’s wholehearted endorsement, he was usually dismissed as a mere entertainer. However he was wielding radical strategies. My Identify Is celebrates the methods Hitchcock escaped the conventions of drama, changing them with hyperrealities, not in contrast to his beloved Cezanne: “His geometry was not the world’s geometry,” Cousins’ Hitchcock says.
This Hitchcock is conscious of how digitalized the longer term — our current — has turn into, however Cousins isn’t eager about updating him or placing him by means of the revisionist mill. “My little metaphor nonetheless pertains” is Hitchcock’s verdict a few scene in Spellbound. His voice rings true when he makes use of the now-passé “transvestite” and typically calls ladies women. However there’s no trace right here of the person who famously mentioned actors ought to be handled like cattle; he speaks fondly, and on a first-name foundation, of the megastars who toplined his options — Jimmy, Cary, Ingrid, Hank (Fonda).
For the Hitchcock-curious, Cousins’ movie simply may function an introduction to his work. For others, it casts a brand new gentle on scenes you will have watched dozens of occasions, laying naked the ache in Norman Bates’ philosophical musings and the charged area round lonely feminine characters. It finds an exhilarating rhyme between the telephone sales space in The Birds and the bathe in Psycho, and hyperlinks the blinding orange afterglow of flashbulbs in Rear Window, on a soundstage facsimile of Greenwich Village, to A-bomb checks within the desert on the opposite aspect of the continent.
No Hitchcock fan wants reminding that one of the best of his motion pictures are endlessly, insistently watchable. And but, seen by means of the prism of this discerning and adoring doc, it’s exceptional how affecting the photographs nonetheless are, and the way the motion can nonetheless make your coronary heart skip a beat. Wielding the digital camera as voyeur, detective and tense-shuffling “time phantom,” Hitchcock attracts us in. By comparability, with its theatrical gadget of a fake narrator, the documentary retains you at a sure distance. The ensuing push-pull retains this valentine from getting mushy and, at its strongest, it’s a sturdy and eloquent friction.
Movie Reviews
LOVE LIES BLEEDING Review
LOVE LIES BLEEDING is a modern-day, highly immoral, sleazy take on the film noir genre. It features a graphic lesbian relationship, numerous scenes of graphic violence, substance abuse, and abundant foul language. The movie has a twist-filled script, fast pacing and gritty performances, but it repulsed the vast majority of moviegoers at the box office.
Dominant Worldview and Other Worldview Content/Elements:
Vicious, promiscuous, totally immoral movie filled with violence and sex, especially lesbian sex;
Foul Language:
At least 78 obscenities (including 65 “f” words), three strong profanities using Jesus Christ and a gross scene where a woman has to unclog a clogged toilet;
Violence:
Numerous people are shot in graphically bloody fashion with sickening wounds and shocking sound effects, woman shoots another woman in the head and causes blood to splatter all over the camera, woman beats a man to death, woman breaks that man’s jawbone wide open as she slams his head repeatedly into a table, abused wife is hospitalized by a particularly brutal yet offscreen beating that leaves her face severely bruised and swollen, another character tortures this woman by pressing hard against her facial injuries, woman shoots another man in a shootout then shoves the barrel of her gun into his mouth, takes the gun back out but smashes the gun into his face to kill him, and a woman is shown waking up from a seemingly fatal gunshot wound, but another woman chokes her to death and dumps her body in the desert;
Sex:
Graphic lesbian sex scenes, particularly showing oral sex, the sex is shown promiscuously on a one-night stand, and later another lesbian blackmails one of the lead lesbians into having relations with her (though this is only implied and discussed, not shown), movie opens with a man having forceful, adulterous sex with a woman from behind in the back of a car, and a lesbian sucks on her girlfriend’s toe;
Nudity:
Several lesbian sex scenes feature female breasts and buttocks but no genitals, another lesbian woman is shown standing with full rear nudity after an implied sex scene, and shirtless men are seen working out in several scenes;
Alcohol Use:
Adults frequently drink alcohol, with one scene showing a woman drunk;
Smoking and/or Drug Use and Abuse:
A woman smokes cigarettes frequently, a female bodybuilder severely abuses steroids throughout, leading to violent outbursts and her vomiting onstage in front of a crowd, and the steroid injections are shown in a sensuous fashion;
Miscellaneous Immorality:
Lying, double-crosses, deception rampant throughout, with a dehumanizing use of violence.
LOVE LIES BLEEDING is a modern-day, highly immoral, sleazy take on the film noir genre that centers on a graphic lesbian relationship, numerous scenes of graphic violence and an abundance of foul language. LOVE LIES BLEEDING has a twist-filled script, fast pacing and gritty performances, but should not be viewed by anyone.
The story centers upon a lesbian woman named Lou (Kristen Stewart), who is estranged from her vicious father Lou Sr. (Ed Harris) yet works managing a decrepit gym he owns in their desert town. Meanwhile, a female drifter named Jackie (Katy O’Brien) arrives in town and immediately engages in back-seat, adulterous sex with JJ (Dave Franco), who’s married to Lou’s sister Beth (Jena Malone).
The backseat liaison results in a job for Jackie at a gun range on the edge of town owned by Lou Jr. She’s just saving up money to finish a trip to Las Vegas for a women’s bodybuilding championship, and when she flexes her massive muscles, Lou is instantly attracted to her.
The two soon engage in a tawdry sexual relationship, but Lou’s happiness is abruptly halted when Beth winds up in a hospital after a vicious (offscreen) beating at the hands of JJ. Lou Sr. wants to keep it all in the family rather than report JJ to the police, which angers Lou greatly.
Jackie has been abusing steroids in order to build muscle for her upcoming competition, and flies into a murderous rage that results in her brutally killing JJ. When Lou and Jackie dump his body in an enormous pit in the desert outside of town, a string of double-crosses explodes as Lou Sr. is determined to find out who killed JJ and federal agents start asking Lou lots of questions about his potentially criminal enterprises.
Can Lou manage to bring her father and his illicit crime machine down? Is Jackie a serious love interest or a con artist using her for her own ends?
LOVE LIES BLEEDING has excellent performances from all of its cast, who bring a wide array of seedy characters to vivid life. Also, Director/Co-writer Rose Glass keeps the twists coming fast and furious throughout the movie’s bonkers second half.
Despite the technical skill with which it’s made, LOVE LIES BLEEDING is a movie that has literally no characters to support and no sense of legal justice – just brutal vigilante revenge meted out several times over. Even Lou becomes utterly reprehensible and heartless by the end, and the movie’s entire mood is demoralizing and dehumanizing.
Packed with graphic violence, sex and nudity and an abundance of foul language, LOVE LIES BLEEDING is utterly distasteful and a must to avoid for viewers of all ages.
Movie Reviews
Love Child (2024) Movie Review & Ending Explained: Can Love and Sacrifice Keep Ayla and Paolo’s Family Together?
Rom Coms, the ones that match the endearing and intelligent with equal fluency, have a scintillating flavor. The book of tricks to make a romcom sing and soar may have admittedly gone jaded and dog-eared. The crises of couples, dilemmas, and anxieties they have to battle have undergone dramatic changes in a fast-evolving world. Expectations vary with the decades, even as gendered rules haven’t dented much.
The urge to steal a leaf or two from every standard template Hollywood romcom is immanent in any new derivation. It becomes a constant tussle, hence, for a new film in similar spaces to eke out freshness and smarts. Jonathan Jurilla’s directorial “Love Child” (2024) has little to add or say anything genuinely sparkling. It’s a weary distillation of parental exhaustion and re-alignment, too silly to pass off what it views as clever self-reflexive remarks.
There are basic cardinal rules a romcom must ensure is upheld. Conflicts should ideally resonate across a demographic; humor needs to exist in spades. A helping of self-awareness goes a long way in establishing a winking playfulness. The best rom-coms sail through these assumptions with lightness and spryness.
Love Child (2024) Plot Summary & Movie Synopsis:
Ayla and Paolo’s Journey of Love, Sacrifice, and Resilience
Ayla (Jane Oineza) and Paolo (RK Bagatsing) are young parents. Incidentally, the actors themselves are a couple in real life, who call the film a “free trial” to parenthood. Ayla and Paolo have been exultant about becoming parents but what awaits them is a whole lot of instability, fraught periods of testing faith in each other to weather the hardships of raising their child, Kali (John Tyrron Ramos) who is diagnosed with autism. It’s this diagnosis that opens the film and sends their lives into a tailspin. The two have fought with their families on several counts to realize their togetherness. Dreams have also been put on hold. Paolo is a filmmaker who desires to make it big but naturally meets resistance from his father, from whom he has cut loose.
They arrive in the Philippines to put up at the house that Ayla’s aunt has offered. They don’t have to worry about rent, an exponential anxiety hence taken care of. The first thing they get done is to enroll Kali at a school for children with support needs. They hope he can be addressed with due attention and be given proper time, nourished in a safe, loving, and understanding community.
How Far Will Ayla and Paolo Go to Secure a Future for Their Son?
Of course, things don’t go as smoothly. The money to raise the child is immense, formidable, and persistent. It’s no small task. To exacerbate matters, the couple has no savings to lean on. Ayla has just a small income from a virtual assistant job and Paolo has barely any gigs to draw a livelihood from in the Philippines.
At home back in Australia, opportunities were, at least, higher. Sources of supporting themselves stand a chance. The couple start a coffee cart as an added source of income. Even that isn’t enough. Customers are few. To run the cart is its own demanding affair that strains their purses more than they expected it to.
One night, Kali falls terribly sick. His parents rush him to the hospital, where medical expenses surge. Where will the couple find the money to foot the bill? They are at wit’s end. Pao assures Ayla not to worry. He’ll dredge out a way. However, when he is away scavenging for a source, Ayla already turns to her mother who lends her the needed money. He is angry with her because Ayla’s mother has been refusing to recognize Kali as her grandson. She tells him, if they waited longer, they’d be staring at an added day of hospital expenses.
Love Child (2024) Movie Ending Explained:
Do Ayla and Paolo find a way of raising their child?
Ayla and Paolo are compelled to employ specialized teachers and attendants for Kali. The cost of living becomes exceedingly high. How can they afford it? Ultimately, they edge toward the pained but necessary realization that they have to live apart at least for a while. If that’s the only way they can build a decent future for Kali, they can’t ignore it. What’s significant and decisive is both Ayla and Paolo are wholly committed to being there for Kali, no matter what it takes, as well as underscoring the need to go out and chase their individual aspirations.
Yes, she must pursue her dream of being a lawyer. The climax is a wistful one, with Paolo leaving for Australia where he would brush aside his bruised ego and accept his father’s job offer. He takes the marks of his wife and child, remnants of them he’d carry with him as he moves into an uncertain, yet hope-tinged future in Australia. They part ways with a promise of return. They know he’ll be back when the time is right and resources have accrued enough to carve for them a comfortable life together.
Love Child (2024) Movie Review:
“Love Child” lacks a fundamental, driving vitality and energy. It is only inconsistently curious and sporadic in its plunges into human indecision and the fear of failure. What is that projection we induce when we feel we are turning into reflections of our parents, a reality most horrific and to skirt clear? To encounter such a realization is depressing and upsetting.
The central pair of the film have to negotiate and move past reservations and a bundle of fears popping up. They are opposed to seeking the help of their parents, who have never sided with them in big decisions, but they also understand the need for a bigger family their child ought to have. Having just his parents wouldn’t suffice for Kali to rely on. For his sake, the parents have to look past their grudges and learn to forgive and let go of ill will.
Read More: 15 Best Netflix Original Horror Movies
It’s a question of need and learning to trust again those who have failed us, giving them another chance without being bogged down by ego and justified anger and disappointment. But the film never pads this vital realization of the parents well to land its ultimate point. “Love Child” dwells lightly on vast conflicts as these, papering them over with a convenient switch.
This is why the hardship and everyday strife don’t hit as deeply as they ought to. “Love Child” leaves you pining for a more textured understanding of the complex bonds of care between the couple and their child, who is bereft of any dimension other than his support needs. The film takes a blinkered, dull view and yet bungs in a slapdash discovery of the importance of a larger family.
Love Child (2024) Movie Trailer:
Love Child (2024) Movie Links: IMDb, Rotten Tomatoes, Wikipedia, Letterboxd
The Cast of Love Child (2024) Movie: RK Bagatsing, Jane Oineza, John Tyrron Ramos, Milton Dionzon, Mai-Mai Montelibano, Jaden Biel Fernandez, Chart Motus, Mary Jane Quilisadio, Mandy Alonso, Tey Sevilleno
Love Child (2024) Movie Runtime: 1h 40m, Genre: Drama
Where to watch Love Child
Movie Reviews
Movie Review | Bleakness of Iceland adds to horror tale
Despite the so-so storytelling, the work here by Palsson piques your interest as to what the native Icelander will make in the future.
Subscribe to continue reading this article.
Already subscribed? To login in, click here.
Originally Published:
-
Health1 week ago
New Year life lessons from country star: 'Never forget where you came from'
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta’s ‘software update issue’ has been breaking Quest headsets for weeks
-
Business5 days ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture5 days ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports5 days ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics4 days ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics3 days ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics2 days ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?